Jurassic Werewolf - Isla Nublar

Gabriel WW wrote: »

If roles have been changed, it completely makes everything on day0 irrelevant, since anything said could now have been changed, good or bad.

Eva WW wrote: »

Best approach would seem to be treat the game as starting post lock and disregard anything pre that. If there are tasks in that then so be it, any wolf would have an easy excuse even if we found them. Not the only option, just my perspective

Thoughts folks?

I wouldn't disregard anything that points towards someone being a baddy. I wouldn't hang someone solely on it either, but if a wolf task was spotted, I'd file it away as suspicious, especially since it seems only some roles were re-rolled (based on the initial announcement). If people spot other tasks later in the game, then use Day 0 as possible side evidence.

Pter wrote: »

MOD NOTE

OK so going to do my best here guys. Need everyone's cooperation as we came close to the game ending just now.

Posts before the lock may or may not have validity. Its n0 so all posts didnt really matter anyway. Hence why we are happy to continue.

At the same time, no more chat about Barbara please. No more speculation about the closure or the removal. I get its N0 and there is little else to go on, but please find something else. A rerand was carried out, so what barbara was or wasnt is irrelevant.

Any further posts that contravene the mod notes we will posted will have to be punished. If you are unsure, PM me or the other game mods.

Thank you.

Who? :pac:

Noted. All of it. Game just starting. Happy days.

yeah that's a lock

Henry WW wrote: »

Btw, with the reshuffle, Babs was not a nvr.

How so

Pter wrote: »

I WILL PERSONALLY HAVE A DINOSAUR SIT ON THE PERSON WHO ANSWERS THIS POST.

Holly, read my mod notes again please.

Just caught up

Can't sleep, dinosaurs might eat me. Or looking at above, potentially sit on me :eek:

Pter wrote: »

*MEANINGFUL LOOK*

Sorry, I thought I wasn't crossing the line. Genuinely not trying to, so I'll drop the line of thought utterly

Liam WW wrote: »

Derry is a wolf.

Exactly how did you come to this conclusion. don't you think it would be nice to have some reasons with this?


Yeah, waiting...

Derry WW wrote: »

Exactly how did you come to this conclusion. don't you think it would be nice to have some reasons with this?


Yeah, waiting...

Liam WW wrote: »

[]

Isla WW wrote: »

Thats suspicious in itself.

Who doesnt have Simpsons knowledge.

Lynch Derry, hes my lock of the week

Dunno, you're misrepresenting the comment a bit there. He said he doesn't have the Simpsons knowledge others may, not that he had no Simpsons knowledge.

There's other reasons to suspect Derry alright, namely jello references up the gazoot but not sure why he's now lock of the week.

Why Derry is a wolf in 3 easy posts

Strike 1 :: Timing

Derry WW wrote: »

@22:06




@22:11




@22:17






that is odd, wonder what how thats explained off.



kickback and wait for reply.

For a post with so little content, you'd think it would arrive on the forums a little quicker than it did. but the post was eventually posted at 22:27 - a full 10 minutes after Eva's last post. Not like it takes all that long to grab 3 quotes and timestamp them. Not only that, but look at the line :: " wonder what how thats explained off. " Wonder. What. How. That's - This is a classic case of trying to force construction of a post instead of just typing what comes naturally. He clearly meant to leave out the what, but because hes a wolf and overthought the situation he mixed up his editing.

Strike 2 :: The read that's not a read

Derry WW wrote: »

I know that boards can do odd thins, and double posts do happen, but having 11 minutes between the origional and the repost, and it being due to back buttons, i don't know. looking at it anotherway though, it would be a crap task, to doublepost, and if i was given that as a task, they'd be right beside each other, not 11 minutes apart. l'll put a note down, but nothing major, your stuff with billy and mrme is stranger tbh.

This is classic "I'm calling someone a wolf, but backtracking on it so as not to give a read and therefore be drawn on it later." He starts off wanting to get into a confrontation with Eva, but because his read is basically bogus he tries to backtrack his way out of it. He then finishes with, ' I'll put a note down but nothing major ' - Backtrack completed.

fyi, when Derry does come back a wolf. Eva is not clear - Its the perfect way of styling shade on a wolf buddy and then retracting that shade.

Strike 3 :: The fake roundup

Derry WW wrote: »

Now that have googled it is a lot less suspicious, I just dont have the simpsons knowledge others may.

As if the Simpsons has anything to do with it. But its a perfect way for you to back out of your "read".

Liam WW wrote: »

Why Derry is a wolf in 3 easy posts

Strike 1 :: Timing



For a post with so little content, you'd think it would arrive on the forums a little quicker than it did. but the post was eventually posted at 22:27 - a full 10 minutes after Eva's last post. Not like it takes all that long to grab 3 quotes and timestamp them. Not only that, but look at the line :: " wonder what how thats explained off. " Wonder. What. How. That's - This is a classic case of trying to force construction of a post instead of just typing what comes naturally. He clearly meant to leave out the what, but because hes a wolf and overthought the situation he mixed up his editing.

Strike 2 :: The read that's not a read



This is classic "I'm calling someone a wolf, but backtracking on it so as not to give a read and therefore be drawn on it later." He starts off wanting to get into a confrontation with Eva, but because his read is basically bogus he tries to backtrack his way out of it. He then finishes with, ' I'll put a note down but nothing major ' - Backtrack completed.

fyi, when Derry does come back a wolf. Eva is not clear - Its the perfect way of styling shade on a wolf buddy and then retracting that shade.

Strike 3 :: The fake roundup



As if the Simpsons has anything to do with it. But its a perfect way for you to back out of your "read".

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ik0BPKM9WQg

That's at least a fair shout of reasoning re: Derry rather than... Simpsons knowledge :pac: