Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Whack to the arse

13567

Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 828 ✭✭✭wokingvoter


    It doesn't sound like they're very well behaved. Not that it was truly awful behaviour, but she had to repeatedly tell the child not to do it.I wonder if it's a regular occurence.
    Confiscating the ball would have been another option.

    Not repeatedly. Once. The mother was a clear as a bell. Put the ball away now and find some other game to play.
    Total defiance of authority resulted in a small but swift and final punishment.
    For their own safety as well as the well being of others, 5 year old girls need to do as they are told. Now.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,772 ✭✭✭✭Whispered


    I can of course completely understand why people make the comparison. For me it absolutely isn't as simple as that though, and it never will be. I don't view my wife in the same way as I view my child. In an attempt to be objective, the comparison simply comes off as an abstract concept that ignores the fact that ignores human individuality.

    You're right, In a way it does ignore individuality I guess because it's based on the idea that no matter the relationship, circumstance, people involved, age etc the use of pain and/or fear is not only ineffective compared to other methods but is also disrespectful. Like you, and I'm sure most people, I see my child and my husband in different ways. I don't equate that with it being acceptable or necessary to slap.

    Now, my son is young. Still just a baby and maybe I'll loose my idealism as he grows, but I hope not.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,439 ✭✭✭✭One eyed Jack


    It doesn't sound like they're very well behaved. Not that it was truly awful behaviour, but she had to repeatedly tell the child not to do it.I wonder if it's a regular occurence.
    Confiscating the ball would have been another option.


    It's impossible to judge anything from workingvoters post in fairness, so I have no idea how you managed to extrapolate that from it. There's just too many variables and scenarios and everyone knows a better option for someone else's children.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,576 ✭✭✭Keane2baMused


    As someone who suffered at the hand of someone who felt throwing their weight about to a small child was ok I can honestly say no, it's not ok.

    All it served to do was make me scared and feel like a worthless piece of cr*p who had no place in the world.

    I don't look up to this person with respect and understanding and think that's how my children should be disciplined too. I look down on them and think how could you?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,779 ✭✭✭storker


    Candie wrote: »
    I'm familiar with the posters take on a few things.

    The use use of "triggered" was in earnest? Wow (in a totally unimpressed way).

    I guess "safe space" must be next up. :)


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,237 ✭✭✭✭jimgoose


    Not repeatedly. Once. The mother was a clear as a bell. Put the ball away now and find some other game to play.
    Total defiance of authority resulted in a small but swift and final punishment.
    For their own safety as well as the well being of others, 5 year old girls need to do as they are told. Now.

    Small children are savages. Communication neeeds to be very clear and very fast.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 293 ✭✭jackinthemix94


    I hope all these people that are fine with hitting a child with either a hand or an object would be happy to be hit themselves by somebody else as a punishment / to discipline them.

    It. Is. Never. OK. To. Hit. A. Child.

    I can't even imagine what would motivate a person to hit any child, never mind their own. It is a sign of poor / lazy parenting, and parents that are repeat offenders should be arrested and punished for hurting their child.

    Confiscating items, grounding them, revoking privileges are all fine. Hitting a defenseless child, is not.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,772 ✭✭✭✭Whispered


    As someone who suffered at the hand of someone who felt throwing their weight about to a small child was ok I can honestly say no, it's not ok.

    All it served to do was make me scared and feel like a worthless piece of cr*p who had no place in the world.

    I don't look up to this person with respect and understanding and think that's how my children should be disciplined too. I look down on them and think how could you?

    Actually this also brings up; what's worse, a quick slap on the leg and move on or a parent who uses their words to make their child feel like crap.

    It's scary how vulnerable kids can be at the hands of people who aren't fit to be parents. Most parents try to do their best for their kids, for some that might involve a slap every now and again. It's the abusive, angry, power hungry people that are the problem. Even if they had their hands tied those type of people can still wound :(


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,544 ✭✭✭Samaris


    I have a notion it probably did less harm in the long run to kids when it was a generally accepted thing that it happened. If everyone's kids occasionally get a smack when they're bad, the kids just take it as part of life. Leaving aside the moral implications of either side for now, if a child is smacked nowadays, when they know it's a "bad thing to do", it's illegal, and they're the only one of all their friends that gets smacked, it's probably a lot more harmful. The child will wonder why only they get smacked, if mammy and daddy are bad for doing something wrong in smacking them, etcetera. That's where you start getting resentment and problems.

    Hundreds of generations were brought up being beaten or smacked or hit and while I won't say it never did any harm, I will say that we still have a functioning society for (or despite of) it. It is now normalised to NOT smack your children or physically chastise them and thus, for the sake of children and parents both, it shouldn't be done.

    Edit: Even back then, it was acknowledged that different punishments are more effective on different children. For me, sarcasm was absolutely the worst punishment. In school, I'd be one of those kids that you'd have to be very cautious about using it on, because I'd definitely feel it and it would upset me a lot more than an outright telling off. I'd probably have preferred the ruler to the sarcasm!


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,678 ✭✭✭lawlolawl


    It. Is. Never. OK. To. Hit. A. Child.

    What if you are a dwarf and you get into a fist fight with one?

    Are you just going to stand there and get your ass kicked like a pussy?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,633 ✭✭✭✭Widdershins


    Not repeatedly. Once. The mother was a clear as a bell. Put the ball away now and find some other game to play.
    Total defiance of authority resulted in a small but swift and final punishment.
    For their own safety as well as the well being of others, 5 year old girls need to do as they are told. Now.

    Not repeatedly, then- it was just ignored when she did say it :''
    30 seconds later the ball smacks even louder''

    I agree that it's important that children listen to their parents. I don't see why it's necessary to hit them rather than remove the ball. If it's a consistent parenting approach then it doesn't seem to work, since the girl ignores her mother.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 851 ✭✭✭kimokanto


    kids need to fear something if they think they go off and do sh#t with no worries they will do it if they think i will be killed if ido that they will think about it simple

    What a load of rubbish as evidenced by the following honest and impressive post. ...
    As someone who suffered at the hand of someone who felt throwing their weight about to a small child was ok I can honestly say no, it's not ok.

    All it served to do was make me scared and feel like a worthless piece of cr*p who had no place in the world.

    I don't look up to this person with respect and understanding and think that's how my children should be disciplined too. I look down on them and think how could you?

    Fair play to your honesty.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,237 ✭✭✭✭jimgoose


    ...It. Is. Never. OK. To. Hit. A. Child...

    Bit of a generalisation there, chief. In the case of a six-foot fifteen-year-old with a knife, I'll take his fcukan head off with a roundhouse! :D


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,678 ✭✭✭lawlolawl


    jimgoose wrote: »
    Bit of a generalisation there, chief. In the case of a six-foot fifteen-year-old with a knife, I'll take his fcukan head off with a roundhouse! :D

    That's a terrible way of disciplining a child.

    You are supposed to take the knife off him and only give it back when he promises to behave himself.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,237 ✭✭✭✭jimgoose


    lawlolawl wrote: »
    That's a terrible way of disciplining a child.

    You are supposed to take the knife off him and only give it back when he promises to behave himself.

    Oh you can do that at the same time! :D


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,633 ✭✭✭✭Widdershins


    jimgoose wrote: »
    Bit of a generalisation there, chief. In the case of a six-foot fifteen-year-old with a knife, I'll take his fcukan head off with a roundhouse! :D

    Sounds like some kind of horrible scenario where someone snaps after years of being whacked. I am sure it happens too once the child is big enough to stand up for themself.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,626 ✭✭✭✭My name is URL


    Whacked to the arse, and you're to blame.. you give love a bad name


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,779 ✭✭✭storker


    I hope all these people that are fine with hitting a child with either a hand or an object would be happy to be hit themselves by somebody else as a punishment / to discipline them.

    It. Is. Never. OK. To. Hit. A. Child.

    I can't even imagine what would motivate a person to hit any child, never mind their own. It is a sign of poor / lazy parenting, and parents that are repeat offenders should be arrested and punished for hurting their child.

    Confiscating items, grounding them, revoking privileges are all fine. Hitting a defenseless child, is not.

    While I would not criminalise someone for slapping a child (repeat offenders...hmmm...perhaps but how much and how often?), there certainly are more effective techniques. Our kids had the (very) occasional slap on the bum when they were small, but you couldn't really say that it was part of the disciplinary repertoire in our house.

    We've found two simple principles to be very effective...(a) never reward bad behaviour (i.e. tantrums should never result in a desire being satisfied) and (b) never make a threat you're not prepared to follow through on. Regarding note (b) parents should never, ever threaten to cancel a big event unless they really do mean it. I made that mistake once, thinking it would result in instant compliance only to discover that our younger daughter (at 4) had a real gift for brinkmanship...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,633 ✭✭✭✭Widdershins


    As a child, I wouldn't have respected a parent if they hit me. I would have resented them. I was treated with respect and trust and I returned it. I'd no wish to disappoint my parents. Yet kids who are hit seem to almost act up, as if they're attention seeking, even though they know the reaction they'll get. I don't understand it, but I know this much: few people appreciate being forced to obey someone who wants to assert their power and authority over them. It makes people rebellious.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,439 ✭✭✭✭One eyed Jack


    Whispered wrote: »
    You're right, In a way it does ignore individuality I guess because it's based on the idea that no matter the relationship, circumstance, people involved, age etc the use of pain and/or fear is not only ineffective compared to other methods but is also disrespectful. Like you, and I'm sure most people, I see my child and my husband in different ways. I don't equate that with it being acceptable or necessary to slap.

    Now, my son is young. Still just a baby and maybe I'll loose my idealism as he grows, but I hope not.


    Eesh, it's a tough one because what I would see as discipline, you're going to see as inflicting pain and fear in a child, and there's no way I could reassure that my child is now a happy, healthy, mature for his age, well-rounded child. The intent of smacking him was not to instill fear or inflict pain, but to instill discipline. I'm very much aware of what the statistics and studies have concluded on this and I can only reassure you again that I have never, ever intended to hurt or harm my own child.

    Even when it comes to my own child, I don't raise him by the numbers, I don't think there's a parent or guardian alive that could raise their children by the numbers and raise an adult that would be a statistically "perfect in every way" adult, if that makes sense? There have been numerous books, articles, studies done on parenting and raising children and there is absolutely no "one size fits all" way to parent a child or children. It just doesn't happen. Parents as hard as they try to go against them, will always parent subjectively and by instinct rather than by any objective methodology.

    I wouldn't call your position idealism, I think as their parent you will always want to do your best for your child. The vast, vast majority of parents do, but where I'm coming from is simply that each and every human being is an individual, and I don't subscribe to the "blank slate" theory that completely ignores an individuals personality and ignores a whole number of environmental and contextual factors in order to make an argument that literally is a very controlled set of ideal circumstances, and has no grounding in reality. That, is idealism.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 14,521 ✭✭✭✭mansize


    Whacked to the arse, and you're to blame.. you give love a bad name

    That was in my head too lol


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,067 ✭✭✭✭fryup


    to paraphrase Mrs Doyle...."we all need a good kick up the arse sometimes"


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 896 ✭✭✭Fuzzytrooper


    Fleawuss wrote: »
    I thought this was going to be about a folk song from the Dubliners: I could hear the chorus "whack to the arse...something something O". Or maybe an incident at the photocopier at work. Instead it's about why cant we half murder children like we used to.
    Sigh.
    All together now: "Those were the days my friend, we thought they'd never end..."

    And I'll bet you're against children working in my underground copper mines too. Backbone of our nation they are!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,772 ✭✭✭✭Whispered


    Eesh, it's a tough one because what I would see as discipline, you're going to see as inflicting pain and fear in a child, and there's no way I could reassure that my child is now a happy, healthy, mature for his age, well-rounded child. The intent of smacking him was not to instill fear or inflict pain, but to instill discipline. I'm very much aware of what the statistics and studies have concluded on this and I can only reassure you again that I have never, ever intended to hurt or harm my own child.

    Even when it comes to my own child, I don't raise him by the numbers, I don't think there's a parent or guardian alive that could raise their children by the numbers and raise an adult that would be a statistically "perfect in every way" adult, if that makes sense? There have been numerous books, articles, studies done on parenting and raising children and there is absolutely no "one size fits all" way to parent a child or children. It just doesn't happen. Parents as hard as they try to go against them, will always parent subjectively and by instinct rather than by any objective methodology.

    I wouldn't call your position idealism, I think as their parent you will always want to do your best for your child. The vast, vast majority of parents do, but where I'm coming from is simply that each and every human being is an individual, and I don't subscribe to the "blank slate" theory that completely ignores an individuals personality and ignores a whole number of environmental and contextual factors in order to make an argument that literally is a very controlled set of ideal circumstances, and has no grounding in reality. That, is idealism.

    IT is a tough one because decent parents aren't going to physically damage their kids either way, whether they sometimes think a slap is warranted or not.
    On the idea that you giving a slap to instil discipline but not fear/pain, how does a slap work if it doesn't instil the fear of it happening again?

    I'm not really speaking about a "blank slate" theory when I say I disagree with slapping, I'm working from learning theory, which at its most basic level, is the same across most species! Obviously how it's implemented is best looked at on an individual basis. (Of course lack of parenting at all can have a fall out im not suggestion that kids shouldn't be disciplined)
    I would think it depends on the circumstance but I can't imagine a scenario in which I'd slap where I hadn't lost control. Where I hadn't let the situation get out of hand.

    Fwiw I feel the same about using shouting, shaming the child and threats in parenting. In an ideal world we'd find other ways of doing it. But despite best intentions I've lost the head with my boy and shouted - usually when I've taken my eye off the ball and he's about to do something dangerous.

    I think you're right too about parents trying to be perfect. People put so much pressure on themselves and that in itself can cause frustration and short tempered behaviour. I'm also aware that while I'm saying I disagree with X,y or z, there are likely to be things I do everyday that others would disagree with. We're never all going to agree on best methods.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 89 ✭✭anitaca


    Candie wrote: »
    Yes, we don't hit adults who don't do as we say, but it's fine to hit children.
    but (some) women do slap men when men do something women dont like and its more socially acceptable than hitting a child.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,779 ✭✭✭✭Princess Consuela Bananahammock


    anitaca wrote: »
    but (some) women do slap men when men do something women dont like and its more socially acceptable than hitting a child.

    Not really - people hear of a child getting a smack, they think the child did something to deserve it.

    They hear it happened in a relationship, they advise the receiver should get the **** out.

    Everything I don't like is either woke or fascist - possibly both - pick one.



  • Posts: 26,219 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    anitaca wrote: »
    but (some) women do slap men when men do something women dont like and its more socially acceptable than hitting a child.

    Adults hitting each other is a crime. Adult hitting a child isn't. I don't think either is acceptable, and especially not the latter.

    Maybe I'm just lucky, but I don't know a single person who thinks it's acceptable to hit a partner.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,439 ✭✭✭✭One eyed Jack


    Not really - people hear of a child getting a smack, they think the child did something to deserve it.

    They hear it happened in a relationship, they advise the receiver should get the **** out.


    Those two examples are easily interchangeable. One could apply the generalisation either way.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,439 ✭✭✭✭One eyed Jack


    Candie wrote: »
    Adults hitting each other is a crime. Adult hitting a child isn't. I don't think either is acceptable, and especially not the latter.

    Maybe I'm just lucky, but I don't know a single person who thinks it's acceptable to hit a partner.


    An adult hitting a child can be charged with the same crime as an adult hitting an adult. It would depend upon the circumstances of each individual case whether charges would or wouldn't be brought though.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,218 ✭✭✭Murt10


    Fleawuss wrote: »
    I thought this was going to be about a folk song from the Dubliners: I could hear the chorus "whack to the arse...something something O". ."

    Was it about Reillys Daughter.

    Thanks a lot anyway. You have just given an ear worm.


Advertisement
Advertisement