The damage I would do to her/I would smash it...

17-12-2015 07:39AM #1

...just saw this on another thread.

"Kate Beckinsale, the damage I would do to her".

And I'm wondering what, what damage would the poster do? Would he like to inflict a little internal bruising perhaps, or bleeding, maybe some resistance so he could slap or choke her.

Either way, it seems to me to be such a violent phrase, but one that is getting more popular, along with other apparently violent phrases like "I would smash it".

Is it time to tone it down? Or are these phrases not based on violence at all? Or were they always used? Or is it fine and nothing to see here?

tritium · 17-12-2015 07:54AM

Men (and women) have been making crude comments about the quantity and quality if sexual prowess they'd display with their object of desire for pretty much ever. Not really something to get too worked up about.

We really are scraping the bottom of the outrage barrel at this stage.

Gaygooner · 17-12-2015 07:59AM

empty vessels make most noise, people who use these phrases are likely to go to bed each night and have a lonely **** and a cry

pickarooney · 17-12-2015 07:59AM

It's not as ba as the latent cannibals who do be making comments about cute babies.

17-12-2015 08:02AM

tritium wrote: »

Men (and women) have been making crude comments about the quantity and quality if sexual prowess they'd display with their object of desire for pretty much ever. Not really something to get too worked up about.

We really are scraping the bottom of the outrage barrel at this stage.

You say men and women have been using such phrases forever? Really? I didn't know that.

Could you tell me some phrase women used to describe sex with men and specifically the violence they would inflict from, say, the 1800s?

And who was "outraged"? To say something might be objectionable is not the same as saying one is outraged.

gramar · 17-12-2015 08:02AM

I only recently found out that 'bate it into her' was a sexual reference.

NachoBusiness · 17-12-2015 08:07AM

Oh for heaven sake. You're not meant to take it literally. If a person said: "I would love to have sexual intercourse with her and then kiss her mouth really passionately" they would sound odd. People exaggerate in the hope of conveying the level of their desire and perhaps add a little humour also. Not just with regards to sex, but many things. Like someone saying they are so hungry they are going to eat plate and all or a band saying they are going blow the roof off a venue. Intentional exaggeration is all it is.

strelok · 17-12-2015 08:15AM

and today on "why men are evil and must be stopped"

T-K-O · 17-12-2015 08:19AM

Are you for real, it's time to tone it up. Between this nonsense and the latest fad of 'toy guns create isis soldiers' let's all just sit at home and watch American gladiators.

MarkR · 17-12-2015 08:20AM

[Deleted User] wrote: »

You say men and women have been using such phrases forever? Really? I didn't know that.

Could you tell me some phrase women used to describe sex with men and specifically the violence they would inflict from, say, the 1800s?

And who was "outraged"? To say something might be objectionable is not the same as saying one is outraged.

The agony of bliss. Victorian term for orgasm. La petite mort. The little death, more orgasm talk.

Unga bunga. Possibly Neanderthal for sweet sweet love.

17-12-2015 08:28AM

MarkR wrote: »

The agony of bliss. Victorian term for orgasm. La petite mort. The little death, more orgasm talk.

Hasn't heard the former.

Neither phrase conveys any sense of violence inflicted on the other, do they?

Menas · 17-12-2015 08:28AM

Its a bloody outrage.

17-12-2015 08:29AM

T-K-O wrote: »

Are you for real, it's time to tone it up. Between this nonsense and the latest fad of 'toy guns create isis soldiers' let's all just sit at home and watch American gladiators.

I don't even know what this means?

ISIS? American gladiators?

17-12-2015 08:31AM

NachoBusiness wrote: »

Oh for heaven sake. You're not meant to take it literally. If a person said: "I would love to have sexual intercourse with her and then kiss her mouth really passionately" they would sound odd. People exaggerate in the hope of conveying the level of their desire and perhaps add a little humour also. Not just with regards to sex, but many things. Like someone saying they are so hungry they are going to eat plate and all or a band saying they are going blow the roof off a venue. Intentional exaggeration is all it is.

Ummmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm.

I know one is not meant to take it literally. Did you know that metaphors can convey violence? Evidently not. Well today you learned something new.

Avatar MIA · 17-12-2015 08:32AM

Menas wrote: »

Its a bloody outrage.

Only certain times of the month

sonny.knowles · 17-12-2015 08:37AM

Health and safety gone mad.

One eyed Jack · 17-12-2015 08:40AM

The raven himself is hoarse
That croaks the fatal entrance of Duncan
Under my battlements. Come, you spirits
That tend on mortal thoughts, unsex me here,
And fill me from the crown to the toe top-full
Of direst cruelty. Make thick my blood,
Stop up th’access and passage to remorse,
That no compunctious visitings of nature
Shake my fell purpose, nor keep peace between
Th’ effect and it. Come to my woman’s breasts,
And take my milk for gall, you murd’ring ministers,
Wherever in your sightless substances
You wait on nature’s mischief. Come, thick night,
And pall thee in the dunnest smoke of hell,
That my keen knife see not the wound it makes,
Nor heaven peep through the blanket of the dark,
To cry ‘Hold, hold!’

- Lady Macbeth

(Now there was a woman with a certain way about her

)

well spoken man · 17-12-2015 08:40AM

What about smashing in her back door.might be about the high rise in burglaries.......

racso1975 · 17-12-2015 08:41AM

Gaygooner wrote: »

empty vessels make most noise, people who use these phrases are likely to go to bed each night and have a lonely **** and a cry

I can confirm this to be true

tritium · 17-12-2015 08:42AM

[Deleted User] wrote: »

You say men and women have been using such phrases forever? Really? I didn't know that.

Could you tell me some phrase women used to describe sex with men and specifically the violence they would inflict from, say, the 1800s?

And who was "outraged"? To say something might be objectionable is not the same as saying one is outraged.

Given Shakespeare has long been acknowledged as full of sexual innuendo and the Victorians notorious for repressing sexual imagery ( which there was plenty of) I'm not sure why you can't just use Google to answer this-i don't intend chasing my tail doing research you didn't before asking your somewhat pointless question on this thread

17-12-2015 08:44AM

I've said about men "oh Jesus he'd destroy you", or "imagine the damage he'd do to you".

That means I think he's hot as fcuk and I would gladly have some vigorous sex with him. It does not mean that I want internal bruising or bleeding!

17-12-2015 08:44AM

tritium wrote: »

Given Shakespeare has long been acknowledged as full of sexual innuendo and the Victorians notorious for repressing sexual imagery ( which there was plenty of) I'm not sure why you can't just use Google to answer this-i don't instead chasing my tail doing research you didn't before asking your somewhat pointless question on this thread

I love that old "no I can't think of one example so I'll say there are loads and you can find them yourself".

First used on day 2 of the internet.

Turtyturd · 17-12-2015 08:46AM

OP asks a load of questions.... proceeds to get pissy when he doesn't get the answers he wants.

Tarzana2 · 17-12-2015 08:47AM

Deleted User wrote: »

Is it time to tone it down?

No.

Christ, I feel I've stumbled onto the set of a morning TV discussion show.

LittleLiar · 17-12-2015 08:48AM

OP, you have a filthy mind. Everyone knows the expressions you quoted refer to breaking a lady's heart.

You utter cad.

Alf Veedersane · 17-12-2015 08:48AM

Deleted User wrote: »

...just saw this on another thread.

"Kate Beckinsale, the damage I would do to her".

And I'm wondering what, what damage would the poster do? Would he like to inflict a little internal bruising perhaps, or bleeding, maybe some resistance so he could slap or choke her.

The phrase doesn't convey that the poster wants to or intends to do any damage to Kate Beckinsale any more than they want top or intend to actually 'pull the mickey off themselves' when Kate doesn't show up for her liaison dangereuse.

It's just a crude phrase.

17-12-2015 08:49AM

Turtyturd wrote: »

OP asks a load of questions.... proceeds to get pissy when he doesn't get the answers he wants.

Not in the slightest. Could you point to the posts you found "pissy" and we can have a look at the language in them?

DeanAustin · 17-12-2015 08:49AM

Ah sweet sufferin Jesus.

It's a turn of phrase. I've often said "Jaysus she'd destroy you", "she'd make bits of you" or "she'd laugh at your best".

None of them have actually happened to me or anyone I know. Ok, I lie. The last one happens to me regularly.

OP needs to get a grip. What a nonsense thread.

17-12-2015 08:50AM

Also I have said "I would break him" in a situation where I'm quite strong and the guy would be athletic/long distance runner built - I.e. Skinnier than me.

That also means I think he's hot as fcuk and would like to have vigorous sex with him.

I don't want him to end up in a cast like.

17-12-2015 08:51AM

Mmmmmm vigorous sex.

DeanAustin · 17-12-2015 08:51AM

Deleted User wrote: »

Not in the slightest. Could you point to the posts you found "pissy" and we can have a look at the language in them?

Stop taking yourself so seriously.

The damage I would do to her/I would smash it...

Comments