Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
If we do not hit our goal we will be forced to close the site.

Current status: https://keepboardsalive.com/

Annual subs are best for most impact. If you are still undecided on going Ad Free - you can also donate using the Paypal Donate option. All contribution helps. Thank you.

Shootings in Paris - MOD NOTE UPDATED - READ OP

1204205207209210240

Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,493 ✭✭✭long range shooter


    Nodin wrote: »
    You said you didn't know. That's an answer, but certainly not the answer.


    ....what truth? you allege that letting muslims in leads to terrorist violence yet theres five million of them in France that seem to be visibly uninterested in running a sustained campaign of violence. You can't explain why your thesis has fallen flat on its face.

    i said i didnt know,cause i dont plan terrist attacks.how many times do i have to spell it for you?
    strange that the terror attacks should happen twice in a year in Paris isnt it?
    since its only have 5 million muslims there.
    and you still keep on derailing again.And you still havent answered my question.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,218 ✭✭✭✭Bannasidhe


    No ,cause the muslim population is rather small in Ireland in comparison to other European countries.

    So other factors can lead to the creation of No-Go Areas?
    What do you think these factors are and are any of them present in the 55 zones in Sweden you keep referring to?

    If you could answer in text and not via a video that would be great as I am in rural crap broaddbandland and videos are a no-go on a Saturday night.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,493 ✭✭✭long range shooter


    Bannasidhe wrote: »
    So other factors can lead to the creation of No-Go Areas?
    What do you think these factors are and are any of them present in the 55 zones in Sweden you keep referring to?

    If you could answer in text and not via a video that would be great as I am in rural crap broaddbandland and videos are a no-go on a Saturday night.

    i have answered this before,look at my other posts,i am tired of repeating myself to you and Nodin.
    seems like same questions comes up just to derail the whole thread.
    And the reason is simple you cant handle the truth.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 46,938 ✭✭✭✭Nodin


    i said i didnt know,cause i dont plan terrist attacks.how many times do i have to spell it for you?
    strange that the terror attacks should happen twice in a year in Paris isnt it?since its only have 5 million muslims there.
    and you still keep on derailing again.And you still havent answered my question.

    But according to you they should be attacking day and night. You not knowing the mechanics is neither here nor there.

    "only five million muslims" "terror attacks twice in a year".....no, no pattern there at all.

    What was your question? Or is that an unknown too?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 12,069 ✭✭✭✭LordSutch


    Personally speaking, I find in unpalitable & unacceptable that people who openly support terrorism (shooting, bombings, knee cappings etc) should post on here and strutt around, as if their views are normal & balanced.

    You know who you are.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 46,938 ✭✭✭✭Nodin


    i have answered this before,look at my other posts,i am tired of repeating myself to you and Nodin.
    seems like same questions comes up just to derail the whole thread.
    And the reason is simple you cant handle the truth.


    The truth that dare not speak its name?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,493 ✭✭✭long range shooter


    Nodin wrote: »
    But according to you they should be attacking day and night. You not knowing the mechanics is neither here nor there.

    "only five million muslims" "terror attacks twice in a year".....no, no pattern there at all.

    What was your question? Or is that an unknown too?

    when did i say they where attacking day and night?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,493 ✭✭✭long range shooter


    Nodin wrote: »
    The truth that dare not speak its name?

    no the truth that repeats itself in every post on this thread.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 46,938 ✭✭✭✭Nodin


    no the truth that repeats itself in every post on this thread.


    ....every post? Do I need special glasses to see it? I'd ask you to tell me what it is but we know how that would end up.

    You didn't tell me what your question was.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,493 ✭✭✭long range shooter


    Nodin wrote: »
    ....every post? Do I need special glasses to see it? I'd ask you to tell me what it is but we know how that would end up.

    see,now you try your tactics again.How many tines do i have to post it to you,maybe you do need glasses.
    when are you going to answer me then?


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 46,938 ✭✭✭✭Nodin


    see,now you try your tactics again.How many tines do i have to post it to you,maybe you do need glasses.
    when are you going to answer me then?


    I suspect at this stage you are taking the proverbial. You were asked to explain yourself and you couldn't. You were asked what question you were asking and can't provide that.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,544 ✭✭✭Samaris


    I have no idea what you're on about either at this point, LRS.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,020 ✭✭✭BlaasForRafa


    see,now you try your tactics again.How many tines do i have to post it to you,maybe you do need glasses.
    when are you going to answer me then?

    This is the way these islam threads go with some posters, it becomes a tedious barrage of irrelevant one-liners and strawmen to deflect away from whatever are the central points to the issue at hand into trying to make out that you're arguing something other than what you actually said. You can see that those with tens of thousands of posts have endurance if nothing else and they will keep going long enough until they see the thread get locked.

    State your point and move on, don't get dragged into tit-for-tat and don't say anything that will get you a yellow card. You don't have to let certain posters dictate the course of the discussion, you aren't a witness in the dock, under examination.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,218 ✭✭✭✭Bannasidhe


    i have answered this before,look at my other posts,i am tired of repeating myself to you and Nodin.
    seems like same questions comes up just to derail the whole thread.
    And the reason is simple you cant handle the truth.

    Hold your fire there.

    You said there are 55 No-Go Zones in Sweden because 'Muslims'.
    I pointed out there is a NO-Go zone in Dublin and asked it that was because 'Muslims'.
    Hours later, after you went off on some tangent about Norwegian News channels, you say the Dublin No-Go isn't because 'Muslims' because there arn't enough of them.

    I then ask if perhaps there could be factors other than 'Muslims' which can lead to the creation of No-Go Zones (poverty, unemployment for example) which the 55 Swedish No-Go Zones and Cherry Orchard share.

    Your answer is to say I can't handle the truth.
    Seriously?
    What bloody truth?
    That No-Go Zones can and do exist without a Muslim setting foot in the place which is a truth you seem to be finding hard to digest never mind admit.

    Nodin can continue to try and get a straight answer out of you if he wants. I don't have that kind of patience.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,219 ✭✭✭✭Snake Plisken


    see,now you try your tactics again.How many tines do i have to post it to you,maybe you do need glasses.
    when are you going to answer me then?

    No point debating him on after hours one of the mods protects him and you will end up getting banned better off heading into the politics cafe similar topics but his trolling one liners are kept to a minimum!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,274 ✭✭✭jackofalltrades


    Are those sharia patrols anything like the jewish Shomrim 'police' in the UK, who have their own patrol cars; with lights and sirens and the whole lot... and are known to stop women from driving and walking on the same side of the street as men?

    Funny how there's never any hysteria about that

    https://pbs.twimg.com/media/B-2a2xMXEAAAxND.jpg

    http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/london-council-removes-unacceptable-stamford-hill-posters-telling-women-which-side-of-the-road-to-9746012.html

    https://www.rt.com/uk/262653-stamford-hill-women-drivers/?
    None of those links prove that the Shomrim did any of the the things highlighted above.
    Belz rabbis sent the letter to parents threatening to ban their children from schools if their mothers drove them.
    The posters advising men and women to walk on different sides of the road, were but up by an orthodox group, for a religious event.
    The local Shomrim group actually advised them to change it.
    And if I remember correctly both incidents were discussed on boards and got international media attention.

    The Londons Shomrim's have got significant praise and even an official police commendation.
    It's safe to say that they are not the same as those "Sharia Patrols" and seem to have done more to protect the Muslim community as well.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,015 ✭✭✭fed up sick and tired


    Nodin wrote: »
    You're telling me you haven't seen any such posts when there's two in the first 15 posts alone?

    The most recent -
    http://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/showpost.php?p=97813078&postcount=6173

    Long range shooters posts amount to much the same.

    Firstly, I don't the post you've linked to demonstrates a general attitude of 'all Muslims are this or that'.

    We could as easily say, and with more explicit evidence, that the post is a call to increased integration, since the poster says explicitly in the post you linked to...
    the safest situation for here is that muslim kids grow up surrounded by non Muslim kids so that they are exposed to modern culture fully

    Not that I take that to be the poster's basic position either. We see and read what we want to, it seems.

    Secondly, I'd suggest that in a thread of 6.2k posts, you're possibly over-reacting to what you perceive as a mindset, in a mere handful of posts.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 543 ✭✭✭DubVelo


    Bannasidhe wrote: »
    Until 1971 Bangladesh was East Pakistan. From the 1950s there was a growing 'Bangladeshi' (who were officially Pakistani) community in the Brick Lane/Commercial Rd area of Whitechapel. This is when the term 'Paki bashing' was coined by racists who were not interested in the geo-political dynamics on the Indian sub-continent but were perfectly happy to label anyone who looked like they came from the region a 'paki' and beat the living daylights out of them.

    You see that 'traditional' thing among other immigrant groups too - including the Irish - look at Shane McGowan and his whole Oirish schtick. You don't notice the amount who have integrated because they have integrated as so look just like 'everyone' else.

    Did not know that. But then I had to ask my Bangla friend where Bangladesh was! :o
    Well you'll be glad to know it's now more likely the former 'Pakis' doing the bashing.

    I don't know, I never met any plastic paddys wearing balaclavas and talking about implementing the Brehon Laws.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,997 ✭✭✭✭bodhrandude


    An interesting film to look at with France's past as regards colonialism in Muslim countries, an interesting document charting the 1950s and early 60s in Algeria's rise to independence.

    If you want to get into it, you got to get out of it. (Hawkwind 1982)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,274 ✭✭✭jackofalltrades


    Bannasidhe wrote: »
    But, I would say 'Paki Bashing' began long before any 'Sharia Patrols' so it could be argued they grew out of a response to racially motivated attacks.
    How can that be argued?
    These 'Sharia patrols' only intention was to impose Sharia law.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,015 ✭✭✭fed up sick and tired


    How can that be argued?
    These 'Sharia patrols' only intention was to impose Sharia law.

    It can be 'argued' only because her much-vaunted history degree didn't teach her anything about the logical fallacy of 'post hoc, ergo propter hoc'.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Post_hoc_ergo_propter_hoc


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 625 ✭✭✭130Kph


    .......Islam is clearly the most dangerous and problematic movement in the world lately.
    Question "Can I ask you – where do you get most of your information about Islam that leads you to believe the specific statement above. Basically which media, books, magazines, websites or commentators?"

    I’d really like an answer to above; this really isn’t a smart arse question!!

    Maybe where you’re getting controversial information about Islam isn’t from a bigoted source. If so this would make everyone here sit up & take notice. It would make most reconsider their position about Islam!!!!!!

    If, for some reason, you don’t respond, I think it’s safe to assume you’re getting your information about Islam from the same group of rabble rousing, hate peddling, redneck/illusion of intelligence bigoted, paranoid, gimps (possibly funded indirectly by an ex-general in Tel Aviv-Jaffa, oops, sorry I mean Tel Aviv-Yafo) that I suspected you were getting it from.

    Sorry to be harsh, but – this is a public forum after all !!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,218 ✭✭✭✭Bannasidhe


    DubVelo wrote: »
    Did not know that. But then I had to ask my Bangla friend where Bangladesh was! :o
    Well you'll be glad to know it's now more likely the former 'Pakis' doing the bashing.

    I don't know, I never met any plastic paddys wearing balaclavas and talking about implementing the Brehon Laws.

    Nooooooo!!! Don't even think about joking about Plastic Paddys wearing balaclavas in case we spiral off down that tangent again :eek:

    I got bashed in London. Still have the scars. Wasn't people descended from people from the Indian Sub-Continent - was people descended from people from the West Indies. Still not big on people getting bashed over 30 years later.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,085 ✭✭✭questionmark?


    This thread is just going around in circles.

    Some posters saying Islam is not the problem others saying it is.

    Are all Muslims supporting these kind of attacks. Nope.
    Are there quite a few issues with certain sects of Islam fitting into the modern world. Yep. Does this lead to some becoming radicalised. Yep.

    It's how we now move forward from here so that the attacks in Paris, Mali, Beruit and many more do not become the norm.

    Muslims have a duty to integrate and respect the countries that they live in and we non muslims have a duty to allow them to intergrate. However I and many others will never accept murder as justified because of what some fairytale book says, that is the battle that we are in.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,274 ✭✭✭jackofalltrades


    130Kph wrote: »
    Question "Can I ask you – where do you get most of your information about Islam that leads you to believe the specific statement above. Basically which media, books, magazines, websites or commentators?"

    I’d really like an answer to above; this really isn’t a smart arse question!!

    Maybe where you’re getting controversial information about Islam isn’t from a bigoted source. If so this would make everyone here sit up & take notice. It would make most reconsider their position about Islam!!!!!!

    If, for some reason, you don’t respond, I think it’s safe to assume you’re getting your information about Islam from the same group of rabble rousing, hate peddling, redneck/illusion of intelligence bigoted, paranoid, gimps (possibly funded indirectly by an ex-general in Tel Aviv-Jaffa, oops, sorry I mean Tel Aviv-Yafo) that I suspected you were getting it from.

    Sorry to be harsh, but – this is a public forum after all !!
    Why are you using a racist term?

    You're just coming out with the same "attack the source" defence that a lot of other posters seem to be coming out with.
    Saying that people have a negative view of Islam due to the sites that they visit is flawed logic.
    Feel free to counter any of the numerous points that posters have made about Islam.
    Do you want to start with the one that you quoted earlier.
    "Islam is clearly the most dangerous and problematic movement in the world lately".


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,703 ✭✭✭IrishTrajan


    Nodin wrote: »
    And again, according to you, IS would enjoy support from a "huge minority" in France. What happens in other areas and on actual battlefields would be, if anything, a reason to open up yet more asymmetric warfare on another front. This hasn't happened - why? Where is the sustained terrorist campaign?

    They have differing goals, many of the IS sympathisers have gone to Syria and Iraq to help establish the Caliphate. You are trying to draw parallels between groups with different M.O.'s
    Nodin wrote: »
    And, for the second time, what is the percentage you put on the "huge minority" of muslims who support extremists? Specifically in regard to the French community, if you would.

    http://www.newsweek.com/16-french-citizens-support-isis-poll-finds-266795
    One in six French citizens sympathises with the Islamist militant group ISIS, also known as Islamic State, a poll released this week found.

    The poll of European attitudes towards the group, carried out by ICM for Russian news agency Rossiya Segodnya, revealed that 16% of French citizens have a positive opinion of ISIS. This percentage increases among younger respondents, spiking at 27% for those aged 18-24.


    Or do you not think 15% is a tremendously large minority? That's around 750,000 people by my estimate.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,703 ✭✭✭IrishTrajan


    Some ira bombs killed kids in a ci

    That's horrendous, but how does that pertain to the argument at hand?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 625 ✭✭✭130Kph


    Why are you using a racist term?

    Oh really,- racist :eek::eek::eek::eek::D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D Redneck means a country bumpkin, what’s racist about that?????????
    You're just coming out with the same "attack the source" defence that a lot of other posters seem to be coming out with.
    Saying that people have a negative view of Islam due to the sites that they visit is flawed logic.

    I disagree – hugely!

    Others are far better than me about debating “points made about Islam”. What I’m interested in here is – why do people think the way they do. I find that far more interesting- intriguing, in fact. What position are they coming from.

    It’s just another way of analysing the debate…;)

    re: your question about the worst dangers in the world at the moment......

    I would say ................

    Pig ignorant depraved terrorist Jihadi scum (agreement – yes, no, maybe???), Mexican drug cartels (100,000 dead bodies), Putin’s miserable dictatorship, Iran’s attempt to get a nuclear weapon, general organised crime, Boko Harem, and endless militant groups who fight against useless or backward governments in the developing world, organised crime trafficking women or children – I think that’s a fair start.

    Not looking good for the proposition that Islam is the most dangerous movement in the world atm (on this thread) is it BlaasForRafa or Jack? Ouch…..The way to resolve this is – give us your sources………….that is the holy grail now…..please give us your sources about Islam :confused:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 28,710 ✭✭✭✭Paully D


    While I wasn't sure where to put this, this is probably the best suited thread. It's a bit different obviously, but this book is a really interesting read for anyone who wants an inside look at these type of groups. I'd recommend it. You can get it much cheaper elsewhere:

    http://www.amazon.com/Agent-Storm-Life-Inside-Qaeda/dp/0802123147

    Guardian review of the book below:

    http://www.theguardian.com/books/2014/jul/02/agent-storm-al-qaeda-morten-storm-review
    Morten Storm is a former biker turned European militant Islamist blowhard, turned al-Qaida associate close to some of the most senior operational extremists in the world, turned spy, turned whistleblower. This is, it's not unfair to say, an unusual combination.

    Storm grew up in a tough, working-class coastal Danish town. His alcoholic father left home, his stepfather beat him and he committed his first armed robbery at 13. There followed multiple expulsions, special schools and a promising career as a boxer curtailed by indiscipline. By his mid teens, he was involved in a local street gang mainly composed of local Palestinian, Turks and Iranian immigrants. "I gravitated to [them]. I felt like an outsider in Korsor and I always identified with the underdog," he says early in this fascinating account of a decade or so spent inside both militant Sunni Muslim activism and security services' counterterrorism.

    Leaving the neighbourhood street toughs, Storm graduated to the Bandidos, a biker gang, and enjoyed much violence, casual sex and drugs. At the age of 21, in 1997, however, he found a biography of the prophet Muhammad in a local library. The "dignity and simplicity" of Muhammad's life appealed to Storm, as did "his story of battling the odds, fighting for a cause"; the cause also brought with it "a sense of solidarity and loyalty".

    The gangster declared himself a Muslim and enjoyed the comradeship of other Muslims he knew from the neighbourhood. None of them took the strictures of faith very seriously or knew many of its teachings. They celebrated his conversion by going on a drinking binge.

    But another bout of jail – and exposure to much more rigorous and radicalised Muslims behind bars – hardened Storm's Islamic faith and changed his perception of the world beyond Demark. When he fled to London to avoid angry members of his former gang, he ended up in Regent's Park mosque; then he was offered a Saudi-funded scholarship to study Arabic and his new faith at an ultra-conservative religious school in Yemen. He accepted and this first journey to the Middle East marked the real start of his extraordinary journey through 15 years of extremism in Britain, Denmark and the Yemen. Accounts of "My Time in al-Qaida" are numerous enough for them to constitute a sub-genre, but there are no others in which the main protagonist has also played such an extensive role for western security services, and, more crucially, is prepared to reveal so much.

    Tim Lister and Paul Cruickshank, the two CNN journalists who have written the book with Storm, have done a fine job of giving context to his extraordinary story and appear to have tested much of his account. The result is a credible narrative that illuminates both violent Islamic extremism and the intelligence community's efforts to fight it. Neither the Islamists nor the spooks come out of it particularly well.

    After learning Arabic and soaking up the teachings of some of the most conservative contemporary Islamic thinkers, Storm left Yemen for the UK. This was the end of the 1990s and London was home to many exiled radicals calling for violence overseas. The Danish convert quickly found new friends, some of whom went on to commit terrorist acts, and he spent time with Omar Bakri Mohammed Fostok, the leader of the Al-Muhajiroun group. British activism existed on the very margins – cultural, political, social – of mainstream society. Staying in grubby flats in run-down council estates, living off welfare and petty (or occasionally more serious) crime, Storm and his associates inhabited a world of overstayed visas, violent online videos, idolised preachers, frustration and alienation.

    Throughout the book, militant activism is revealed to be amateurish but nonetheless a threat. While the Islamic societies and the links between the brothers created a surrogate family or "fictive kin", and were a form of cultish "closed society", they were also connected to a global network of contacts who shared an ideology and a purpose. Storm's own credentials as a militant were reaffirmed continually by his apparent closeness to well-known activists and ideologues.

    The most prominent of these, and a central character in his account, is Anwar al-Awlaki, a charismatic US-born radical cleric of Yemeni origins who would eventually be regarded as second only to Osama bin Laden in posing the greatest threat to western security. Al-Awlaki, the son of a senior figure in a major local tribe, invited Storm to dinner when the young Danish convert was back in Yemen in early 2006, and impressed him greatly.

    Even so, Storm was beginning to doubt the message. He was troubled by what he saw as an incoherence within Islam on the question of free will and predestination. According to Agent Storm, however, his biggest problem was presented by the indiscriminate violence of the movement. He "began to reconsider some of the justifications for the killing and maiming of civilians", he writes. "Now I thought of the twin towers, Bali, Madrid in 2004, London in 2005 … If they were part of Allah's preordained plan, I now wanted no part of it. My loss of faith was as frightening as it was sudden."

    Storm was not alone, and Lister and Cruickshank miss an opportunity to point out that tens of millions of people across the Islamic world, including very many who had been broadly sympathetic to the aims of the extremists in the period following the US and British invasion of Iraq, were having the same doubts. From Morocco to Malaysia, levels of support that were high in 2004 or 2005 had declined by 2007.

    Both MI5 and PET, the Danish intelligence service, had previously attempted to recruit Storm, with no success. Having repudiated his former "brothers", he dug out a card with a number on it and called. From here on, the narrative gathers pace, becoming a spy thriller written in spy-thriller prose. Detailed accounts by participants of how western intelligence agencies attempted to kill major al-Qaida figures are rare, and Storm's descriptions of meetings, training sessions and discussions are revelatory. He recounts a series of episodes working as an informant for MI5 (back to the dingy flats and the mosques), for PET in Denmark and, eventually, for the CIA.

    Storm's portrayal of the spooks is unflattering. From the philandering, flashy, hard-drinking PET, to the stand‑offish, rule-obsessed Brits, to the arrogant, wealthy CIA, no one comes out well. The degree to which the agencies conform to national stereotype is jarring, but his account of the lavish post-mission "debriefing" sessions with Danish handlers in luxury hotels in Bangkok and Lisbon is nonetheless more than plausible. Indeed, much has subsequently been confirmed by internal official inquiries in Denmark. Storm, astonishingly, taped meetings with the CIA by leaving his iPhone recording and this material, too, corroborates his story.

    His relationship with all the agencies eventually fell apart after the CIA set out to kill Al-Awlaqi. The cleric's vehicle was destroyed by a missile fired from an unmanned drone in September 2011. Storm claims that a flash drive he delivered to Al-Awlaqi led the Americans to their target. The CIA denied this and Storm lost out on a promised $5m reward. He had fallen out with MI5 and MI6 long before, in part because they suspected he had become involved in an assassination attempt, something prohibited by UK law. His relationship with the PET ended in acrimony too, as he went public with his story.

    Storm repeatedly insists that he was led into radical Islamic violence by a "quest to fight for the underdog". Equally important, perhaps, was his desire to be one of the team, to be liked, even to be admired by the gangsters, the aspirant militants in the UK, the hardened networks in the Arab Peninsula and the security services. Terrorism is less a matter of faceless organisations than a social activity – one which, in nature if not purpose or justification, is much like any other.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,850 ✭✭✭Depp


    130Kph wrote: »
    Oh really,- racist :eek::eek::eek::eek::D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D Redneck means a country bumpkin, what’s racist about that?????????



    I disagree – hugely!

    Others are far better than me about debating “points made about Islam”. What I’m interested in here is – why do people think the way they do. I find that far more interesting- intriguing, in fact. What position are they coming from.

    It’s just another way of analysing the debate…;)

    re: your question about the worst dangers in the world at the moment......

    I would say ................

    Pig ignorant depraved terrorist Jihadi scum (agreement – yes, no, maybe???), Mexican drug cartels (100,000 dead bodies), Putin’s miserable dictatorship, Iran’s attempt to get a nuclear weapon, general organised crime, Boko Harem, and endless militant groups who fight against useless or backward governments in the developing world, organised crime trafficking women or children – I think that’s a fair start.

    Not looking good for the proposition that Islam is the most dangerous movement in the world atm (on this thread) is it BlaasForRafa or Jack? Ouch…..The way to resolve this is – give us your sources………….that is the holy grail now…..please give us your sources about Islam :confused:

    Call a spade a spade theres a lot of racist bandwagoning going on, but there is reason for concern, outside of the racist motivations, Islam but more specifically the parts of the quran that encourage killing of non believers/civil rights issues/aggressive conversion threaten most of the freedoms we enjoy every day.

    Now I'm not coming from the ''put the muslims in camps/nuke the middle east'' camp, what Im suggesting needs to be done is Daesh have to be defeated completely, by whatever means necessary, there need to be tighter controls on immigration, the shengen agreement needs to be thrown out, tighter background checks are an absolute essential, also finally and arguably most crucially, there needs to be huge reform in islam but it cant be forced reform, it has to come from grassroots muslims, while the estimates of percentages of moderate muslims are hugely varied i dont deny they are in the vast majority, they need to speak up and do this, because while the quran is thought in its current form groups like al qaeda, boka haram and daesh will keep popping up and murdering innocents in the name of allah. True a certain number of these men will still kill, but if the quran didnt contain the verses i have spoken of these men wouldnt be seen as islamic martyrs they would be seen as evil murderers who happened to be muslim, also it would take away there best recruiting tool.


Advertisement