Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Flightradar24 Thread Part II

1257258260262263334

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 164 colbarr
    ✭✭


    JP McManus wrecking Dublin ATC's head! https://www.flightradar24.com/7f61b14


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 894 polydactyl
    ✭✭✭


    Any idea whats happening with EI123? Have good friends on it with a small baby. Must be going mental at this stage.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,458 lolie
    ✭✭✭


    Pretzill wrote: »
    And Air France 1816 also go around diverting to Belfast - great respect for ATC and the pilots in this weather.

    Still hasn't landed yet, must be fairly low on fuel now.

    Edit: just touched down, 3 hour flight.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 164 colbarr
    ✭✭


    polydactyl wrote: »
    Any idea whats happening with EI123? Have good friends on it with a small baby. Must be going mental at this stage.

    Just took off.

    https://www.flightradar24.com/EIN123/7f6026c


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,098 The_Wanderer
    ✭✭✭


    What's the story with FR338?

    http://www.flightradar24.com/RYR7LX/7f5f39a


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,346 homerjay2005
    ✭✭✭✭



    refuel in liverpool i assume


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,490 JCX BXC
    ✭✭✭✭


    FR507 (BRS-DUB) divert to Liverpool
    FR338 (LTN-DUB) diverting to Liverpool
    FR8012 (WMI-DUB) diverting to Manchester
    FR7045 (AGP-DUB) diverted to Liverpool
    AF1816 (CDG-DUB) diverted to Belfast
    EI403 (FCO-DUB) diverted to Shannon
    EI545 (NCE-DUB) diverted to Shannon
    EI3291 (CWL-DUB) diverted to Belfast

    Did I miss anything else?

    Also today
    FR2359 (ACE-NOC) diverted to Dublin (Will continue on the outbound joruney from DUB-ACE, scheduled for 5pm)
    FR6673 (LPL-NOC) diverted to Shannon (Will continue on the outbound journey from SNN-LPL soon)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,490 JCX BXC
    ✭✭✭✭


    EI545 from the earlier diverted NCE-DUB flight returning to DUB from SNN (Without PAX). Some creative flight paths around dublin now due to aircraft requesting alternate headings to avoid weather.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,346 homerjay2005
    ✭✭✭✭


    Carnacalla wrote: »
    FR507 (BRS-DUB) divert to Liverpool
    FR338 (LTN-DUB) diverting to Liverpool
    FR8012 (WMI-DUB) diverting to Manchester
    FR7045 (AGP-DUB) diverted to Liverpool
    AF1816 (CDG-DUB) diverted to Belfast
    EI403 (FCO-DUB) diverted to Shannon
    EI545 (NCE-DUB) diverted to Shannon

    Did I miss anything else?

    Also today
    FR2359 (ACE-NOC) diverted to Dublin (Will continue on the outbound joruney from DUB-ACE, scheduled for 5pm)
    FR6673 (LPL-NOC) diverted to Shannon (Will continue on the outbound journey from SNN-LPL soon)

    did those Liverpool flights come back to Dublin yet?


    EDIT : fr704 on approach from Liverpool now.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 971 Senecio
    ✭✭✭


    I work in Northern Cross with a great view of the rw28 approach. One of the Ryanair flights this afternoon aborted an approach just as it was crossing the Malahide Rd. Seemed an awful long way out to decide to abort. Can't be very nice up there.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,129 Spanish Eyes
    ✭✭✭✭


    As a pax I can only say.....

    This thread has helped me enormously to not fear a rocky approach anywhere really. The information given here has shown me that there are maximum wind speeds and gusts beyond which airlines say NO!. The pilots (god bless em), can wait for a lull etc in the hold. and then make a decision as they always do based on safety and guidelines.

    But the important thing I got from all this, is that hysteria is largely unwarranted. Even if you are fekin terrified. Those at the pointy end have it sussed.

    How many times have I seen go arounds, holding patterns, diversions, and sometimes landings here.

    All done within safety parameters.

    It has made me feel a lot more secure when the plane is swaying from side to side on approach. Either we are going to make it, or we will go around, or divert.

    Hats off to crew and ATC.

    And those pilots are so calm and cool when this happens too. Another + to make me happier in those conditions!

    I love watching and listening to FR24 and ATC though!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,490 JCX BXC
    ✭✭✭✭


    Wind at dub 250 degrees, 33kts gusting 48!
    Was only 18kts 5 minutes ago.
    Down to 29kts now mean speed.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 439 TedR
    ✭✭


    jimbis wrote: »
    Great day for hanging out at rwy 16. Wish I was out that way :(
    Drove out to have a look at R16 on the go this afternoon, arrived precisely as they changed back to fecking R24 :-)

    Meant to answer Mech earlier, feed is great, thanks


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 439 TedR
    ✭✭


    As a pax I can only say.....

    This thread has helped me enormously to not fear a rocky approach anywhere really. The information given here has shown me that there are maximum wind speeds and gusts beyond which airlines say NO!. The pilots (god bless em), can wait for a lull etc in the hold. and then make a decision as they always do based on safety and guidelines.

    But the important thing I got from all this, is that hysteria is largely unwarranted. Even if you are fekin terrified. Those at the pointy end have it sussed.

    How many times have I seen go arounds, holding patterns, diversions, and sometimes landings here.

    All done within safety parameters.

    It has made me feel a lot more secure when the plane is swaying from side to side on approach. Either we are going to make it, or we will go around, or divert.

    Hats off to crew and ATC.

    And those pilots are so calm and cool when this happens too. Another + to make me happier in those conditions!

    I love watching and listening to FR24 and ATC though!
    I very much agree

    it is very reassuring to hear ATC and the pilots dealing with everything so calmly, cant underestimate what they do and how well they do it


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 527 de biz
    ✭✭✭


    Senecio wrote: »
    I work in Northern Cross with a great view of the rw28 approach. One of the Ryanair flights this afternoon aborted an approach just as it was crossing the Malahide Rd. Seemed an awful long way out to decide to abort. Can't be very nice up there.

    EI121 (A330)was occupying the runway at the time powering up for departure.
    The FR crew anticipated the potential seperation and/or wake issue.
    Excellent decision making.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,163 Chris_5339762
    ✭✭✭


    They then went to Manchester or Liverpool AFAIK, which was an odd decision. They'd been holding for a while but to just head off straight away I was surprised with.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 262 PinOnTheRight
    ✭✭


    de biz wrote: »
    EI121 (A330)was occupying the runway at the time powering up for departure.
    The FR crew anticipated the potential seperation and/or wake issue.
    Excellent decision making.

    The EI121 departed runway 16. There was a RYR8AR on approach to 16 prior to this but their reason for breaking off the approach was the imminent change to runway 28. They were still with approach at the time.

    Unless you're talking about another scenario... ?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,702 smurfjed
    ✭✭✭✭


    They'd been holding for a while but to just head off straight away I was surprised with.

    What would you expect them to do?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,643 Woodville56
    ✭✭✭


    smurfjed wrote: »
    What would you expect them to do?

    But why divert to Manchester or Liverpool as against going to Belfast or Shannon as other flights had done ??


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,490 JCX BXC
    ✭✭✭✭


    But why divert to Manchester or Liverpool as against going to Belfast or Shannon as other flights had done ??

    Flight crews usually nominate a preferred diversion airport depending on the forecasted conditions at the airports. SNN and BFS probably didnt have the best conditions forecasted. Liverpool and Manchester are also a little closer to Dublin afaik.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 527 de biz
    ✭✭✭


    The EI121 departed runway 16. There was a RYR8AR on approach to 16 prior to this but their reason for breaking off the approach was the imminent change to runway 28. They were still with approach at the time.

    Unless you're talking about another scenario... ?

    Correction EI123....


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 971 Senecio
    ✭✭✭


    de biz wrote: »
    EI121 (A330)was occupying the runway at the time powering up for departure.
    The FR crew anticipated the potential seperation and/or wake issue.
    Excellent decision making.

    That makes sense, cheers


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 696 TheFitz13
    ✭✭✭


    Will all these diversions affect passenger numbers?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 164 colbarr
    ✭✭


    Carnacalla wrote: »
    Flight crews usually nominate a preferred diversion airport depending on the forecasted conditions at the airports. SNN and BFS probably didnt have the best conditions forecasted. Liverpool and Manchester are also a little closer to Dublin afaik.

    I was listening to ATC yesterday afternoon and I heard one pilot ask if ATC could ring Belfast and ask if the had space for them to park. And looking at AF1816's flight path, it looked like it was heading for BHD, but opted instead for BFS. So it could have been a capacity issue due to there being a lot of diversions at the time as well.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,090 RadioRetro
    ✭✭✭


    A few minutes ago there was IAA554 of the RAF cruising at 30 (thirty) knots at FL 250 over Dublin Airport but it's now disappeared. What could that have been?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 720 calnand
    ✭✭✭


    Just saw that Ei109 is taking a very different route to its normal transatlantic route, is that due to weather?

    http://www.flightradar24.com/EIN10E/7f89713


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,190 Comhrá
    ✭✭✭


    Probably avoiding the strong Westerly jetstream further South:

    Animation here: http://www.stormsurfing.com/cgi/display_alt.cgi?a=natla_250

    natla_250_72hr.png


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,477 highlydebased
    ✭✭✭


    Indeed, very Northerly tracks owing to the jetstream

    atlantic_west.gif


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 429 chinwag
    ✭✭


    calnand wrote: »
    Just saw that Ei109 is taking a very different route to its normal transatlantic route, is that due to weather?

    http://www.flightradar24.com/EIN10E/7f89713

    Would the last part of call sign for that aircraft be 109 or 10E?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,370 b757
    ✭✭✭


    chinwag wrote: »
    Would the last part of call sign for that aircraft be 109 or 10E?

    Shamrock 10E


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement