Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Could YOU kill baby Hitler?

«1345

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,798 ✭✭✭✭DrumSteve


    Well not now I couldn't.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,298 ✭✭✭moc moc a moc


    I don't think I'd kill him, I'd probably rape him instead.

    Is that better or worse?

    Mod: Banned


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,798 ✭✭✭✭DrumSteve


    I don't think I'd kill him, I'd probably rape him instead.

    Is that better or worse?

    I know its Hitler, but ****ing hell.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 49,731 ✭✭✭✭coolhull


    Hitchens wrote: »
    http://www.thejournal.ie/nyt-magazine-baby-hitler-2407424-Oct2015/

    NYT Magazine asked readers "could you kill a baby Hitler?"

    not me, no way in the wide earthly world could I harm a baby!

    Well, the baby hasn't done anyone any harm, so isn't the question a bit playschool-ish


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,746 ✭✭✭AgileMyth


    No. If I kill another baby people will think I'm weird.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,822 ✭✭✭✭Ally Dick


    Nein


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 16,768 ✭✭✭✭tomwaterford


    In a heartbeat


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,034 ✭✭✭mad muffin


    No because WWII brought us so many technological and medical advances. It also reduced the population by a significant amount.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 28,956 ✭✭✭✭murpho999


    Hitchens wrote: »
    http://www.thejournal.ie/nyt-magazine-baby-hitler-2407424-Oct2015/

    NYT Magazine asked readers "could you kill a baby Hitler?"

    not me, no way in the wide earthly world could I harm a baby!

    I couldn't kill him as he's a baby but I would ask him if suffers from gas.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,188 ✭✭✭LDN_Irish


    I'd ****ing knock him out the little zdope.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 255 ✭✭Mother Brain


    I don't think I'd kill him, I'd probably rape him instead.

    Is that better or worse?

    Then you'd have to tell people you had sex with Hitler though. :p


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 158 ✭✭TheNobleKipper


    What is the point of killing a baby? Why wouldn't you just take it away and try to bring it up to be a decent person that would grow up without some insane hatred of the world? :confused:


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,730 ✭✭✭Sheep Lover


    DrumSteve wrote: »
    I know its Hitler, but ****ing hell.

    Is rape worse than murder?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 386 ✭✭Nichard Dixon


    it might be interesting to circumcise him though.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,400 ✭✭✭Medusa22


    What is the point of killing a baby? Why wouldn't you just take it away and try to bring it up to be a decent person that would grow up without some insane hatred of the world? :confused:

    Maybe just make sure he gets plenty of art lessons and he should be fine :D


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,436 ✭✭✭c_man


    This is just like that bit from Babylon5: The Lost Tales where Sheridan is pushed to kill a boy who he has a vision of attacking Earth when he's older. Instead of the easy choice, he instead kinda adopts him or something like that and raise him to be a good'un.

    Where my B5 fans at?!


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 158 ✭✭TheNobleKipper


    Medusa22 wrote: »
    Maybe just make sure he gets plenty of art lessons and he should be fine :D

    And bagels


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,142 ✭✭✭Hitchens


    NYT poll result:

    42% - yes
    30% - no
    28% - not sure


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 917 ✭✭✭Mr_Muffin


    I would name him Barry and ship him to Australia. Hopefully he would start a reign of terror over there instead.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,873 ✭✭✭✭The Hill Billy


    I don't think I'd kill him, I'd probably rape him instead.

    Is that better or worse?

    Wow. Whenever I shall see your username from now on I will think of that comment.

    Stay classy, or whatever it is you think you are.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,630 ✭✭✭jaykay74


    Hitchens wrote: »
    NYT Magazine asked readers "could you kill a baby Hitler?"

    Of course you could. Would you though ?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,467 ✭✭✭Very Bored


    It would be somewhat futile as it was Mussolini who developed fascism and Himmler was probably even more an evil nutter than Adolf.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,244 ✭✭✭✭bnt


    If a "baby Hitler" was born today, he wouldn't have the same experiences as the real Hitler did. His life was shaped by World War I and its aftermath: he was injured, and thought there was a conspiracy in German civilian circles ("Jews and Communists") to lose the war.

    After the war he was assigned to military intelligence to spy on the German Workers' Party, but found himself in agreement with much of what founder Anton Drexler believed; he basically ignored his spying task and fully joined the party as soon as he was discharged from the Army. Without the war, he wouldn't have been in the Army, and wouldn't have been exposed to the ideas he later co-opted.

    Government resting upon the will and universal suffrage of the people has no anchorage except in the people's intelligence.

    — Grover Cleveland



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,853 ✭✭✭✭silverharp


    as an alternative , kill his dad , apparently he was part of the reason he was messed up

    A belief in gender identity involves a level of faith as there is nothing tangible to prove its existence which, as something divorced from the physical body, is similar to the idea of a soul. - Colette Colfer



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,365 ✭✭✭✭Kermit.de.frog


    silverharp wrote: »
    as an alternative , kill his dad , apparently he was part of the reason he was messed up

    "We need to send someone back to the time before the war..."


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,142 ✭✭✭Hitchens


    bnt wrote: »
    If a "baby Hitler" was born today, he wouldn't have the same experiences as the real Hitler did. His life was shaped by World War I and its aftermath: he was injured, and thought there was a conspiracy in German civilian circles ("Jews and Communists") to lose the war.

    After the war he was assigned to military intelligence to spy on the German Workers' Party, but found himself in agreement with much of what founder Anton Drexler believed; he basically ignored his spying task and fully joined the party as soon as he was discharged from the Army. Without the war, he wouldn't have been in the Army, and wouldn't have been exposed to the ideas he later co-opted.

    "any chance you could answer the question?" - Vincent Browne :)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,758 ✭✭✭Laois_Man


    Surely on the week that we saw Back to the Future day, we should know that disrupting the Time continuum creates a time paradox and a new temporal event sequence resulting in an alternate reality creating an alternate 2015

    Doc would say....don't foooook with the time continuum.

    So no!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,782 ✭✭✭✭RobertKK


    I blame the parents.

    Social services should have taken him into care.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,298 ✭✭✭moc moc a moc


    Then you'd have to tell people you had sex with Hitler though. :p

    I already tell people that


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,328 ✭✭✭Magico Gonzalez


    Wow. Whenever I shall see your username from now on I will think of that comment.

    Stay classy, or whatever it is you think you are.

    However moronic you think people might be, you always underestimate them.


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement
Advertisement