One nights stands

Aint Eazy Being Cheezy wrote: »

Ah it's easy, all women like the same thing. Bitta finger banging, few licks like a parched labrador drinkin' watur, six or eight almighty thrusts, obligatory "I'm gonna come now!" more of a threat than a promise, and roll off. Done & dusted in 25mins flat.

25 minutes?

Fcuk, I've been seriously short changed!

Aint Eazy Being Cheezy wrote: »

Ah it's easy, all women like the same thing. Bitta finger banging, few licks like a parched labrador drinkin' watur, six or eight almighty thrusts, obligatory "I'm gonna come now!" more of a threat than a promise, and roll off. Done & dusted in 25mins flat.

FFS don't be given them ideas!

Sheep Lover wrote: »

A key that opens many locks is a master key.

A lock opened by many keys is a sh1t lock.

A key that can't get near the lock is a sh*t key.

eviltwin wrote: »

I don't know anyone who thinks like that anymore. No one under 70 anyway. If that attitude was persistent in the people I know I'd be distancing myself from them tbh. That kind of prudish, outdated thinking based solely on gender lines has no place in a modern society. Sex is a good thing, a pleasurable experience. It's sad some people still use it as a way of judging others

I saw a thread in PI a while ago. A woman had got drunk and arrived at a guys house that she had been in contact with online for only a short time. They ended up sleeping together. After that he wanted to keep online flirting with her but he didnt seem to want to ask her out. He said he was in no rush.

anyway some of the advice that she was given was that she had "relegated" herself to "easy drunken shag". The post got 27 likes.

another post suggested that he had "the patience of a saint" even though he slept with her. That post got 38 likes.

Advisers or posters said that her "drunken impulsiveness" had probably turned him off yet he was being called a saint and it was said that he must really like her because he succumbed to her advances.

It seemed to me that she was being scolded for her drunken error where he was being praised even though he showed lack of wilpower too when he was responsive to her advances.

I know it doesnt prove anything but i just thought the reaction to that thread was interesting.

Whitewinged wrote: »

I saw a thread in PI a while ago. A woman had got drunk and arrived at a guys house that she had been in contact with online for only a short time. They ended up sleeping together. After that he wanted to keep online flirting with her but he didnt seem to want to ask her out. He said he was in no rush.

anyway some of the advice that she was given was that she had "relegated" herself to "easy drunken shag". The post got 27 likes.

another post suggested that he had "the patience of a saint" even though he slept with her. That post got 38 likes.

Advisers or posters said that her "drunken impulsiveness" had probably turned him off yet he was being called a saint and it was said that he must really like her because he succumbed to her advances.

It seemed to me that she was being scolded for her drunken error where he was being praised even though he showed lack of wilpower too when he was responsive to her advances.

I know it doesnt prove anything but i just thought the reaction to that thread was interesting.

If it's the thread I'm thinking of,she came across as slightly erratic

Whitewinged wrote: »

Even if she did, it was the fact that posters thought that he had "relegated" her to "easy drunken shag"

why would he do that? Unless thats how some people think.

I think the best advice for her would have been to lay off the booze

Sheep Lover wrote: »

It's quite true actually.

I didn't realise that my vagina is a lock. So what does it open into? What's inside? I wonder if there's good storage space in there

Banana Ice wrote: »

No its not actually. It's not women's goal to prevent men having sex with them. A woman who has sex with lots of men is a woman who just enjoys sex, there is nothing negative about it.

There is always "that girl" in every local village or town. You'd take her home for a good rogering, but you wouldn't be seen talking to her after mass type of thing. Do you get me?

Banana Ice wrote: »

No its not actually. It's not women's goal to prevent men having sex with them. A woman who has sex with lots of men is a woman who just enjoys sex, there is nothing negative about it.

Well, possibly.

Although I've met very few very promiscuous women who were all there in the head. And I've dated a stripper. Possibly this is true of over promiscuous men as well.

Sure to some people this is just enjoyable aerobics, to others who need to score all the time, something seems missing.

Jaysus lads, it's just sex like. The reason why we're all here in the first place. Remember the birds and bees business?

Someone judging another person for having casual sex tells me all I need to know about that person. Off back to the 50s with you where that kind of attitude towards the most normal and natural and human act in the world belongs.

Yes I've had a few ONS back in the day. Most were a bit forgettable, one or two were spectacular events, adventurous and liberating sex at its finest. Sometimes it's nice to not have to worry about the niceties and the awkward "I'll call you"s that come with sex with someone you already know and to just get down to the carnal no-strings business of getting your rocks off.