Rangers FC On Field Gossip & Rumour Thread 2017 Mod Note in OP(Updated 14/08)

Just to clarify what charges they are facing.

Green faced 4 charges:

Conspiracy
Fraud
Companies Act 2006, Sec. 190
Criminal Justice and Licensing Scotland Act 2010, Sect. 28(1)

Whitehouse faced 2 charges:

Conspiracy
Criminal Justice and Licensing Scotland Act 2010, Sect. 28(1)

Whyte faced 2 charges:

Conspiracy
Criminal Justice and Licensing Scotland Act 2010, Sect. 28(1)

Given that they were all charged with Conspiracy (to defraud) and Criminal Justice and Licensing Scotland Act 2010, Sect. 28(1), the prosecution are obviously claiming that they were all in it together and acting in concert......

Conspiracy:
An agreement between two or more persons to engage jointly in an unlawful or criminal act, or an act that is innocent in itself but becomes unlawful when done by the combination of actors.
Rather serious stuff.

Andy Newport ‏@AndyNewportPA 1m1 minute ago
Ex-Gers chiefs Whyte & Green appear in court over "serious organised crime" charges

Rangers v Raith in the championship today the Raith manager will no doubt have his side fired up but it is a home game so for me a Rangers win

Rangers: Foderingham; Tavernier, Kiernan, Wilson, Wallace; Halliday, Holt, Zelalem; McKay, Waghorn, Oduwa.
Subs: Kelly, Hardie, Thompson, Aird, Ball, Law, Miller.
Raith Rovers: Cuthbert, Thomson, Toshney, Benedictus, Anderson, McCros, Stewart, Davidson, Daly, McKeown, Craigen.
Subs: Laidlaw, Petrie, Megginson, Matthews, Bates, Ellis, Mackie.

What a goal by Wallace.

Great practiced set piece on the free kick and Wallace curls it past the goalie.

Great goal by Tavernier, fantastic pass from Oduwa.

Soft penalty but Waghorn puts it away 4-0

Another Pen not soft this time and Waghorn puts it away. Hardie on for Oduwa

bobbysands81 wrote: »

I hope he does great for you guys and gets a full 5 goals next season.

Quick update on this.

Challenge Cup: played 2 goals 2
League Cup : Played 2 goals 1
League : played 5 goals 5
Total : played 9 goals 8

Congratulations Martyn.

Intifada wrote: »

Could you do a quick update on this too http://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/showpost.php?p=96860048&postcount=6723

Nope. Not right now.

Intifada wrote: »

Thought so. Look forward to a few months time when ye are all playing the victim once again.

I'm sure you'll know how to spot 'playing the victim' :cool:

Jelle1880 wrote: »

I'm sure you'll know how to spot 'playing the victim' :cool:

I will, having seen most of your fans already do it after Murray, after Whyte, and after Green :cool:

Intifada wrote: »

Do my fellow Bears believe Sir Dave King's claims that Hibs actually offered Allen to Rangers, but then suddenly said no, we won't sell him to you at all http://sport.stv.tv/football/clubs/rangers/1328431-hibs-made-initial-approach-to-rangers-over-scott-allan-dave-king-claims/

One thing that we can be sure of is the mighty Glasgow Rangers came out on top here, as they always do. Even if their big transfer target went to a rival club in a bigger league. Staunch.

"Fellow Bears" 😂😂
No reason to disbelieve King re Hibs approaching Rangers. So you really believe Rangers are missing your bench sitter ah well 😉

It would indeed be the first time in history that a club has changed it's mind regarding selling a player.

Intifada wrote: »

I suppose one reason to disbelieve him, other than his criminal record, is that it is a pretty ridiculous turn of events for Club A to offer a player to Club B, then state they refuse to sell a player to Club B.

Allen is the "bench sitter" for the Champions of Scotland. Fair to say that many of our lesser players would be sought after by lower league teams. One example of this would be Scott Allen, who Rangers tried desperately to buy in the summer. Coincidentally the exact player we are talking about right now!

It is good that Rangers have come out on top here though. Everything went as according to plan for The People.

Oh get over yourself let us worry about King. Now where did I say he would not have been a good player for us but he made his choice he went for Champions League football I can understand that but you cannot say Ki g was wrong about Celticsoing is a favour. It's simple if you had not bought him there's every chance he would still be at Hibs and therefore a decent player would have been playing for our main rivals this season. It's not difficult 😉

Intifada wrote: »

Where have I worried about him?


Here "So you really believe Rangers are missing your bench sitter ah well" if that isn't what you meant by that then you seriously need to work on your communication skills.


Nobody is having difficulty understanding King's spin here, however I'm afraid it conflicts with the talk of challenging for the SPL in 16/17. Rangers carry on like it is their divine right to be challenging for the title and their time in the lower leagues is a blip, yet now it's a "benefit" that their soon to be competition has signed a talented young player that they themselves were desperate to land, all because it weakens a fairly shambolic Hibs side. How ambitious :pac:

Nonsense saying we are not missing him does in no way he is not a good player. I really think you should think before mouthing off.
Off course King is going to say he wants us challenging no reason we shouldn't be but it's clear we are in no way missing him this season and if we are not missing him this season it means he could have ended up sitting on our bench next season.
But you carry thinking what you want it obviously makes you a happy bear