Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Big Brother UK 2015 **Use spoiler tags, mod warning post #1 & 3037**

1…228229231233234…282

Comments

  • #6902
    Wtwasithinkin
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 149 ✭✭Wtwasithinkin


    The money made it easier for them. I'd love to have had chloe have the 15 because then they would have had to justify it.


  • #6903
    [Deleted User]
    Posts: 13,839 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Sam is well deserving of her 5 grand now. Didn't hear the other two saying "evict me"


  • #6904
    Uncle Ben
    Closed Accounts Posts: 1,843 ✭✭✭Uncle Ben


    That Danny is one money grabbing fcker.


  • #6905
    Old Perry
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,511 ✭✭✭Old Perry


    dark crystal wrote: »
    Will the bookies have to pay out on Harry and Sam now? Sam was a big price!

    Think most of the time if second eviction is surprise it is only the first that counts for bets placed


  • #6906
    MarkY91
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,073 ✭✭✭MarkY91


    Sam scapegoated as usual.

    I thought she was a good HM. Id rather chloe to have left


  • Advertisement
  • #6907
    [Deleted User]
    Posts: 13,839 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Lol @ chlorine!


  • #6908
    eternal
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 8,867 ✭✭✭eternal


    She shouldn't have gone, she's a decent girl and that was a selfless act. I think Nick should win now, the rest bug me.


  • #6909
    callaway92
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,245 ✭✭✭✭callaway92


    dark crystal wrote: »
    Will the bookies have to pay out on Harry and Sam now? Sam was a big price!

    No they won't. Harry was the person evicted by the public vote, therefore, she was the winning bet. All others were losers. Don't understand how you could think otherwise really.


  • #6910
    Wicklow Brave
    Closed Accounts Posts: 492 ✭✭Wicklow Brave


    Old Perry wrote: »
    Think most of the time if second eviction is surprise it is only the first that counts for bets placed

    No odds will just be halved. Sam was 12/1 I think so they'll pay out at 6/1.


  • #6911
    duffman13
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 9,274 ✭✭✭duffman13


    dark crystal wrote: »
    Will the bookies have to pay out on Harry and Sam now? Sam was a big price!

    No they only pay on the next eviction!

    Danny has 100% showed his true colours, Joel said he wasn't getting involved, didn't hear a word from Nick or Cristian and then that clown hops in and says we have to get someone out. What would big brother do if they refused?


  • Advertisement
  • #6912
    Wtwasithinkin
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 149 ✭✭Wtwasithinkin


    @Strawberry Milkshake

    Can't take credit. ..auto correct


  • #6913
    Necro
    Moderators, Business & Finance Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Sports Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 58,128 Mod ✭✭✭✭Necro


    That 'twist' was all a bit meh. Obvious as hell when the remaining HMs were to choose that Sam would be gone. Not that it matters much. The clique lives on guys! Right to the end...
    #Clique4Life

    Moderator: Current Affairs/IMHO, Soccer, Pro Wrestling, State Benefits



  • #6914
    dark crystal
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,962 ✭✭✭✭dark crystal


    callaway92 wrote: »
    No they won't. Harry was the person evicted by the public vote, therefore, she was the winning bet. All others were losers. Don't understand how you could think otherwise really.

    I'm not a betting person, so was just asking a simple question. Sorry.


  • #6915
    Wicklow Brave
    Closed Accounts Posts: 492 ✭✭Wicklow Brave


    callaway92 wrote: »
    No they won't. Harry was the person evicted by the public vote, therefore, she was the winning bet. All others were losers. Don't understand how you could think otherwise really.

    Nope on oddschecker they had if two are evicted it's odds halved.


  • #6916
    Old Perry
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,511 ✭✭✭Old Perry


    That was a good timebomb but the actual nomination was a bit shoehorned. either sam was was gone. the others were never going for chloe.


  • #6917
    callaway92
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,245 ✭✭✭✭callaway92


    Wicklow Brave wrote: »
    No odds will just be halved. Sam was 12/1 I think so they'll pay out at 6/1.

    Where do you get this farcical info from?


  • #6918
    Uncle Ben
    Closed Accounts Posts: 1,843 ✭✭✭Uncle Ben


    duffman13 wrote: »
    No they only pay on the next eviction!

    Danny has 100% showed his true colours, Joel said he wasn't getting involved, didn't hear a word from Nick or Cristian and then that clown hops in and says we have to get someone out. What would big brother do if they refused?

    Mercenary.


  • #6919
    [Deleted User]
    Posts: 13,839 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    callaway92 wrote: »
    No they won't. Harry was the person evicted by the public vote, therefore, she was the winning bet. All others were losers. Don't understand how you could think otherwise really.

    Errr if you ain't a gambler how would they know? And bookies make their own rules up depending on their losses!


  • #6920
    duffman13
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 9,274 ✭✭✭duffman13


    Wicklow Brave wrote: »
    No odds will just be halved. Sam was 12/1 I think so they'll pay out at 6/1.

    Not the case, most of the bookies have it as next to be evicted which mean only Harri will be paid out

    Edit: Seen your comment on oddschecker, it's only a comparison site, in my experience of most of the big bookies only pay out on next to be eliminated. May be some that will pay on both


  • #6921
    callaway92
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,245 ✭✭✭✭callaway92


    Wicklow Brave wrote: »
    Nope on oddschecker they had if two are evicted it's odds halved.

    They weren't both evicted by the public...Jesus


  • Advertisement
  • #6922
    Kolido
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,461 ✭✭✭✭Kolido


    Old Perry wrote: »
    That was a good timebomb but the actual nomination was a bit shoehorned. either sam was was gone. the others were never going for chloe.

    Would have been more interesting if Chloe had 50k and Jack and Sam had a fiver each.


  • #6923
    Wicklow Brave
    Closed Accounts Posts: 492 ✭✭Wicklow Brave


    callaway92 wrote: »
    Where do you get this farcical info from?

    Oddschecker. Depends on the firm but most were doing that.


  • #6924
    callaway92
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,245 ✭✭✭✭callaway92


    Strawberry Milkshake wrote: »
    Errr if you ain't a gambler how would they know? And bookies make their own rules up depending on their losses!

    :rolleyes:


  • #6925
    callaway92
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,245 ✭✭✭✭callaway92


    Wicklow Brave wrote: »
    Oddschecker. Depends on the firm but most were doing that.

    See post #6921


  • #6926
    dark crystal
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,962 ✭✭✭✭dark crystal


    callaway92 wrote: »
    They weren't both evicted by the public...Jesus
    callaway92 wrote: »
    :rolleyes:

    You don't have to get narky about it, it was just a simple question. Jeez!


  • #6927
    jluv
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 3,964 ✭✭✭jluv


    Can you believe I'm totally gutted that the hypocrite is still there;)
    God help them cos she'll think she is queen of the house now..
    As for Harri and Sam..at least they can have a good time tonight:D


  • #6928
    callaway92
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,245 ✭✭✭✭callaway92


    dark crystal wrote: »
    You don't have to get narky about it, it was just a simple question. Jeez!

    No, you're fine. It's Wicklow Brave with his frustratingly incorrect info.


  • #6929
    Wicklow Brave
    Closed Accounts Posts: 492 ✭✭Wicklow Brave


    callaway92 wrote: »
    They weren't both evicted by the public...Jesus

    But they were both evicted? It didn't specify it had to be by the public.


  • #6930
    duffman13
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 9,274 ✭✭✭duffman13


    This clown Emma is awful, if she doesn't like a housemate she doesn't hide it well. Thoroughly unprofessional, Rylan would be much better than her. Never thought I'd say that


  • Advertisement
  • #6931
    Old Perry
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,511 ✭✭✭Old Perry


    Wicklow Brave wrote: »
    But they were both evicted? It didn't specify it had to be by the public.

    yeah public vote is besides the point. bookies never mention or would have access to this info. it stated more often then not that bets are placed on first gone in the event of two evictions.


Advertisement