Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Sean O'Rourke Today Show

18687899192230

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,750 ✭✭✭touts


    BarryD wrote: »
    Yep, they're a soft and easy target.

    Why doesn't SOR get our Minister for Finance or Taoiseach in and try his luck?

    He has a fair few FG ministers heads sticking on spikes outside the gates of RTE. He doesn't care which party the incompetent minister comes from.


  • Posts: 17,847 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    touts wrote: »
    Joan Burton is getting her ass kicked by Sean. Destroyed her on Greece, Denis O'Brien and now on single mothers. She's fuming. Grab the popcorn and tune in.

    We must have been listening to different interviews. He was shouting her down and not letting her explain how single parents can help themselves out of a rut. When single parents were getting double payments to do CE schemes, they were well able to get their children minded. Now that double payment is dropped, they don't want to know!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,750 ✭✭✭touts


    We must have been listening to different interviews. He was shouting her down and not letting her explain how single parents can help themselves out of a rut. When single parents were getting double payments to do CE schemes, they were well able to get their children minded. Now that double payment is dropped, they don't want to know!

    You must have been reading the talking points Labour HQ sent her in with because you definitely heard a very different interview. He had to interrupt her several times to get her to answer the question he asked not the one she wished he had asked. She was waffling on and on and on and not saying anything. She wasn't explaining anything and that had nothing to do with Sean interrupting. I thought it was a great performance by Sean not willing to take the usual bland rubbish she, and other ministers, trot out.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,917 ✭✭✭BarryD


    touts wrote: »
    He has a fair few FG ministers heads sticking on spikes outside the gates of RTE. He doesn't care which party the incompetent minister comes from.

    Which FG ministers?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,750 ✭✭✭touts


    BarryD wrote: »
    Which FG ministers?

    Michael Noonan completely lost his temper with him a few weeks ago and came away from it with a PR disaster.

    Big Phil was filleted on Irish water and had to skulk off to Europe.

    I recall Richard Bruton getting a hammering in the early days.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,917 ✭✭✭BarryD


    touts wrote: »
    Michael Noonan completely lost his temper with him a few weeks ago and came away from it with a PR disaster.

    Big Phil was filleted on Irish water and had to skulk off to Europe.

    I recall Richard Bruton getting a hammering in the early days.

    Well I missed Noonan so.

    But Phil Hogan and Irish Water was another very soft and easy target (maybe justifiably). Hard to miss that one!! That'd be a 'tabloid interview'.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,750 ✭✭✭touts


    BarryD wrote: »
    Well I missed Noonan so.

    But Phil Hogan and Irish Water was another very soft and easy target (maybe justifiably). Hard to miss that one!! That'd be a 'tabloid interview'.

    Ah Get off the stage! Get off the Stage!

    http://www.thejournal.ie/noonan-rte-siteserv-2074754-Apr2015/

    And Hogan's wasn't a "tabloid interview". As things have turned out and the deals he oversaw have become murkier and murkier as they get investigated further it turns out he got off lightly.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,917 ✭✭✭BarryD


    touts wrote: »
    And Hogan's wasn't a "tabloid interview". As things have turned out and the deals he oversaw have become murkier and murkier as they get investigated further it turns out he got off lightly.

    Anything, anything to do with Irish Water has been 'tabloid interview' status with the media for quite a while. The logic of restructuring water services in the country is completely lost, they're just a convenient horse to flog.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 32,372 ✭✭✭✭HeidiHeidi


    Feck's sake, I escaped to the relative calm of Pat Kenny, and now she's on there :mad:

    Her voice is back down to a normal pitch though. For now.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,351 ✭✭✭✭Harry Angstrom


    touts wrote: »
    Joan Burton is getting her ass kicked by Sean. Destroyed her on Greece, Denis O'Brien and now on single mothers. She's fuming. Grab the popcorn and tune in.

    She's on now with Pat Kenny. I doubt he'll mention Denis.


  • Advertisement
  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 7,771 ✭✭✭michael999999


    She's on now with Pat Kenny. I doubt he'll mention Denis.

    Not when one of them hopes to be employed by him in the future like Biffo, and the other one wants to stay in he's employment!

    #redacted


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,750 ✭✭✭touts


    BarryD wrote: »
    Anything, anything to do with Irish Water has been 'tabloid interview' status with the media for quite a while. The logic of restructuring water services in the country is completely lost, they're just a convenient horse to flog.

    I'm pretty sure Minister Lowry also used the tabloid journalism and blocking progress arguments to dismiss some journalists questions about the whole murky relationships involved in the flogging off of national assets during the last FG led government. What Sean did today, and does consistently, is refuse to accept the meaningless dribble government ministers come out and which is accepted by the majority of journalists who are in fact little more than stable mates of the same ministers they are interviewing.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,224 ✭✭✭alaimacerc


    Roger_007 wrote: »
    Labour got less than 20% of the vote in the last election and yet they get lambasted for not delivering everything they promised. If most of the electorate wanted what Labour were promising, then most of the electorate would have voted for them..............but they didn't.

    Exactly.

    I watched that Independents' Day thing last night, with jokers like Ogle claiming that people had been "radicalised" by water charges. O RLY? Is that more people voting "left"? Or just the existing "left" being angry about it? (Skating over the elements of opposition to IW that clearly aren't in any sense "left" at all. Freeman, DDI, Lucinda Creighton... Ronon bleedin' Mullen, would you believe it...)

    I think, sadly, what you'll find it that much the same people that voted for Labour to have a sadly small influence in the present government will vote for a variety of other parties... in order to have no influence at all over the next one.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,936 ✭✭✭✭Brendan Bendar


    alaimacerc wrote: »
    Exactly.

    I watched that Independents' Day thing last night, with jokers like Ogle claiming that people had been "radicalised" by water charges. O RLY? Is that more people voting "left"? Or just the existing "left" being angry about it? (Skating over the elements of opposition to IW that clearly aren't in any sense "left" at all. Freeman, DDI, Lucinda Creighton... Ronon bleedin' Mullen, would you believe it...)

    I think, sadly, what you'll find it that much the same people that voted for Labour to have a sadly small influence in the present government will vote for a variety of other parties... in order to have no influence at all over the next one.

    Frankly , I thought you had a bit more sense than to watch crud like that.
    No offence , but anyone who thinks Independents are anything more than a bunch of self-serving mē fēiners is challenged.

    Now I'm sure you just looked for info purposes and you know the score,but sadly there are people out there who support these gloamers.


  • Administrators, Entertainment Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 18,830 Admin ✭✭✭✭✭hullaballoo


    Moderator: can we move the discussion back on topic, please


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,051 ✭✭✭✭Odyssey 2005


    Love the way this dope from the water protest yesterday has the " only accurate account" of what went on yesterday :)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,160 ✭✭✭Callan57


    This clown seems to be channelling Charlie McCreevey - I know nothing, I saw nothing


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,051 ✭✭✭✭Odyssey 2005


    He's making me WANT TO PAY my water bill.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,750 ✭✭✭touts


    Callan57 wrote: »
    This clown seems to be channelling Charlie McCreevey - I know nothing, I saw nothing

    They are a right pair of muppets. They seem to have been at completely different protests. You started it by drawing batons. No you started it by throwing traffic cones. Scarily both of these are actually elected representatives.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 74,495 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    touts wrote: »
    They are a right pair of muppets. They seem to have been at completely different protests. You started it by drawing batons. No you started it by throwing traffic cones. Scarily both of these are actually elected representatives.

    One story is accurate, though.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,051 ✭✭✭✭Odyssey 2005


    I'm afraid there's nothing forcing them to stay here.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,160 ✭✭✭Callan57


    Apparently the definition of "democracy" changes to suit the agenda of Ruth Coppinger et al


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,708 ✭✭✭serfboard


    Callan57 wrote: »
    Apparently the definition of "democracy" changes to suit the agenda of Ruth Coppinger et al
    Could you please elaborate for those who didn't hear it, or who might want to podcast it?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,917 ✭✭✭BarryD


    Callan57 wrote: »
    Apparently the definition of "democracy" changes to suit the agenda of Ruth Coppinger et al

    Indeed and according as to who has to pay. Bye, bye our €350 million loan to Greece but sure who gives a feck about the democratic wishes of the Irish taxpayer. Maybe we should just double the water charges to make up the loss?? ;)


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 907 ✭✭✭foxtrot101


    BarryD wrote: »
    Indeed and according as to who has to pay. Bye, bye our €350 million loan to Greece but sure who gives a feck about the democratic wishes of the Irish taxpayer. Maybe we should just double the water charges to make up the loss?? ;)

    The Greek debt levels are unsustainable. So the only chance of getting some of that 350 million euro back is if Greece gets a debt write-down. If Greece defaults we'll get nothing.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 7,771 ✭✭✭michael999999


    BarryD wrote: »
    Indeed and according as to who has to pay. Bye, bye our €350 million loan to Greece but sure who gives a feck about the democratic wishes of the Irish taxpayer. Maybe we should just double the water charges to make up the loss?? ;)

    Or ask Fine Gael sugar daddy Denis o Brien to pay back the 350 million debt that was written off for him!

    But that's not going to happen is it?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,917 ✭✭✭BarryD


    foxtrot101 wrote: »
    The Greek debt levels are unsustainable. So the only chance of getting some of that 350 million euro back is if Greece gets a debt write-down. If Greece defaults we'll get nothing.

    Ah but which countries should take the hit in this write down, isn't that what I meant re Ruth Coppinger above? Everyone says write off the Greek debt but nobody really wants to be the one to do it. And of course, if it were to happen, there'd be a queue rapidly forming.

    I suppose we could be martyrs and just write of the €350 million we lent them. As I say, stick a bit of extra tax on here and there and cut our social welfare payments a bit??? That'd do the job nicely, but of course you'd soon have a chorus of accusations of austerity and stealth cuts etc. and from the very people who advocate debt write off.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 907 ✭✭✭foxtrot101


    BarryD wrote: »
    Ah but which countries should take the hit in this write down, isn't that what I meant re Ruth Coppinger above? Everyone says write off the Greek debt but nobody really wants to be the one to do it. And of course, if it were to happen, there'd be a queue rapidly forming.

    It would most likely be an x percent write-down across the board. "The very people who advocate debt write off"... now includes the IMF.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,305 ✭✭✭Bits_n_Bobs


    Pat Rabbitte obviously feels the people have sucked up enough austerity for him to ride into the sunset with his big fat pension...


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,681 ✭✭✭✭Loafing Oaf


    Remember Aine Lawlor told David Norris he wasn't running for election in ancient Greece? Well going by this interview, someone is going to have to tell a government rep in the run-up to the next election that they're not standing in modern Greece...


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement