Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

DART Underground planning due to lapse, but lots of Airport Luas talk?

1246725

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,785 ✭✭✭jd


    Aard wrote: »
    Not the Northern line.
    If DU is built, wouldn't line at SSG serve current Northern line?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,049 ✭✭✭thomasj


    jd wrote: »
    If DU is built, wouldn't line at SSG serve current Northern line?

    Yes based on the plans for the interconnector the northern line would have operated to hazelhatch via SSG


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,512 ✭✭✭strassenwo!f


    thomasj wrote: »
    Yes based on the plans for the interconnector the northern line would have operated to hazelhatch via SSG

    Yes, based on the plans for the interconnector, the northern line will operate to Hazelhatch via St. Stephen's Green.

    To be strictly correct.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,510 ✭✭✭✭expectationlost


    monument wrote: »
    Dart Underground planning approval / railway order due to lapse in September if the Government does not make the final call then. But this week and last week there's articles of Luas link to Dublin Airport being funded under the Aer Lingus windfall.

    This seems like a big mistake given that the Dart project is ready to go and has one of the best cost benefit ratio around and would have far-reaching benefits.

    This is all when a good amount of Dublin-based TDs are ministers.

    Are we going around and around and around? Or is it just local TDs pushing local projects?



    http://www.northcountyleader.ie/2015/06/16/local-reps-differ-over-aer-lingus-loot/

    when I read about this last week I thought at first that the airport link wouldn't qualify but maybe it does reading this more recent description

    https://www.kildarestreet.com/wrans/?id=2015-06-23a.16&s=%22connectivity+fund%22#g18.r

    connectivity fund
    Given that the proceeds came from the sale of the State's stake in a transport asset, the fund will be dedicated to enhancing connectivity both within and for the State. It will allow for much needed investment in a range of commercially viable connectivity projects, both domestic and international. The projects will generate economic impact and competitiveness benefits for Ireland through enhancing our regional connectivity, improving attractiveness and competitiveness in the tourism sector, and promoting investment and enhanced opportunities for growth. For the purposes of the Fund, 'connectivity' will be broadly defined. Therefore, connectivity will be taken to include traditional transport type projects, such as ports and airports, and access to such assets. However, it will also take a wider definition of connectivity to include, for example, data connectivity (including broadband, fibre optic cables, interconnectors, etc) and energy connectivity (including energy inter-connectors and other related projects).

    https://www.kildarestreet.com/wrans/?id=2015-06-23a.16&s=%22connectivity+fund%22#g18.r


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,769 ✭✭✭✭Muahahaha


    Its insane to think that Luas could be an option to the airport given how over capacity the green line already is. The demand for it would be just too much from day one and then the politicians will pretend for years that its just a popular service before admitting defeat and going ahead with an airport dedicated underground in the end.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,567 ✭✭✭✭Idbatterim


    Its insane to think that Luas could be an option to the airport given how over capacity the green line already is. The demand for it would be just too much from day one and then the politicians will pretend for years that its just a popular service before admitting defeat and going ahead with an airport dedicated underground in the end.
    Exactly, the "but how were we to know" excuses, simply dont wash anymore!

    I had a German colleague who lived here and still does for over twenty years, her logic on it was, we simply couldnt be that stupid when it came to planning, there was simply far more money in getting it wrong than right...

    My German dad could never understand how a country with about the population of Berlin a bit over a decade back. Had such problems in running itself and the poor infrastructure... Yet here we still are!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,702 ✭✭✭✭BoatMad


    Idbatterim wrote: »
    Exactly, the "but how were we to know" excuses, simply dont wash anymore!

    I had a German colleague who divided here and still does for over twenty years, her logic on it was, we simply couldnt be that stupid when it came to planning, there was simply far more money in getting it wrong than right...

    My German dad could never understand how a country with about the population of Berlin a bit over a decade back. Had suck problems in running itself and the poor infrastructure... Yet here we still are!

    Yes , had we been like the Germans , we'd have great roads , but the two destructions of Europe we would have caused along the way as well as the abortion that is the Euro , might have been a high price to pay !!!!

    Ps I've driven most German autobahns, many till recently were utterly clapped out

    Ireland does a reasonable job in general , given the constraints ( or have you not driven our motorways at all


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,702 ✭✭✭✭BoatMad


    Muahahaha wrote: »
    Its insane to think that Luas could be an option to the airport given how over capacity the green line already is. The demand for it would be just too much from day one and then the politicians will pretend for years that its just a popular service before admitting defeat and going ahead with an airport dedicated underground in the end.
    If LUAS is built and runs at or near capacity it means the project was justified.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,785 ✭✭✭jd


    BoatMad wrote: »
    If LUAS is built and runs at or near capacity it means the project was justified.
    If it does that from day one, given that Dublin and Airport traffic are projected to grow, it means the "solution" was under-speced.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,647 ✭✭✭✭loyatemu


    what's current public transport capacity to/from the airport? Anytime I see the Aircoach it does not look packed.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 980 ✭✭✭stevedublin


    loyatemu wrote: »
    what's current public transport capacity to/from the airport? Anytime I see the Aircoach it does not look packed.

    Aircoach is quite expensive, it also competes with a Dublin bus express service (747, I think). Also the 41 routes go to city centre. Do taxis qualify as public transport? lots of them to/from airport.
    Any metro/luas to the airport would almost certainly be cheaper/more frequent than the Aircoach and would also serve Swords and other parts of north Dublin


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,567 ✭✭✭✭Idbatterim


    Aircoach is quite expensive, it also competes with a Dublin bus express service (747, I think). Also the 41 routes go to city centre. Do taxis qualify as public transport? lots of them to/from airport.
    Any metro/luas to the airport would almost certainly be cheaper/more frequent than the Aircoach and would also serve Swords and other parts of north Dublin
    I have stopped using aircoach... too many bottlenecks in town for my liking and the fact they dont have RTPI...
    Dublin bus express service (747, I think)

    yeah the 747 goes from heuston station to the airport via the port tunnel. Takes out god knows how many lights between O'Connell street and airport. I had the gf take it the other day and also drove to the airport via it the other day...
    Ireland does a reasonable job in general , given the constraints ( or have you not driven our motorways at all
    yes I have and I use them frequently... The roads are now in general of a very good standard and the motorway network is impressive. Rail has been starved of funding for too long. With the motorway network now as good as complete, I HOPE that rail will start getting adequate funding. Because some of the rail schemes I see held up for pocket change amounts is insane, you then read about a road scheme getting hundreds of millions in funding as if its nothing... Dublins roads are not up to the insane volumes of traffic they handle, end of story.

    Adequate rail infrastructure is needed and has been pointed out, if it goes through green or brownfield sites, then great, they can be put up at high densities that promote sustainable living...
    If it does that from day one, given that Dublin and Airport traffic are projected to grow, it means the "solution" was under-speced.
    does anyone think in 5 years that if we were discussing this, that Luas would be an option? If no, why the hell is it being put forward when the bloody thing wont even be built in 5 years? Build something that will be able to take serious numbers of people whom we can house within a reasonable distance of the new line... Its mainly to the north and west that Dublin can expand...
    If it does that from day one, given that Dublin and Airport traffic are projected to grow, it means the "solution" was under-speced.
    another government commissioned report was carried out was it around 05-06 saying Luas wouldnt be up to the job, to put it simply. Yet on the one hand we have out current government ministers banging on about our fantastic growth, claiming lessons have been learned. Yet this hatchet Luas job is being put forward, probably as they will be seen to do something and its "cheap" compared to some of the alternatives. Well price is what you pay and value is what you get. Do they think the hundreds of millions just vanishes when they commit to a construction project, or does a huge amount not go back to the exchequer? including corporation tax, employment taxes, vat on materials and all of the spin off jobs and a myriad of other areas?

    Isnt that what Burton kept raising, that with sacred welfare cash cow, that money flows through the economy and supports / creates jobs?

    A real pity that work had not commenced on MN and DU with contracts signed before the poo hit the fan. Billions wasted on other areas IMO, that could have been far better spent...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,702 ✭✭✭✭BoatMad


    Heavy surface rail investment is a waste of money. It's an outdated restricted capacity system

    Ireland is restricted now in its current and capital deficits it can run , hence increased borrowing requires continued growth. This is a very unfortunate issue and a reason the euro is doomed. Ireland should be borrowing for infrastructure like crazy as QE means money is cheap and available, but it cannot

    So it may be a cheap ( er ) LUAS solution rather then none at all,

    Personally I'm comfortable with that.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,844 ✭✭✭Banjoxed


    BoatMad wrote: »
    Heavy surface rail investment is a waste of money. It's an outdated restricted capacity system

    Ireland is restricted now in its current and capital deficits it can run , hence increased borrowing requires continued growth. This is a very unfortunate issue and a reason the euro is doomed. Ireland should be borrowing for infrastructure like crazy as QE means money is cheap and available, but it cannot

    So it may be a cheap ( er ) LUAS solution rather then none at all,

    Personally I'm comfortable with that.

    Mercs for me, Buses for the Proles. Yay! That's been a standard tune since the seventies. http://dublinobserver.com/2011/03/white-elephant-on-tracks/


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 125 ✭✭hardy_buck


    BoatMad wrote: »
    Heavy surface rail investment is a waste of money. It's an outdated restricted capacity system

    Ireland is restricted now in its current and capital deficits it can run , hence increased borrowing requires continued growth. This is a very unfortunate issue and a reason the euro is doomed. Ireland should be borrowing for infrastructure like crazy as QE means money is cheap and available, but it cannot

    So it may be a cheap ( er ) LUAS solution rather then none at all,

    Personally I'm comfortable with that.

    What exactly do you mean by restricted capacity system? If you're suggesting that heavy rail has a lesser capacity than a LUAS then I'm sorry but thats wrong.

    Regarding the second point, I would say that Ireland has a lot more wiggle room, especially considering the sh1tshow that is this Greek situation. We would have a lot more negotiating power considering we are the new posterchild for EU fiscal policy.

    I'm pretty sure it has been concluded in a number of other threads that this issue isn't financial but political.

    Personally, I'm not comfortable with a LUAS as it means our transport strategy has regressed.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,032 ✭✭✭✭cgcsb


    Idbatterim wrote: »
    yes I have and I use them frequently... The roads are now in general of a very good standard and the motorway network is impressive. Rail has been starved of funding for too long. With the motorway network now as good as complete, I HOPE that rail will start getting adequate funding. Because some of the rail schemes I see held up for pocket change amounts is insane, you then read about a road scheme getting hundreds of millions in funding as if its nothing... Dublins roads are not up to the insane volumes of traffic they handle, end of story.

    We're currently building a motorway between the Village Gort and town of Tuam County Galway, populations 2,700 and 8,200 respectively so that they can use it as a 'commuter motorway'(yes they are still a thing even after the N3 Dublin-Navan disaster) to Galway City, pop. 75,000

    The motorway will cost over €550 million and traffic levels will be about 10,000 cars per day(an extrodinarily optimistic projection by the NRA given the population served and the declining population in the area) on a road designed for 50,000 cars per day. Nobody bats an eyelid at this.

    Compare that to the proposed spend on a luas to the airport, over capacity from day 1. And there'll STILL be shrills screaming about Dublin getting everything.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,844 ✭✭✭Banjoxed


    hardy_buck wrote: »
    What exactly do you mean by restricted capacity system? If you're suggesting that heavy rail has a lesser capacity than a LUAS then I'm sorry but thats wrong.

    Regarding the second point, I would say that Ireland has a lot more wiggle room, especially considering the sh1tshow that is this Greek situation. We would have a lot more negotiating power considering we are the new posterchild for EU fiscal policy.

    I'm pretty sure it has been concluded in a number of other threads that this issue isn't financial but political.

    Personally, I'm not comfortable with a LUAS as it means our transport strategy has regressed.

    Years ago, while the Green Line was struggling to conclusion and all sorts of idiots were looking for Berlin Walls at the back of their naice houses, it was suggested to me that TBTB preferred road to rails because the footprint was far wider and could be moved to follow the money more efficiently.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,032 ✭✭✭✭cgcsb


    BoatMad wrote: »
    Heavy surface rail investment is a waste of money. It's an outdated restricted capacity system

    Wha'?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,702 ✭✭✭✭BoatMad


    hardy_buck wrote: »
    What exactly do you mean by restricted capacity system? If you're suggesting that heavy rail has a lesser capacity than a LUAS then I'm sorry but thats wrong.

    Regarding the second point, I would say that Ireland has a lot more wiggle room, especially considering the sh1tshow that is this Greek situation. We would have a lot more negotiating power considering we are the new posterchild for EU fiscal policy.

    I'm pretty sure it has been concluded in a number of other threads that this issue isn't financial but political.

    Personally, I'm not comfortable with a LUAS as it means our transport strategy has regressed.


    The current heavy rail network , is

    (a) inside greater dublin, capacity and space constrained , with low speed commuter running , limited approaches to Connolly and the loop line etc , none of which are easily or cheaply fixed for the given advantages

    (b) outside Dublin, difficult to justify investment, poor average line speeds , and bad management


    LUAS has proven to be popular and successful, one naturally does more of successful things

    increasing LUAS can be grade separated , allowing longer configurations and higher running speeds ( expresses etc )


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,533 ✭✭✭✭end of the road


    the only thing stopping investment in the heavy rail network is politics

    I'm very highly educated. I know words, i have the best words, nobody has better words then me.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,032 ✭✭✭✭cgcsb


    BoatMad wrote: »
    LUAS has proven to be popular and successful, one naturally does more of successful things

    The Luas is over capacity at the moment, becuase it was under speced
    BoatMad wrote: »
    increasing LUAS can be grade separated , allowing longer configurations and higher running speeds ( expresses etc )

    Metro North is a grade separated luas


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,702 ✭✭✭✭BoatMad


    cgcsb wrote: »


    Metro North is a grade separated luas

    indeed but built to heavy rail standards I understand

    mind you I find it bizarre we have as a country introduced two rail gauges , when most two gauge countries are tearing up theirs


  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 23,698 Mod ✭✭✭✭bk


    BoatMad wrote: »
    indeed but built to heavy rail standards I understand

    No that isn't correct at all!

    Metro North was and is very much light rail based like Luas.

    It was to use the same 1,435 mm track gauge as Luas, with the same trams, with the same width, just 90 meters long rather then max 52 meters of Luas.

    Also it was designed by the RPA, just like the Luas.

    The only differences between MN and Luas are:

    - 90 meters long versus 52 meters
    - Lots of underground running
    - Fully segregated running.

    Metro North really is just Luas underground, a higher spec and capacity version of Luas.

    Definitely not heavy rail.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,032 ✭✭✭✭cgcsb


    BoatMad wrote: »
    indeed but built to heavy rail standards I understand

    Nope, to light rail standards
    BoatMad wrote: »
    mind you I find it bizarre we have as a country introduced two rail gauges , when most two gauge countries are tearing up theirs
    Not true, take Spain as an example 3 different gauges. It wouldn't really be practical to have Irish Gauge on street trams. The trams have to be made in factories in other countries, so it's cheaper to order them in standard gauge than having them built to Irish gauge on a bespoke basis.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 727 ✭✭✭Lockheed


    To be honest, i see LOADS of airport-buses going from all over ireland to the airport, so the Luas-to-airport is pointless in a way as you can get on a bus from Dublin city. Dart Underground however could reinvent the way you commute around Dublin, so I do not see why the government are even thinking of putting the Airport luas link


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,032 ✭✭✭✭cgcsb


    BoatMad wrote: »

    actually the two [Luas]lines are connected by engineering tracks, this could be upgraded in future http://www.irrs.ie/Journal%20177/luas_map_2012.pdf

    personally a thing few would want to interchange with the Maynooth line, most would be heading for the major terminus is they want access to heavy rail

    BoatMad in fairness you probably should take a bit of time to at least read up about Dublin. Even those with only a passing knowledge of the place will tell you that the green line terminates at Stephen's Green and the amount of people commuting into town along the N3/Maynooth line corridor is ferocious of a morning.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,032 ✭✭✭✭cgcsb


    Lockheed wrote: »
    To be honest, i see LOADS of airport-buses going from all over ireland to the airport, so the Luas-to-airport is pointless in a way as you can get on a bus from Dublin city.

    I don't get your point, it'd be pretty silly to only build rail to areas where there is no bus services for the simple reason that they have no bus service. The amount of buses going to dublin airport is a testiment to it's popularity as a destination. Luas on an indirect route is an insufficient solution to North Dublin's needs.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,844 ✭✭✭Banjoxed


    cgcsb wrote: »
    BoatMad in fairness you probably should take a bit of time to at least read up about Dublin. Even those with only a passing knowledge of the place will tell you that the green line terminates at Stephen's Green and the amount of people commuting into town along the N3/Maynooth line corridor is ferocious of a morning.

    Next thing you know someone will assert with complete certainty that the Green Line was built to 5'3" and the Red Line to 4'8.5" :rolleyes


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 952 ✭✭✭hytrogen


    This whole fiasco never would have transpired had we kept our rail network instead of opting for extreme nationalist ideals & abolishing anything that resembled British after we got independence in the 30s.
    Back to the present, simple solution until they finally dig the trench or tunnel is: link the airport via Swords to Malahide along the waterfront & continue the dart via Croke park & canal onto Heuston and Dun Laoghaire / Greystones, set up a couple more stops along the Royal canal & we have a reasonable patch up job.
    Then again trying to get CIE to do anything positively productive is like drawing blood from a stone


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,702 ✭✭✭✭BoatMad


    cgcsb wrote: »
    BoatMad in fairness you probably should take a bit of time to at least read up about Dublin. Even those with only a passing knowledge of the place will tell you that the green line terminates at Stephen's Green and the amount of people commuting into town along the N3/Maynooth line corridor is ferocious of a morning.

    i dont understand your comments

    in effect luas cross city is an extension of the green line , there as planed to be engineering connection to the red line,

    a luas interchanging with the maynooth line is in fact a duplication , as both are heading to the centre, traffic in other directions is likely to be small.


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement