Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Angelus Bells and the 6.01

1356789

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,544 ✭✭✭Samaris


    murpho999 wrote: »
    I never get this viewpoint. Sometimes things are wrong and it has to change.

    There was a time that slavery was viewed by the majority as correct and doing no harm.

    In Ireland, corporal punishment in school was viewed as normal and no harm etc.
    Same applies to not having divorce, contraception etc.

    On all these issues, society moves on and forms different opinions to their ancestors, as was recently shown in the marriage referendum. (Which the organisation behind the Angelus was against)

    The country should officially be leaving behind it's Catholic ethos and it should not be promoted/broadcast by the state broadcaster. If people choose to follow a religion and it's practices then that's their own private decision.

    I absolutely don't agree with "tradition" being used to not change things that are harmful to others. And someone did make a very good point up the thread that the Angelus in how its shown is actually contravening RTE's own mandate as a national network, and the Constitution.

    My point up there was that if all things are equal, tradition is not the worst reason to do something when it harms no-one. But I've definitely taken on board some of the concrete arguments against :D


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 803 ✭✭✭Rough Sleeper


    faceman wrote: »
    Genuine question. Why is it considered overly religious?
    They said overtly, as in plainly or obviously, not overly.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,399 ✭✭✭Daith


    Samaris wrote: »
    and I don't see that one minute of bonging is really that traumatic to anyone.

    I don't see the harm in letting two men marry but to the Catholic Church our referendum was a "defeat for humanity". I don't particularly want to reflect on their nonsense before I watch the news tbh.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,379 ✭✭✭donegaLroad


    I think RTE should give the angelus the chop, not because it might offend someone of another religion, but because it would be a step in the right direction in widening the gap between church and state.

    That said, I would not like to see political correctness gone mad here as in North America, where everyone says 'happy holidays' at Christmas in case you offend non christians.. I heard recently that it is getting to a stage where you can't even say 'christmas tree'.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 10,069 ✭✭✭✭Dan_Solo


    Most of the arguments for keeping the Angelus seem boil down to "what harm is it doing". Well it's not like building pyramids here. You just don't show it and make the news a minute longer. Is that so difficult or do we not have one more minute's worth of news worth showing?


  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 26,920 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Tbh the Muslim call to prayer is a lot more musical and pleasant sounding than fuppin bells.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,536 ✭✭✭Kev W


    For an organisation that frowns on homosexuality as much as the church does they do seem awfully interested in calling attention to their big dongs.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,436 ✭✭✭c_man


    Are you genuinely unaware of what the angelus is, or are you trying to claim it's not religious? :confused:

    Yes, plenty of times on these threads Catholics have come in and admonish all for claiming that it's religious. They'll tell you it's not religious, merely a time of reflection. However it's very important that this period of reflection coincides with the times for the Catholic Call to Prayer, and it should have the traditional Catholic bell tolling allowing for timing to recite the Angleus. And the tv bits should feature Catholics doing their stuff.

    Apart from all that, yes it's not religious :P


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,096 ✭✭✭conorhal


    This is such a tedious circular argument. It's 18 bongs over 60 seconds. Personally I couldn't give a toss, it lets me catch the BBC news headlines before turning over to RTE.
    What was it the progressive liberals used to say to the fuddy old 'Mary Whitehouse Brigade' who were never done campaigning against 'obsenity' on the telly?
    If you don't like what you see you have the right to change the channel.
    Perhaps they should take their own advice.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 10,069 ✭✭✭✭Dan_Solo


    conorhal wrote: »
    If you don't like what you see you have the right to change the channel.
    Perhaps they should take their own advice.
    But I don't have the right not to pay for this religious PR in the case of the Angelus.
    Spot the difference?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,691 ✭✭✭failinis


    It should be replaced with Linda Martin doing Get Lucky

    How about Get Lucky Angelus?:D



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,399 ✭✭✭Daith


    conorhal wrote: »
    This is such a tedious circular argument. It's 18 bongs over 60 seconds. Personally I couldn't give a toss, it lets me catch the BBC news headlines before turning over to RTE.

    Well clearly you are giving a toss because you're choosing to turn over to the BBC instead of watching it.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,306 ✭✭✭✭Drumpot


    Daith wrote: »
    I don't see the harm in letting two men marry but to the Catholic Church our referendum was a "defeat for humanity". I don't particularly want to reflect on their nonsense before I watch the news tbh.

    I don't disagree with your sentiments. However, part of the Angeles is about reflection and pause. In modern society this is an extremely healthy but lacking trait that people ignore.

    There are many things wrong with the Catholic church but I don't think it means throwing out every single thing it preaches. Why does the Angeles have to be about the Catholic Church? Can't it just be about people taking a minute to pause and reflect on their day?

    i think a lot of the teachings of the church, including the stories about people being kind to people , are just positive messages to try and encourage harmony.

    Yes, there is a lot of negative things associated with religion but that doesn't mean that everything that has a semblance of some religion should be thrown out just because it has a connection to a religion.

    there is a way to separate the negative actions of individuals within the church with good , positive parts of the church that we should maintain as a society.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,536 ✭✭✭Kev W


    Drumpot wrote: »

    there is a way to separate the negative actions of individuals within the church with good , positive parts of the church that we should maintain as a society.

    There is, it's called secular humanism.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 1,951 ✭✭✭frostyjacks


    "The bells! The bells!"

    Seriously, is this really a burning issue for some people? I suppose we should ban the shamrock as well, given it's Christian connotations.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,399 ✭✭✭Daith


    Drumpot wrote: »
    I don't disagree with your sentiments. However, part of the Angeles is about reflection and pause. In modern society this is an extremely healthy but lacking trait that people ignore.

    You can have a minute of pause and reflection without the hypocrisy that the Catholic Church brings into it.
    Drumpot wrote: »
    there is a way to separate the negative actions of individuals within the church with good , positive parts of the church that we should maintain as a society.

    And that traditionally meant turning a blind eye as events over the last week have shown


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,536 ✭✭✭Kev W


    "The bells! The bells!"

    Seriously, is this really a burning issue for some people? I suppose we should ban the shamrock as well, given it's Christian connotations.

    It's not the shamrock's fault it got used that way. Besides most people I imagine think of it as a symbol of Ireland, separate from it's use as a symbol of the Trinity.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,845 ✭✭✭mailforkev


    It's the Irish equivalent of the Confederate battle flag hanging outside the state buildings in some southern US states.

    Sure, it's not really causing anyone any harm but it's a symbol of an out of date oppressive organisation that has damaged the country significantly.

    A publicly funded broadcaster should not be pandering to one group. Religious programming is fine of course but not if it is about only one religion every day in a prime time spot.


  • Posts: 26,920 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Should we come up with a new Angelus?


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 2,618 ✭✭✭The Diabolical Monocle


    Don't care if its kept.
    IMHO we could do with a minute of reflection ... if that meant a non denominational minute of silence then fine.

    A tiny counter to the 24 7 rat race consumerism culture that pervades the day.


  • Advertisement
  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 1,951 ✭✭✭frostyjacks


    Je suis Angelus


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,096 ✭✭✭conorhal


    Daith wrote: »
    I don't see the harm in letting two men marry but to the Catholic Church our referendum was a "defeat for humanity". I don't particularly want to reflect on their nonsense before I watch the news tbh.

    So your point is what? That you to are entitled to indulge in hysterical hyperbole?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 803 ✭✭✭Rough Sleeper


    Drumpot wrote: »

    There are many things wrong with the Catholic church but I don't think it means throwing out every single thing it preaches. Why does the Angeles have to be about the Catholic Church? Can't it just be about people taking a minute to pause and reflect on their day?
    Well I don't think it's coincidence that it goes off at the same time as our local Catholic church bells starts ringing. If they just wanted it to be a generic time of reflection they could have "Self-introspection minute" at 15.58 to a background of ambient music.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,536 ✭✭✭Kev W


    Don't care if its kept.
    IMHO we could do with a minute of reflection ... if that meant a non denominational minute of silence then fine.

    A tiny counter to the 24 7 rat race consumerism culture that pervades the day.

    A minute of footage of mountains and fields and the like, with some soft music. Call it "a moment of reflection" or "a minute's reflection".

    Sounds lovely and doesn't celebrate an organisation that's poisoned our society for centuries.

    Lovely.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,399 ✭✭✭Daith


    conorhal wrote: »
    So your point is what? That you to are entitled to indulge in hysterical hyperbole?

    Where's my "hysterical hyperbole"?

    My point is you can have a minutes reflection without any religions connotation.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,536 ✭✭✭Kev W


    conorhal wrote: »
    So your point is what? That you to are entitled to indulge in hysterical hyperbole?

    I think you'll find the hysterical hyperbole came from the church that time.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,845 ✭✭✭mailforkev


    Should we come up with a new Angelus?

    Maybe something like Channel 4 do from time to time after their news where they give random people a minute to talk about an issue that's important to them?

    We could all apply for our own minute.

    Or let TV3 do the angelus, at least that way I'm not paying for it.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 9,085 ✭✭✭SpaceTime


    Daith wrote: »
    You can have a minute of pause and reflection without the hypocrisy that the Catholic Church brings into it.

    There are loads of options:

    1) BBC News 24 style 60 second count in with shots of Irish landscapes and no religions connotations whatsoever. Just a nice chilled out bit of imagry.

    2) Something like Euronews' No Comment segment which could just take one topic and let people reflect on it without any particular angle being taken.

    3) A space for art and culture. Give animators and film makers a 60 second space.

    4) Something like a video diary that just gives you a 1 minute snippet of some aspect of Irish life. Could be anything.. might be an interesting way of using it.

    ...

    The Angelus no matter how they spin it is a throw back to the days when Ireland didn't understand what being a Republic is (we still don't really understand it but we're improving a bit).

    It's entirely about lack of an ability to separate the church and state, which largely just photocopied from the UK in 1921. We broke off from a theocratic state with an established church and then for some daft reason decided to attempt to quasi-establish the Catholic Church.

    There's simply no reason why a state body like RTE with a huge platform as public service broadcaster should be doing twice daily calls to prayer for any religion.

    If they're doing religious programming, it should be "about religion" not dogmatic or ritualistic stuff.

    I really fundamentally think Ireland throws the word "republic" around the way North Korea throws the word "democratic" around. It means government for the people, by the people and of the people. We should not have to be referring to any outside agencies like the Catholic Church or to a deity for our concept of sovereignty.

    Our constitution still establishes its notion of sovereignty based on the British model that it's from god. Where as the French constitution for example is very much about "we the people".

    Compare the two if you ever get the chance. Ireland's is like a Mass booklet while the French one is like a rip roaring declaration of a true republic, flinging down despots and dictators, enshrining fundamental rights and all about a sovereign population. It's fairly short and it's full of enlightenment ideas.

    There's nothing anti-religious about being a secular republic, far from it, it just means that religion is a private matter and the state usually guarantees your freedom to practice and protects that. What it doesn't mean is that the state imposes a religion on anyone or gives any religion special privileges. Ireland does both of those things through the 90%+ fully religious education system and other public services.

    Being a Republic is more than just having a president instead of a queen and being "not the UK".


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,498 ✭✭✭obezyana


    How about replacing with a song from wee Daniel or Crystal Swing or maybe the Sunday Game tune.......get us all motivated for dinner.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,399 ✭✭✭Daith


    Kev W wrote: »
    I think you'll find the hysterical hyperbole came from the church that time.

    As a gay man I have nothing on the overly dramatic Catholic Church and their flamboyant priests.


Advertisement
Advertisement