Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

DART Underground planning due to lapse, but lots of Airport Luas talk?

1356725

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,318 ✭✭✭✭Grandeeod


    I'm dumbfounded as to why anyone would be surprised/shocked etc. by this.

    It's business as usual.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,276 ✭✭✭sdanseo


    Grandeeod wrote: »
    I'm dumbfounded as to why anyone would be surprised/shocked etc. by this.

    It's business as usual.

    Something we have to put a stop to.

    I genuinely don't mind (or more correctly, can get over it) if the money simply isn't there to build nice things.

    Building or planning things that are total nonsense for Dublin or Ireland and then finding some hyper-innovative city in Europe as a case study to justify it is something I find much less tolerable.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 18,966 ✭✭✭✭syklops


    I've been reading about the Dargan project. Its thoroughly depressing. There is a transcript of the Oireachtas debate here: http://debates.oireachtas.ie/TRJ/2006/12/13/00003.asp

    "Deputy Shortall", I presume is Roisin Shortall. Where do we find these people?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,032 ✭✭✭✭cgcsb


    There are more and more offices being planned for Dublin Airport campus, Swords is the fastest growing town by population, last I checked, in the state. I don't see how quartering the capacity of metro north, adding 15 mins to the journey time and paying the same price for it can be considered as acceptable.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,957 ✭✭✭Kopparberg Strawberry and Lime


    the whole tram and BXD is a shambles.

    it should've all went underground from the beginning with luas taking traffic and pedestrians and everything out of the equation along with the city centre mess at the moment.

    A luas to the airport is no use, its too open and too slow in terms of actual speed and number of stops (Stops include actual tram stations and traffic stops for light changes etc.) in comparison to an underground system.

    I've used both underground in Paris and London getting from the airport to the city and a direct , fast link is what you want. Not a tram that everybody uses to get about and for scumbags to run a muck on with too many stops.

    underground should go ahead for the basics such as speed, quality, capacity, separated from traffic/congestion/incidents on route that the luas has all the time such as traffic, blocking of a track / accidents etc. with it going to the airport.

    why you would choose a luas over underground is beyond me.

    but the underground must go to the airport as it will make it more worth while also and Irish rail have come out and said it can do it with dart underground no problems.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,567 ✭✭✭✭Idbatterim


    what is the best place to start putting pressure on the minister for transport? writing to him? to local papers? or getting a fund together to put something in a prominent national newspaper to show it up for the sham that it is and take it to pieces there? I pay thousands a year in tax, get nothing in return and it appears Dublin is about to get yet another mickey mouse, hatchet job solution. I have no problem donating money to a fund that could bring this sham into the spotlight...

    Would it have been possible to bring the luas greenline underground to O'Connell Street to link the lines and have MN terminate at O'Connell Street?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,730 ✭✭✭veryangryman


    Idbatterim wrote: »
    what is the best place to start putting pressure on the minister for transport? writing to him? to local papers? or getting a fund together to put something in a prominent national newspaper to show it up for the sham that it is and take it to pieces there? I pay thousands a year in tax, get nothing in return and it appears Dublin is about to get yet another mickey mouse, hatchet job solution. I have no problem donating money to a fund that could bring this sham into the spotlight...

    Local TD I would say (and encourage others to do same). If he/she is worth their salt, they'll bring it up.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,567 ✭✭✭✭Idbatterim


    what infuriates me is, they want to be seen to do something, to get votes. It doesnt matter that its not the right thing, as they will probably be long gone by the time the effects of the short sighted vision are realised...
    There are more and more offices being planned for Dublin Airport campus, Swords is the fastest growing town by population, last I checked, in the state. I don't see how quartering the capacity of metro north, adding 15 mins to the journey time and paying the same price for it can be considered as acceptable.

    I have raised those issues before, also the airport is going to be about 25,000,000 this year, god knows what by the time whatever option is built, that figure alone makes a joke out of anything other than MN or MNO (optimised) or heavy rail... Lets say it is 30.000.000 - 35,000,000 that is a seriously big airport and a tram going out to it is laughable...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,032 ✭✭✭✭cgcsb


    Idbatterim wrote: »
    I have raised those issues before, also the airport is going to be about 25,000,000 this year, god knows what by the time whatever option is built, that figure alone makes a joke out of anything other than MN or MNO (optimised) or heavy rail... Lets say it is 30.000.000 - 35,000,000 that is a seriously big airport and a tram going out to it is laughable...

    I can't see a similar sized airport on this list with no rail link


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,905 ✭✭✭Aard


    Idbatterim wrote: »
    what is the best place to start putting pressure on the minister for transport?
    Did you make a submission to the Fingal North Dublin transport consultation?


  • Advertisement
  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 1,121 ✭✭✭ClovenHoof


    Idbatterim wrote: »
    what is the best place to start putting pressure on the minister for transport? writing to him? to local papers?

    Changing your name to Denis O'Brien. Nothing else works.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,567 ✭✭✭✭Idbatterim


    Did you make a submission to the Fingal North Dublin transport consultation?
    no I didnt, I doubt they give a toss, its a smoke screen anyway. The past few pages has blown Luas an option out, so I am sure out highly paid minister for transport with his expertise in the area will reach the same conclusion.

    If you look at getting anything changed or done in this country, it is only when they are shamed or backed into a corner by public pressure...

    You know the cynic or realist in me, sees this an attempt for them to rush through the cheap job, while they think they still can, because a year or two down the line, the figures will be so overwhelmingly against anything other than MN, MNO etc...

    Also could somebody tell me was MN planned to interchange with the northern line?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,209 ✭✭✭Murt10


    cgcsb wrote: »
    There are more and more offices being planned for Dublin Airport campus, Swords is the fastest growing town by population, last I checked, in the state.

    What about the Greater Blanchardstown Area?

    There is an election coming in the near future. I am expecting the Government to announce an extension of the Broombridge Luas line to Blanchardstown.

    Two senior ministers in the constituency, which I think for the moment goes right out as far as Swords.

    LVaradker (FG) was in charge of Transport for a number of years. I would be surprised if he hadn't been eyeing this project up all along. I think that maybe he was waiting for the right moment to announce it to his constituents, until he was suddenly given the poisoned chalice and moved to Health.

    The other Minister in the area is Joan Burton (Lab), who is also the Tainiste. She is part of the 4 man EMC which controls all the financal decisions of the Government.

    Both FG and Lab would want and greatly benefit if this major good news project was announced just before the upcoming election.

    James Reilly (FG), who has zero credibility with the public at this stage (imo), is based in Swords. I think he was deputy leader of the FG party (not sure if he still is). Any good news on luas/rail commuter improvements would be greatly welcomed by him

    As I said, expect a really big announcement.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 453 ✭✭pclive


    No MN was not planned to interchange with the northern line

    I did make a submission at the time asking why not and for it to be linked


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 892 ✭✭✭Telchak


    Murt10 wrote: »
    I am expecting the Government to announce an extension of the Broombridge Luas line to Blanchardstown.
    To Ballycoolin maybe, but a line to Blanch proper would go through a lot of empty land alongside an existing rail line so would be pretty hard to justify.

    An extension of BXD to Finglas Village & Charlestown and/or a spur to Ballycoolin & Tyrrelstown would probably be the only appropriate extensions to BXD I think (both far in the future).

    If the D2 underground section from Broadstone to Stephen's Green did go ahead in the future, it would probably be best for the Green line to become Swords to Bride's Glen. Then BXD could become the city centre section for the the line to Finglas and perhaps the Tallaght via Teranure line. These lines would much better suit the capacity constraints of BXD than the Green line & Airport line.

    BeEPIxe.png


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,209 ✭✭✭Murt10


    Telchak wrote: »
    To Ballycoolin maybe, but a line to Blanch proper would go through a lot of empty land alongside an existing rail line so would be pretty hard to justify.

    That may be so but the present Sligo train line only serves a very small portion of the Blanchardstown area.


    As for the empty land here's a recent article from the IT. Two birds with one stone.

    New, well served housing land, for those who need it and a much improved transport system for the rest of the constituency.

    http://www.irishtimes.com/news/politics/coalition-to-free-up-land-for-additional-housing-1.2257970


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,567 ✭✭✭✭Idbatterim


    We have enough dreamers that are willing to believe in Paul Murphy's dogma and the money tree that SF have in ther back garden that would also be clueless enough to believe anything this fool says. I just dont know what he gets out of it
    why in gods name when you go that close to the other line, would you not link them? so if you are currently on the northern line and wanted to get to the airport, you would have to go into town and back out again?!

    We have a massive housing shortage, higher capacity rail can support higher density housing etc. Is this really the extent of the vision here?

    From page 1 of the Aecom report. "The overall objective of this Finglas / North Dublin transportation is to identify the optimum long term public transport solution to connect Dublin City Centre, Dublin airport and Swords" LOL!

    is this from the same school of planning that now what the "upgraded" M50 over capacity just as we are coming out of recession?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,905 ✭✭✭Aard


    Idbatterim wrote: »
    no I didnt, I doubt they give a toss, its a smoke screen anyway. The past few pages has blown Luas an option out, so I am sure out highly paid minister for transport with his expertise in the area will reach the same conclusion.

    If you look at getting anything changed or done in this country, it is only when they are shamed or backed into a corner by public pressure...

    You know the cynic or realist in me, sees this an attempt for them to rush through the cheap job, while they think they still can, because a year or two down the line, the figures will be so overwhelmingly against anything other than MN, MNO etc...

    Also could somebody tell me was MN planned to interchange with the northern line?

    Sorry but if you don't engage with the public consultation you don't have much right to complain imo.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,567 ✭✭✭✭Idbatterim


    Sorry but if you don't engage with the public consultation you don't have much right to complain imo.
    Aard, I dont deem it acceptable, that we have to battle constantly on many fronts here, to get the right thing done. I find it totally and utterly unacceptable. Most of us I am assuming have busy lives. Should we constantly try to be on top of politicians and planners to do the right thing? Who's job is it, I know for damn sure I am not getting their ridiculous pay and it is not my job...

    Wasnt there a report done years ago, that said Luas was not adequate for that corridor? Here we are, growing strongly again and now all of a sudden, luas is an adequate option?

    You advocate we base things on figures and sound facts, well those making the decisions arent influenced by them...

    I travel to the airport a lot, live close to dundrum luas, would love to be able to take rail transport to the airport, but if it is some botch convoluted luas job, reluctantly I will have to keep going by car. Getting to the airport is time critical, I have no interest in stopping every half minute for a mini tour of Dublin...

    on another thread on this subject, multiple flaws were highlighted with that Aecom report...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,905 ✭✭✭Aard


    Public consultation is an amazing facility of the Irish planning system. While not as robust as in some European countries, the fact that the public can have their individual views known and on record is something that most of the world does not have at their disposal.

    It's easy to engage with public consultations, almost as easy as writing posts on the topic on an online discussion forum.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 125 ✭✭hardy_buck


    Idbatterim wrote: »
    Aard, I dont deem it acceptable, that we have to battle constantly on many fronts here, to get the right thing done. I find it totally and utterly unacceptable. Most of us I am assuming have busy lives. Should we constantly try to be on top of politicians and planners to do the right thing? Who's job is it, I know for damn sure I am not getting their ridiculous pay and it is not my job...

    Wasnt there a report done years ago, that said Luas was not adequate for that corridor? Here we are, growing strongly again and now all of a sudden, luas is an adequate option?

    You advocate we base things on figures and sound facts, well those making the decisions arent influenced by them...

    I travel to the airport a lot, live close to dundrum luas, would love to be able to take rail transport to the airport, but if it is some botch convoluted luas job, reluctantly I will have to keep going by car. Getting to the airport is time critical, I have no interest in stopping every half minute for a mini tour of Dublin...

    on another thread on this subject, multiple flaws were highlighted with that Aecom report...

    Grandeeod had a post on the first page I think of this thread that pretty much says all that needs to be said about things. The public consultations and letters to TD's don't really seem to make much of a difference as far as I can see. The rural TD's and in fact TD's even in other areas of the city will fight this tooth and nail within their parties and no doubt through countless other methods as they try to garner pet projects for their own constiuency to secure seats.
    The half assed approaches such as luas in this case are as a result of the political structure here favouring localism over a holistic plan, something that has existed since 1922.

    No government will ever vote to change the setup so we will be left with a status quo until the population probably breaks 10 million or so (if even?) ,the country is mainly urbanised and we have a more informed electorate who can see beyond some seemingly large figures.
    Sorry if I'm being pessimistic...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,032 ✭✭✭✭cgcsb


    pclive wrote: »
    No MN was not planned to interchange with the northern line

    I did make a submission at the time asking why not and for it to be linked

    yes it was, the connection would be at Drumcondra Station


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,032 ✭✭✭✭cgcsb


    Murt10 wrote: »
    What about the Greater Blanchardstown Area?

    There is an election coming in the near future. I am expecting the Government to announce an extension of the Broombridge Luas line to Blanchardstown.

    Two senior ministers in the constituency, which I think for the moment goes right out as far as Swords.

    LVaradker (FG) was in charge of Transport for a number of years. I would be surprised if he hadn't been eyeing this project up all along. I think that maybe he was waiting for the right moment to announce it to his constituents, until he was suddenly given the poisoned chalice and moved to Health.

    The other Minister in the area is Joan Burton (Lab), who is also the Tainiste. She is part of the 4 man EMC which controls all the financal decisions of the Government.

    Both FG and Lab would want and greatly benefit if this major good news project was announced just before the upcoming election.

    James Reilly (FG), who has zero credibility with the public at this stage (imo), is based in Swords. I think he was deputy leader of the FG party (not sure if he still is). Any good news on luas/rail commuter improvements would be greatly welcomed by him

    As I said, expect a really big announcement.

    It'd be a bit hard to sell when the Maynooth line could easily serve Blanchardstown if Dublin Bus were bothered to provide a suitable feeder bus service.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,905 ✭✭✭Aard


    cgcsb wrote: »
    yes it was the connection would be at Drumcondra Station

    Not the Northern line.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,032 ✭✭✭✭cgcsb


    Aard wrote: »
    Not the Northern line.

    Oh right. Got confused talking about Blanch. True enough but a future extension to somewhere like Donebate could easily have been done in the future. The luas to airport proposal goes right past the Maynooth line and doesn't connect.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,533 ✭✭✭✭end of the road


    Aard wrote: »
    Sorry but if you don't engage with the public consultation you don't have much right to complain imo.
    he does have a right yes . we live in a free country, not a dictatorship

    I'm very highly educated. I know words, i have the best words, nobody has better words then me.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,905 ✭✭✭Aard


    he does have a right yes . we live in a free country, not a dictatorship

    Oh god give over with the free country stuff. Not engaging with the consultation then complaining afterwards simply amounts to protest. It's not conducive to influencing the process.


  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators Posts: 14,110 Mod ✭✭✭✭monument


    Aard wrote: »
    Oh god give over with the free country stuff. Not engaging with the consultation then complaining afterwards simply amounts to protest. It's not conducive to influencing the process.

    I might have agreed at one point but when we're at the stage of many plans being dropped, chopped and changed you have to start wondering.

    We have solid projects shelved or dropped, a key one about to lose its planning permission, and agencies fighting with the NTA in a process and behind their back outside the process to get their project approved.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,844 ✭✭✭Banjoxed


    monument wrote: »
    I might have agreed at one point but when we're at the stage of many plans being dropped, chopped and changed you have to start wondering.

    We have solid projects shelved or dropped, a key one about to lose its planning permission, and agencies fighting with the NTA in a process and behind their back outside the process to get their project approved.

    All we need now is any TD calling for an independent assessment of outstanding projects. Christ on a bike, but Dublin and transport proposals have been analysed to death over the last forty years.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,567 ✭✭✭✭Idbatterim


    Public consultation is an amazing facility of the Irish planning system. While not as robust as in some European countries, the fact that the public can have their individual views known and on record is something that most of the world does not have at their disposal.

    It's easy to engage with public consultations, almost as easy as writing posts on the topic on an online discussion forum.

    Aard, you honestly think things are based on sound logic and good planning or are they a hot political potato? The soon things grind to an absolute halt again here the better, its only when that happens, that they reluctantly get their finger out.

    I wonder when we will get a report on the Aecom report. The only way you can get something done or done properly here is with public pressure, when they capitulate pretty quickly...

    they are so obsessed with cycling at the moment, maybe they should just build a segregated footpath and cycle way out to the airport, sure wouldnt that be the cheapest option and promote sustainable modes of transport?


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement