Big Brother UK 2015 Use spoiler tags, mod warning post #1 & 3037

Lemlin · 22-06-2015 12:35PM

United Chester Men wrote: »

Why all the silly nicknames for Danny!! He is not that controversial of a character! A very random housemate to build up such a hatred against tbh!!
Just because you love Mark (??!) doesn't mean you have to hate Danny!

I don't love Marc. I don't even expect him to win. Joel will. The bunker ruined Marc. He would have won it until that point. I still believe he will be the most remembered housemate though.

I wouldn't say I have a hatred for Danny either. It's a TV show after all. I do dislike him when compared to others though. For me, he's playing the biggest game in there. You've also conveniently ignored the rest of my post and just picked up that I called him a name.

I think its a decent name because the lad seems to think he's Danny Dyer. I've seen others use names like Ice Ice Christian etc.

United Chester Men wrote: »

And Mark has changed a hell of a lot since being in there. He has become extremely bitter, paranoid, angry, more vicious and sulky the last week and a half. He has lost all that annoying energy he has and has resorted all his energy into bitching about other housemates when weeks ago he said he was just here to have a laugh and didn't give a fk. Or banter!

How would you expect him to act? He has been targetted. His friends have been targetted. Christian even named him when nominating Sam. Danny has also tried his Phil Mitchell act on a couple of occasions now, and dragged others like Christian and Brian Bellend (there's another nickname for ya) into it.

He's putting his energy into breaking up the clique which is exactly what he said he was going to. Ther problem for Marc is that he doesn't have his crew as brainwashed as Danny does e.g. Jack seeking approval before he had even nominated.

You say Danny is such a nice lad, why didn't he tell Jack to make up his own mind?

United Chester Men · 22-06-2015 01:13PM

Lemlin wrote: »

I don't love Marc. I don't even expect him to win. Joel will. The bunker ruined Marc. He would have won it until that point. I still believe he will be the most remembered housemate though.

I wouldn't say I have a hatred for Danny either. It's a TV show after all. I do dislike him when compared to others though. For me, he's playing the biggest game in there. You've also conveniently ignored the rest of my post and just picked up that I called him a name.

I think its a decent name because the lad seems to think he's Danny Dyer. I've seen others use names like Ice Ice Christian etc.

How would you expect him to act? He has been targetted. His friends have been targetted. Christian even named him when nominating Sam. Danny has also tried his Phil Mitchell act on a couple of occasions now, and dragged others like Christian and Brian Bellend (there's another nickname for ya) into it.

He's putting his energy into breaking up the clique which is exactly what he said he was going to. Ther problem for Marc is that he doesn't have his crew as brainwashed as Danny does e.g. Jack seeking approval before he had even nominated.

Right so if Danny is danny dyer and Phil Mitchell which one of them is Ian Beale......

Mark has been targetted.....................!! The most ironic thing I have ever heard!! There is a difference between targetting someone (like Mark admitted he was going to do when initially entering and then reentering) and calling out and TRYING to put people in their place for their gamesmanship.

Jack and the rest of them hated Mark's behaviour before any of this bunker stuff so don't try to say Danny turned them against Mark! Maybe he rallied them a bit but they were weak characters in that respect (although both Jack and Chloe and even Christian all showed they were willing to stand up to him and not let hi control the house).

The people Mark seems to get very angry with (Harri, Danny, Christian, Jack, Chloe, Brian) all happened to be individuals who have stood up to him and criticised his behaviour. It is very telling that. he has welcomed Danny back as a "friend" as he recognises he is a strong enough character, much like he welcomed Joel after recognising he was the one person who would beat him intellectually and emotionally in a verbal slanging match. Simon is just a lap dog side kick now! They barely interacted beforehand but Simons crush a day or so before Mark departed and the ensuing fake crying on his eviction (watch it again at the stairs............he conveniently stops and acts normal when they all walk away from him!! Funny stuff!) said to Mark I have him won over anyway!

Wtf is this clique bs anyway! Why does he care so much about it! Why is he letting himself get so emotionally enraged when a few others don't like his behaviour when he has fully acknowledged already his self anointed purpose was to irritate people, cause mayhem, break down people etc. Did he expect everyone to just sit back and say nothing?? The truth is I genuinely think he did as he seems like the sort of person who isn't used to handling people who he sees as inferior to him standing up to him.

Here is an article of what defines a serial bully. Make of it what you want (perhaps you may see danny in it but it has all the traits of Mark if you ask me)

I was amazed upon reading it how startlingly similar to him it was.

A serial bully could be anyone. They are attracted to positions of authority and trust, but that does not mean that everyone in such a position is a serial bully. Also, not every serial bully is in a position of authority or trust. They cannot be identified by their status, but by their conduct.

(This illustration uses the masculine pronoun "he", but a serial bully could be female.) This is a person who mercilessly bullies one person after another, but whose depravity appears to be constrained by the understanding that he has to appear to behave decently, to blend in with civilised people. Rather than using physical violence, he abuses people with methods that are harder for onlookers to notice, such as emotional blackmail and abusing the authority that comes with his job.

He is able to manipulate others' emotions and perceptions, and does so to get what he wants. He has to impress those whom he thinks will help him maintain or advance his status, and these are likely, at least initially, to perceive him as smooth, charming, accomplished, charismatic and authoritative, and worthy of support, respect and deference. He may gain their respect by exaggerating his achievements, he hasn't even got his degree yet, just finished his exams! Let alone a scientist favouring cronies and by trying to mimic the behaviour of respectable people. Some onlookers appear to maintain their positive first impression indefinitely, but some only appear to do so because they are frightened of not doing. Others, whom he never thought he had to please, may soon come to regard him as grossly incompetent, deceitful, insensitive, unintelligent, aggressive, ruthless and completely unaware of or indifferent to the effect of his behaviour. These people, the first to see through the charisma, Harri are those he is most likely to pick on, focusing the worst of his aggression on one person at a time.

The serial bully feels threatened by colleagues with competence, integrity and popularity, and sooner or later he picks one out and projects onto them his own inadequacy and incompetence. Using unwarranted criticsm and threats, he controls them and subjugates them, without a thought for the contribution they make to the organisation, or their self esteem, self confidence, loyalty or their health. Sooner or later this person - the bully's "target" - realises that they are not being "managed", "mentored", "developed" or "investigated", but "bullied", and they start to show signs of intolerance. When this becomes apparent to the bully, sensing that the target might complain to a higher authority and expose his misconduct, he neutralises the target by isolating them and destroying their credibility and reputation among decision-makers and peers, and then putting them out of the picture through dismissal, forced resignation or even early retirement. Once the target has gone, within about two weeks, the bully's focus turns to someone else and the cycle starts again.

Perhaps the most easily recognisable Serial Bully traits are:

Jekyll and Hyde nature - Dr Jekyll is "charming" and "charismatic"; "Hyde" is "evil"; very Mark
Convincing liar - Makes up anything to fit his needs at that moment; I am not sure he has lied as such (although he did deny a few things, such as the Chloe incident the other day but he is very Manipulative in arguments to suit his side
Treats some people in a way that causes them unprecedented levels of stress, frustration and fear; This goes without saying
Damages the health and reputations of organisations and individuals; had no empathy for emotionally isolating Harri
Reacts to criticism with denial, retaliation and by feigning victimhood and blaming victims; Classic Mark behaviour
Apparently immune from disciplinary action (nomination discussion/ immune from eviction/verbal assaults/ sexist behaviour
Moves to a new target when the present one burns out or leaves. (Harri harrassment became boring to him, moved on to Christian when reentering)

Albeit some of it is a bit harsh to Mark as this is only a gameshow, it is an interesting read when analysing Mark

skipper_G · 22-06-2015 01:26PM

United Chester Men wrote: »

Convincing liar - Makes up anything to fit his needs at that moment; I am not sure he has lied as such (although he did deny a few things, such as the Chloe incident the other day but he is very Manipulative in arguments to suit his side

By incident, do you mean where Chloe randomly started crying (again) for no apparent reason ?

United Chester Men · 22-06-2015 01:27PM

Yeah, some of that is very harsh, so dont think all of it I am affiliating to him please. ; )

United Chester Men · 22-06-2015 01:34PM

skipper_G wrote: »

By incident, do you mean where Chloe randomly started crying (again) for no apparent reason ?

well it wasn't for no reason. It was a little bit self caused. And she overreacted a lot .But Mark upset her when she asked him what he was on about when she overheard him saying "I am going to break up their little clique" or something of that sort and he accused her quiet aggressively of being a nosey earwigger and got rather verbally strong with her. If he had overheard something like that he would have exploded.

When approached about it he denied saying anything to her. Yes, it wasn't that serious what he said to her but she clearly was emotionally fragile and someone like him talking you down like that may easily make a young girl upset.

But he completely denied saying anything and made her look silly.

PS You are the 5th person who has signed up on Boards just to challenge my opinion on this thread!! I am starting to feel famous (or perhaps infamous moreso!!!) I am enjoying the debate though!

daisybelle2008 · 22-06-2015 01:37PM

skipper_G wrote: »

By incident, do you mean where Chloe randomly started crying (again) for no apparent reason ?

First post in 8 years skipper_G :eek:....! I agree Chloe is prone to the old waterworks, which is a bit fine but OTT, and I don't understand why others have to wade in to her defence. If she is a spontaneous crier, let her get it out of her system herself, she is a grown woman.

Lemlin · 22-06-2015 01:38PM

United Chester Men wrote: »

well it wasn't for no reason. It was a little bit self caused. And she overreacted a lot .But Mark upset her when she asked him what he was on about when she overheard him saying "I am going to break up their little clique" or something of that sort and he accused her quiet aggressively of being a nosey earwigger and got rather verbally strong with her. If he had overheard something like that he would have exploded.

When approached about it he denied saying anything to her. Yes, it wasn't that serious what he said to her but she clearly was emotionally fragile and someone like him talking you down like that may easily make a young girl upset.

But he completely denied saying anything and made her look silly.

PS You are the 5th person who has signed up on Boards just to challenge my opinion on this thread!! I am starting to feel famous (or perhaps infamous moreso!!!) I am enjoying the debate though!

He didn't deny saying anything. He fully admitted whispering it to Jade in a joke manner. He said to cheer her up, he said something along the lines of "don't worry, I'm going to break up their clique".

Chloe then took it upon herself to run back with this after overhearing it. All he called her was an earwigger and she ran into the room crying and made a big thing of it.

daisybelle2008 · 22-06-2015 01:44PM

United Chester Men wrote: »

PS You are the 5th person who has signed up on Boards just to challenge my opinion on this thread!! I am starting to feel famous (or perhaps infamous moreso!!!) I am enjoying the debate though!

Member since 2007!

The bully word is getting completely overused though. There are some strong personalitys, some boring ones, but Im not seeing all this so called bullying.

skipper_G · 22-06-2015 01:47PM

United Chester Men wrote: »

well it wasn't for no reason. It was a little bit self caused. And she overreacted a lot .But Mark upset her when she asked him what he was on about when she overheard him saying "I am going to break up their little clique" or something of that sort and he accused her quiet aggressively of being a nosey earwigger and got rather verbally strong with her. If he had overheard something like that he would have exploded.

When approached about it he denied saying anything to her. Yes, it wasn't that serious what he said to her but she clearly was emotionally fragile and someone like him talking you down like that may easily make a young girl upset.

But he completely denied saying anything and made her look silly.

PS You are the 5th person who has signed up on Boards just to challenge my opinion on this thread!! I am starting to feel famous (or perhaps infamous moreso!!!) I am enjoying the debate though!

That wasn't how it played to me, I remember him denying he did anything to make her cry, not that he denied saying anything. Semantics I know, but there is a subtle difference. And that whole situation was made worse when Chloe ran off and told a half truth to the rest of the clique.

Ps: Not exactly signed up, just that I felt compelled to get engaged in the debate after 8 years

skipper_G · 22-06-2015 01:50PM

daisybelle2008 wrote: »

First post in 8 years skipper_G :eek:....! I agree Chloe is prone to the old waterworks, which is a bit fine but OTT, and I don't understand why others have to wade in to her defence. If she is a spontaneous crier, let her get it out of her system herself, she is a grown woman.

I kinda forgot I had this account and spent 8 years lurking in the shadows

I've grown seriously tired of her waterworks, I get the impression that if you let a particularly bad fart that would cause her to have an emotional breakdown, not like any "normal" girl I've ever met anyway

daisybelle2008 · 22-06-2015 01:59PM

skipper_G wrote: »

I kinda forgot I had this account and spent 8 years lurking in the shadows
I've grown seriously tired of her waterworks, I get the impression that if you let a particularly bad fart that would cause her to have an emotional breakdown, not like any "normal" girl I've ever met anyway

Welcome out of the shadows! I'd say it's a tough enough environment and she could be a bit hormonal or whatever. But they should ignore it and let her sob in her pillow, get herself together without jumping to her defence. Some (Brian) seem to be using it as an excuse to vent their own frustrations...

Lemlin · 22-06-2015 02:02PM

United Chester Men wrote: »

Right so if Danny is danny dyer and Phil Mitchell which one of them is Ian Beale......

Mark has been targetted.....................!! The most ironic thing I have ever heard!! There is a difference between targetting someone (like Mark admitted he was going to do when initially entering and then reentering) and calling out and TRYING to put people in their place for their gamesmanship.

Jack and the rest of them hated Mark's behaviour before any of this bunker stuff so don't try to say Danny turned them against Mark! Maybe he rallied them a bit but they were weak characters in that respect (although both Jack and Chloe and even Christian all showed they were willing to stand up to him and not let hi control the house).

The people Mark seems to get very angry with (Harri, Danny, Christian, Jack, Chloe, Brian) all happened to be individuals who have stood up to him and criticised his behaviour. It is very telling that. he has welcomed Danny back as a "friend" as he recognises he is a strong enough character, much like he welcomed Joel after recognising he was the one person who would beat him intellectually and emotionally in a verbal slanging match. Simon is just a lap dog side kick now! They barely interacted beforehand but Simons crush a day or so before Mark departed and the ensuing fake crying on his eviction (watch it again at the stairs............he conveniently stops and acts normal when they all walk away from him!! Funny stuff!) said to Mark I have him won over anyway!

Wtf is this clique bs anyway! Why does he care so much about it! Why is he letting himself get so emotionally enraged when a few others don't like his behaviour when he has fully acknowledged already his self anointed purpose was to irritate people, cause mayhem, break down people etc. Did he expect everyone to just sit back and say nothing?? The truth is I genuinely think he did as he seems like the sort of person who isn't used to handling people who he sees as inferior to him standing up to him.

Here is an article of what defines a serial bully. Make of it what you want (perhaps you may see danny in it but it has all the traits of Mark if you ask me)

I was amazed upon reading it how startlingly similar to him it was.

A serial bully could be anyone. They are attracted to positions of authority and trust, but that does not mean that everyone in such a position is a serial bully. Also, not every serial bully is in a position of authority or trust. They cannot be identified by their status, but by their conduct.

(This illustration uses the masculine pronoun "he", but a serial bully could be female.) This is a person who mercilessly bullies one person after another, but whose depravity appears to be constrained by the understanding that he has to appear to behave decently, to blend in with civilised people. Rather than using physical violence, he abuses people with methods that are harder for onlookers to notice, such as emotional blackmail and abusing the authority that comes with his job.

He is able to manipulate others' emotions and perceptions, and does so to get what he wants. He has to impress those whom he thinks will help him maintain or advance his status, and these are likely, at least initially, to perceive him as smooth, charming, accomplished, charismatic and authoritative, and worthy of support, respect and deference. He may gain their respect by exaggerating his achievements, he hasn't even got his degree yet, just finished his exams! Let alone a scientist favouring cronies and by trying to mimic the behaviour of respectable people. Some onlookers appear to maintain their positive first impression indefinitely, but some only appear to do so because they are frightened of not doing. Others, whom he never thought he had to please, may soon come to regard him as grossly incompetent, deceitful, insensitive, unintelligent, aggressive, ruthless and completely unaware of or indifferent to the effect of his behaviour. These people, the first to see through the charisma, Harri are those he is most likely to pick on, focusing the worst of his aggression on one person at a time.

The serial bully feels threatened by colleagues with competence, integrity and popularity, and sooner or later he picks one out and projects onto them his own inadequacy and incompetence. Using unwarranted criticsm and threats, he controls them and subjugates them, without a thought for the contribution they make to the organisation, or their self esteem, self confidence, loyalty or their health. Sooner or later this person - the bully's "target" - realises that they are not being "managed", "mentored", "developed" or "investigated", but "bullied", and they start to show signs of intolerance. When this becomes apparent to the bully, sensing that the target might complain to a higher authority and expose his misconduct, he neutralises the target by isolating them and destroying their credibility and reputation among decision-makers and peers, and then putting them out of the picture through dismissal, forced resignation or even early retirement. Once the target has gone, within about two weeks, the bully's focus turns to someone else and the cycle starts again.

Perhaps the most easily recognisable Serial Bully traits are:

Jekyll and Hyde nature - Dr Jekyll is "charming" and "charismatic"; "Hyde" is "evil"; very Mark
Convincing liar - Makes up anything to fit his needs at that moment; I am not sure he has lied as such (although he did deny a few things, such as the Chloe incident the other day but he is very Manipulative in arguments to suit his side
Treats some people in a way that causes them unprecedented levels of stress, frustration and fear; This goes without saying
Damages the health and reputations of organisations and individuals; had no empathy for emotionally isolating Harri
Reacts to criticism with denial, retaliation and by feigning victimhood and blaming victims; Classic Mark behaviour
Apparently immune from disciplinary action (nomination discussion/ immune from eviction/verbal assaults/ sexist behaviour
Moves to a new target when the present one burns out or leaves. (Harri harrassment became boring to him, moved on to Christian when reentering)

Albeit some of it is a bit harsh to Mark as this is only a gameshow, it is an interesting read when analysing Mark

I do wish you'd try to answer some of my questions rather than just move on each time. If anything, you're unwillingness to take them on head on shows you don't trust your own argument.

So why did Danny call a pep talk with his sheep and tell them they needed to wise up? Why are they all seeking his approval regarding who they nominate? Jack before he even has done. Marc didn't do anything like that until he saw Christian name him when nominating Sam. A clear message was sent of what the clique was doing - we can't get you but we're going to go after your friends. Danny is such a nice lad but he is happy to influence the weak housemates into doing what he wants. Doesn't seem very nice guy to me. I think he's the manipulator in the house, not Marc.

If Marc is picking on the weak housemates, why is he the one sticking up for the likes of Sam, Showbiz and Eileen who have been ostracised by the others? They are the weak characters, even weaker than Jack, Chloe and Christian, yet you claim Marc targets the easy people. He doesn’t, as I said previously, he allies himself to them.

He has always said there was a clique and there clearly is. It's apparent every Friday evening when you see where people sit. If anything, he has gone the hard way by targetting that clique. As I said previously, he could have just been 'nice Marc' like Joel and others have said to him and blended into the background. The problem for Danny is that he had his group setup to guarantee him a nice ride to the final and Marc has ended all of that. I think Marc's problem wasn't the perception of him from the clique but the fact that they were actually the ones picking on others. He expects to be disliked and has openly said it. For example, he didn't say much to Jack for his little drunken rant because he accepted he had annoyed Jack.

The actual housemates I'd think the most of are Helen, Marc and Joel. Helen may not be liked but she's a good judge of character for me and, after last night's episode, I don’t see how you could think she likes Danny. Marc I didn't think I'd like at all but you have to admire how much entertainment he has brought to what was a very unforgettable cast. Even Joel said that he gained a huge respect for him after his interview with him and that he's never met a character as complex as him. Joel has also said if there is one thing that Marc is its honest so I don't see how you can call him a "convincing liar".

What exactly has Danny provided? Other than some pizza box throwing and recent arguments when he was forced to show a truer side of himself.

United Chester Men wrote: »

PS You are the 5th person who has signed up on Boards just to challenge my opinion on this thread!! I am starting to feel famous (or perhaps infamous moreso!!!) I am enjoying the debate though!

You have to see from that yourself that others just aren't seeing things the way you are.

Necro · 22-06-2015 02:18PM

Lemlin wrote:

You have to see from that yourself that others just aren't seeing things the way you are.

But, but... UCM knows Joels mother well. That clearly gives a much better insight into the show than you or me!

daisybelle2008 · 22-06-2015 02:27PM

United Chester Men wrote: »

Right so if Danny is danny dyer and Phil Mitchell which one of them is Ian Beale......

Simon is Ian Beale and Helen is Peggy Mitchell.

Crimsonforce · 22-06-2015 02:32PM

After those long rambling essays, do you think harri would like to stick Nick in a nappy and baby him? I'd say he'd have no problem slipping into a pampers

RobertKK · 22-06-2015 02:39PM

Danny sees himself as the father, sure the ones in cliche are helpless kids.
That is what he implied in yesterday's program.

If Danny was to be nominated and voted out, the poor children would be orphans...

daisybelle2008 · 22-06-2015 02:48PM

Crimsonforce wrote: »

After those long rambling essays, do you think harri would like to stick Nick in a nappy and baby him? I'd say he'd have no problem slipping into a pampers

She is a strange strange girl...the hair washing last night was just gross.

MythicalMadMan · 22-06-2015 02:54PM

deco nate wrote: »

Em, the one that moved from tv3 to c5 (I think he work for c4 before)
It's well known that he was the one that wanted mark in bb.

(a producer on Tallifornia, that went to be a producer on bb for 5)

Is this sarcasm or a joke i cant tell as Im quite hungover atm

skipper_G · 22-06-2015 03:00PM

Crimsonforce wrote: »

After those long rambling essays, do you think harri would like to stick Nick in a nappy and baby him? I'd say he'd have no problem slipping into a pampers

daisybelle2008 wrote: »

She is a strange strange girl...the hair washing last night was just gross.

A mental image I won't be able to forget very quickly, the bathing scene was disturbing. Nick looked like a total fruit loop with the weird groans of him, but yes Harri is an odd girl and the babying is part of her domination thing with Nick. All very strange

Mam of 4 · 22-06-2015 03:00PM

daisybelle2008 wrote: »

She is a strange strange girl...the hair washing last night was just gross.

The noises and faces Nick was making , and Jack looking on was just too weird .

Old Perry · 22-06-2015 03:02PM

Crimsonforce wrote: »

After those long rambling essays, do you think harri would like to stick Nick in a nappy and baby him? I'd say he'd have no problem slipping into a pampers

Excuse me for a moment i zhink i just got sick a little bit.

the fella is pure cringeworthy, he has common sense and probably is intelligent enough but god knows its takin little for him to submit those to harry. maybe hes smarter than we know and closer to the end he'll turn this into somesort of coming of age self founding story.

havin said that i wouldn be surprised to turn it on tonight and see him pickin his nose through a gimp mask.

Crimsonforce · 22-06-2015 03:05PM

skipper_G wrote: »

A mental image I won't be able to forget very quickly, the bathing scene was disturbing. Nick looked like a total fruit loop with the weird groans of him, but yes Harri is an odd girl and the babying is part of her domination thing with Nick. All very strange

I could see them two opening a swingers club for people who like to dress up as babies with Nick as compere, welcoming people with a man size nappy on.

MythicalMadMan · 22-06-2015 03:13PM

daisybelle2008 wrote: »

Him groaning under the tap while she washed his hair made me want to throw up. Jack looking on just added to the creepiness of it, was glad when he eventually left... Jesus it was horrible. What a weird dynamic.

Marc said she was a 'creepy creature', can see where he is coming from. Last night when she piped up that she was supposed to get married 27th of july...everyone just looked at her with disbelief. She makes it up as she goes along..a 'wife' she doesn't sleep with and maybe a 'boyfriend'...?...

The wife thing is her friend she lives with, its a joke type thing.

Id blame Nick and Jack for the creepiness of it, she only washed his hair in fairness.

Missymoohaa · 22-06-2015 03:14PM

Crimsonforce wrote: »

After those long rambling essays, do you think harri would like to stick Nick in a nappy and baby him? I'd say he'd have no problem slipping into a pampers

Ah seriously Crimson, I had to put my hand over the screen it was a cringe fest. And Jack made it even worse, sometimes you can cringe at stuff and still find it funny but that scene last night was just creepy. Was Nick enjoying it a little too much, I think. Ugggguh even the thoughts of it. Liked Nick and all I did. I think Jack thinks he's started work as a gofor on the set of porno film festival.

RobertKK · 22-06-2015 03:14PM

It was interesting last night when Helen was talking to Danny about his anger/showing signs of being violent and how it would look to viewers.
She mentioned the two occasions he did it.

It was good advice, but maybe she is trying to make it easier for Marc, by getting Danny to calm it a bit.

Then Cristian being told the truth by Harry and I had respect for her for doing that. But Cristian is another who isn't mature enough to accept being told what a person thinks. Honesty should be admired, one could argue Harry should have been more tactful, but it showed she is her own person, by saying Cristian.
Cristian may think the way he acted last week saved him, so maybe more of this new housemate Cristian, given the one who stayed quiet and just looked pretty for the cameras has been replaced by an angry man.

Crimsonforce · 22-06-2015 03:15PM

Missymoohaa wrote: »

Ah seriously Crimson, I had to put my hand over the screen it was a cringe fest. And Jack made it even worse, sometimes you can cringe at stuff and still find it funny but that scene last night was just creepy. Was Nick enjoying it a little too much, I think. Ugggguh even the thoughts of it. Liked Nick and all I did. I think Jack thinks he's started work as a gofor on the set of porno film festival.

Jack was a having a right stare . Was looking at harri boobs like they were a set of his favourite pain au chocolats

tipptom · 22-06-2015 03:17PM

skipper_G wrote: »

A mental image I won't be able to forget very quickly, the bathing scene was disturbing. Nick looked like a total fruit loop with the weird groans of him, but yes Harri is an odd girl and the babying is part of her domination thing with Nick. All very strange

It was like a scene from a brothel with a hooker and an aul fella dressed as a baby and another aul fella looking on excitedly through a two way mirror choking the chicken

zl1whqvjs75cdy · 22-06-2015 03:19PM

I'm all for drama and tension in the house to some extent but jesus it is all very toxic this year isn't it? There's a row every 5 minutes and there's at least one screaming match per episode. I definitely couldn't cope with that and I'd be worried that it would turn the house mates into bitter and angry people. Christian Danny and Marc have all gotten more angry in the last week. Can't be good for them psychologically.

daisybelle2008 · 22-06-2015 03:22PM

Mam of 4 wrote: »

The noises and faces Nick was making , and Jack looking on was just too weird .

Looks like he had forgotten 'the safe word'. Apparently he told Chloe he has spent over 30k on webcam sites :eek:....he is living his wet dream.

Necro · 22-06-2015 03:23PM

Crimsonforce wrote:

I could see them two opening a swingers club for people who like to dress up as babies with Nick as compere, welcoming people with a man size nappy on.

As long as it's not Jack in the nappy let them have at it! I will say this for Harry, she went up ever so slightly for her honesty with Ice, Ice Christian. That, was then completely negated with her daft nomination. And I don't even like Simon!

Big Brother UK 2015 **Use spoiler tags, mod warning post #1 & 3037**

Comments

Big Brother UK 2015 Use spoiler tags, mod warning post #1 & 3037