Big Brother UK 2015 **Use spoiler tags, mod warning post #1 & 3037**

mdwexford wrote: »

What are you on about.

Necrominus wrote: »

What the hell are you raving on about?

I see we have a few farmers that read the thread.

Im just spouting hyperbolic nonsense to keep with the theme of the conversation is all. Funny how ye both only quoted and replied to half my post.

Willing to take bets on

Harri hitting someone.
Harri being removed for her own safety or that of the other housemates.

Someone spending a few hours in bed, in a confined setting like the BB house cause someone else was giving them **** wouldnt make me call them crazy.

Old Perry wrote: »

the utter silence? can someone please give me a definition of silence whereby crazyness is a characteristic. people who are silent or quite are crazy? simple as that. this is diluded.

at most her silence and threat were immature and rash.

Sure she is a crazy woman shtombing around the house and shpendind all day in bed, I heard she even has a wife jesus whats the world coming to, Twont be long now till all the resht ah dem wake up dead.

power pants wrote: »

Im not sure you understand what big brother is about either.

its a game show, where you pit your wits against the other housemates in anyway deemed acceptable by the producers and the public

If you overstep the mark, you will be asked to leave either by the producers or by the public

Mark is playing the game and so far towing a fine line but definitely ruling the house.

I think some people on here think BB is an experiment of everyday life of how adults behave behind closed doors. This is not the case :pac:

applaud applaud applaud :) this is a great post, my take on the programme entirely, some people take it WAY too seriously.

It's a gameshow and Marc is playing the game brilliantly and with great entertainment for the viewers.

Harri, though, I do not think she's crazy by any means, acted very strangely yesterday. She could have been pre menstrual (we can all get a bit stroppy then) who knows, I'll see if she's back on form tonight before I judge.:cool:
That said, I can't take to her at all, her game is far too transparent I think, Mark is working harder and playing it more intelligently I think anyway. He really must be boll*xed by now. Duracell Bunny or what?

Anyway the bookies have him at 7/2 favourite but Chloe and Danny are closing in on him. They have him to thank for that as he brought both of them out onto the stage more. They were proper boring before he came.

mdwexford wrote: »

I'm not insulted, I find it strange someone would try and use the word farmer as an insult.

I've quoted you above now, so because you say no one is coming across as crazy that means it's case closed? How she's coming across to me and how she's coming across to you are two different things.

You must have be good crack if that was funny to you.

5/1 is a shockingly bad value price, I shall not be availing of your offer.

I wasnt using it as an insult dont be putting words in my mouth now.

We wouldnt really be discussing it if she was coming across the same way to both of us, I never said case closed either as I left the discussion very open, again you misrepresent what I'm saying.

So you dont think this crazy person will get thrown out or lash out 83.3% of the time. What % do you think she will out of interest

dark crystal wrote: »

If Harry had taken Jade's approach to Marc, it would stand to her much more. The sulky silent teenager act won't win her any allies in there.

I agree with someone earlier who said her gameplan had gone to shit and her "I don't care what anyone thinks of me" schtick is starting to unravel a bit now. She clearly does care and when even Nick is starting to doubt her motives, she must be wondering how she can rewind and find a new way to play the game.

As much of a knob as Marc is, I reckon he's right when he said she's trying to manipulate a situation where he's either going to be severely warned or thrown out by BB. She'd be much better off playing his game and beating him at it, rather than going down the petulant victim route.

Marc is manipulating and stirring about her too though.

Its weird because I like marc and I don't really like harry but I lean more towards her side on this.

Marc is an authoritarian, he needs to control. Harry is an anarchist, she wants to be free but she is also manipulative.

I don't like how Nick is handling the situation either. I think he's keeping both sides happy but he's coming off as a bit wimpy like in fairness he hasn't really stood by harry really and he did the same with Jade when everyone turned against her so I wonder who is really using who with those two.

I do think that harry probably feels extremely repressed in the house. I know they want her to wear clothes and I would want her to wear clothes too but there is thing of 'you have to try to fit in with our way in the house' . They do this to simon as well, they nit pick at his personality because it doesn't fit in their opinion of a harmonious house.

power pants wrote: »

Im not sure you understand what big brother is about either.

its a game show, where you pit your wits against the other housemates in anyway deemed acceptable by the producers and the public

If you overstep the mark, you will be asked to leave either by the producers or by the public

Mark is playing the game and so far towing a fine line but definitely ruling the house.

I think some people on here think BB is an experiment of everyday life of how adults behave behind closed doors. This is not the case :pac:

I think everyone understands that it is a game but there are parts that are real in how people choose to play that game and its fun to analyse it well I think it is. The game reveals aspects of peoples personalities whether they like it not.

Some people reveal nasty, loveable, controlling or very controlled, fun, sensitive, critical, mental or whatever traits come out as they are trying to play the game. Its still real even if they are playing the game because its how they play and react to the game that reveals them.