Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Vigilante Justice

  • 09-06-2015 04:36PM
    #1
    Closed Accounts Posts: 8,866 ✭✭✭


    I swore I'd never be one of those posters to post about news stories and look at me! For shame. Anyway, the below story got me thinking a bit about the legal system and vigilante justice. What are your thoughts on it?

    In a way, I sort of felt sorry for the guy that was attacked in this situation. Granted, I don't know anything about his case only that he is a child sex offender. Should it be the responsibility of our legal system alone to deal with criminals?

    Vigilante justice or in layman terms 'An eye for an eye' wouldn't be something I would agree with, but if something happened to my family or my friends, I think my morals would go out the window. I'm quite an over protective person and the thoughts of someone hurting my family or friends fills me with dread. I don't think I'd leave a rock un-turned in my quest to find the culprit. The sentences given out to murderers and rapists in this country and others can be sickeningly lenient. I'd prefer a justice system with harsher sentences. At the same time though, I would be totally against the death penalty. Does that make me a hypocrite?

    Linky to article: http://www.independent.ie/irish-news/local-mob-that-beat-up-convicted-child-rapist-in-dublin-were-concerned-parents-31289340.html

    I hope this is okay here.


«1

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 256 ✭✭AlphaRed


    Why should the government have the monopoly on violence?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,681 ✭✭✭bodice ripper


    Thread title is an oxymoron.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,730 ✭✭✭Sheep Lover


    I like bating this one eyed guy i know after he looks at my sister. Is that the same?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 13,925 ✭✭✭✭anncoates


    For once in these stories, the guy actually looks like a cartoon pervert


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 8,866 ✭✭✭Fat Christy


    Thread title is an oxymoron.

    I didn't know what else to put. :(


  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 14,242 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    I believe in the principle of retribution, but not by a mob. I'm not sure the latter should even need elaboration. Obviously the penal system should be organised, professional, and evenhanded.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,728 ✭✭✭dilallio


    What happens when the vigilantes are wrong or idiots?

    http://www.theguardian.com/uk/2000/aug/30/childprotection.society
    Self-styled vigilantes attacked the home of a hospital paediatrician after apparently confusing her professional title with the word "paedophile", it emerged yesterday.
    Dr Yvette Cloete, a specialist registrar in paediatric medicine at the Royal Gwent hospital in Newport, was forced to flee her house after vandals daubed it with graffiti in the middle of the night.
    The word "paedo" was written across the front porch and door of the house she shared with her brother in the village of St Brides, south Wales.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 8,866 ✭✭✭Fat Christy


    Re-reading my OP, there's at least 3 separate issues. Man I'm sh*t at trying to explain things....


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,758 ✭✭✭RedemptionZ


    No I don't agree with vigilante justice, because everyone should have the right to a fair trial, if people don't like the sentence handed out then campaign for harsher/different sentences. Beating the guy up because the justice system failed to punish him adequately isn't going to fix the justice system and people like him will consistently get 'soft' sentences, whatever people consider soft sentences to be.

    With regards to that case, it's one of those things where nobody wants a child rapist living in their area, but ultimately they do have to live somewhere. I'd rather have the guy housed, he's on the sex offender register I assume so the Garda will know what he's up to. I mean ultimately beating him up isn't going to un-rape the child. If he's hanging round schools then call the police.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,564 ✭✭✭✭whiskeyman


    Re-reading my OP, there's at least 3 separate issues. Man I'm sh*t at trying to explain things....

    I'd ban you 'vigilante style' if I could...


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,439 ✭✭✭✭One eyed Jack


    I like bating this one eyed guy i know after he looks at my sister. Is that the same?


    I hope not... :o


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 3,188 ✭✭✭DoYouEvenLift


    "How would I feel if this was done to me or someone in my family?" is how judges should decide their sentences. That way I'm sure there wouldn't be child molesters and murderers getting such lenient sentences.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 958 ✭✭✭MathDebater


    "He had been seen in the local shop with kids' DVDs and with kids' games in his hands, I don't understand how that is not breaking regulations of his parole.

    "There is transitional housing for women and kids from abusive relationships just 50 feet away from where he was living."

    The convicted criminal was also staying only a short walk away from a local crèche and playgroup.



    Probably shouldn't have been resttled there in the first place.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,828 ✭✭✭5rtytry56


    Re-reading my OP, there's at least 3 separate issues. Man I'm sh*t at trying to explain things....

    It's called the 'gugleguy syndrome' from a guy who used to post here.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,507 ✭✭✭Buona Fortuna


    Re-reading my OP, there's at least 3 separate issues. Man I'm sh*t at trying to explain things....

    We've got jackets for that.

    My 2cents ;). I have no sympathy for Ward and don't give a second thought for any $hit coming his way.

    Our justice system is broken. Heard today on the radio of a guy being released from prison today who had killed a Gard in 2009 (iirc). He'd already absconded from an open prison ffs.

    But I don't like or agree with people taking the law into their own hands. You only have to read some of the nuttier threads on here.

    Mob justice is no justice at all.


  • Posts: 14,242 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    "How would I feel if this was done to me or someone in my family?" is how judges should decide their sentences.
    No, that's comparable with allowing victims to sentence people.

    The law should strike a balance between revenge and rehabilitation, and no victim or their family would be capable of striking that balance in a fair manner.
    Probably shouldn't have been resettled there in the first place.
    No matter where you go in Ireland, you'll never be far from a playground, or a park, or a school, or an estate full of kids.

    Some of the claims about his activity (seen peeking through windows, caught buying children's toys) are a little fishy. They sound like they were pulled straight from a hysterical facebook page.

    In any case, as long as Ward is free, I don't think he can really be secluded from children, ideal though that would be.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,192 ✭✭✭Ken Shamrock


    I swore I'd never be one of those posters to post about news stories and look at me! For shame. Anyway, the below story got me thinking a bit about the legal system and vigilante justice. What are your thoughts on it?

    In a way, I sort of felt sorry for the guy that was attacked in this situation. Granted, I don't know anything about his case only that he is a child sex offender. Should it be the responsibility of our legal system alone to deal with criminals?

    Vigilante justice or in layman terms 'An eye for an eye' wouldn't be something I would agree with, but if something happened to my family or my friends, I think my morals would go out the window. I'm quite an over protective person and the thoughts of someone hurting my family or friends fills me with dread. I don't think I'd leave a rock un-turned in my quest to find the culprit. The sentences given out to murderers and rapists in this country and others can be sickeningly lenient. I'd prefer a justice system with harsher sentences. At the same time though, I would be totally against the death penalty. Does that make me a hypocrite?

    Linky to article: http://www.independent.ie/irish-news/local-mob-that-beat-up-convicted-child-rapist-in-dublin-were-concerned-parents-31289340.html

    I hope this is okay here.

    How in the name of Christ could anyone feel sorry for a convicted rapist/Paedo?


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 1,513 ✭✭✭whupdedo


    I like bating this one eyed guy i know after he looks at my sister. Is that the same?

    Masterbating to your sister you mean


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 8,866 ✭✭✭Fat Christy


    How in the name of Christ could anyone feel sorry for a convicted rapist/Paedo?

    I said 'sort of'. And then there's the rest of my OP.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,002 ✭✭✭✭AlekSmart


    No, that's comparable with allowing victims to sentence people.

    The law should strike a balance between revenge and rehabilitation, and no victim or their family would be capable of striking that balance in a fair manner.

    Perhaps the greater issue here is what leeway Irelands Citizens are prepared to give our Superior Courts in their interpretation of appropriate sentencing.

    Reading through this account from the Court of Criminal Appeal,I would suggest that reasonable and fair minded people would have a case for seeking a fuller explanation from at least Three Senior Judges.

    http://www.independent.ie/irish-news/courts/burglars-pursued-by-robbed-homeowner-until-gardai-stopped-them-have-sentences-reduced-31289516.html
    James Cash (28), of Boot Road, Clondalkin, Dublin 22, Thomas Wall (23) of Neilstwon Cottages, Clondalkin, Dublin 22 and William Wall (32), of Blacktrench, Newbridge, Co Kildare were found guilty at Cork Circuit Criminal Court on four counts of burglary committed in the Cork City area on December 1 and 2 2012.
    Cash and William Wall lost appeals against conviction last month but all three men today successfully appealed their sentences. A new sentence of four years imprisonment with the final 21 months suspended was imposed on Cash while the Walls were both given four years with two suspended.
    Cash was sentenced to seven years imprisonment with one suspended while the Walls were both sentenced to seven years imprisonment with the final two suspended by Judge Seán Ó Donnabháin on February 4 2014.

    Speaking on behalf of the Court of Appeal, Mr Justice George Birmingham said William Wall, a married man with two children, had no previous convictions for anything of this nature and it was his first time in custody.

    Again, Thomas Wall had no “significant previous convictions,” the judge said.

    Cash was “to a significant extent different”. He came before the courts with 37 previous convictions some of which were for burglary. He hadn't actually served a sentence but a number of sentences had been suspened.

    From my laymans perspective,I would suggest that Judge Seán Ó Donnabháin was 100% accurate in the sentence he imposed.

    I would most certainly question the judgement and motives of the Judges comprising this Court of Appeal.

    The reasons advanced by Mr Justice Birmingham,speaking on behalf of Mr Justice Garrett Sheehan and Mr Justice Alan Mahon to my layman's ears,do not sound credible or reasonable...In fact I would consider them irrational,and counter to the rights of NON Criminally inclined citizens to safe enjoyment of their property and life.

    The increasingly eccentric,sometimes bizzarre judgements of the Court of Appeal and quite often,the Supreme Court itself would appear to be have the welfare of the Criminal at heart.....I,for noe,would welcome a learned Judges explanation as to why this should be ?


    Men, it has been well said, think in herds; it will be seen that they go mad in herds, while they only recover their senses slowly, and one by one.

    Charles Mackay (1812-1889)



  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 704 ✭✭✭lizzyman


    "How would I feel if this was done to me or someone in my family?" is how judges should decide their sentences. That way I'm sure there wouldn't be child molesters and murderers getting such lenient sentences.

    Absolutely not. The whole point is that the judge is neutral and decides the sentence based on the case and the evidence before him. Judges would not be allowed rule on a case where their family members are involved.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 8,866 ✭✭✭Fat Christy


    dilallio wrote: »
    What happens when the vigilantes are wrong or idiots?

    http://www.theguardian.com/uk/2000/aug/30/childprotection.society

    O.o

    I would expect something like that to happen in America, not Wales. Mother of divine Christ!


  • Posts: 14,242 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    AlekSmart wrote: »
    The increasingly eccentric,sometimes bizzarre judgements of the Court of Appeal and quite often,the Supreme Court itself would appear to be have the welfare of the Criminal at heart.....I,for noe,would welcome a learned Judges explanation as to why this should be ?
    I don't know how 'eccentric' they are are, although any man caught sauntering near the Phoenix Park in a wig & frock certainly meets the description.

    I was responding to a more basic point. However eccentric they are, judges shouldn't be putting themselves in the shoes of anyone except a good-natured bystander.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,730 ✭✭✭Sheep Lover


    whupdedo wrote: »
    Masterbating to your sister you mean

    Stop labelling me, man.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,673 ✭✭✭AudreyHepburn


    I don't like the idea of Vigilante Justice because I can't see how becoming violent makes you any better than the person you are attacking.

    Although I waive that viewpoint for anyone who lays a hand on a child or the elderly...if you do that imo you forfeit the right to be treated as human.

    I just feel that there is a lot of scope for such a system to be abused - beating up a child molester is one thing but what happens when that is extending to include anyone and everyone who has ever done you wrong? What happens when innocent people who are wrongly accused of crimes starting getting hurt?

    Everyone has the right to a fair trial. Lynch mobs solve nothing imo.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,972 ✭✭✭captbarnacles


    I felt sorry for him. Didn't want to and it annoyed me that I did.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 1,951 ✭✭✭frostyjacks


    Nothing wrong with a bit of street justice every now and then. The law only punishes people after they commit the crime, in cases like this it's best to get the punishment in beforehand.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,362 ✭✭✭K4t


    Animals.

    Rather than travelling to a Garda station to share their grievances, or holding a community meeting to inform the neighborhood of the situation and perhaps setting out a strategy, they decided that the best cause of action was to physically assault the man? I'll just quote one of the comments under the article - I'd be more concerned for them as parents.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 8,866 ✭✭✭Fat Christy


    I felt sorry for him. Didn't want to and it annoyed me that I did.

    Yeah, I was the same.


  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 26,920 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    I hope everyone involved is identified and prosecuted for assault.


Advertisement
Advertisement