Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Are Irish people aesthetically challenged?

245

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,037 ✭✭✭Day Lewin


    Beauty is a difficult thing to define, yet most of us have little difficulty in recognising it. Those exquisite villages in England, for instance: serene city streets in many towns.
    But architecture always has something to do with the surrroundings - what one Irish architect called "mannerly in the landscape"
    (It was a phrase that caught my eye immediately on some TV programme, years ago: unfortunately I can't remember who it was, some guy who had a practice in rural Cork, maybe)
    Your house ought not to deface the natural landscape, or make a vulgar attention-seeking statement. It ought to be suited to its purpose and of compatible style with the local architectural tradition and materials. It ought to be part of the community - sustainable - partake of the village street or the country watersupply. Not invade beautiful views with aggressive novelty. Not squat as if glaring at passersby. Should occupy its own space gracefully, enjoying the sunshine, a bit of garden, making the best of what it has.

    Ah, but do designers, builders, architects and planners know all this? And if not, why not? Who gets to veto?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,605 ✭✭✭✭kneemos


    katemarch wrote: »
    Beauty is a difficult thing to define, yet most of us have little difficulty in recognising it. Those exquisite villages in England, for instance: serene city streets in many towns.
    But architecture always has something to do with the surrroundings - what one Irish architect called "mannerly in the landscape"
    (It was a phrase that caught my eye immediately on some TV programme, years ago: unfortunately I can't remember who it was, some guy who had a practice in rural Cork, maybe)
    Your house ought not to deface the natural landscape, or make a vulgar attention-seeking statement. It ought to be suited to its purpose and of compatible style with the local architectural tradition and materials. It ought to be part of the community - sustainable - partake of the village street or the country watersupply. Not invade beautiful views with aggressive novelty. Not squat as if glaring at passersby. Should occupy its own space gracefully, enjoying the sunshine, a bit of garden, making the best of what it has.

    Ah, but do designers, builders, architects and planners know all this? And if not, why not? Who gets to veto?


    They know it but who can afford it?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 24,461 ✭✭✭✭darkpagandeath


    katemarch wrote: »
    Beauty is a difficult thing to define, yet most of us have little difficulty in recognising it. Those exquisite villages in England, for instance: serene city streets in many towns.
    But architecture always has something to do with the surrroundings - what one Irish architect called "mannerly in the landscape"
    (It was a phrase that caught my eye immediately on some TV programme, years ago: unfortunately I can't remember who it was, some guy who had a practice in rural Cork, maybe)
    Your house ought not to deface the natural landscape, or make a vulgar attention-seeking statement. It ought to be suited to its purpose and of compatible style with the local architectural tradition and materials. It ought to be part of the community - sustainable - partake of the village street or the country watersupply. Not invade beautiful views with aggressive novelty. Not squat as if glaring at passersby. Should occupy its own space gracefully, enjoying the sunshine, a bit of garden, making the best of what it has.

    Ah, but do designers, builders, architects and planners know all this? And if not, why not? Who gets to veto?

    No one gets a veto hence the amount of one offs.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,037 ✭✭✭Day Lewin


    @kneemos - a fair question: but I think it is applicable even to very small and modest homes, just as much as to flashy new-builds.

    Even blocks of flats, in theory at least, (heaven help us, LOL)

    @darkpagandeath - I think someone, or some well-qualified group, OUGHT to have a veto. (Not one that can be bribed out, either)


    -But that returns us to the sage words of the OP - who, in this nation, has the aesthetic credentials to be believable as a veto?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 34,808 ✭✭✭✭smash


    I'm always amazed when someone builds a nice big house and then doesn't bother to paint it. Feckin concrete coloured houses all over the place.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 18,299 ✭✭✭✭The Backwards Man


    smash wrote: »
    I'm always amazed when someone builds a nice big house and then doesn't bother to paint it. Feckin concrete coloured houses all over the place.

    I wouldn't paint a house until at least five years after it was plastered.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 163 ✭✭QuantumP


    Re: the Americans, they obviously had an idealised preconception about what the Irish houses would be like - that I'm not defending. Its just their conversation got me thinking differently about how I viewed them myself and that's when I realised how ugly they are!


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 24,461 ✭✭✭✭darkpagandeath


    QuantumP wrote: »
    Re: the Americans, they obviously had an idealised preconception about what the Irish houses would be like - that I'm not defending. Its just their conversation got me thinking differently about how I viewed them myself and that's when I realised how ugly they are!

    When was the last time you heard of people building a house out of stone and then rendering the outside and thatching it ?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,202 ✭✭✭partyguinness


    Well the Celtic Tiger certainly did not help. There was such a rush to build that any old design rubbish was good enough.

    No thought or imagination whatsoever. TBH- I don't think we really cared.

    Sure we were all going to sell on for a huge profit in a few months anyway so why waste the time...:rolleyes:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,638 ✭✭✭Teyla Emmagan


    As a nation, we have feck all taste. Houses with big eagles on the pillars, and sunbeams on the side, cabbage palms in the gardens and PVC doors. And cobbledash! Feckin cobbledash everywhere! With probably a rusting old car around to the side of the house, leaning up against the doric columns. Not to mention the hideous colours we paint our houses - peach and green and pink FFS. And miles of ugly ribbonny bungaloes coming into every town, the entire driveways of which are covered in tarmac or wall to wall cobblelock.

    You should be fined for having any of those things IMO.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,634 ✭✭✭ThinkProgress


    What where the Americans expecting ? 20 People in a horse and cart ?

    Does that qualify as a dwelling?

    Pikey mansion!! lol


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 8,635 ✭✭✭Pumpkinseeds


    Does that qualify as a dwelling?

    Pikey mansion!! lol

    Pikey mansions, sounds like the name of an inner city Dublin council estate. :D


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,489 ✭✭✭Yamanoto


    The proliferation of various shades of vomit beige pebble-dash bungalows has left us with some of the ugliest rural housing stock anywhere in Europe.

    We're the Moldova of the north.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,833 ✭✭✭DeadHand


    I wouldn't paint a house until at least five years after it was plastered.

    Why?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 24,461 ✭✭✭✭darkpagandeath


    Yamanoto wrote: »
    The proliferation of various shades of vomit beige pebble-dash bungalows has left us with some of the ugliest rural housing stock anywhere in Europe.

    We're the Moldova of the north.

    Is there not some place down near cork famous for day glow coloured house's.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 478 ✭✭ejabrod


    kneemos wrote: »
    Naming houses something I've always found slightly odd.

    I called my first house 'John'


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,605 ✭✭✭✭kneemos


    smash wrote: »
    I'm always amazed when someone builds a nice big house and then doesn't bother to paint it. Feckin concrete coloured houses all over the place.


    I heard someone state that if they painted the house once they'd have to keep painting it .


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 163 ✭✭QuantumP


    When was the last time you heard of people building a house out of stone and then rendering the outside and thatching it ?

    Are you serious? I don't know how to make this any clearer. I know their preconception was ridiculous. Their conversation simply prompted me to look at the houses objectively, which were ugly as fu*k.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 18,299 ✭✭✭✭The Backwards Man


    DeadHand wrote: »
    Why?

    Two reasons.

    Give the walls plenty of time to dry out, but more importantly, once you start painting you have to keep painting. A house that needs painting is a lot uglier than one that has never been painted.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,443 ✭✭✭loveisdivine


    The amount of grey houses in Dublin is so depressing. Its bad enough that the skies always grey, why not make the houses a little brighter?


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 8,635 ✭✭✭Pumpkinseeds


    Stone cladding is awful and the country is littered with tacky McMansions. Has anyone else noticed the Irish lack of ability to furnish a dining room? Seriously, if I see one more kitchen that has a big rectangular space that's either empty or has a cheap looking knotty pine table and chairs thrown haphazardly in a corner I think I'll scream. Why build it if you don't know how to or intend to furnish it? It's not that difficult. That's another thing, what the fcuk is it with all the fricking pine people are putting in houses? It's awful.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,059 ✭✭✭✭osarusan


    Two reasons.

    Give the walls plenty of time to dry out, but more importantly, once you start painting you have to keep painting. A house that needs painting is a lot uglier than one that has never been painted.

    Just make it with magnolia-coloured plaster so. Sorted.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,794 ✭✭✭Aongus Von Bismarck


    QuantumP wrote: »
    I was on a bus through Connemara and I overheard American tourists talking about their disappointment with how ugly the houses were (they were expecting thatched roofs everywhere :rolleyes:).

    Anyway, I decided to try see them from a tourists perspective and was amazed with how ugly most of them are. Mustard yellows and peach pink everywhere too wtf is that about :confused:.

    The houses in Connemara are disgusting eyesores for the most part. Faded and chipped magnolia paint, if they bothered painting at all. Abandoned cars in the rocky field beside the house. A collective fear of putting down tarmac in the drives of their houses', weeds and overgrown bushes in every garden. The locals must spend too much time gurning, drinking, drink driving, and staring into the distance to find the time to do their homes up.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,634 ✭✭✭ThinkProgress


    Stone cladding is awful and the country is littered with tacky McMansions. Has anyone else noticed the Irish lack of ability to furnish a dining room? Seriously, if I see one more kitchen that has a big rectangular space that's either empty or has a cheap looking knotty pine table and chairs thrown haphazardly in a corner I think I'll scream. Why build it if you don't know how to or intend to furnish it? It's not that difficult. That's another thing, what the fcuk is it with all the fricking pine people are putting in houses? It's awful.

    It's funny, when I was renting an apartment on my own a few years ago, my complete lack of interior design knowledge led me to keep things very simple and plain.

    This led to people complimenting how well furnished the place was because they thought I was going for the "minimalist look"... lol

    I was, but not in the manner they were thinking! :p


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 18,299 ✭✭✭✭The Backwards Man


    The houses in Connemara are disgusting eyesores for the most part. Faded and chipped magnolia paint, if they bothered painting at all. Abandoned cars in the rocky field beside the house. A collective fear of putting down tarmac in the drives of their houses', weeds and overgrown bushes in every garden. The locals must spend too much time gurning, drinking, drink driving, and staring into the distance to find the time to do their homes up.

    Still, better than Bauhaus protuberances any day of the week.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,266 ✭✭✭✭whisky_galore


    When was the last time you heard of people building a house out of stone and then rendering the outside and thatching it ?

    I saw an imitation thatched cottage once, built out of blocks and then they came along and stuck some yokes resembling a concrete 1/4 of a football to make it look 'lumpy'.:pac: Looked like the house had acne.

    One thing we're not so good at is re-using old houses or old industrial buildings as living spaces. I know it costs way more, but the end result of some of them is fantastic. The amount of abandoned buildings dotting the landscape is something else.

    Another bugbear is chipping off all the rendering off old buildings and leaving the bare rubble stone, which was never intended to be out in the open. So called 'traditional' Irish pubs are notorious for this.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 24,461 ✭✭✭✭darkpagandeath


    I saw an imitation thatched cottage once, built out of blocks and then they came along and stuck some yokes resembling a concrete 1/4 of a football to make it look 'lumpy'.:pac: Looked like the house had acne.

    One thing we're not so good at is re-using old houses or old industrial buildings as living spaces. I know it costs way more, but the end result of some of them is fantastic. The amount of abandoned buildings dotting the landscape is something else.

    Another bugbear is chipping off all the rendering off old buildings and leaving the bare rubble stone, which was never intended to be out in the open. So called 'traditional' Irish pubs are notorious for this.

    Yeah that's odd alright, Would it not be more traditional to have lime white render ?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 159 ✭✭poeticjustice


    Stone cladding is awful and the country is littered with tacky McMansions. Has anyone else noticed the Irish lack of ability to furnish a dining room? Seriously, if I see one more kitchen that has a big rectangular space that's either empty or has a cheap looking knotty pine table and chairs thrown haphazardly in a corner I think I'll scream. Why build it if you don't know how to or intend to furnish it? It's not that difficult. That's another thing, what the fcuk is it with all the fricking pine people are putting in houses? It's awful.

    Yeah...those people are crazy... ;)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,342 ✭✭✭fatknacker


    There's a house in Craughwell that has a full size ships anchor in the front lawn, kinda takes a way from the house a bit.

    Or keeps it there! Like...you know?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,266 ✭✭✭✭whisky_galore


    fatknacker wrote: »
    Or keeps it there! Like...you know?

    Stops it drifting and colliding with other houses?


Advertisement
Advertisement