Has the balance has now shifted(straight & sexually derived Vs being gay)

Electric Boobs · 06-06-2015 02:50PM #1

Is it now officially more shameful to be a sexually starved male than be a gay one? There was a time, when if someone highlighted the fact I don't get girls, I could say, "well at least I'm not gay". But now with the referendum and all, it seems we've to admit that homosexuality is normal.

So if someone made a similar comment in the future, I could avoid the insult by pretending to be gay... since it now carries less shame!!

Debate!

Stheno · 06-06-2015 02:51PM

Electric Boobs wrote: »

Is it now officially more shameful to be a sexually starved male than be a gay one? There was a time when I could say, "well at least I'm not gay", but now that we've to admit being gay is normal, that means things have changed.

Debate!

Eh what?

paulmclaughlin · 06-06-2015 02:55PM

It would be easier to start a debate if your topic made more sense.

Dan_Solo · 06-06-2015 02:57PM

Electric Boobs wrote: »

Is it now officially more shameful to be a sexually starved male than be a gay one? There was a time when I could say, "well at least I'm not gay", but now that we've to admit being gay is normal, that means things have changed.

Debate!

Are you the topic of the debate or your... whatever it is you said?

Turtwig · 06-06-2015 03:02PM

Electric Boobs wrote: »

Is it now officially more shameful to be a sexually starved male than be a gay one? There was a time when I could say, "well at least I'm not gay", but now that we've to admit being gay is normal, that means things have changed.

Debate!

Let me get this straight. You consider being sexually inactive as a negative thing, but that was ok because being gay was clearly a more negative shameful thing.

Politely fck off!
The only thing that's shameful is judging people based on their interests and actions that don't harm anyone!

Timberrrrrrrr · 06-06-2015 03:04PM

Electric Boobs wrote: »

Is it now officially more shameful to be a sexually starved male than be a gay one? There was a time when I could say, "well at least I'm not gay", but now that we've to admit being gay is normal, that means things have changed.

Debate!

Well at least now you can just say "I still have my rampant homophobia to keep me going on those lonely nights"

tommy2bad · 06-06-2015 03:11PM

Right so their was a time when heading back to your scratcher all alone yet again, your consolation was at least you weren't gay!
Tbh I'd be more sorry I wasn't gay if my success with the ladies was that bad but to each his own.
Interesting observation though, I didn't realize people felt such pressure that they needed people to look down on. We owe the gays a big thanks for fulfilling this role for so long, now all we have to do is find another group to feel superior to. Other than sex obsessed but not getting any folks of course.

ancapailldorcha · 06-06-2015 03:14PM

Locked.

Has the balance has now shifted(straight & sexually derived Vs being gay)

Comments