3 British ISIS brides that flew into Syria reportedly on the run from their husbands

Cold War Kid wrote: »

Ooh, I know this one! YOU don't care, therefore nobody else does? Amirite or amirite?

But if you DO care, you fancy Osama Bin Laden and want to burqa the pope.

Nodin wrote: »

You seem to have gone from the specific to the general.

Well from the earlier post it seems to suggest letting people go over to join groups like this. And when in trouble should be funded by the tax payers to get them out of the jam they created themselves. What do you suggest brought back and someone shake a finger going don't do it again ?

Candie wrote: »

An issue with what?

The only issue I have is with three stupid kids being wished harm on the basis of stupid, ignorant decision. The greatest harm they've done is to themselves but they've been wished all kinds of torture in this thread. If they're guilty of a crime, then they should be punished accordingly, but many posters are acting as though the girls have been on a murder spree and deserve to be punished in kind.

My issue is with the spite and vitriol.

They didn't actually commit any acts of terror - they stupidly glorified a terrorist group to be rebellious. Teens rebel. They certainly took it to the extreme and were silly eejits, but it was ultimately teen rebellion and trying to be edgy and all that shyte that teens do, if to the extreme.
Now they've learned their lesson and they're not going to do anything stupid again.
Yet people still want them severely punished (I do think they certainly deserve a right bollocking from their parents but prison?) or, more sinisterly, enjoy the idea of them being brutalised by Isis.
I would say such people don't really care what they did and just like the idea of "little bitches" being violated. Ya know yourself.

kstand wrote: »

It's a shame the law here doesn't dictate a 12 stroke birching for each of them if they do decide to return to this country.

This isn't Britain.

Yep, nothing like corporal punishment to show them sharia law has no place in Europe.

darkpagandeath wrote: »

I have no idea if they did or not how can you say that ?

None that we know of. Is it that they should be imprisoned for "stuff that they might have done" now?

If they do let them back in they should be locked in a secure mental facility for the rest of their years.

Cold War Kid wrote: »

They didn't actually commit any acts of terror - they stupidly glorified a terrorist group to be rebellious. Teens rebel. They certainly took it to the extreme and were silly eejits, but it was ultimately teen rebellion and trying to be edgy and all that shyte that teens do, if to the extreme.
Now they've learned their lesson and they're not going to do anything stupid again.
Yet people still want them severely punished (I do think they certainly deserve a right bollocking from their parents but prison?) or, more sinisterly, enjoy the idea of them being brutalised by Isis.
I would say such people don't really care what they did and just like the idea of "little bitches" being violated. Ya know yourself.

Ah here travelling a couple of thousand miles at great effort to lend material support to a group that publicises the most amazingly brutal acts of violence against their victims is more than teenage rebellion or trying to be edgy.
If you were a shia living beside these girls would you feel ok because its alright their parents have given them a bollocking

darkpagandeath wrote: »

I have no idea if they did or not how can you say that ? We have seen what supporters of this group are capable of. You know executions big screens people watching cheering, I have no idea one can just make a broad statement as if it's fact with zero evidence.

Yes, IS are known for their empowerment of females, allowing them key positions in the organisation. Feminazis the lot of them.

PeteFalk78 wrote: »

Worthwhile human being? You just gave me the best laugh of the day.
You, good sir, are a comedic genius.

Well it's hardly a sign of being a worthwhile human being to gloat at teenagers being in danger of butchering to death.

Cold War Kid wrote: »

Jail for what? They can be tried as adults?

Age is immunity from the law now ? When did this happen ?

RDM_83 again wrote: »

Ah here travelling a couple of thousand miles at great effort to lend material support to a group that publicises the most amazingly brutal acts of violence against their victims is more than teenage rebellion or trying to be edgy.
If you were a shia living beside these girls would you feel ok because its alright their parents have given them a bollocking

They're trying to get away now - they strike me merely as highly impressionable dopes. I'm not under-estimating their stupidity or ISIS, I'm pointing out the way people like the idea of them having goodness knows what done to them if caught.

Cold War Kid wrote: »

Well it's hardly a sign of being a worthwhile human being to gloat at teenagers being in danger of butchering to death.

Who is gloating? I'd love to see your definition of a "worthwhile human being". Don't SJWs such as yourself think every human being is "worthwhile"?