3 British ISIS brides that flew into Syria reportedly on the run from their husbands

cloud493 · 14-05-2015 06:17PM

osarusan wrote: »

About what were you using the term Schadenfreude in your first post?

The fact they they thought they were getting one thing and didn't get what they expected?

doesn't equate to 'woo hoo hope they get slaughtered by terrorists' christ.

darkpagandeath · 14-05-2015 06:18PM

Candie wrote: »

So now SJW is the new dismissive disparagement. De PC brigade has run it's course I suppose, so we need a new meaningless put-down so that we can shut people up out of hand.

The girls actions amount to going into ISIS controlled territory thinking they'd marry what they think are hero husbands.

They haven't, it seems, beheaded anyone or blown up people, but hey, lets talk like they're just as bad as those who do to legitimise the vitriol.

Care to answer the question ?

osarusan · 14-05-2015 06:19PM

SJW....does it even mean anything any more? Did it ever?

14-05-2015 06:19PM

Care to answer the question ?

What actions do you think they should bear the consequences of, and what consequences should they face for them?

osarusan · 14-05-2015 06:21PM

cloud493 wrote: »

The fact they they thought they were getting one thing and didn't get what they expected? doesn't equate to 'woo hoo hope they get slaughtered by terrorists' christ.

You deriving enjoyment from their misfortune is quite different to you just not giving a crap about them, don't you think?

14-05-2015 06:22PM

osarusan wrote: »

SJW....does it even mean anything any more? Did it ever?

It means nothing, just usurps De PC Brigade and/or De Feminists as a meaningless dismissive.

darkpagandeath · 14-05-2015 06:23PM

osarusan wrote: »

SJW....does it even mean anything any more? Did it ever?

http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=SJW

cloud493 · 14-05-2015 06:24PM

osarusan wrote: »

You deriving enjoyment from their misfortune is quite different to you just not giving a crap about them, don't you think?

Nope. I'm experiencing bitter joy at them being idiots, whilst also not particularly wishing for them to be slaughtered by terrorists, nor be assisted by peoples tax dollars to make it back to the west.

The Backwards Man · 14-05-2015 06:24PM

I thought it was something to do with Sarah Jessica Parker, my dyslexia must be getting worse.

darkpagandeath · 14-05-2015 06:25PM

Candie wrote: »

What actions do you think they should bear the consequences of, and what consequences should they face for them?

Laws dealing with joining Terrorist organisations in their jurisdiction.

darkpagandeath · 14-05-2015 06:29PM

The Backwards Man wrote: »

I thought it was something to do with Sarah Jessica Parker, my dyslexia must be getting worse.

Nah just think of it as people high fiving each other over how concerned they are for people they do not know. Or trying to be the most outraged. :pac:

14-05-2015 06:29PM

darkpagandeath wrote: »

Laws dealing with joining Terrorist organisations in their jurisdiction.

Did they join?

I thought they were out to marry ISIS jihadis, not join ISIS? I haven't read that they joined anywhere.

Junkyard Tom · 14-05-2015 06:31PM

darkpagandeath wrote: »

http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=SJW

Ah yes, the Urban Dictionary.. the lexicon of geniuses.

14-05-2015 06:31PM

darkpagandeath wrote: »

http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=SJW

So yeah, a basically meaningless dismissive used to demean and quell someone with an opposing point of view, just as much as it's used to describe someone with empty principles.

darkpagandeath · 14-05-2015 06:33PM

Junkyard Cat wrote: »

Ah yes, the Urban Dictionary.. the lexicon of geniuses.

:pac:

ardinn · 14-05-2015 06:33PM

Is there a form you have to fill out??

14-05-2015 06:34PM

darkpagandeath wrote: »

Nah just think of it as people high fiving each other over how concerned they are for people they do not know. Or trying to be the most outraged. :pac:

One more and you'll have a triple whammy.

'Outrage' is a term most often used to make someone who doesn't agree with your point of view look like an hysteric and therefore safely dismissed.

People aren't walking around strung out on the adrenaline of 'outrage'. They just don't agree with you.

Give us another one, go on.

darkpagandeath · 14-05-2015 06:34PM

Candie wrote: »

So yeah, a basically meaningless dismissive used to demean and quell someone with an opposing point of view, just as much as it's used to describe someone with empty principles.

So, What age should people be responsible for their actions ?

darkpagandeath · 14-05-2015 06:35PM

Candie wrote: »

One more and you'll have a triple whammy.

'Outrage' is a term most often used to make someone who doesn't agree with your point of view like an hysteric and therefore safely dismissed.

People aren't walking around strung out on the adrenaline of 'outrage'. They just don't agree with you.

Give us another one, go on.

So, What age should people be responsible for their actions ? Anyone ?

osarusan · 14-05-2015 06:35PM

darkpagandeath wrote: »

http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=SJW

Hahahaaha....you might as well quote Roger Melly's profanisaurus.

What exactly is the social justice you think these warriors are fighting for?

I don't see much in this thread beyond thinking that people hoping they get 'pistol whipped' or that their 'goatf**king husbands find them' is going too far.

14-05-2015 06:36PM

darkpagandeath wrote: »

So, What age should people be responsible for their actions ?

Lets go with the legal age of voting.

Now, lets talk about the actions they should face the consequences of.

Going to Syria? Marrying brainwashed Jihadis?

Or are we going to pretend they bombed and beheaded people and should be locked up for life, at 15, 15, and 16 years old?

darkpagandeath · 14-05-2015 06:38PM

osarusan wrote: »

Hahahaaha....you might as well quote Roger Melly's profanisaurus.

What exactly is the social justice you think these warriors are fighting for?

I don't see much in this thread beyond thinking that people hoping they get pistol whipped or that their goatf**king husband find them is going too far.

No, Most are just saying they are responsible for their own actions. What age are people responsible for their actions ? Its the other side going off on tangents about wanting bad things to happen to them. As per usual if you don't agree you support xyz.

Fr_Dougal · 14-05-2015 06:38PM

I think they should be allowed to marry whoever they want to.

14-05-2015 06:39PM

darkpagandeath wrote: »

No, Most are just saying they are responsible for their own actions. What age are people responsible for their actions ? Its the other side going off on tangents about wanting bad things to happen to them. As per usual if you don't agree you support xyz.

You want them to face the consequences of their actions.

What actions, and what consequences do you want to see addressed?

darkpagandeath · 14-05-2015 06:40PM

Candie wrote: »

Lets go with the legal age of voting.

Now, lets talk about the actions they should face the consequences of.

Going to Syria? Marrying brainwashed Jihadis?

Or are we going to pretend they bombed and beheaded people and should be locked up for life, at 15, 15, and 16 years old?

Candie wrote: »

You want them to face the consequences of their actions.

What actions, and what consequences do you want to see addressed?

I would go with joining a terrorist group/supporting it. Laws dealing with that in Their jurisdiction.

14-05-2015 06:42PM

darkpagandeath wrote: »

I would go with joining a terrorist group/supporting it. Laws dealing with that in Their jurisdiction.

Okay. So what do you think a 15 year old in the early 90's who thought the IRA was a freedom fighting force should have faced, legally?

Lets say, for argument, that they gave out pro IRA pamphlets at school, thus distributing material in support of an outlawed organisation?

darkpagandeath · 14-05-2015 06:45PM

Candie wrote: »

Okay. So what do you think a 15 year old in the early 90's who thought the IRA was a freedom fighting force should have faced, legally?

Lets say, for argument, that they gave out pro IRA pamphlets at school, thus distributing material in support of an outlawed organisation?

Ireland has laws dealing with this.

osarusan · 14-05-2015 06:45PM

darkpagandeath wrote: »

I would go with joining a terrorist group/supporting it. Laws dealing with that in Their jurisdiction.

What are those laws and punishments?

darkpagandeath · 14-05-2015 06:46PM

osarusan wrote: »

What are those laws and punishments?

Ask the UK authorities.

who the fug · 14-05-2015 06:47PM

darkpagandeath wrote: »

Ireland has laws dealing with this.

No one is saying do not enforce the law, we are just saying the law must take into account the village idiots.

3 British ISIS brides that flew into Syria reportedly on the run from their husbands

Comments