Same Sex Marriage Referendum Mega Thread - MOD WARNING IN FIRST POST

jimdublin15 · 10-05-2015 02:42AM

Cris Jones wrote: »

thanks for you response. I would though, call it ganged up on, if anybody says no to the yes campaign.

No problem, sorry to hear you see it that way. That's your view and ill respect you are entitled have your own view. .

To be honest I don't think the problem is as such if someone would say they are voting No, but it's a discussion thread so of course the reason behind a yes or no vote is discussed. But it's not required to read the thread or discuss it thankfully. Bit like TV I suppose, if i don't like the channel, I change it. But that's just me.

jimdublin15 · 10-05-2015 02:47AM

Lyaiera wrote: »

Do you think Paddy Power would give odds on who ****s up their kids more (per capita?) Same-sex married parents or opposite-sex married parents?

On the one hand I think gay parents have to go through a lot to win a child. There's surrogacy, adoption rules, paying lots of money, etc. which takes a lot of homework. And I think gay couples for the first few years would be more conscious of messing up. Straight couples can win a child any night of the week (most of them anyway, not the ones who have to go through adoption or surrogacy, the poor craters.) And they're really practiced at messing up children. You could say they're naturals!

But balancing that is the fact that everyone is human. And kids are thick as planks who'll mess up their own lives no matter what the parents do.

"Straight couples can win a child any night of the week"
lol, you make it sound like a raffle prize.

I'm a very proud father of two and my kids live in a "gay" household with gay parents. No homework was required BTW to have the kids either.

But not much of anything either of us just said has any relation to SSM

Cris Jones · 10-05-2015 02:50AM

jimdublin15 wrote: »

No problem, sorry to hear you see it that way. That's your view and ill respect you are entitled have your own view. .

To be honest I don't think the problem is as such if someone would say they are voting No, but it's a discussion thread so of course the reason behind a yes or no vote is discussed. But it's not required to read the thread or discuss it thankfully. Bit like TV I suppose, if i don't like the channel, I change it. But that's just me.

it has been well noticed that anybody saying no is ganged up on in media. but thank you. you have been polite.

jimdublin15 · 10-05-2015 02:51AM

Cris Jones wrote: »

you are talking guff, guff which you think will be popular. now i wait to be ganged up on.

:rolleyes:

jimdublin15 · 10-05-2015 02:53AM

Cris Jones wrote: »

it has been well noticed that anybody saying no is ganged up on in media. but thank you. you have been polite.

No problem.

Modern media tends to always do whatever they think will get viewers and sell papers and unfortunately are (in my view) less and less representative of the population.

Cris Jones · 10-05-2015 02:59AM

jimdublin15 wrote: »

No problem.

Modern media tends to always do whatever they think will get viewers and sell papers and unfortunately are (in my view) less and less representative of the population.

thank you for polite -answer. however having lived many years and in many countries (working) I have not seen all these one sex wanting to get married.

bodice ripper · 10-05-2015 03:05AM

Cris Jones wrote:

thank you for polite -answer. however having lived many years and in many countries (working) I have not seen all these one sex wanting to get married.

So i guess what you are saying here is one sex good, two sex better?

jimdublin15 · 10-05-2015 03:07AM

Cris Jones wrote: »

thank you for polite -answer. however having lived many years and in many countries (working) I have not seen all these one sex wanting to get married. I have not like you say,seen them in any population and if i did, it wasn't that they wanted to be married like a man and a woman. I can fill in details if you want me to.

Well you know let's think about that for a moment.
I've lived and worked in The Netherlands/Denmark/UK and France myself BTW.

Your saying" I have not seen all these one sex wanting to get married."

To be honest your right, neither have I. Then again not all straight couples want or do get married, however giving them the choice to do so is exactly that a choice. When we then say maybe at tops 10 % of the population would be gay, maybe at tops 4-5 % openly gay or part of the LGBT and from that even is we say most would want to get married so let's say 3 % . 3 % from a population is very small number so it figures even in countries that allow gay marriage we would see very little of it.

Just because only a few would use a right does (I feel) not mean we should exclude them from having that right to choose.

Cris Jones · 10-05-2015 03:09AM

bodice ripper wrote: »

So i guess what you are saying here is one sex good, two sex better?

trolling.

dubscottie · 10-05-2015 03:10AM

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8SW0W7L4vRc

Cris Jones · 10-05-2015 03:13AM

jimdublin15 wrote: »

Well you know let's think about that for a moment.
I've lived and worked in The Netherlands/Denmark/UK and France myself BTW.

Your saying" I have not seen all these one sex wanting to get married."

To be honest your right, neither have I. Then again not all straight couples want or do get married, however giving them the choice to do so is exactly that a choice. When we then say maybe at tops 10 % of the population would be gay, maybe at tops 4-5 % openly gay or part of the LGBT and from that even is we say most would want to get married so let's say 3 % . 3 % from a population is very small number so it figures even in countries that allow gay marriage we would see very little of it.

Just because only a few would use a right does (I feel) not mean we should exclude them from having that right to choose.

You have edited my reply and googled quick. I win.

jimdublin15 · 10-05-2015 03:16AM

Cris Jones wrote: »

You have edited my reply and googled quick. I win.

I did not edit your reply. How rude to say that, I was writing my reply and quoted yours. If you edited yours before anyone posted whilst I was wrting my reply it would not show as edited.

Win ? win what.

Anyhow my reply to you stands and if you don't want to answer it that fine, be grow-up and just say that.

I edited this twice does not show see how it works.

bodice ripper · 10-05-2015 03:18AM

Cris Jones wrote:

trolling.

Oh. I thought so. Carry on.

Cris Jones · 10-05-2015 03:19AM

dubscottie wrote: »

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8SW0W7L4vRc

links to films don't make your post good.

bodice ripper · 10-05-2015 03:22AM

Cris Jones wrote:

links to films don't make your post good.

Yes, let us return to talking about all the one sex...

Ozymandius2011 · 10-05-2015 03:25AM

Interesting revelationfrom a 3 year old tweet in which no campaigner Kate Bopp supported Clint Eastwood's support for gay marriage.

https://twitter.com/mrs_bopp/status/204687095665672192

Cris Jones · 10-05-2015 03:29AM

bodice ripper wrote: »

Yes, let us return to talking about all the one sex...

Like never met in life before. pull your own wire and leave the rest of us alone with your gay desire.

dubscottie · 10-05-2015 03:30AM

I can not believe that we are still being told what to do by idiots that think some sky fairy created everything..

This referendum has nothing what so ever to do with children..

I am gay and would like to get married to my other half of 15 years.. (yes 15 years.. We don't all ride the first arse we see)

We hate kids.. And we wont be stealing a straight couples smelly, **** producing, puking, money sucking crotch goblin..

I would like the same rights as my straight brother however..

dubscottie · 10-05-2015 03:31AM

Cris Jones wrote: »

links to films don't make your post good.

Better than what you have come up with..

bodice ripper · 10-05-2015 03:32AM

Cris Jones wrote:

Like never met in life before. pull your own wire and leave the rest of us alone with your gay desire.

You gonna gang up on me?

Cris Jones · 10-05-2015 03:34AM

dubscottie wrote: »

I can not believe that we are still being told what to do by idiots that think some sky fairy created everything..

This referendum has nothing what so ever to do with children..

I am gay and would like to get married to my other half of 15 years.. (yes 15 years.. We don't all ride the first arse we see)

We hate kids.. And we wont be stealing a straight couples smelly, **** producing, puking, money sucking crotch goblin..

I would like the same rights as my straight brother however..

Then live nice and stop being abusive. You sound repulsive. Give a little instead of expecting a lot.

jimdublin15 · 10-05-2015 03:34AM

Cris Jones wrote: »

Like never met in life before. pull your own wire and leave the rest of us alone with your gay desire.

Cris really now. Your not answering the questions posted to you and your responses and replies are simply beneath you and not constrictive debate or discussion.

I thought for a while you wanted to actually talk and discuss SSM guess I was wrong.

Cris Jones · 10-05-2015 03:35AM

dubscottie wrote: »

Better than what you have come up with..

no, i don't think so:P

dubscottie · 10-05-2015 03:37AM

Cris Jones wrote: »

Then live nice and stop being abusive. You sound repulsive. Give a little instead of expecting a lot.

You sir are the repulsive one..

Am I repuslive because I have said I am gay?.. Your true agenda is showing now..

Cris Jones · 10-05-2015 03:39AM

dubscottie wrote: »

You sir are the repulsive one..

go and pull your wire. you have nothing else to give than your hand ****.

Mod Edit: User banned for 1 day

dubscottie · 10-05-2015 03:42AM

Cris Jones wrote: »

go and pull your wire. you have nothing else to give than your hand ****.

I have more to give to this state than you..

The country has no need for the likes of you anymore..

Feck off back to the 1900's and leave us that live in the 2000's alone..

Lyaiera · 10-05-2015 03:46AM

Cris Jones wrote: »

you are talking guff, guff which you think will be popular. now i wait to be ganged up on.

I really don't think it's popular to suggest that all newly borns are sent to central holding. Applicants for the children are assessed and the newly borns are dispensed to parents or parent on a ratio of ability to care and provide, to crap filled nappies filling up central holding.

Now, in an ideal world central holding with have the results of bad parents shoveling the nappies into a incendiary disposal unit but they probably have their notions of applying for childer of their own.

Lyaiera · 10-05-2015 03:48AM

jimdublin15 wrote: »

"Straight couples can win a child any night of the week"
lol, you make it sound like a raffle prize.

I'm a very proud father of two and my kids live in a "gay" household with gay parents. No homework was required BTW to have the kids either.

But not much of anything either of us just said has any relation to SSM

Oh.

I guess the referendum isn't about going on Winning Streak and spinning the wheel for children.

Annasopra · 10-05-2015 09:08AM

ted1 wrote: »

Can anyone explain as to why there is an election?

The consistution currently has equality and doesn't say marriage is between male and female.

The 2004 civil partnership bill says marriage is between male and female , this could be changed over night.

The 2015 family and relationship bill looks after adoption etc and lets same sex couples adopt among other stuff.

So why the vote? Why not just change the bill?

Because the Courts have interpreted the constitution to say Marriage is between a man and a woman

gandalf · 10-05-2015 09:33AM

I see Breda O'Brien is now backtracking totally on her challenge to Panti Bliss for a debate. What a pathetic and cowardly organisation this so called Iona Institute is.

Same Sex Marriage Referendum Mega Thread - MOD WARNING IN FIRST POST

Comments