How will you vote in the Marriage Equality referendum? Mod Note Post 1

ohnonotgmail · 02-05-2015 01:15AM

mucksavage1985 wrote: »

Well fanny licking or anal busting whichever ur into. Here is a link about stable homes if anyone is interested http://now.uiowa.edu/2012/10/parental-bondinghappy-stable-child

i dont see anything in that link that says the parents have to be heterosexual.

bodice ripper · 02-05-2015 01:16AM

mucksavage1985 wrote: »

Nature bit is when a man sticks his penis into a woman's vagina. Then he ejaculates which in turn causes semen to flow into vulva and into Fallopian tubes where the egg will be fertilised and then imbed on the wall of womb. From their it takes approx up 9 months to grow all going well into a healthy baby which will be born.

Oooh. Premature ejaculation. Not ideal for reproduction.

mucksavage1985 · 02-05-2015 01:17AM

Bannasidhe wrote: »

Well, there are other methods but that is the most common.

What does this have to do with raising a child?
You know - being a parent?

I am sure that all around Ireland right now extremely drunk men are sticking their penises into the vaginas of equally drunk women. Some of them may even be doing this down an alleyway or similar salubrious location. Do you think the fact that drunk man can find the hole qualifies this couple to raise a child?

Haha I enjoyed reading that.

mucksavage1985 · 02-05-2015 01:18AM

Doctor Jimbob wrote: »

Ah but see it mentions a mum and a dad!

What do you mean it didn't compare this with homosexual parents and that wasn't the point of the study?

It's about stable homes

ohnonotgmail · 02-05-2015 01:19AM

Doctor Jimbob wrote: »

Ah but see it mentions a mum and a dad!

What do you mean it didn't compare this with homosexual parents and that wasn't the point of the study?

it actually says mother OR father.

“There is a really important period when a mother or a father should form a secure relationship with their child, and that is during the first two years of life.

ohnonotgmail · 02-05-2015 01:19AM

mucksavage1985 wrote: »

It's about stable homes

so why cant a gay couple have a stable home? What is it about being gay that prevents this?

AtomicHorror · 02-05-2015 01:19AM

bodice ripper wrote: »

Oooh. Premature ejaculation. Not ideal for reproduction.

I'm not sure if it's vocabulary or his experience that's betraying him there.

ohnonotgmail · 02-05-2015 01:21AM

Doctor Jimbob wrote: »

Here's a similarly relevant article

http://www.smashingmagazine.com/2011/06/13/the-story-of-scandinavian-design-combining-function-and-aesthetics/

oooh, interesting article. I'll read it tomorrow.

Bannasidhe · 02-05-2015 01:21AM

mucksavage1985 wrote: »

Well fanny licking or anal busting whichever ur into. Here is a link about stable homes if anyone is interested http://now.uiowa.edu/2012/10/parental-bondinghappy-stable-child

How does one bust an anal?

Do you mean rupture a rectum?
Did you know that is the access point for men's g spot? Wouldn't want to go rupturing that now would we. Lube is our friend.
Did you also know there is no reason heterosexuals cannot also enjoy these activities?

mucksavage1985 · 02-05-2015 01:21AM

VinLieger wrote: »

Define a stable home....... also id love some facts, figures and verifiable scientific publications to back up your assertions if you don't mind?

http://now.uiowa.edu/2012/10/parental-bondinghappy-stable-child

Bannasidhe · 02-05-2015 01:22AM

mucksavage1985 wrote: »

It's about stable homes

Would a nice barn conversion do?

bodice ripper · 02-05-2015 01:23AM

mucksavage1985 wrote: »

Well fanny licking or anal busting whichever ur into. Here is a link about stable homes if anyone is interested http://now.uiowa.edu/2012/10/parental-bondinghappy-stable-child

He's against fanny licking! You want to side with this kill-joy? Do you want one day to one day tell your now adult children "first they came for the gays, but then they came for the fanny-lickers...If only we had listened."

Vote Yes.

ohnonotgmail · 02-05-2015 01:23AM

mucksavage1985 wrote: »

http://now.uiowa.edu/2012/10/parental-bondinghappy-stable-child

yeah you posted that already. Do you have anything actually relevant to the point you are trying to make?

mucksavage1985 · 02-05-2015 01:23AM

Bannasidhe wrote: »

How does one bust an anal?

Do you mean rupture a rectum?
Did you know that is the access point for men's g spot? Wouldn't want to go rupturing that now would we. Lube is our friend.
Did you also know there is no reason heterosexuals cannot also enjoy these activities?

Well there is actually because it causes proctitis in the rectum. Which is a nasty inflammation that causes blood and mucous to seep from the anal passage during stool movements. Anal sex is not good for anyone.

ohnonotgmail · 02-05-2015 01:24AM

mucksavage1985 wrote: »

Well there is actually because it causes proctitis in the rectum. Which is a nasty inflammation that causes blood and mucous to seep from the anal passage during stool movements. Anal sex is not good for anyone.

you're doing it wrong.

Bannasidhe · 02-05-2015 01:24AM

bodice ripper wrote: »

He's against fanny licking! You want to side with this kill-joy? Do you want one day to one day tell your now adult children "first they came for the gays anal busters, but then they came for the fanny-lickers...If only we had listened."

Vote Yes.

FYP

Hammer Archer · 02-05-2015 01:25AM

OK....
That's enough internet for me today.

bodice ripper · 02-05-2015 01:25AM

mucksavage1985 wrote: »

http://now.uiowa.edu/2012/10/parental-bondinghappy-stable-child

From you our own link:

This appears to be especially good news for single mothers and stay-at-home dads, two marked parenting shifts that are defining this generation. Kim says the study shows that either parent can serve as a secure, attachment figure for the infant, thus providing the closeness and support to promote the child's healthy emotional growth.

“Some people think the father is not good enough to be the primary caregiver,” says Kim, who earned his doctorate in sociology at the UI last year. “Our data show otherwise.”

Bannasidhe · 02-05-2015 01:26AM

mucksavage1985 wrote: »

Well there is actually because it causes proctitis in the rectum. Which is a nasty inflammation that causes blood and mucous to seep from the anal passage during stool movements. Anal sex is not good for anyone.

Sounds like piles.

Childbirth can cause piles.

We should ban it.

AtomicHorror · 02-05-2015 01:26AM

mucksavage1985 wrote: »

Well there is actually because it causes proctitis in the rectum. Which is a nasty inflammation that causes blood and mucous to seep from the anal passage during stool movements. Anal sex is not good for anyone.

Conventional sex carries all manner of risks as well, as does pretty much every action possible. Also inaction can be very risky.

The best way to avoid risks and maximise the risk:benefit ratio to infinity is to cease to exist.

mucksavage1985 · 02-05-2015 01:27AM

ohnonotgmail wrote: »

you're doing it wrong.

Use all the lube u like. U still can get it. It's not natural. Imagine a child walking in on their two daddy's ramming each other. What an image for them. It's bad enough to walk in one ur mammy and daddy

Bannasidhe · 02-05-2015 01:27AM

AtomicHorror wrote: »

Conventional sex carries all manner of risks as well, as does pretty much every action possible. Also inaction can be very risky.

The best way to avoid risks and maximise the risk:benefit ratio to infinity is to cease to exist.

Like pregnancy. Very dangerous.
Can even cause death.

We should ban it.

mucksavage1985 · 02-05-2015 01:28AM

Bannasidhe wrote: »

Sounds like piles.

Childbirth can cause piles.

We should ban it.

Oh piles are in the ha'penny place compared to proctitis. Look it up. It's nasty!

AtomicHorror · 02-05-2015 01:29AM

mucksavage1985 wrote: »

Use all the lube u like. U still can get it. It's not natural. Imagine a child walking in on their two daddy's ramming each other. What an image for them. It's bad enough to walk in one ur mammy and daddy

I don't think a child is going to find either image better or worse, unless they have someone like you to tell them how much worse one of them is. There's no objectively worse quality to homosexual acts.

bodice ripper · 02-05-2015 01:29AM

mucksavage1985 wrote: »

Use all the lube u like. U still can get it. It's not natural. Imagine a child walking in on their two daddy's ramming each other. What an image for them. It's bad enough to walk in one ur mammy and daddy

It's always about the men.

ohnonotgmail · 02-05-2015 01:30AM

mucksavage1985 wrote: »

Oh piles are in the ha'penny place compared to proctitis. Look it up. It's nasty!

well lay off the anal sex then.

Bannasidhe · 02-05-2015 01:30AM

mucksavage1985 wrote: »

Use all the lube u like. U still can get it. It's not natural. Imagine a child walking in on their two daddy's ramming each other. What an image for them. It's bad enough to walk in one ur mammy and daddy

Imagine a child walking in on daddy sticking his penis in mammy's vagina :eek:.

Someone should invent a device that prevents doors being opened at inopportune moments.

Or some sort of cover underneath which adults could lie while they stick bits of each other into each other.

Bannasidhe · 02-05-2015 01:31AM

mucksavage1985 wrote: »

Oh piles are in the ha'penny place compared to proctitis. Look it up. It's nasty!

Far more common though.

mucksavage1985 · 02-05-2015 01:32AM

Bannasidhe wrote: »

Imagine a child walking in on daddy sticking his penis in mammy's vagina :eek:.

Someone should invent a device that prevents doors being opened at inopportune moments.

Or some sort of cover underneath which adults could lie while they stick bits of each other into each other.

At least vagina only leaves the penis wet. Fecal matter after anal is another matter

Bannasidhe · 02-05-2015 01:32AM

bodice ripper wrote: »

It's always about the men.

*invisible*

How will you vote in the Marriage Equality referendum? Mod Note Post 1

Comments