Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

RIP Time magazine.

  • 22-04-2015 06:30PM
    #1
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 2,618 ✭✭✭


    Today I saw the most recent copy of Time magazine.

    The acclaimed, long established internationally distributed magazine that has previously featured on its cover such historic figures as hitler, bin laden, Bush, Churchill, Palin and any number of controversial, yet undeniably important figures in the spheres of world politics, finance, history.

    Todays copy features Kanye West, full page cover spread, face portrait.

    It is now dead to me.

    Sorry to start a whole thread about this, but its beyond trivial annoyance.


    My jimmys have officially been rustled, at the thought of that buffoon framing his Time magazine cover of himself on his wall. The world must feel my pain.

    Is nothing sacred ?

    Anyone else feel the same ?


«13

Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,351 ✭✭✭NegativeCreep


    I love Kanye West.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,204 ✭✭✭dodderangler


    It's only dead to you now? It's been covered with Kim cowdashian and every other idiot for years and it's just a Shiite anyway


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 2,344 ✭✭✭Littlehorny


    Totally agree, that talentless asshole actually believes he is some kind of a god, horrible person altogether.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,161 ✭✭✭frag420


    It's about time!!


  • Posts: 22,384 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    It was always a bit...light. Kinda an inoffensive publication, where countries would advertise how great they were. Can't remember the last hard hitting analysis I've read on it. Strictly for dentists waiting rooms.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 40,059 ✭✭✭✭Harry Palmr


    In the summer of 1983 David Bowie was on the cover. Lets Dance had just propelled him to global superstardom.

    http://content.time.com/time/covers/0,16641,19830718,00.html

    The letters page two weeks later did contain some angry correspondence.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,042 ✭✭✭who the fug


    It was always a bit...light. Kinda an inoffensive publication, where countries would advertise how great they were. Can't remember the last hard hitting analysis I've read on it. Strictly for dentists waiting rooms.

    I rember it from the barbers my father dragged me to as a child.


  • Posts: 12,836 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    In the summer of 1983 David Bowie was on the cover. Lets Dance had just propelled him to global superstardom.

    http://content.time.com/time/covers/0,16641,19830718,00.html

    Yeah but that's Bowie, not Kanye ****ing West


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,159 ✭✭✭✭phasers


    I dropped Time after they named this eejit person of the year in 2006


  • Posts: 22,384 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    phasers wrote: »
    I dropped Time after they named this eejit person of the year in 2006

    Hey, I bloody deserved it back in 06!


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,291 ✭✭✭✭Gatling


    Felt exactly the same when his wife appeared in playboy


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 2,618 ✭✭✭The Diabolical Monocle


    It was always a bit...light. Kinda an inoffensive publication, where countries would advertise how great they were. Can't remember the last hard hitting analysis I've read on it. Strictly for dentists waiting rooms.

    Ok fair point and I agree, and as someone above said maybe I've missed the boat since other halfwits have previously graced its cover.

    But surely at one time it was a symbol of something, ... maybe it represented an appreciation of that which is important and not the utter trivial shyte which we are bombarded with.

    oh well, its gone now.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 46,938 ✭✭✭✭Nodin


    Totally agree, that talentless asshole actually believes he is some kind of a god, horrible person altogether.

    In his defence, he is by all a/c's mentally ill in some fashion. The fact that this is hard to discern amongst so many rampant egos with no such excuse is the frightening part.

    Nor may there be such an excuse for sticking him on the cover of Time. They need cash, I suppose.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,324 ✭✭✭RGDATA!



    Todays copy features Kanye West, full page cover spread, face portrait.

    It is now dead to me.

    You think that's bad? U2 were on the cover 20 years ago.
    (PS whatever you think of him, Kanye is as much relevant today as they were then).


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 24,461 ✭✭✭✭darkpagandeath


    Fishsticks.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,366 ✭✭✭bonzodog2


    OMG, what next? The RTE Guide? Say it ain't so!


    They shoulda kept up with the times!



    :rolleyes:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,598 ✭✭✭✭Aidric


    I'll stick with The Economist.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,487 ✭✭✭Right Turn Clyde


    Totally agree, that talentless asshole actually believes he is some kind of a god, horrible person altogether.

    Asshole? Yes. Think he's god? Yes. Horrible person? Yes. Talentless? No chance. He is a truly imaginative and gifted music producer.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 329 ✭✭BlatentCheek


    Time's been very light for a very long time. This video from the Onion pretty much says it all.

    http://https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4TT81o4hL4c


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 2,618 ✭✭✭The Diabolical Monocle


    He is a truly imaginative and gifted music producer.

    maybe once or twice, but so is mmm... I dunno, Britney or whoever.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,208 ✭✭✭✭Cienciano


    OP, you're getting old. Do you find yourself saying "music was better in my day"?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,487 ✭✭✭Right Turn Clyde


    maybe once or twice, but so is mmm... I dunno, Britney or whoever.

    You're only showing your ignorance now. It's possible to dislike something whist appreciating the artistry involved in it. I don't like his music, but it's absolutely brimming with originality and ideas. Think of how big rap/hip hop is, and how recognisable it is. He is one man, and he changed it, virtually on his own. That's pretty impressive. When you consider how fundamental hip hop has been to mainstream American culture for the past 20 years, I think it's appropriate that he's on the cover of Time.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,681 ✭✭✭bodice ripper


    Used to be a big fan of Time when i was young ( as would you be if you were raised by Americans overseas...). But fuxk me, it went to ****.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,656 ✭✭✭somefeen


    Its True Kanye West might be a complete arsehole and an otherwise absolute waste of space but his music is hugely influential. He is a modern Phil Spector.
    I wouldnt be a fan myself but listening to his latest stuff on the radio and it is more original than most of the crap thats come out in the past twenty years.

    Would you have a problem with Elvis being on the cover?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,106 ✭✭✭catallus


    Aidric wrote: »
    I'll stick with The Economist.

    The Economist is gone kind of fluffy these days too.


  • Moderators, Education Moderators, Sports Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 12,673 Mod ✭✭✭✭artanevilla


    [godwin] Sure Hitler was on the cover several times, he wasn't a particularly pleasant person either. [/godwin]


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1 Monotonous


    Well, not that I like his music or anything, but Kanye West is "relevant". He is everywhere, on the internet, in the magazines, and is spoken of very damned often. Just like Hitler, Bin laden, and Bush, who have all been featured on the magazine, Kanye West is very controversial. You either love or hate him. Time hasn't really changed, but is just doing what it's always done.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,106 ✭✭✭catallus


    Monotonous wrote: »
    . Kanye West is very controversial. You either love or hate him.

    That's just not true.

    Many people don't care.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,798 ✭✭✭✭hatrickpatrick


    Doesn't having one's jimmies rustled mean getting sexually excited?

    If it doesn't, it really should.


Advertisement
Advertisement