Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Dublin Bus - can anyone be happy with the price and service?

1111214161731

Comments

  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 24,122 Mod ✭✭✭✭bk


    Have you ever traveled with PKP (Train Company) in Poland? :)

    Doors opening when not at stations is not unheard of, infact it happened to me this weekend!

    The doors lit up and I pressed the button to open since it was dark and only saw track, and realised that for some reason the doors had been released outside a station.

    If they operate the DART like service between Gdansk - Sopot - Gydnia (TriCity), then yes, many times.

    Yes, Polands train service does seem to need modernisation. It seems to be much more rickety then their bus services. They have done a fantastic job updating and upgrading the actual train stations, but the trains themselves seem ancient and journey times long. Certainly not up to German standards.

    Having said that the TriCity DART like service runs all night and carrys a crazy number of people, even at 5am!


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 172 ✭✭dublindiehard


    I'm not talking about the local trains, PKP is more intecity and long distance, I will say more aobut them in the other thread later.

    I find generally the local operators in general do a good job, despite the fact some of them have obstacles put in their place and also track access charges which are too high for the quality of the infrastructure involved.

    It is believed to be in part why Przewozy Regionalne, PKP's only true intercity rail competitor, has cut back drastically it's services recently is because of the high track access charges which are also set by PKP who they also compete with via their InterRegio and the dearly departed RegioExspress Brand

    But Krakow Glowny was a product of the short lived Dworzec Polski. That company did an amazing job. It's a shame they were forced into liquidation since they achieved more in their limited time span of being in charge of stations than had been achieved in the years before and the years since.


  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 12,022 Mod ✭✭✭✭devnull


    WARTA was a fine train with on board movie services shame it was reaped of life.

    Dworzec Polski was intergrated back into Pkp when they went bust who finished the subway passages in krakow station . The platforms themselves were done before they went bust


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 264 ✭✭eejoynt


    zombie thread on dublin bus turns into debate on PKP....yawn


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 172 ✭✭dublindiehard


    There are some things in PKP which are very relevant to CIE as a whole, when I get chance I will post what they are.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,761 ✭✭✭cdebru


    There are some things in PKP which are very relevant to CIE as a whole, when I get chance I will post what they are.

    Can't wait.


  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Education Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 27,467 CMod ✭✭✭✭spurious


    It's always an adventure on PKP.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,761 ✭✭✭cdebru


    bk wrote: »
    I apologise for digging up an old thread, but reading threw it, many posts here clearly show me that many people here on this thread have never used buses in other countries in Europe and have no idea what a fast, efficient bus service looks like. Sorry that I didn't multiquote the points, but here are the general points.



    This one had me really choking! The person who said this really needs to travel around Europe on public transport.

    It is absolutely normal for multidoor buses to be used with zero infrastructure. For instance as I posted over on another thread today, using a 4 door bendi bus between Krakow city and airport. Outside the city there are no bus stops, not even bus stop poles!! The bus simply stops at the edge of each road intersection. Only the front door would be aligned with the curb. The other three doors would also open and people would simply step into the middle of the street/intersection and walk to the footpath!

    I've seen this on my travels all throughout Poland, Lithuania, Czech Republic and yes even Germany.

    In rural areas it is a case there isn't even a footpath. The multi-door bus simply stops on a dirt road and leaves people off into a ditch! Not unusual at all.



    Bull****, I see the front doors being used dangerously on a daily basis. The 16 bus stop on Westmoreland St is a perfect example. Often the stop is wrongly blocked by taxis, so the bus just stops a lane away from the curb and people enter and exit by stepping into the lane way.

    I see this happening all over the city center daily. Sometimes it is because another DB bus is already stopped at the stop, so the driver behind won't bother to pull in and instead will open the front doors one lane away from the curb and behind the other bus and have people disembark onto the lane.

    And I'm not saying they are wrong to do this. It is the reality of running a busy, congested city bus service. But don't make out DB are angels and always concerned about health and safety. It seems to me they only blame h&s when it suits them and they are simply too lazy to use the rear doors.

    Interestingly, in Poland, the doors mostly seem to be actually operated by the passengers. The passenger presses a button on either the inside or outside of the door and it opens. Pretty much the same to how the Luas/Dart works. I assume these buttons only work when the bus is stopped and the driver has pressed a button to allow them to be used.

    Perhaps this is the solution to the health and safety issue. It takes responsibility away from the driver and places it on the passengers who have decided to use it.



    Again this has no basis in reality of what happens throughout Europe! Again taking my Krakow example, I watched as at least 4 or 5 people stood in each of the rear 3 doorways (obviously not the front one). When people wanted to get off, people in the doorway would simply step off to leave them out and then step back into the bus. Simple easy peasy.

    Again I've seen this all throughout Europe.

    We even see this every day at peak times on the Luas and DART. So I'm not sure why it is such a surprise to people!

    Sure people might not be use to it on Dublin Bus. But if DB start to use multi-doors constantly, I'm sure people will quickly adapt to it, just like people in London and the rest of Europe and even Irish people on the DART and Luas.

    So the double door buses, clearly have more standing room then their previous, single door equivalents and thus much the same capacity.

    Fascinating and all as the novel you wrote is my answer is so what ?

    Do the poles and wherever else you have been have the same compensation culture as Ireland ? In your vast traveled have you heard if one of these bus companies paying out €9million plus to someone you ran out in front of a bus ?

    The correct procedure when bus stop is blocked is to stop at the stop out the vehicles blocking the stop, the front doors are only used because the driver has no control over the people exiting though the center doors .

    So do you want DB to operate to the lowest standards you can find ? I would say if you give each bus driver indemnity that he/she won't be held in anyway responsible for anyone being injured whilst boarding or alighting then no problem they will open any door anywhere you want but until then comparisons with your travels through the former soviet bloc or anywhere else are kind of useless.


  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 24,122 Mod ✭✭✭✭bk


    cdebru wrote: »
    So do you want DB to operate to the lowest standards you can find ?

    Lowest standard! My point is Dublin Bus is the lowest standard.

    It is one of the worst run city bus services in any capital in Europe. Even the poles blow it out of the water. That is how bad Dublin Bus it and that is my point.

    We pay far too much for the crap service DB delivers.
    cdebru wrote: »
    I would say if you give each bus driver indemnity that he/she won't be held in anyway responsible for anyone being injured whilst boarding or alighting then no problem they will open any door anywhere you want but until then comparisons with your travels through the former soviet bloc or anywhere else are kind of useless.

    Unfortunately it is simply impossible to indemnify someone in this way. Even if you do indemnify them, then there is nothing at all stopping someone suing a driver. It just simply is the way the law works. That is when their is so much confusion about the rear door issue. A driver can be sued for any reason, for improperly using the front door, for saying the wrong thing to a passenger, any reason at all and there is nothing DB can do to indemnify them. There is no particular greater danger to using the rear door, it is just drivers not understanding how the law works.

    And as I mentioned, you could move to the Polish, Dart, Luas model where the passengers open the rear doors when the bus stops. That would greatly reduce the drivers exposure.

    But really there is no extra risk in using rear doors.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 86 ✭✭dublinstevie


    bk wrote:
    We pay far too much for the crap service DB delivers.

    bk wrote:
    Lowest standard! My point is Dublin Bus is the lowest standard.

    bk wrote:
    It is one of the worst run city bus services in any capital in Europe. Even the poles blow it out of the water. That is how bad Dublin Bus it and that is my point.


    WHY USE IT THEN IF IT THAT BAD, FANNY PAD


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,761 ✭✭✭cdebru


    bk wrote: »
    Lowest standard! My point is Dublin Bus is the lowest standard.

    It is one of the worst run city bus services in any capital in Europe. Even the poles blow it out of the water. That is how bad Dublin Bus it and that is my point.

    We pay far too much for the crap service DB delivers.



    Unfortunately it is simply impossible to indemnify someone in this way. Even if you do indemnify them, then there is nothing at all stopping someone suing a driver. It just simply is the way the law works. That is when their is so much confusion about the rear door issue. A driver can be sued for any reason, for improperly using the front door, for saying the wrong thing to a passenger, any reason at all and there is nothing DB can do to indemnify them. There is no particular greater danger to using the rear door, it is just drivers not understanding how the law works.

    And as I mentioned, you could move to the Polish, Dart, Luas model where the passengers open the rear doors when the bus stops. That would greatly reduce the drivers exposure.

    But really there is no extra risk in using rear doors.


    No it is yourself not understanding the way Ireland works and that is do f all and if something goes wrong find a gilly to blame it on, so the NTA, Dublin bus, the Gardai, Dublin city council, Fingal, SDCC, are happy to not bother design or provide adequate bus stops to allow parking and loading bays either side, to allow taxi drivers to create their own ranks etc etc etc, and no one does anything but lo and behold the day something goes wrong they all walk away wash their hands of it and hang some poor gib****e trying to do his job out to dry.


    And hopefully for the last time, front door operation is safer because you can often pull the front of the bus in and offer some protection to passengers from cyclists or indeed motor cyclists coming up the inside even where you can't get the front in it allows the driver to stop or hold people back when they see someone coming up the inside, you can not do that with the center doors.


    It is actually a very bad sign for the future of the NTA as they seem to be completely unable to understand the difference between a symptom of a problem and a cause if a problem and they try and address symptoms while completely ignoring causes, ie buy center door buses but ignore bus stop design and parking, illegal taxi ranks etc, lat year they got a bee over even headways for a few weeks and tried to enforce it till they eventually realized just slowing buses didn't fix the problem, and they still haven't looked at integrated timetables abd timing points, its like they get ideas from reading this forum but have no idea how to implement them.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 38,227 ✭✭✭✭Guy:Incognito


    steddyeddy wrote: »
    We also subsidise Dublin bus in taxes. We're paying too much for a rubbish service..

    Does that not suggest fares aren't high enough?

    Is there not an app that gives live times?

    EDIT. BAH, this is why I should pay more attention, didn't see the dates or pages of replies.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,922 ✭✭✭✭end of the road


    bk wrote: »
    Lowest standard! My point is Dublin Bus is the lowest standard.

    no it isn't
    bk wrote: »
    It is one of the worst run city bus services in any capital in Europe. Even the poles blow it out of the water. That is how bad Dublin Bus it and that is my point.

    absolute rubbish. no its not perfect, but lets not dramatize about how imperfect it is.
    bk wrote: »
    We pay far too much for the crap service DB delivers.

    we pay because the government isn't willing to subsidize it properly. if we want public transport either we pay for it properly via our taxes, or we except paying in fares. its not perfect, but its not a crap service either. some frequencies could be improved, that would make me happy

    I'm very highly educated. I know words, i have the best words, nobody has better words then me.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 29,810 ✭✭✭✭_Kaiser_


    absolute rubbish. no its not perfect, but lets not dramatize about how imperfect it is.



    we pay because the government isn't willing to subsidize it properly. if we want public transport either we pay for it properly via our taxes, or we except paying in fares. its not perfect, but its not a crap service either. some frequencies could be improved, that would make me happy

    Ah now... this same excuse gets trotted out again and again, but DB has been awful for decades!!

    Some of the stuff bk talks about (multi-door operation, multi-validators etc) is extremely cheap to do and was common-place in Europe 30 years ago! I know.. I lived in Alkmaar and Amsterdam for a period in the mid-80s and these things were the norm, as were the arrival times on the bus stop being for that stop - something we never quite got around to, instead going for an RTPI system with vanishing buses!

    Fares have gone up, service has gone down and still we're expected to believe it's down to investment? DB seemed to have plenty of cash to splash on new buses every year in the "good times"?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 29,810 ✭✭✭✭_Kaiser_


    WHY USE IT THEN IF IT THAT BAD, FANNY PAD

    Well that'd be because there's no real competition in the Dublin market.. but you have a point, many people DO exactly what you suggest and stop using it as a result....

    .... and then we have public transport advocates complaining about congestion on the roads because of private cars....


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,761 ✭✭✭cdebru


    _Kaiser_ wrote: »
    Ah now... this same excuse gets trotted out again and again, but DB has been awful for decades!!

    Some of the stuff bk talks about (multi-door operation, multi-validators etc) is extremely cheap to do and was common-place in Europe 30 years ago! I know.. I lived in Alkmaar and Amsterdam for a period in the mid-80s and these things were the norm, as were the arrival times on the bus stop being for that stop - something we never quite got around to, instead going for an RTPI system with vanishing buses!

    Fares have gone up, service has gone down and still we're expected to believe it's down to investment? DB seemed to have plenty of cash to splash on new buses every year in the "good times"?


    See a huge part of the problems with DB are out of their control, so you can invest in new buses and nice shiney RTPI, and GPS and ramps and electronic displays but if buses are stuck in traffic and the supposed bus priority measures aren't policed and people can still park willy nilly then it is all largely a waste of money and time, its like giving the chef cheap ingredients and not all the ingredients and then complaining the meal doesn't taste great !! You can hardly blame the chef.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,519 ✭✭✭✭punisher5112


    Saw 5 11s stuck in traffic in goatstown this morning .

    Nothing moving at all.
    I believe the 11s are terrible time wise and that would explain as they have no bus lane to help in the effected areas.

    Face it there are more cars on the road as more are working.
    Lots of new cars been sold also.

    How can you compare db with a bus service ran in a country that have feck all health and safety laws and as said previously crazy compo culture here.

    People take no responsibility for their own actions as they are always too busy been in a rush on the phone, texting internet etc etc.


    DB use to have timed stops along routes years ago where the driver or conductor would have to log there point of travel at a specific stop.
    People are annoyed at how drivers have to change along route and only takes a minute or 2 yes sometimes there are delays but anything can happen along the way from nobody having fare ready to accidents on or off the bus.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,502 ✭✭✭howiya


    cdebru wrote: »
    See a huge part of the problems with DB are out of their control, so you can invest in new buses and nice shiney RTPI, and GPS and ramps and electronic displays but if buses are stuck in traffic and the supposed bus priority measures aren't policed and people can still park willy nilly then it is all largely a waste of money and time, its like giving the chef cheap ingredients and not all the ingredients and then complaining the meal doesn't taste great !! You can hardly blame the chef.

    Would the chef get away with putting up the price every year?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,922 ✭✭✭✭end of the road


    howiya wrote: »
    Would the chef get away with putting up the price every year?
    they would when their other income, that from their shareholder keeps being cut.

    I'm very highly educated. I know words, i have the best words, nobody has better words then me.



  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,761 ✭✭✭cdebru


    howiya wrote: »
    Would the chef get away with putting up the price every year?

    The chef doesn't put up the price the restaurant does, kind of like the NTA and Dublin bus I guess.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,502 ✭✭✭howiya


    they would when their other income, that from their shareholder keeps being cut.

    Improving the service may result in increased farebox income. Lowering the price could also make it more attractive to use the bus and increase income.

    Had the need to take the bus today. €6.60 into town and back. Before someone says I could have got a cheaper fare with a Leap card, you have to buy a card first


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,502 ✭✭✭howiya


    cdebru wrote: »
    The chef doesn't put up the price the restaurant does, kind of like the NTA and Dublin bus I guess.

    The customer would be very unlikely to return if the meal didn't taste great and would choose a different restaurant instead of paying a higher price for the same meal


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,519 ✭✭✭✭punisher5112


    howiya wrote: »
    Improving the service may result in increased farebox income. Lowering the price could also make it more attractive to use the bus and increase income.

    Had the need to take the bus today. €6.60 into town and back. Before someone says I could have got a cheaper fare with a Leap card, you have to buy a card first

    The card cost €5 as a refundable deposit.

    Can't see the harm in having one top up online, in a shop at a luas or train station.

    No excuse really.

    The reality is that the bus network will be cashless as that is what they are setting this all up for.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,502 ✭✭✭howiya


    The card cost €5 as a refundable deposit.

    Can't see the harm in having one top up online, in a shop at a luas or train station.

    No excuse really.

    The reality is that the bus network will be cashless as that is what they are setting this all up for.

    Yesterday I walked to the bus stop. If I wanted to purchase a Leap card I would have had to walk a longer route to a shop and then to the bus stop missing the bus I intended to catch.

    I would have had to pay €5 for the card and top up with a minimum of €5 which makes a total of €10 for a journey that would have otherwise cost me €6.60. I would have then had to wait for the next bus.

    But feel free to ignore the points in the first sentence of my post. Dublin Bus would be perfect if everyone had a Leap card :rolleyes:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,519 ✭✭✭✭punisher5112


    howiya wrote: »
    Yesterday I walked to the bus stop. If I wanted to purchase a Leap card I would have had to walk a longer route to a shop and then to the bus stop missing the bus I intended to catch.

    I would have had to pay €5 for the card and top up with a minimum of €5 which makes a total of €10 for a journey that would have otherwise cost me €6.60. I would have then had to wait for the next bus.

    But feel free to ignore the points in the first sentence of my post. Dublin Bus would be perfect if everyone had a Leap card :rolleyes:

    Sure next time your passing a shop go in and get 1.
    Yes minimum would be 10 1st use but your €3.30 is only €2.60 and a €1 discount if using other transport within 90 mins.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 172 ✭✭dublindiehard


    Polish Rail
    Rail services in Poland are very complicated. You generally have two operations, PR and PKP and various classes of trains within eahc operator as well as some much smaller regional operators. Almost all tickets are bought for a per train basis and not an open ticket, and there are many different classes of train on the same line of which tickets are not transferaable.

    PKP especially are known for their lax timekeeping, and unreliability. Even this weekend I saw a situation where a train bound for Wroclaw came into Krakow, and the locomotive was took off just as the train was about to depart. About 10 minutes later another one turned up with a group of people getting underneath and above it trying to fix some fault with the new locomotive in a very laid back fashion. The train left about 30 minutes late in the end, and nobody from the staff really cared (the gentleman who my partner asked about the delay said "that there was no rush, since he didn't need to take the train so not really his problem"

    PKP:
    Express Intercity Premium - Pendolino Trains with premium interiors operating on Polish Tracks between the biggest cities
    Express Intercity - High quality express intercity trains connecting medium and large cities.
    Intercity - Standard quality intercity trains connecting cities and a limited number of large towns.
    TLK - Cheap Railway Lines - services that make more stops some calling at medium towns, but feature the oldest trains (30+ years)

    Problem is you may have 12 trains a day between Warsaw and Krakow, but it'll be split between 3-4 different classes of train, all which have their own ticketing structure. A nightmare for planning travel.

    PR:
    InterRegio - Discounted inter city trains, standard can vary from slightly better than TLK or slightly worse.
    Regio - Local trains stopping at Small Towns and the occasional vilage. However in recent years a lot of these regio operated services have been replaced with new modern, comfortable stock.

    Recently PR were modernising a lot of stock and upgrading them on board. Recently however they have cut back their schedule heavily, and have to pay track access charges to the competitor, PKP who owns the tracks, and it's widely believed that the track access charges are very inflated for what is on the whole below average infrastructure.

    NTERCITY BUS SERVICES
    Previously a company called PKS, divided into a number of regional companies offered all intercity bus services in the state. Think of them as the equivlant of Bus Eireann, just with MUCH MUCH older stock. There are many vehicles from the late 80s and 90s going around. If you type PKS Poland into Google Image search you will see what I mean. For many people, this is the only option.

    In the bigger cities there has been a revolution of private operators connecting them in the last few years which has even expended to international bus services, people like simple express, plus bus, polskibus and others, all operating very modern coaches such as Mercedes Benz, Vanhool and Scania, to name a few build in the last few years and can be compared to some of the top coaches operating in the UK and Ireland.

    There is also a sizeable market for converted van / transit van / mercedes sprinter minibuses operating between small towns and big cities and small towns and other small towns. All of these are privately run and the standard of vehicles can vary from a brand new Mercedes Sprinter, to a knackered 20 year old transit, but they fill a gpa and are very common.

    My point is tht whilst there are a lot of things that Poland does well, especially with some of the bigger train stations such as Krakow Glowny and the city bus services in the bigger cities, there is also a lot of stuff that they do poorly.


  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 24,122 Mod ✭✭✭✭bk


    WHY USE IT THEN IF IT THAT BAD, FANNY PAD

    If their was a private operator alternative, I'd use them in a heart beat, just as I've stopped using BE and IR for intercity transport and now use the private bus companies (Aircoach, CityLink, etc.) who offer a service not just a little better, but vastly superior to BE, many MANY times better then BE's crap service.

    But no such alternative exists, so I'm forced to use DB and given that it is heavily subsidised by my tax money, I think I'm quiet entitled to complain about the very poor service DB delivers.

    To be honest I flip back and forward between wanting Dublin's city bus services to be privatised.

    On the one hand I don't want to see drivers, etc. lose their jobs or end up working a difficult, anti-social job for less money and worse conditions. After all they are people like you and me, with families to look after etc.

    But then when I travel Europe, I see how vastly superior city bus services are everywhere else and how poor DB's service and product is in comparison, it just makes me mad.

    It then makes me even madder when I see CIE/DB staff come on here and try and justify DB's terrible service and make out that it is ok or that I should go use a car instead!

    If DB staff and management aren't willing to recognise the problems in the company and the pretty bad level of service they are delivering and try and work to fix it. To deliver to us, the taxpayer and your passengers, a modern city bus service fit for a European capital city. Then I say feck them, privatise it all so. The private companies really can't be any worse then DB's service and maybe they will end up much better, like the private intercity coach services have ended up.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 172 ✭✭dublindiehard


    PKP and CIE have a lot in common :)

    I see the same kind of stuff in PKP that I do in the other companies here in ireland.

    I won't bring LOT Polish Airline / EuroLOT into this, but they are also now getting a severe run for their money by Ryanair on domestic plane routes within Poland.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,922 ✭✭✭✭end of the road


    howiya wrote: »
    Improving the service may result in increased farebox income. Lowering the price could also make it more attractive to use the bus and increase income.

    Had the need to take the bus today. €6.60 into town and back. Before someone says I could have got a cheaper fare with a Leap card, you have to buy a card first
    nobody will pay for it though. the passenger doesn't want to pay, the government doesn't want to pay, nobody wants to pay

    I'm very highly educated. I know words, i have the best words, nobody has better words then me.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,922 ✭✭✭✭end of the road


    bk wrote: »
    If their was a private operator alternative, I'd use them in a heart beat, just as I've stopped using BE and IR for intercity transport and now use the private bus companies (Aircoach, CityLink, etc.) who offer a service not just a little better, but vastly superior to BE, many MANY times better then BE's crap service.

    what is crap about be's service.
    bk wrote: »
    To be honest I flip back and forward between wanting Dublin's city bus services to be privatised.
    If DB staff and management aren't willing to recognise the problems in the company and the pretty bad level of service they are delivering and try and work to fix it. To deliver to us, the taxpayer and your passengers, a modern city bus service fit for a European capital city. Then I say feck them, privatise it all so. The private companies really can't be any worse then DB's service and maybe they will end up much better, like the private intercity coach services have ended up.

    why would you want it to be privatized. why should our tax money go on private ventures. privatizing it because "shur they wouldn't do any worse" is a ridiculous reason. private companies can't improve anything. the NTA is incharge of the bus services and they decide everything. so privatization is pointless. no point in comparing a socially necessary bus service like dublin bus and be to a luxury unnecessary bus service like the intercity private coaches. and i say luxury/unnecessary because if they went chances are you would have some sort of service. to clear it up for discussion purposes, i've nothing to do with CIE.

    I'm very highly educated. I know words, i have the best words, nobody has better words then me.



Advertisement
Advertisement