Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/

Athiests - Who cares

1262729313237

Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,277 ✭✭✭DamagedTrax


    kylith wrote: »
    Except it isn't a test. If there is a god then he knows, and has known from the beginning of time, what you are going to do. Not only that but he is directing you every step of the way to fit in with his ineffable plan. It'd be like me training my dog to crap on the carpet then beating it for crapping on the carpet: I knew it was going to do it, I made sure it could do it, then I punished it for doing exactly that.

    And then people try to say it's a loving and merciful god, and I laugh and laugh and laugh.

    ahh but they've solved that old paradox... god gave us 'free will'... as long as we stick to his 10 rules and send him lots of money.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 9,085 ✭✭✭SpaceTime


    I think the title of this thread sums up Irish attitudes at official level and establishment to religious diversity and freedom of conscience.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,277 ✭✭✭DamagedTrax


    SpaceTime wrote: »
    I think the title of this thread sums up Irish attitudes at official level and establishment to religious diversity and freedom of conscience.

    it should probably read

    Nihilism - who cares?


    :pac:


  • Posts: 6,691 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    I find that these "annoying atheists" are usually the ones who were brought up with religion (usually strict religious parents) and then decided they were atheist at some point.

    My Dad's side of the family have no religion, it's not even mentioned. I lived in England and France until I moved here when I was about 8. Before I moved to Ireland I didn't even know religion existed! Mainly because I never went to a religious school before that, and my parents didn't baptise us or mention anything about religion. My Mother did get us baptised in the end because she didn't want us to feel left out with communion etc, after moving from a different country.

    It's only when I started speaking to friends about religion that I realised how big of a deal it was in their upbringing, so it doesn't really surprise me how much some people talk about their atheism.

    It does really annoy me when people with no religion try to make out that religious people are stupid. I couldn't care less what others believe in, even if it makes no sense to me.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,744 ✭✭✭✭kylith


    ahh but they've solved that old paradox... god gave us 'free will'... as long as we stick to his 10 rules and send him lots of money.
    Either we have free will or god is omnipotent. If we have free will then we can scupper god's ineffable plan, which would mean that he's not omnipotent.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 9,085 ✭✭✭SpaceTime


    Lia_lia wrote: »
    I find that these "annoying atheists" are usually the ones who were brought up with religion (usually strict religious parents) and then decided they were atheist at some point.

    My Dad's side of the family have no religion, it's not even mentioned. I lived in England and France until I moved here when I was about 8. Before I moved to Ireland I didn't even know religion existed! Mainly because I never went to a religious school before that, and my parents didn't baptise us or mention anything about religion. My Mother did get us baptised in the end because she didn't want us to feel left out with communion etc, after moving from a different country.

    It's only when I started speaking to friends about religion that I realised how big of a deal it was in their upbringing, so it doesn't really surprise me how much some people talk about their atheism.

    It does really annoy me when people with no religion try to make out that religious people are stupid. I couldn't care less what others believe in, even if it makes no sense to me.

    Similar experience here (grew up partially in more progressive countries) and had very very bad experiences of Irish primary teachers in the 90s including being referred to as "the heathen" and being told that my parents were a disgrace for not taking me to mass and also told lies that if I didn't make my confirmation I wouldn't be allowed to go to secondary school.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,277 ✭✭✭DamagedTrax


    kylith wrote: »
    Either we have free will or god is omnipotent. If we have free will then we can scupper god's ineffable plan, which would mean that he's not omnipotent.


    you're definitely going to hell for that!


  • Posts: 6,691 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    SpaceTime wrote: »
    Similar experience here (grew up partially in more progressive countries) and had very very bad experiences of Irish primary teachers in the 90s including being referred to as "the heathen" and being told that my parents were a disgrace for not taking me to mass and also told lies that if I didn't make my confirmation I wouldn't be allowed to go to secondary school.

    My Brother told his teacher that he was making his communion "for the money" and my Mother was called in for a meeting :o


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,972 ✭✭✭captbarnacles


    you're definitely going to hell for that!

    But he's using his intelligence (that 'God gave him') to assess whether or not God exists which as per the Bible he is required to do so obviously God will be aware of this and will let him into heaven.

    Congrats Kylith. You are going to paradise.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,277 ✭✭✭DamagedTrax


    But he's using his intelligence (that 'God gave him') to assess whether or not God exists which as per the Bible he is required to do so obviously God will be aware of this and will let him into heaven.

    Congrats Kylith. You are going to paradise.

    you just broke religion and my brain in one go :eek:


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,804 ✭✭✭Wurzelbert


    +1

    I'm educated to a far higher level than the majority of posters here yet my opinions are ridiculed like I'm an idiot.

    i know what you mean, atheists tend to be like that as they think they know best anyway...though i have yet to hear convincing and coherent answers to the really big questions from an atheist...


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,277 ✭✭✭DamagedTrax


    Wurzelbert wrote: »
    i know what you mean, atheists tend to be like that as they think they know best anyway...though i have yet to hear convincing and coherent answers to the really big questions from an atheist...

    perhaps if you pose a 'really big question' to us, we could give our own answers? i quite enjoy theorising on that which cannot be explained.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,804 ✭✭✭Wurzelbert


    i dont mean to offend you by giving you this straight answer, so i really do apologise in advance :o

    but imagine you were talking to a grown adult that believed in santa. thats how we some atheists feel.

    it is horrible, its something i personally struggle with when dealing with religious friends or family. but it is what it is :o

    no worries, i forgive you and i know there is no point launching into a lengthy debate about this now...just felt like leaving that one comment in this thread...will leave the godless to their “facts” and all the nothingness now...


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 9,085 ✭✭✭SpaceTime


    Lia_lia wrote: »
    My Brother told his teacher that he was making his communion "for the money" and my Mother was called in for a meeting :o

    I used to get pulled aside by the vice-principal and quizzed about my family's beliefs quite a lot with much tutting. I was handed bibles, religion books, pamphlets etc etc to take home and read. That sort of weirdness.

    When I eventually told them at home what happened (months later) they actually took me out of the school after a very loud discussion with the principal. I ended up being moved into a private school, still Catholic one, but far more open minded as it had a diversity of intake and more international students.

    I still hated it and wanted to move for years.

    My whole view of Ireland didn't really change until I hit the end of second level and then university which was totally secular. I just had this notion that I'd moved to some kind of depressing version of Hogwarts with priests for years.

    I really don't think Irish people understand how absolutely weird the education system is here. "we" think it's normal because most of us have never experienced anything else and think that primary school and Mass are two very similar things.

    If you think about how most Irish teachers are trained too (especially primary):

    Religious primary school > Religious secondary school > Religious teaching training academy [no exposure to secular university systems ever and probably quite institutionalised].

    At least second level teachers get a bit more of exposure to the real world and diversity of points of view for a few years.

    There's also the fact that in primary especially, your job / promotional options were all about sucking up to your employer and being extra pious in the past. So, I suspect a lot of older teachers are extremely-conservative / likely to be the kinds of people who tow the line at all times - be seen at Mass several times a week and so on.

    Then you've got the fact that the management of the education system is often being done by people who have nothing whatsoever got to do with teaching - i.e. the parish priest!?
    Surely it should be managed by expert educators and child development specialists, educational psychologists and so on ?

    I don't really see why knowing how to say Mass is a qualification for running a large educational establishment, which seems to often be the case here.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,945 ✭✭✭✭One eyed Jack


    And so it should be. We should respect people, not ideas. And it does not matter how educated or intelligent a person is (or claims to be, or feels they are) when they espouse a claim.... it is the CLAIM that has to be evaluated, not the person making it.

    And if we rip apart an idea and show it to be idiotic, that is purely a comment on the idea. NOT the person who holds it. If you choose, and it is a choice, to become vicariously offended on behalf of your ideas.... then so be it. But do not expect anyone else to pander to this.

    Possible the greatest mind our species has yet produced through all the vagaries of genetics.... Isaac Newton.... a man who basically invented Calculus on a dare he was that smart......... also subscribed to some fantastically nonsense ideas.

    Respect people, not ideas. Evaluate ideas, not the person espousing them and their supposed credentials. And take none of it personally.


    I get what you're saying there nozzferahtoo, but where do you actually draw the line between attacking an idea, and attacking the person who holds the idea so fundamentally as a part of who they are, their identity, that their belief is as much a part of who they are and is a reality to them as much as for instance the cup of coffee they have in front of them.

    If you base everything you believe in on the presence, or indeed the absence of evidence, then you're missing the whole point of 'faith'. If you are to base everything you believe on the evidence presented, then where does that leave you when someone tells you that they are not the gender they appear to be? They can't articulate exactly why they feel this way. It's just a feeling, is the best way they can describe it.

    Would you tell them that the idea they are not the gender they appear to be on the outside, is ridiculous, that it's all in their mind, that they are statistically of lesser intelligence because they believe in such nonsense with such fervor? I know you wouldn't, as that would be disrespectful, and you would respect a person's right to self-determination and self-identification.

    So why then if someone identifies as Roman Catholic for instance, would you think it's acceptable to turn around to them and say "All the evidence says you're not, because you don't behave according to Roman Catholic doctrine, etc".

    Richard Dawkins talks about increasing the sum of all happiness, but by all accounts, he can't possibly be very happy if he wants to take something from people that they find makes them happy. He, in the same way as you're doing, is applying his own standards of happiness in the way that people should only be happy by his standards. He's no different to the extremists he despises that he rallies against.

    Instead of attacking that which he despises, and turning science into an unscientific popularity contest, I'm asking do you think his last forty years would have been better spent showing real leadership to the masses, instead of being such a miserable bastard all the time that sounds like the next evolution for humanity is being born with a stick up their ass?


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 5,172 ✭✭✭Ghost Buster


    Wurzelbert wrote: »
    i know what you mean, atheists tend to be like that as they think they know best anyway...though i have yet to hear convincing and coherent answers to the really big questions from an atheist...

    They don't have the answers, they don't claim to, . Thats religions you're thinking of with "God did it"


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,972 ✭✭✭captbarnacles


    i dont mean to offend you by giving you this straight answer, so i really do apologise in advance :o

    but imagine you were talking to a grown adult that believed in santa. thats how we some atheists feel.

    it is horrible, its something i personally struggle with when dealing with religious friends or family. but it is what it is :o

    Agreed. My children were baptised. I put up a quite a fight over it but if I hadn't agreed in the end would have alienated my own family and my wife's family. Sad but true.
    Then you have to stand in the church answering all the rubbish like 'Do you reject the works of Satan etc'. It's comical when you hear it. All the sensible people around you solemnly answering this drivel.
    I answered the first question and then said nothing from then on. I felt like such a fraud even being there.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 9,085 ✭✭✭SpaceTime


    One other little thing that REALLY annoys me is the insistence on having prayers in the Dail and Seanad.

    I mean why not just read out Anglo Irish Bank's mission statement or something, it's the worst and most corrupt form of insider lobbying / corporatism I've ever witnessed in what is supposed to be a religiously diverse Republic.

    You're letting a 3rd party organisation directly into the heart of the Irish democratic process without any reason for it to be there and possibly chilling debates on controversial topics too.

    This is what is said at the start of EVERY session.

    I have no issue with TDs having personal religious beliefs, I have a huge issue with introducing them to the formal procedures of a parliament.
    Direct, we beseech Thee, O Lord, our actions by Thy holy inspirations and carry them on by Thy gracious assistance; that every word and work of ours may always begin from Thee, and by Thee be happily ended; through Christ our Lord. Amen.

    or
    Iarraimíd Ort, a Thiarna, d'anáil naofa a chur fúinn chun sinn a stiúradh inár ngníomhartha agus neart do ghrásta a bhronnadh orainn chun iad a thabhairt chun críche, ionas gur uaitse a thosófar ár n-uile bhriathar agus ár n-uile ghníomh feasta, agus gur tríot a chríochnófar iad; trí Chríost ár dTiarna.

    http://www.oireachtas.ie/viewdoc.asp?fn=/documents/a-misc/prayer.htm

    So, basically it's a big f**k off to anyone who isn't a very particular couple of flavours of Christian never mind someone who might be non-religious or of a very different religion.

    To me that says "this is our nice holy parliament, you're most unwelcome.. f**k off back to France, America or whatever heathen place you came from!"

    I think a lot of people have a lot of things to be somewhat annoyed by when it comes to the way things operate in Ireland. There's too much 'aragh sure it's grand..." attitudes taken and I think it'll probably end up where there's expensive legal action taken against the state for discrimination in education at some stage in the future as society becomes more diverse.

    It's also going to cause ghettoisation of primary / secondary schools as other religious groups demand similar treatment.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 3,257 ✭✭✭Peist2007


    Lia_lia wrote: »
    I find that these "annoying atheists" are usually the ones who were brought up with religion (usually strict religious parents) and then decided they were atheist at some point.

    My Dad's side of the family have no religion, it's not even mentioned. I lived in England and France until I moved here when I was about 8. Before I moved to Ireland I didn't even know religion existed! Mainly because I never went to a religious school before that, and my parents didn't baptise us or mention anything about religion. My Mother did get us baptised in the end because she didn't want us to feel left out with communion etc, after moving from a different country.

    It's only when I started speaking to friends about religion that I realised how big of a deal it was in their upbringing, so it doesn't really surprise me how much some people talk about their atheism.

    It does really annoy me when people with no religion try to make out that religious people are stupid. I couldn't care less what others believe in, even if it makes no sense to me.

    My house was half religious and i am an atheist. The reason i am an atheist is because there is no evidence that he exists or ever existed and those that say he does ask us to rely on "faith" which essentially means "there is no evidence, simply believe us". My critical mind just could not make that leap - at the age of 12. And i havent looked back since.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 23,468 ✭✭✭✭Akrasia


    Just because you refuse to believe in the truth behind Christmas (and the catholic faith in general) in no way makes it a lie and in fact you have no right making accusations like that. Religion is an important part of a child's upbringing and I pity the children who are born into atheist familys and denied it.

    There is no truth behind christmas. The entire nativity scene (like most of the other stories in the bible both old and new testament) is completely made up and has absolutely no basis in history

    There was no 'census' that meant people had to travel to their home town
    The idea that people had to travel to their home town in order to complete a census is itself a ludicrous idea

    There wasn't even a place called Bethlehem at the time jesus was supposed to have been born.

    The existence of the historical jesus is also highly questionable. There is simply no reliable independent evidence that the historical jesus existed. Have a read of the article below
    http://www.washingtonpost.com/posteverything/wp/2014/12/18/did-historical-jesus-exist-the-traditional-evidence-doesnt-hold-up/

    I agree with you, that often religion is an important part of a childs upbringing, but I don't think that this is for the better. I see a direct correlation between how religious a childs upbringing is, and how damaging that influence is on the child.

    Chomsky(2017) on the Republican party

    "Has there ever been an organisation in human history that is dedicated, with such commitment, to the destruction of organised human life on Earth?"



  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 9,085 ✭✭✭SpaceTime


    I'm quite proud to be Irish but I still absolutely cringe when I have to explain the religious fundementalism of the recent past when I'm abroad.

    Things like "yes, really, they did ban condoms right up until the 1970s... and yes, you needed a prescription for them in the 1980s..."

    and "no, oddly enough it wasn't actually a theocratic dictatorship at the time..."

    and "yes, we did introduce a blasphemy law in the late 2000s, not the 1600s..."

    I had French journalist friends of mine asking if it "was safe" to visit Ireland after that law came in as they'd published things that might be considered blasphemous and were afraid that they might be prosecuted by religious fundamentalists here.

    I don't think most Irish people actually realise what a totally nutty backwater that piece of legislation made us look. It was like something Russia would do under the current Putin regime.

    It's very hard to argue that "no really! it is actually a very liberal place these days..."

    Then you've all the horror stories about the institutional abuse and Magdalene laundries that's been picked up in parts abroad too so, people are vaguely aware of that too.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,277 ✭✭✭DamagedTrax


    SpaceTime wrote: »
    I'm quite proud to be Irish but I still absolutely cringe when I have to explain the religious fundementalism of the recent past when I'm abroad.

    Things like "yes, really, they did ban condoms right up until the 1970s... and yes, you needed a prescription for them in the 1980s..."

    and "no, oddly enough it wasn't actually a theocratic dictatorship at the time..."

    and "yes, we did introduce a blasphemy law in the late 2000s, not the 1600s..."

    I had French journalist friends of mine asking if it "was safe" to visit Ireland after that law came in as they'd published things that might be considered blasphemous and were afraid that they might be prosecuted by religious fundamentalists here.

    I don't think most Irish people actually realise what a totally nutty backwater that piece of legislation made us look. It was like something Russia would do under the current Putin regime.

    It's very hard to argue that "no really! it is actually a very liberal place these days..."

    Then you've all the horror stories about the institutional abuse and Magdalene laundries that's been picked up in parts abroad too so, people are vaguely aware of that too.

    throw in a smattering of public figures such as dana or john waters and those on the outside could be forgiven for thinking the loons have taken over the asylum!


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 9,085 ✭✭✭SpaceTime


    I don't really have any issue with Dana, she has her beliefs, she's quite open about them and people opt not to vote for her.

    Waters is a journalist, he's entitled to his views too.

    We supposedly live in a pluralist democracy, so everyone's absolutely entitled to have their views, it's just the fact that the state shouldn't be institutionalising one particular set of religious views and imposing them on the whole population (while all the time insisting it isn't...)

    It's the sneaky stuff where it's all quietly inserted into the system without any oversight / choice in the matter i.e. corporatism that is worrying.

    I don't think the Irish public is that conservative at all, and I don't know if they ever were either. They were however very definitely cowed by establishment figures / organisations who were gatekeepers to all sorts of essential services like health, welfare, education, employment opportunities and so on...


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,277 ✭✭✭DamagedTrax


    SpaceTime wrote: »
    I don't really have any issue with Dana, she has her beliefs, she's quite open about them and people opt not to vote for her.

    It's the sneaky stuff where it's all quietly inserted into the system without any oversight / choice in the matter.

    I don't think the Irish public is that conservative at all, and I don't know if they ever were either. They were however very definitely cowed by establishment figures / organisations who were gatekeepers to all sorts of essential services like health, welfare, education, employment opportunities and so on...

    i agree. but as you were talking about how we look to the outside, people like dana and waters make the headlines. the undercurrent rarely does.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,972 ✭✭✭captbarnacles


    Akrasia wrote: »
    The existence of the historical jesus is also highly questionable. There is simply no reliable independent evidence that the historical jesus existed. Have a read of the article below
    http://www.washingtonpost.com/posteverything/wp/2014/12/18/did-historical-jesus-exist-the-traditional-evidence-doesnt-hold-up/
    Comments section is amusing.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 9,085 ✭✭✭SpaceTime


    i agree. but as you were talking about how we look to the outside, people like dana and waters make the headlines. the undercurrent rarely does.

    Well, I just find in some conversations we're thrown in with the US deep south.
    Also, you hear a lot of very serious right-wing fundamentalism coming out of NI e.g. the debates up there around Gay Marriage which are like something out of Alabama.

    The debates in the Republic are actually extremely enlightened in comparison (even in comparison to most continental countries and way way ahead of the US.)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,945 ✭✭✭✭One eyed Jack


    throw in a smattering of public figures such as dana or john waters and those on the outside could be forgiven for thinking the loons have taken over the asylum!


    Ah yes, because nobody outside of Ireland has a couple of the equivalent nutbars in their own country. Sure how would they be expected to understand at all. Sure an American could never understand what extremism is like at all, nor a Chinese person, they wouldn't be familiar with concepts like persecution and intolerance at all, eh?

    Ireland really IS a land of Saints* and Scholars in comparison.



    *Relax, I mean saints in the commonly understood to be good people idea, not that we're all still on bended knees, etc.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,744 ✭✭✭✭kylith


    you're definitely going to hell for that!
    Ticket was bought and paid for long ago! :D
    But he's using his intelligence (that 'God gave him') to assess whether or not God exists which as per the Bible he is required to do so obviously God will be aware of this and will let him into heaven.

    Congrats Kylith. You are going to paradise.

    Nonsense. I'm a woman who is not silently and meekly accepting what the men tell me, and I'm not even in a kitchen! There's a special part of hell just for women like me. Thankfully I know a pile of them from A&A so we'll have a great time.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,816 ✭✭✭Baggy Trousers


    Yet as I pointed out in the UK people go to huge lengths to get into catholic schools.

    Over there the better the school the more points you need, to gain points the child and parents must play an active roll in the church. Serving mass = x points, parents cleaning the church = y points etc. Large numbers of people do this as they very much want their children in catholic schools and the schools are known as being excellent.

    My nephew goes to a so called Catholic ethos primary school in Galway.
    Out of a 2nd class of 30, 9 opted out of first communion for various reasons.


  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 24,774 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    mrkiscool2 wrote: »
    I'm an atheist but I don't go around telling random people I am an atheist or that others are wrong for believing in God(s).

    And I dont go around talking about religion or saying I'm catholic. In fact most people I know wouldn't even know I go to mass.
    SpaceTime wrote: »
    Surely it should be managed by expert educators and child development specialists, educational psychologists and so on ?

    I don't really see why knowing how to say Mass is a qualification for running a large educational establishment, which seems to often be the case here.

    Training to be a priest is a highly academic process, they are well capable of teaching after it or running an educational institution.
    SpaceTime wrote: »
    One other little thing that REALLY annoys me is the insistence on having prayers in the Dail and Seanad.

    Prayers are common in parliaments including in the UK.
    Akrasia wrote: »
    There is no truth behind christmas. The entire nativity scene (like most of the other stories in the bible both old and new testament) is completely made up and has absolutely no basis in history

    There was no 'census' that meant people had to travel to their home town
    The idea that people had to travel to their home town in order to complete a census is itself a ludicrous idea

    There wasn't even a place called Bethlehem at the time jesus was supposed to have been born.

    The existence of the historical jesus is also highly questionable. There is simply no reliable independent evidence that the historical jesus existed. Have a read of the article below
    http://www.washingtonpost.com/posteverything/wp/2014/12/18/did-historical-jesus-exist-the-traditional-evidence-doesnt-hold-up/

    Of course you will root around until you find "facts" written to fit your views.


Advertisement