Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Dublin Bus - can anyone be happy with the price and service?

18911131431

Comments

  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 81 ✭✭poggyone


    Buy more triaxles basically! The spec of bus in Hong Kong (their Alexander Enviro 500s anyway) would be great for Dublin Bus on most core routes.
    The triaxles when driven in dubln EAT the rear tyres.
    The triaxles you see abroad are not making sharp turns on narrow streets,ie Suffok St. They are run on straight motorways.
    DB try only run triaxles M-F, they take them out of service Sat-Sun so they can get a extra week use of the rear tyres. I know a few run Sat-Sun but only at peak times.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 81 ✭✭poggyone


    _Kaiser_ wrote: »
    The nonsense that was the bendi-buses using only the front doors must never happen again (and I remain unconvinced about this "safety" excuse being used to justify it when buses all over the world can operate multi-door vehicles in towns and cities that are a hell of a lot busier or cluttered than Dublin!)

    Remember a year ago a man was pushed under a rear wheel of a bus on dawson st?
    If you knew how DB treated the driver of the bus you would not open the middle doors unless the bus was parallel and close to the kerb and 100% safe to do so. (Driver was 100% innocent of wrong doing)
    Anything that goes wrong with the use of the centre door and the driver will be blamed.
    This is a undeniable fact.
    You want the doors to be used all the time, get someone in power to take responsibility, NTA,DB the drivers dont care, until such time middle doors will be used infrequently only when bus is parallel and close to the kerb.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 81 ✭✭poggyone


    hmmm wrote: »
    I'd love to see more inspectors - stop people eating on buses, clamp down on people not paying.

    Suppose to be more checks in the coming months, honestly it wont make any difference.
    Inspectors have no real power, what is need is transport police.
    The lowlife go to court with dozens of fines and are either let of scot free or only fined once for multiple offences.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,673 ✭✭✭VG31


    I've noticed there are never any tri-axles on the 145 in the morning (southbound at least anyway). The buses are always very full in the city centre, they should send the tri-axles out earlier.
    poggyone wrote: »
    Remember a year ago a man was pushed under a rear wheel of a bus on dawson st?
    If you knew how DB treated the driver of the bus you would not open the middle doors unless the bus was parallel and close to the kerb and 100% safe to do so. (Driver was 100% innocent of wrong doing)
    Anything that goes wrong with the use of the centre door and the driver will be blamed.
    This is a undeniable fact.
    You want the doors to be used all the time, get someone in power to take responsibility, NTA,DB the drivers dont care, until such time middle doors will be used infrequently only when bus is parallel and close to the kerb.

    So if something goes wrong when the front doors are used is it the same? Why are the middle doors different?
    hmmm wrote: »
    I'd love to see more inspectors - stop people eating on buses, clamp down on people not paying.

    Is there any rule saying people can't eat on the bus? I see this all the time.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 20,373 ✭✭✭✭foggy_lad


    cdebru wrote: »
    Whether you are convinced or not is largely irrelevant, there is a Labour court ruling the reasons behind that ruling have never been addressed.
    But to demonstrate the point here is the TFL guidance on bus stop design

    http://www.tfl.gov.uk/cdn/static/cms/documents/accessibile-bus-stop-design-guidance.pdf


    Now head out into Dublin and see how many stops you can find that meet those guidelines.

    Other than that I agree completely different buses are needed, I never understood the reason for getting rid of the single deckers and it seems an awful waste to have double deckers driving around carrying a handful of people even at peak times.

    Fixed the link


  • Advertisement
  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 81 ✭✭poggyone


    VG31 wrote: »
    So if something goes wrong when the front doors are used is it the same? Why are the middle doors different?
    Drivers usually have the front door up to kerb before opening, if accident happen at front when bus not near kerb the driver is screwed, it is much harder in dublin to get middle door near to kerb. Therefore driver is taking a gamble every time they open middle door when not close to kerb.
    Why would you take the risk?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,673 ✭✭✭VG31


    poggyone wrote: »
    Drivers usually have the front door up to kerb before opening, if accident happen at front when bus not near kerb the driver is screwed, it is much harder in dublin to get middle door near to kerb. Therefore driver is taking a gamble every time they open middle door when not close to kerb.
    Why would you take the risk?

    Fair enough, some bus stops need to be fixed. But there are some drivers who will not open the middle doors even if they are close to the kerb. Most stops there is no problem getting near the kerb.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 81 ✭✭poggyone


    VG31 wrote: »
    Most stops there is no problem getting near the kerb.
    In theory, then allow for illegally parked vehicles , too many buses using the same stops, suffolk,D'Olier st, and before you know it most stops are now no longer accessible.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,673 ✭✭✭VG31


    I use Suffolk Street and D'Olier street occasionally, there are lots of buses but on Suffolk Street in particular there are no problems getting near the kerb, the only problem is that buses often pull in too far back from the bus stop. It is more likely to be an issue in residential areas where parked cars may partially block the bus from pulling in.
    If I take the stops on my morning commute into consideration, out of the 17 stops only at 3 stops is getting close to the kerb is sometimes an issue and two of them people don't usually get off at. The rest of the stops there would very rarely be an issue with getting close to the kerb.

    Do you use the middle doors at all?
    You must accept the there are some drivers who will not use the centre doors even if they are perfectly stopped at the bus stop.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 20,373 ✭✭✭✭foggy_lad


    VG31 wrote: »
    I use Suffolk Street and D'Olier street occasionally, there are lots of buses but on Suffolk Street in particular there are no problems getting near the kerb, the only problem is that buses often pull in too far back from the bus stop. It is more likely to be an issue in residential areas where parked cars may partially block the bus from pulling in.
    If I take the stops on my morning commute into consideration, out of the 17 stops only at 3 stops is getting close to the kerb is sometimes an issue and two of them people don't usually get off at. The rest of the stops there would very rarely be an issue with getting close to the kerb.

    Do you use the middle doors at all?
    You must accept the there are some drivers who will not use the centre doors even if they are perfectly stopped at the bus stop.

    Often buses on Suffolk St will stop several yards before even the first stop on the street to offload passengers when there is a Q of buses ahead, then passengers for that bus trot down to their bus and the driver will allow them to board miles away from the stop! This bus is then blocking access for the other first stop on the street and creates even worse confusion and bedlam at peak hours. Yet day after day Dublin bus and the NTA let this illegal bus stop behaviour continue without placing an inspector onwhat is probably the most dangerous street in Dublin for bus passengers!

    At places like Suffolk St buses should not be allowed open doors unless at their designated stop or unless there is an inspector present to oversee the boarding and alighting of passengers.


    For most stops on city streets the bus stops should be placed alongside the traffic/bus lane sticking out from the main footpath if required so then the bus just pulls up alongside and does not need to manoeuvre into a tight bus stop bay that may be partially blocked by cars or just poorly designed like the one at the DCC library in Rathmines, opposite the Travelodge/aldi. This stop cost thousands to place there but most buses stop in the bus lane just past the bus stop! It is easier for Deriver and also for passengers.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,002 ✭✭✭✭AlekSmart


    foggy_lad wrote: »

    At places like Suffolk St buses should not be allowed open doors unless at their designated stop or unless there is an inspector present to oversee the boarding and alighting of passengers.


    For most stops on city streets the bus stops should be placed alongside the traffic/bus lane sticking out from the main footpath if required so then the bus just pulls up alongside and does not need to manoeuvre into a tight bus stop bay that may be partially blocked by cars or just poorly designed like the one at the DCC library in Rathmines, opposite the Travelodge/aldi. This stop cost thousands to place there but most buses stop in the bus lane just past the bus stop! It is easier for Deriver and also for passengers.

    Excellent concept indeed.....diluted a tad by the actual number of Bus Routes allocated to each specific Bus Stop.

    The other unspoken of issue here is the presence of ranked-up Taxi's now regularly seen along the street.
    This makes any attempt to safely access Bus Stops largely impossible.

    No amount of polite requesting will get these people to move,as the Gardai appear to have reached some form of "agreement" with them on the issue which they then take as carte blance to act the eejit 24/7.

    One answer...the old reliable...Pedestrian Barriers along the kerb edge...with openings only at the Bus Stop.

    However,my discussions with DCC Traffic Engineers has revealed a their absolute resistance to ANY form of physical barrier in such cases.

    It would appear that DCC has a significantly greater appetite for risk (Or placing the Public at risk) than the other players in this production.

    As it currently stands,the "Problem" (Officially Non-Existent) will disappear from the 18th Jan,when the Bus Routes are removed to facilitate BXD works.

    Whether this will see the Taxi fraternity make a wild-eyed dash for Lincoln Place to set up their crazy stall is another matter entirely...;)

    The Rathmines issue is far simpler,springing from the reliance of the Local Authorities upon manufacturers theoritical data on Bus Manouvering space,which is then superimposed upon the actual on-street area...resulting in largely unusable Bus Stop arrangements,particularly when Disabled Access is required.

    The Roads Design Engineer thinks laterally it appears,so as long as the required kerb space can accomodate the required length of Bus,the issue of how that Bus actually gets to position at the Stop is somebody else's problem.

    Rathmines Road is an absolute classic,but again,it is a Problem which OFFICIALLY does not exist,because Busdrivers concerns are regarded as nit-picking and trouble-making...the answer I have heard given on more than one occasion...."WTF do yiz want...a fcekkin Runway ?"......to which my reply was...."Yes-A runway,with clear approach and departure slope is EXACTLY what we want...Great Idea !".

    The act of pulling a full-size Bus into and out of that Stop is where the vast majority of the DANGER lies,and it is DANGER which has been deliberately engineered into the location largely as a result of professional laziness....

    Needless to say,my glide-slope analogy was swiftly pooh-pooh'd and the Engineering Luminary moved swiftly on to greater things...such as Arran Quay....!

    Put very simply a 10Mtr+ Vehicle requiring regular access to a Kerbside Location MUST be facilitated to approach that Stop in a controlled and safe manner.
    Rathmines offered the long,straight stretch of Road which could have facilitated this,but the Local Authority plumped instead for the tightly boxed-in approach,always guaranteed to result in a typically Irish Engineered Mess of a solution.

    How does all of that sound then......?


    Men, it has been well said, think in herds; it will be seen that they go mad in herds, while they only recover their senses slowly, and one by one.

    Charles Mackay (1812-1889)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,248 ✭✭✭lucernarian


    poggyone wrote: »
    The triaxles when driven in dubln EAT the rear tyres.
    The triaxles you see abroad are not making sharp turns on narrow streets,ie Suffok St. They are run on straight motorways.
    DB try only run triaxles M-F, they take them out of service Sat-Sun so they can get a extra week use of the rear tyres. I know a few run Sat-Sun but only at peak times.
    Have you ever been to Hong Kong?! That's a mad statement to make. They deliberately run on alignments that are on wider and straight enough roads in Kowloon especially but as terminals can't all be in the same place, the final 3 stops at either end would include some very sharp turns. I didn't take many buses in HK whenever I visit but that was my experience anyway. And route 6/A to Aberdeen on the island is an exceptionally twisty road but the triaxles are used mainly with a sprinkling of EV-like buses.
    AlekSmart wrote:
    One answer...the old reliable...Pedestrian Barriers along the kerb edge...with openings only at the Bus Stop.[\quote]
    Those types of barriers are often lethal to cyclists and tbh I'm glad they are waking up to that. I know they have been implicated in a number of accidents in London where they are used more often.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 19,634 ✭✭✭✭LXFlyer


    poggyone wrote: »
    The triaxles when driven in dubln EAT the rear tyres.
    The triaxles you see abroad are not making sharp turns on narrow streets,ie Suffok St. They are run on straight motorways.
    DB try only run triaxles M-F, they take them out of service Sat-Sun so they can get a extra week use of the rear tyres. I know a few run Sat-Sun but only at peak times.



    While that applies to the Donnybrook VTs, I'm not sure that it applies to the Phibsboro batch.


    I'm pretty sure it is down to the particular settings that DB chose on the initial batch of vehicles.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 19,634 ✭✭✭✭LXFlyer


    AlekSmart wrote: »
    The Rathmines issue is far simpler,springing from the reliance of the Local Authorities upon manufacturers theoritical data on Bus Manouvering space,which is then superimposed upon the actual on-street area...resulting in largely unusable Bus Stop arrangements,particularly when Disabled Access is required.

    The Roads Design Engineer thinks laterally it appears,so as long as the required kerb space can accomodate the required length of Bus,the issue of how that Bus actually gets to position at the Stop is somebody else's problem.

    Rathmines Road is an absolute classic,but again,it is a Problem which OFFICIALLY does not exist,because Busdrivers concerns are regarded as nit-picking and trouble-making...the answer I have heard given on more than one occasion...."WTF do yiz want...a fcekkin Runway ?"......to which my reply was...."Yes-A runway,with clear approach and departure slope is EXACTLY what we want...Great Idea !".

    The act of pulling a full-size Bus into and out of that Stop is where the vast majority of the DANGER lies,and it is DANGER which has been deliberately engineered into the location largely as a result of professional laziness....

    Needless to say,my glide-slope analogy was swiftly pooh-pooh'd and the Engineering Luminary moved swiftly on to greater things...such as Arran Quay....!

    Put very simply a 10Mtr+ Vehicle requiring regular access to a Kerbside Location MUST be facilitated to approach that Stop in a controlled and safe manner.
    Rathmines offered the long,straight stretch of Road which could have facilitated this,but the Local Authority plumped instead for the tightly boxed-in approach,always guaranteed to result in a typically Irish Engineered Mess of a solution.

    How does all of that sound then......?

    The Rathmines stop is an absolute disgrace.

    How any road engineer could ever think that it was a suitable design for a bus stop is beyond me.

    It is impossible for a bus to align up with the kerb correctly due to the bus bay being too short for any bus to pull in properly, and then pull out. It also takes no account of the fact that the stop is served by 8 bus routes, and that an indented bay is completely inappropriate in that location. This sort of thing is basic.

    Any bus cage markings, or indeed bus bays have to allow sufficient space for buses to:
    - Pull in
    - Straighten up
    - Stop
    - Pull out

    I would venture to suggest that a significant number of stops in Dublin fail this basic test.

    I find it difficult to understand how this sort of nonsense is ever allowed to happen. Yet thousands of EURO were spent on something that cannot be used properly.

    TfL have excellent design guidance on this:
    http://www.tfl.gov.uk/cdn/static/cms/documents/accessibile-bus-stop-design-guidance.pdf


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,761 ✭✭✭cdebru


    lxflyer wrote: »
    The Rathmines stop is an absolute disgrace.

    How any road engineer could ever think that it was a suitable design for a bus stop is beyond me.

    It is impossible for a bus to align up with the kerb correctly due to the bus bay being too short for any bus to pull in properly, and then pull out. It also takes no account of the fact that the stop is served by 8 bus routes, and that an indented bay is completely inappropriate in that location. This sort of thing is basic.

    Any bus cage markings, or indeed bus bays have to allow sufficient space for buses to:
    - Pull in
    - Straighten up
    - Stop
    - Pull out

    I would venture to suggest that a significant number of stops in Dublin fail this basic test.

    I find it difficult to understand how this sort of nonsense is ever allowed to happen. Yet thousands of EURO were spent on something that cannot be used properly.

    TfL have excellent design guidance on this:
    http://www.tfl.gov.uk/cdn/static/cms/documents/accessibile-bus-stop-design-guidance.pdf



    I just had a look at Google street view to make sure I was talking about the right stop, and just to demonstrate the problems lo and behold there is a taxi parked up in the stop, and a 128 loading out in the bus lane.

    It is a classic example of why we can't use center doors in one picture, poorly designed stop which can't be used but even if it was correct there is a taxi parked at the entrance to the stop.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 302 ✭✭RFOLEY1990


    I live in East Wall and the bus service is fantastic.

    Very friendly drivers also.

    People saying why thank a driver for 'doing their job' . Have you ever heard of common courteousy? Would you not thank someone in McDonald's for handing you your food?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,815 ✭✭✭✭Muahahaha


    poggyone wrote: »
    Drivers usually have the front door up to kerb before opening, if accident happen at front when bus not near kerb the driver is screwed, it is much harder in dublin to get middle door near to kerb. Therefore driver is taking a gamble every time they open middle door when not close to kerb.
    Why would you take the risk?

    Anytime I'm in London its always the middle doors that you get off. They seem to manage it ok. And dwell times are much shorter as a result and you don't have to wait for all disembarking passengers to get off before those getting on can do so.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,293 ✭✭✭✭Mint Sauce


    steddyeddy wrote: »
    I live in near Donnybrook and I go into Dublin (around 15 mins by bus) once a week. I'm sometimes waiting up to half an hour for a bus that charges me 2.80 for the pleasure of a 15 minute journey. Now I know people will say Leap card is cheaper blah blah but still the fact remains is that Dublin Bus offers and appalling service. I live on the main road into the country's capital and it's a struggle getting in and out of town for a return journey costing me over 5 euro!!

    We also subsidise Dublin bus in taxes. We're paying too much for a rubbish service.


    Edit: I also forgot some of the rudest bus drivers going who act like they're doing you a favour instead of providing a service.

    Wouldn't be too bad if it was 2.80 regardless of the lenght of the journey, be that one stop, or the entire lenght of the route.

    I dont use DB thst often, but nearly anytime i have the driver has seemed to expected me to know what fare stage my stop is in, and what the fare should be. A flat fare would end all of that.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,900 ✭✭✭rannerap


    I live in lusk and We have one bus. It's not nearly as frequent as it needs to be and it takes the guts of two hours to get to town. It's ridiculous


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,761 ✭✭✭cdebru


    Muahahaha wrote: »
    Anytime I'm in London its always the middle doors that you get off. They seem to manage it ok. And dwell times are much shorter as a result and you don't have to wait for all disembarking passengers to get off before those getting on can do so.

    TFL have guidelines for bus stop design which means they don't just stick a pole in the ground and hope for the best, and have you ever seen taxis make a defacto rank at a bus stop in London ?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,815 ✭✭✭✭Muahahaha


    cdebru wrote: »
    TFL have guidelines for bus stop design which means they don't just stick a pole in the ground and hope for the best, and have you ever seen taxis make a defacto rank at a bus stop in London ?

    Don't Dublin Bus also have guidelines for bus stop design? Or at least the pavements seems to be designed for their buses near me. It doesn't explain why the middle doors aren't being used. If its safe to get off onto the pavement at the front door then what is unsafe about the middle one ? I'm just curious as they seem to manage it fine in London, and most other major European capitals from what I can recall too. Are things more dangerous in Dublin for some reason? I can think of plenty of eastern European capitals whose streets are made of cobblestone and yet passengers don't seem to have problems using the middle doors, its the done thing if anything


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 19,634 ✭✭✭✭LXFlyer


    Muahahaha wrote: »
    Don't Dublin Bus also have guidelines for bus stop design? Or at least the pavements seems to be designed for their buses near me. It doesn't explain why the middle doors aren't being used. If its safe to get off onto the pavement at the front door then what is unsafe about the middle one ? I'm just curious as they seem to manage it fine in London, and most other major European capitals from what I can recall too. Are things more dangerous in Dublin for some reason? I can think of plenty of eastern European capitals whose streets are made of cobblestone and yet passengers don't seem to have problems using the middle doors, its the done thing if anything



    All of that is down to Dublin City Council and the other local authorities and as far as I know they don't have any such manual - that much is fairly obvious from looking around the city.


    It's one thing having the kerbing in place, but how many bus stop cages (i.e. the markings on the road) are big enough to allow for buses to:
    1) Pull in
    2) Straighten up
    3) Stop
    4) Pull out


    Many (if not most) of them are purely the length of a bus - they don't allow for the extra space that buses need to do the above manoeuvre safely.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,815 ✭✭✭✭Muahahaha


    I'd suggest that the majority of bus stops are ones where there isn't that much pulling in to do, i.e. they're on the side of the road and the bus just stops on its route.

    Irrespective of whose fault it is it all comes back on the customer at the end of the day. Longer dwell times mean longer journeys for everyone on board. It seems daft to me that Dublin Bus is investing in buses with middle doors which we know are effective at cutting dwell times but then not using them.


  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 12,022 Mod ✭✭✭✭devnull


    Dublin Bus isn't investing in middle doors. Buses for the last number of eyars are being bought by the NTA.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,922 ✭✭✭✭end of the road


    Muahahaha wrote: »
    Anytime I'm in London its always the middle doors that you get off. They seem to manage it ok. And dwell times are much shorter as a result and you don't have to wait for all disembarking passengers to get off before those getting on can do so.
    i'd imagine in london the stops are set up for such operation, and you don't have other vehicles being able to park in them

    I'm very highly educated. I know words, i have the best words, nobody has better words then me.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,815 ✭✭✭✭Muahahaha


    i'd imagine in london the stops are set up for such operation, and you don't have other vehicles being able to park in them

    It does seem to be part of the problem in Dublin city centre with taxis, deliveries and most other people thinking they can park up in a bus lane or at a stop to drop someone off. If Dublin Bus is to reduce dwell times there really needs to be co-operation from the Gardai to change the culture of blocking buses. Also buses can often find it extremely hard to pull out as no motorist wants to be behind them. Its ridiculous seeing buses trying to pull out from a stop as tons of motorists tailgate each other to prevent it happening.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 20,373 ✭✭✭✭foggy_lad


    lxflyer wrote: »
    The Rathmines stop is an absolute disgrace.

    How any road engineer could ever think that it was a suitable design for a bus stop is beyond me.

    It is impossible for a bus to align up with the kerb correctly due to the bus bay being too short for any bus to pull in properly, and then pull out. It also takes no account of the fact that the stop is served by 8 bus routes, and that an indented bay is completely inappropriate in that location. This sort of thing is basic.

    Any bus cage markings, or indeed bus bays have to allow sufficient space for buses to:
    - Pull in
    - Straighten up
    - Stop
    - Pull out

    I would venture to suggest that a significant number of stops in Dublin fail this basic test.

    I find it difficult to understand how this sort of nonsense is ever allowed to happen. Yet thousands of EURO were spent on something that cannot be used properly.

    TfL have excellent design guidance on this:
    http://www.tfl.gov.uk/cdn/static/cms/documents/accessibile-bus-stop-design-guidance.pdf
    There are also regularly cars parked blocking that bus bay in Rathmines and bus bays all over the city! Before money was wasted on that bus stop bay there was room for 2-3 buses to pull up at that stop but now only one bus can safely load/unload passengers when it is pulled in beyond the bus stop.

    cdebru wrote: »
    I just had a look at Google street view to make sure I was talking about the right stop, and just to demonstrate the problems lo and behold there is a taxi parked up in the stop, and a 128 loading out in the bus lane.

    It is a classic example of why we can't use center doors in one picture, poorly designed stop which can't be used but even if it was correct there is a taxi parked at the entrance to the stop.
    There is usually cars parked out on the bus lane behind that taxi shown in street view
    I live in lusk and We have one bus. It's not nearly as frequent as it needs to be and it takes the guts of two hours to get to town. It's ridiculous
    Ye have a train service in Lusk that beats most buses for time into the city centre.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 81 ✭✭poggyone


    One thing to bear in mind regard bus stops, DB have no say in where they are located.
    DB request a stop on a stretch of road and the Garda are the ones who then pick the spot.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,905 ✭✭✭Aard


    How is it that the Gardaí know better than the local authority where a bus stop would best be placed?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,194 ✭✭✭KD345


    poggyone wrote: »
    One thing to bear in mind regard bus stops, DB have no say in where they are located.
    DB request a stop on a stretch of road and the Garda are the ones who then pick the spot.

    This is no longer the case. In 2003, section 16 of the road traffic act transferred responsibility to the local authority.


Advertisement
Advertisement