Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Women's Rights in Islam - UPDATED WITH MOD INSTRUCTION IN FIRST POST

17810121316

Comments

  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 136 ✭✭niamhstokes


    I've spent a lot of time researching Vitamin D and sunlight over the past few years - have also been working on a website that tells you roughly how much of it you do need (it's very complex, because the amount you need differs depending on your skin type, your age, your weight, what time of the year it is, what time of the day it is, what latitude you live at, how dense the ozone layer is on that day, how much of your total skin you have exposed, and for how long).

    First things first, it's not just women who wear Hijab that are at risk of it. Vitamin D deficiency is extremely common - about 1 in 6 people are severely deficient in the winter months. The reason for this is that vitamin D has a half life of around 2 months in our bodies, and in Ireland our skins only really produce it from around April to September when exposed to sunlight (because the UV index needs to be 3 or more to produce any significant amount), so it's not just women who wear Hijab, but everybody needs to know about the risks of it.

    The other thing which really puzzles me about those consultants is that they seem to be blissfully unaware that sunlight isn't the only source of vitamin D. Oily fish (like salmon, herring, mackerel) are very good sources of vitamin D and if you eat them twice a week, that pretty much gives you all you need (and we all should be doing that during the winter months). Furthermore, I was at a dermatology conference in Athlone last year and a consultant dermatologist strongly warned against looking to get vitamin D from the sun (and instead recommended using supplemented milk, cereals etc) because the flip side of the coin is - the more sun exposure your skin gets over time, the more the likelihood of developing skin cancer. She also pointed out that people in general are useless at properly applying sunscreen, and we should be moving away from it for sun protection and focusing more on wearing hats and more clothes in the sun to reduce the risk of sunburn and skin cancer. A recent study also showed that with all these cheap low fare sun holidays we've had in the past 10-15 years, skin cancer rates have shot up. I personally don't completely agree with her, because I do believe that there is a safe middle ground where you can get enough sun to get your vitamin d, but not so much so as to risk sun burn and skin cancer - the problem is that one size does not fit all with regards to sun exposure (due to the complexities mentioned about) and so it's hard to make recommendations for the public at large.

    We all need to be mindful of our life choices that could affect our health - and indeed women who wear Hijab do need to be made aware of the need for sunlight (or alternatives). They can very easily manage it, as you only need to sit in the sun for around 1-2 hours a week during the summer with arms, legs and face exposed to the sun (and that can easily be done from the privacy of their own homes, either in the back garden, or through an open window or door) to get sufficient amounts. If that doesn't suit them, they can either look at oily fish, supplemented milk/cereals or tablet supplements. Beyond that, we all need to be aware that sunlight is useless for the winter months for producing vitamin D and we should be looking to our diet for it, and then we all need to be mindful of being careful in the sun to reduce the risk of skin cancer - something which Hijab will protect you from.

    As I keep saying in this thread, it's important to look at things from all sides :)


    I think also in countries like Ireland we need to take some sort of supplement. I take a vitamin D daily supplement and omega 369 oil. The reason being in Ireland we don't even get a lot of sunshine during the summer months, unlike mainland Europe and their hot summers.



    I guess to make things less complicated just dont wear the hijab. It attracts unwanted attention anyway in Ireland as it's rare so i guess thats the opposite effect of what it's all about, and millions of muslim women don't wear it anyway. That would be my take on it.


    This could be wrong .... but i have heard that muslim women when they become elderly start loosing their hair because of constantly wearing something on their heads? maybe the oxygen isn't getting at their hair? I dont know... to be honest.

    At the end of the day, what I say or you say isn't going to change what muslim women wear or don't wear just like what muslim women say about what I wear isn't going to change or effect my choice either.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 6,351 ✭✭✭katydid


    Indeed, they can't all be right, but it's not because of them deliberately not following a specific teaching (or at least shouldn't be if they are genuine in their endeavours). Scholars are humans - as much as they try to clarify (another word for seeking the truth) what something means in proper context, they are not free from making errors of judgement, and therefore some opinions/interpretations will be wrong. In cases of disagreement, it's generally majority consensus what we go by, and how knowledgable/reputable scholars making a certain claim are.

    But they all believe they are right, so someone must be wrong, which means that someone is telling their followers that God said something he didn't. So the bottom line is Islamic scholars, and Muslims in general by their choice of what interpretation to follow, are deciding all the time that God's word has to be understood only through interpretation, not taken literally. And that interpretation, being a human exercise, is fallible.

    Therefore no Muslim can say with 100% certainty that THEIR interpretation is the word of God.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 136 ✭✭niamhstokes


    katydid wrote: »
    But it is, like it or not. Celibate old men in Rome decide the fate of all Roman Catholics, including you...and you go along with it.

    I guess you could generalise like that or see that input that laity have on committees with the clergy and indeed nuns. We believe the church and its people are helped and guided by the Holy Spirit but i guess if you are anti Catholic whatever i say will not be what you want to hear.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 6,351 ✭✭✭katydid


    I guess you could generalise like that or see that input that laity have on committees with the clergy and indeed nuns. We believe the church and its people are helped and guided by the Holy Spirit but i guess if you are anti Catholic whatever i say will not be what you want to hear.

    I'm not generalising, I'm just telling you something about Roman Catholicism you seem to be unaware of. It's not a democracy, and committees have no power, they are talking shops. The powers that be make the decisions. Parishioners don't get to decide on their own parish priest, for example - the bishop decides.

    I am not anti-Catholic. I am a Catholic. Not a Roman Catholic, but neither anti-Catholic or anti-Roman Catholic. I'm just pointing out a simple fact. The RC church is not a democracy and doesn't pretend to be. It consults the laity, minor clergy and religious, but is under no obligation to listen to what they say.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 326 ✭✭confusedquark


    katydid wrote: »
    But they all believe they are right, so someone must be wrong, which means that someone is telling their followers that God said something he didn't. So the bottom line is Islamic scholars, and Muslims in general by their choice of what interpretation to follow, are deciding all the time that God's word has to be understood only through interpretation, not taken literally. And that interpretation, being a human exercise, is fallible.

    Therefore no Muslim can say with 100% certainty that THEIR interpretation is the word of God.

    You can only choose to follow a different interpretation if a different interpretation exists. Again, the majority of everyday matters in Islam are straight forward to follow and there is no disagreement between the scholars regarding them (such as the five pillars for example). Much of the teachings of the Quran can be taken literally once you know the context in which it was revealed - and sometimes knowing the context isn't even necessary.

    In the minority of matters that there are differences in opinion regarding, I already said that some opinions/interpretations will be wrong. Ideally, Muslims should choose what interpretations to follow based on the knowledge/reputation of scholars and what the general consensus among the majority of scholars is regarding any one particular issue is. Any Muslim who has other agendas and bases their choices on what is convenient for them is committing a grave sin, and will be accountable for it on the day of judgement.

    I'll say it again that there is no one "interpretation of Islam" - there can be interpretations of specific issues within Islam. So the same scholars can be in agreement over some things and differ over others. Muslims are very careful in making any 100% certainty claims (when it comes to being 100% certain about every issue in Islam anyway) - a lot of scholars will write "Allah knows best" at the end of statement, as a way of saying "this is my opinion/interpretation on this issue, but I could be wrong". That's why we repeated ask Allah (subhana wa'tala) for guidance on a daily basis, and to forgive us for any mistakes we make in our judgements.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 326 ✭✭confusedquark


    I think also in countries like Ireland we need to take some sort of supplement. I take a vitamin D daily supplement and omega 369 oil. The reason being in Ireland we don't even get a lot of sunshine during the summer months, unlike mainland Europe and their hot summers.

    Yeah, you can make a strong case for regular supplements (and definitely in the winter months). Although we do get enough sun in the summer to produce sufficient amounts - when you consider a light skinned person needs about 1 hour a week on average, even in Ireland we'd manage that much sun :)
    I guess to make things less complicated just dont wear the hijab. It attracts unwanted attention anyway in Ireland as it's rare so i guess thats the opposite effect of what it's all about, and millions of muslim women don't wear it anyway. That would be my take on it.

    It would also make things less complicated if we, as a society, could accept that there's nothing wrong with people looking different.
    This could be wrong .... but i have heard that muslim women when they become elderly start loosing their hair because of constantly wearing something on their heads? maybe the oxygen isn't getting at their hair? I dont know... to be honest.

    I can't say I've come across that, or indeed any balding Muslim elders. Oxygen enters your body through yours lungs, not skin or hair shafts. Furthermore, Muslim women only wear the headscarf when out and about - not usually at home. Probably an unsubstantiated myth.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6 Sunrays1


    I am a Muslim woman living in Ireland and have read through some of the beginning of this thread (and not completed reading the whole thread right now as it is quite lengthy!) and have some comments to make, in particular to the comments relating to Muslim women's thoughts.
    katydid wrote: »
    No, it's not a "glass half empty/glass half full" situation; things are definitely skewed in favour of men. I have never seen a man covered from head to toe, with just a slit for his eyes. I have never heard of a country which forbids men from driving cars. I have never heard of a country where educating girls was considered immoral. You may say those are extremes of Islam, and indeed they are, but the fact is that Islam is such that it enables such discrimination against women. Nothing you have said that Islam is not misogynistic; it IS misogynistic to make men responsible for providing for woman, as it is saying that women are not capable of providing for themselves.

    Islam does not enable discrimination against anyone. Controlling, un-educated people enable discrimination by whichever means they can. If a woman is free to have a career then the religion is not, “saying that women are not capable of providing for themselves”.

    katydid wrote: »
    You tried to argue that men are discriminated against in Islam because they are expected to look after women. This is hardly discrimination, in that the other side of the coin is that they also have power and control over them. Women are rendered dependent on them, and have little power to change their lives, should they wish.

    Women are not dependent on men as they can have their lives as they wish. Career or no career, own income or not.

    I think women in islam can be summed up like this:

    A bird in a cage is fed, watered and protected, adored and loved; But is the bird free? No!

    The bird is a woman in islam. Let her fly free. Life is not about wearing clothes to hide yourself from the world in case a demonized version of men stare at you. Be free , be happy and enjoy life. God loves to see his children play and be happy, he doesn't say cover yourself from head to toe and dissolve your identity into nothing in public :)

    I am free, happy and enjoying life thanks to Allah. The covering of my body except for my face and hands is my choice of dress and 'identity'. I don't wear an invisible cloak or any cloak for that matter, so I'm very certain that I can be seen in public.

    katydid wrote: »
    Even a headscarf and "dressing modestly" is not freedom, if men are not expected to wear headscarves and "dress modestly" in the same way.

    Why would they need to have a very definite public identity?
    Men in Islam are expected to dress modestly, they have a list of criteria that their dress (and conduct) should meet, according to their body form.

    looksee wrote: »
    I have read your posts, including the bolded bits, and I cannot see that we are getting anywhere. To discuss your points to your satisfaction, I would have to accept the basic premises that you have repeated and repeated, but which I do not accept.

    I am never going to agree that it is a woman's responsibility to cover herself to save men from their passions.

    I am never going to agree that it is appropriate for a man to be as paternalistic/patronising to women as posters here seem to think is natural.

    I would be interested to know why there are not Muslim women contributing to this thread and expressing their views. The only time I have seen women admitting to being Muslim on Boards was in Personal Issues, where they were warning an Irish woman who was wondering about marrying a Muslim of the restrictive nature of marriage in those circumstances.


    To limit temptations is onlynone reason for covering the body for both men and women along with reasons such as generally not drawing attention to yourself, showing off, being moderate in appearance whereby as an individual, male or female, you are neither extravagant nor scruffy looking. Similar to school uniform where everyone is equal and students are not made to feel pressured into designer labels etc. but obviously outside school environment you can dress as you please. Similarly, in Islam, you can dress as you please however, clothes shouldn't be transparent, or tight fitting which show the shape of your body, 'flashy'/attention seeking, always extravagant/expensive or always 'scruffy'/torn. Men are to cover at all times from navel to knees. Women are to cover their body, except face, hands and feet.

    I understand this is where the argument lies but it has to be realised that if a Muslim man was to be topless in front of people, clearly flexing muscles or the alike, then this would not be allowed either. A women being topless will always be more of a statement and attraction than a man being topless, although when it is a statement by a man, it would not be allowed either as mentioned.

    The hair of a woman adds to her beauty and her neck and chest follow on from this. The covering of which has been instructed by Allah therefore is required by Muslim women. If anyone, Muslim or non-Muslim, does not believe Allah or God to have said this, then they do not have to, there is no compulsion in Islam. If the passages which refer to this instruction are examined carefully, it is seen that the head covering is not specifically mentioned. The word 'Khimar' is used when Allah says, "...they should draw their khimar over their bosoms and not display their zeena (beauty)..." (24:60). A khimar is translated as a loose scarf which was worn in the Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) time by women, which covered their head, neck and possibly shoulders only. This is therefore where the instruction appears and the khimar head covering was told to be extended to the bosom too. The passage does go on to mention the covering of the rest of the body but I focussed on head covering there as many people don't understand why women cover their heads and men don't.

    I talk of topless men and women as that is the extreme end of not covering obviously and therefore, a line has been drawn, a boundary has to be made, there needs to be a rule set as it is clearer to follow. Islam being more of a preventative religion in my opinion, rather than curative, (cures however aplenty there are in Islam). Jewels for example are kept safe and hidden away from someone wanting to steal them, similarly, women are covered to be protected. Not just from men, from jealousy too, from extravagance too. If there were no boundaries, it would be harder to maintain a certain form of appropriate too. This extends to protecting men from women, men from jealousy and men from extravagance which are all applicable in Islam to them just as much as they have a dress code and code of conduct. If you refuse to accept that that is what Islam says, then that is unfortunate and a result of the misconceptions of the teachings of Islam that Muslims have and therefore they don’t always act upon.

    Everyone has their own view on what is and isn't appropriate and that is why there are so many different people in the world. Muslims are a type of people and that is their view from their Islamic teachings.

    As we see nowadays there is more and more vulgarity and obscenity in the media as there are no rules as such governing them, so there is nothing stopping people from acting or dressing 'inappropriately', (I use inverted commas as it is only my opinion (which I am using to explain the issue), that some people act and dress inappropriately in the media and in society for that matter and it is probably not their opinion).

    katydid wrote: »
    But of course they are brainwashed. Women who are brought up as equals to men, who turn around and decide to submit to men and cover themselves so that men don't have the effort to show them respect are brainwashed, and not capable of explaining their own oppression.

    It is indeed pointless for you to continue because you have failed to understand that women are not weak creatures who need protection or that men are not weak creatures who are incapable of self-control. If what you portray is Islam, it doesn't have a very high opinion of either men or women...


    I have been brought up as an equal to man as have my female friends and relatives who are Muslim and the covered way I dress is not my submission to men but to Allah. The only Being I want to and need to please. I have been shown nothing but respect by all men, Muslim or not, in places of study, work and of course at home. My father, brother, husband or any man for that matter has never told me to cover, neither did any female relative. It has been through my own studying of my religion which guided me to what my dress code should be.

    Some women do face oppression in the name of Islam, that doesn't make it Islam. There is lots of good and bad in the world and that's one bad. I'm not stating anything ground-breaking there, its common knowledge. Headways are trying to be made in various ways to eliminate misconceptions in Islam by Muslims, things take time, culture can be powerful over religion. Different countries have different ways (again no ground-breaking news there), generalisation is pointless. There are many bad things in the world and good people try to do what they can to eradicate those things. Female oppression is one of them.

    katydid wrote: »
    Can you cite where in the Qur'an where it says that women have to cover themselves from head to toe in a sheet? And how do you know it's God who told them?.

    It's a matter of faith, you either believe or don't believe that is the word of God. Just like other religions.

    katydid wrote: »
    Someone who misreads an exhortation about modesty to mean covering your hair with a wig or wearing old fashioned clothes IS, in my opinion, brainwashed.

    Veils? Slaves? This is 2014.

    I have not misread the verse of Qur'an as can be seen by my above comment on that specific verse.


    katydid wrote: »
    Oh, I know many Muslims who don't take such extreme accounts. My neighbour is a Muslim doctor, and I've never seen her wearing any kind of hijab. And when I taught in the UK there were many Muslim girls who wore the same clothes as everyone else.

    My point is that just like Christianity, there are varied interpretations of Islam. Most Christians accept that the Bible has to be contextualised, and that we don't have to take everything literally. Muslims will admit that there are different interpretations, but insist that since the Qur'an is the direct word of God, it is not open to interpretation. Which is illogical. I just want to get them to admit that they DO interpret...


    Parts of the Qur'an are open to interpretation other parts aren't. The different schools of thought within Islam agree to disagree on parts and people are free to choose what they feel is correct and act accordingly (as humans do) and Allah knows best what is in their hearts. Specifically on the issue of general dress code, there is a consensus between the schools of thought on this. Niqab (face covering) is not obligatory in Islam, some women choose to whilst not being forced to.


    katydid wrote: »
    Of course they have the RIGHT to wear hijab. I never said they didn't have the right. But I am offended by women allowing men to dictate to them what they THINK God told them to do. Men have told women that God wants them to cover up so that men will be able to control themselves in their presence, and women accept that nonsense, instead of telling men to exercise some self control.

    If men are supposed to lower their gaze, and if that was considered enough, then clearly there would be no need for women to cover up in the way they do.

    I never said women cover themselves up to pander to WOMEN'S weakness; I said they pander to MEN'S weakness.

    I am offended that you think I am not capable of knowing and understanding the difference between what men could or have interpreted and what God has said. I understand why you may believe this to be the case but you are quite wrong, as thankfully, I have had an education in the West and have been able to use knowledge seeking skills to study my religion too. I would not blindly follow something, as our education in the West and Islam itself encourages us to question, ponder, research etc. a whole variety of things (this may not be the case in some cultures/countries especially where education is poor and power and control over the vulnerable is rife). In the specific verse there is next to no interpretation except for one word 'khimar', as previously mentioned. Therefore I choose to dress the way I do, covered.


    All in all, I have been treated equally to my brother growing up, had the right to an education, to a career, to marrying whom I wish, for dressing as I wish. The same can be said for all of the females in my circle of friends and family some of whom dress like me and some who don't, all of whom are Muslim.

    Men and women in Islam on the majority have the same roles and responsibilities and definitely have to conduct themselves in the same way, respectfully to each other and to the people in their society. If certain cultures portray this differently, it is not the fault of Islam.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 6,351 ✭✭✭katydid


    You can only choose to follow a different interpretation if a different interpretation exists. Again, the majority of everyday matters in Islam are straight forward to follow and there is no disagreement between the scholars regarding them (such as the five pillars for example). Much of the teachings of the Quran can be taken literally once you know the context in which it was revealed - and sometimes knowing the context isn't even necessary.

    In the minority of matters that there are differences in opinion regarding, I already said that some opinions/interpretations will be wrong. Ideally, Muslims should choose what interpretations to follow based on the knowledge/reputation of scholars and what the general consensus among the majority of scholars is regarding any one particular issue is. Any Muslim who has other agendas and bases their choices on what is convenient for them is committing a grave sin, and will be accountable for it on the day of judgement.

    I'll say it again that there is no one "interpretation of Islam" - there can be interpretations of specific issues within Islam. So the same scholars can be in agreement over some things and differ over others. Muslims are very careful in making any 100% certainty claims (when it comes to being 100% certain about every issue in Islam anyway) - a lot of scholars will write "Allah knows best" at the end of statement, as a way of saying "this is my opinion/interpretation on this issue, but I could be wrong". That's why we repeated ask Allah (subhana wa'tala) for guidance on a daily basis, and to forgive us for any mistakes we make in our judgements.
    Clearly different interpretations exist. Just look at the range of intepretations of what hijab means, from total cover to whatever "modest clothing" means to the wearer.

    And just look at the lifestyles that range from the Taliban's interpretation to the easygoing version of many Muslims from places like Bosnia. Those are hardly minority matters.

    You're right that scholars need to be very careful of making 100% claims; that's my point. They can't, because another scholar will come along and dispute it. None of it is provable, as no one can say for sure what God wanted to say, even if they believe the words are actually his. And they can't explain away contradictions such as saying that women are valued equally to men but that a man has a right to beat his wife.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 326 ✭✭confusedquark


    katydid wrote: »
    Clearly different interpretations exist. Just look at the range of intepretations of what hijab means, from total cover to whatever "modest clothing" means to the wearer.

    And just look at the lifestyles that range from the Taliban's interpretation to the easygoing version of many Muslims from places like Bosnia. Those are hardly minority matters.

    You're right that scholars need to be very careful of making 100% claims; that's my point. They can't, because another scholar will come along and dispute it. None of it is provable, as no one can say for sure what God wanted to say, even if they believe the words are actually his. And they can't explain away contradictions such as saying that women are valued equally to men but that a man has a right to beat his wife.

    I knew this would happen. I did not say that different interpretations for certain issues did not exist (and I must have said that about 3 times already). You have listed a whole of two issues and are going to use that as an example that disagreements are not in the "minority". Suppose there are 10,000 issues that Islam makes rulings on, would you say that citing 2 examples is sufficient to show that disagreements are not in the minority?

    And of course with that you're going to go one further and say that none of the Quran is provable on the simple basis of that. The majority of issues in Islam are provable - I'll be up all night if I started listing out the issues in Islam that there are no differences in opinion regarding, but here are a few - That there's one God, that Muhammad (peace be upon him) was his messenger, that Jesus (peace be upon him) was a messenger before him, and Moses (peace be upon him) before him, that we have to pray 5 times daily, that we have to fast during Ramadan, that we should perform Hajj, that we have to give charity, that we should not drink alcohol, that we should not eat pork, that we should not gamble, that we should not take any form of intoxicants, that we should avoid fornication and adultery, that we should look after our parents in their old age, that we should not indulge in usury etc. etc. etc. There is method in how certain teachings are validated - there's the Quran and sometimes different passages in it that relate to any specific issue, there are the Hadith and what we know about the lives of the Prophet and his companions. Using that method and logic, the majority of teachings can be very easily validated and proven. Of course there are some issues that are somewhat in the grey and that we're not sure about - but those issues don't take away from what we are certain about, and the latter is what core Islam is about. So just because I'm not sure about whether it's ok for me to have a meal in a restaurant that also serves alcohol (different scholars may give a different opinions on that), it doesn't mean that I am (or any other Muslim is) in any doubt about the fact I should be praying 5 times a day.

    The Taliban, ISIS, Al Qaeda are outright rejected by the vast majority of Muslim scholars, and you can clearly see that their actions go against the teachings of Islam (e.g. slaughtering innocent civilians) and that's why they are not considered representative of Islam.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 6,351 ✭✭✭katydid


    I knew this would happen. I did not say that different interpretations for certain issues did not exist (and I must have said that about 3 times already). You have listed a whole of two issues and are going to use that as an example that disagreements are not in the "minority". Suppose there are 10,000 issues that Islam makes rulings on, would you say that citing 2 examples is sufficient to show that disagreements are not in the minority?

    And of course with that you're going to go one further and say that none of the Quran is provable on the simple basis of that. The majority of issues in Islam are provable - I'll be up all night if I started listing out the issues in Islam that there are no differences in opinion regarding, but here are a few - That there's one God, that Muhammad (peace be upon him) was his messenger, that Jesus (peace be upon him) was a messenger before him, and Moses (peace be upon him) before him, that we have to pray 5 times daily, that we have to fast during Ramadan, that we should perform Hajj, that we have to give charity, that we should not drink alcohol, that we should not eat pork, that we should not gamble, that we should not take any form of intoxicants, that we should avoid fornication and adultery, that we should look after our parents in their old age, that we should not indulge in usury etc. etc. etc. There is method in how certain teachings are validated - there's the Quran and sometimes different passages in it that relate to any specific issue, there are the Hadith and what we know about the lives of the Prophet and his companions. Using that method and logic, the majority of teachings can be very easily validated and proven. Of course there are some issues that are somewhat in the grey and that we're not sure about - but those issues don't take away from what we are certain about, and the latter is what core Islam is about. So just because I'm not sure about whether it's ok for me to have a meal in a restaurant that also serves alcohol (different scholars may give a different opinions on that), it doesn't mean that I am (or any other Muslim is) in any doubt about the fact I should be praying 5 times a day.

    The Taliban, ISIS, Al Qaeda are outright rejected by the vast majority of Muslim scholars, and you can clearly see that their actions go against the teachings of Islam (e.g. slaughtering innocent civilians) and that's why they are not considered representative of Islam.

    It doesn't matter if the Taliban and their ilk are rejected by the majority. The point is that they manage to find what they want in Islamic scripture to justify their opinions. Just like the Bible, it is ambiguous enough and has enough contradictions for readers to find what they want to find. If it's the literal word of God, he didn't make himself very clear, did he, if the scripture is open to so many interpretations?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 545 ✭✭✭Defender OF Faith


    katydid wrote: »
    It doesn't matter if the Taliban and their ilk are rejected by the majority. The point is that they manage to find what they want in Islamic scripture to justify their opinions. Just like the Bible, it is ambiguous enough and has enough contradictions for readers to find what they want to find. If it's the literal word of God, he didn't make himself very clear, did he, if the scripture is open to so many interpretations?

    The Qur'an is not like the bible where you can believe in some part and ignore others the Qur'an clearly condemns people that do so:

    So do you believe in part of the Scripture and disbelieve in part? Then what is the recompense for those who do that among you except disgrace in worldly life; and on the Day of Resurrection they will be sent back to the severest of punishment. And Allah is not unaware of what you do.2:85

    The Qur'an was very clear in its massage when it said:
    whoever kills a soul unless for a soul or for corruption [done] in the land - it is as if he had slain mankind entirely. And whoever saves one - it is as if he had saved mankind entirely. And our messengers had certainly come to them with clear proofs. Then indeed many of them, [even] after that, throughout the land, were transgressors.
    5:32

    But whoever kills a believer intentionally - his recompense is Hell, wherein he will abide eternally, and Allah has become angry with him and has cursed him and has prepared for him a great punishment.
    4:93
    Yet many of those killed by such groups are Muslims and believers, however according to their misguided ideology these people are probably not.

    Such groups have existed since the early Islamic era they were described by our prophet and called Kharijit, the Kharijites developed extreme doctrines that further set them apart from both mainstream Sunni and Shiʿa Muslims. The Kharijites were particularly noted for adopting a radical approach to Takfir, whereby they declared other Muslims to be unbelievers and therefore deemed them worthy of death.

    The Kharijite sect was the first to declare Muslims to be unbelievers because of their sins, and they charged as unbelievers whoever differed with them in their innovations and they made lawful the spilling of blood and the taking of wealth.

    Such sect is incarnated today as ISIS,Taliban and those who follow their suit. Such people recite the Quran but it will not go beyond their throats. They pass through the religion just as an arrow pierces its target and they will not return to it just as the arrow does not return to the bow, as the prophet described.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 6,351 ✭✭✭katydid


    The Qur'an is not like the bible where you can believe in some part and ignore others the Qur'an clearly condemns people that do so:
    .

    Actually it is. Otherwise there would be no Taliban or similar groups. Your co-religionist has explained very well the variety of interpretation that goes on. If the text was unambiguous and clear cut, there would be no need for interpretation, would there.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 326 ✭✭confusedquark


    katydid wrote: »
    It doesn't matter if the Taliban and their ilk are rejected by the majority. The point is that they manage to find what they want in Islamic scripture to justify their opinions. Just like the Bible, it is ambiguous enough and has enough contradictions for readers to find what they want to find. If it's the literal word of God, he didn't make himself very clear, did he, if the scripture is open to so many interpretations?

    People have abused religion for their own means throughout history and will continue to do going forward. The scriptures are clear regarding what the likes of what Taliban and ISIS do - but they don't actually care about what the scriptures say, and will use and abuse whatever they can. They come to power using force/oppression (and often western support/aid) and one the main ways to combat them is for the majority to reject them - so it every bit matters that they are rejected, both to combat them and also to clarify what Islam is and what it isn't. Unfortunately it's not easy to topple such oppressors, and it takes more than simple condemnation.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 545 ✭✭✭Defender OF Faith


    katydid wrote: »
    Actually it is. Otherwise there would be no Taliban or similar groups. Your co-religionist has explained very well the variety of interpretation that goes on. If the text was unambiguous and clear cut, there would be no need for interpretation, would there.
    As confusedquark have said people have always abused religion to reach specific goals or desires, the Qur'an condemned those who follow the part that suits them and reject the other.

    The different interpretation or the ways in which the Qur'an is interpreted is far from the topic of this thread however, for a long time now we have been waiting for the input of an actual Muslim women and we got one, you might want to direct some questions to her.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 6,351 ✭✭✭katydid


    As confusedquark have said people have always abused religion to reach specific goals or desires, the Qur'an condemned those who follow the part that suits them and reject the other.

    The different interpretation or the ways in which the Qur'an is interpreted is far from the topic of this thread however, for a long time now we have been waiting for the input of an actual Muslim women and we got one, you might want to direct some questions to her.

    Yes, people have always abused religion; that's beside the point. The point is that the Qur'an, like the Bible, is open to interpretation because it is not always clear what it is saying, and it has contradictions. It seems strange that, if it came straight from God, he would not have made it unambiguous.

    The different interpretations of the Qur'an is at the core of this discussion, because it proves that it says is ambiguous and can't be relied on as an absolute. It has to be filtered through human intelligence and comprehension. And human intelligence will tell us, for example, that when a text tells us one minute that a man's word is worth more than a woman's and then tells us women are valued the same as men, something is not right. We can't take that as the word of God, unless God is very confused.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 136 ✭✭niamhstokes


    Sunrays1 wrote: »
    All in all, I have been treated equally to my brother growing up, had the right to an education, to a career, to marrying whom I wish, for dressing as I wish. The same can be said for all of the females in my circle of friends and family some of whom dress like me and some who don't, all of whom are Muslim.

    Men and women in Islam on the majority have the same roles and responsibilities and definitely have to conduct themselves in the same way, respectfully to each other and to the people in their society. If certain cultures portray this differently, it is not the fault of Islam.

    Thanks so much for adding to the discussion. It's really cool to hear from a muslim woman for a change!!!!! No offense guys :-P

    Just one question... you said you were able to marry who you wanted to but i think that is only true of Muslim men, as they can marry "people of the book" as they call it. Whereas a Muslim woman is not free to marry a Christian man and must only marry a Muslim man. I know the religion's logic behind it etc...about the man most likely to pass on the religion etc.. But that still leaves it that Muslim women are limited to marrying only Muslim men , whereas Muslim men are free to marry a Christian or Jewish woman.

    That said, in my own faith, the Catholic faith, we can only marry non Catholics if they agree that the children will be raised as Catholics:
    "...it is not necessary to become Catholic before marrying a Catholic. However, express permission of the local bishop is necessary. The Catholic person must uphold the obligation to preserve his or her own faith and “ensure the baptism and education of the children in the Catholic Church,” (Catechism of the Catholic Church, 1635)."

    Also i find this REALLY interesting about the comparison between islamic hijabs and nuns habits http://wikiislam.net/wiki/Islamic_Hijabs_and_Nuns_Habits

    Also you should check out Sister Miriam James , she calls herself the 'groovy nun' on twitter http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6pHvjhlFD8U :P At 6min15 sec she talks about her feelings on wearing the habit.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 545 ✭✭✭Defender OF Faith


    katydid wrote: »
    Yes, people have always abused religion; that's beside the point. The point is that the Qur'an, like the Bible, is open to interpretation because it is not always clear what it is saying, and it has contradictions. It seems strange that, if it came straight from God, he would not have made it unambiguous.
    Who said that the Qur'an has contradictions? the Qur'an does not have a single contradiction as God him self says:

    "Do they not consider the Qur'an carefully? Had it been from other then Allah,they would surely have found therein many contradiction"4:82


    The book is clear, in Islam there are ground rules and conditions as to whether ones interpretation is correct or no, a group of Muslim scholars have occupied themselves with establishing the criteria and methodology of how to differentiate proper interpretations from improper ones. The unprecedented science of Usul al-fiqh provide the basic tools necessary to approach shari`ah texts and the requirements for those eligible for practising this interpretation.

    The Qur'an contain verses that may be unclear in their meaning and only these verses are open for interpretation I wrote before discussing such verses:
    I will let this Verse answer your question:

    "It is He who has sent down to you, [O Muhammad], the Book; in it are verses [that are] precise {Muhkamat} - they are the foundation of the Book - and others unspecific {Mutashabihat }. As for those in whose hearts is deviation [from truth], they will follow that of it which is unspecific, seeking discord and seeking an interpretation [suitable to them]. And no one knows its [true] interpretation except Allah. But those firm in knowledge say, "We believe in it. All [of it] is from our Lord." And no one will be reminded except those of understanding." (3/7)

    "Allah states that in the Qur'an, there are Ayat that are Muhkamat, entirely clear and plain, and these are the foundations of the Book which are plain for everyone. And there are Ayat in the Qur'an that are Mutashabihat not entirely clear for many, or some people. So those who refer to the Muhkam Ayat to understand the Mutashabih Ayat, will have acquired the correct guidance, and vice versa.
    They are the foundations of the Book), meaning, they are the basis of the Qur'an, and should be referred to for clarification, when warranted.

    (And others not entirely clear) as they have several meanings, some that agree with the Muhkam and some that carry other literal indications, although these meaning might not be desired.

    The Muhkamat are the Ayat that explain the abrogating rulings, the allowed, prohibited, laws, limits, obligations and rulings that should be believed in and implemented. As for the Mutashabihat Ayat, they include the abrogated Ayat, parables, oaths, and what should be believed in, but not implemented.

    (So as for those in whose hearts there is a deviation) meaning, those who are misguided and deviate from truth to falsehood (they follow that which is not entirely clear thereof) meaning, they refer to the Mutashabih, because they are able to alter its meanings to conform with their false interpretation since the wordings of the Mutashabihat encompass such a wide area of meanings. As for the Muhkam Ayat, they cannot be altered because they are clear and, thus, constitute unequivocal proof against the misguided people. This is why Allah said, (seeking Al-Fitnah) meaning, they seek to misguide their following by pretending to prove their innovation by relying on the Qur'an -- the Mutashabih of it --

    Its narrated by Ibn `Abbas, "Tafsir/Interpretation is of four types: Interpretation that the Arabs know in their language; Interpretation that no one is excused of being ignorant of; Interpretation that the scholars know; and Interpretation that only Allah knows.''

    From Tafsir Ibn Kathir chapter 3 verse 7


    katydid wrote: »
    The different interpretations of the Qur'an is at the core of this discussion, because it proves that it says is ambiguous and can't be relied on as an absolute. It has to be filtered through human intelligence and comprehension. And human intelligence will tell us, for example, that when a text tells us one minute that a man's word is worth more than a woman's and then tells us women are valued the same as men, something is not right. We can't take that as the word of God, unless God is very confused.
    The issue of the testimony have already been explained numerous times before, review the OP who even discussed the verse as there's no different interpretation regarding this verse it just need to be put into contexts and taken as a whole before being explained.
    4) A woman's testimony in the case of a financial transaction needs a backup, whereas a man's doesn't in the same circumstance. From what I can gather, the reason for this at the time the verse was revealed was because women didn't deal as much with financial affairs, and a backup was needed more so because of their inexperience. The Islamic jurisprudent Ibn Taimeya clarified that the verse was discussing the condition of transaction not the legal testimony before a judge. He added that a woman’s forgetfulness and hence her need for another woman to confirm her testimony in situations of deals is not a nature in all woman, but it rather has to do with experience and practice (in financial affairs), so if a woman has experience in financial matters and was known to have piety then her testimony alone is accepted. Allah (subhana wa'tala) knows best. Furthermore, another verse relating to women's testimony in court shows that a woman's testimony is at least equal to (if not greater than) her husband's if she is accused of adultery:

    "And as for those who accuse their wives but have no witnesses except themselves, let the testimony of one of them be four testimonies (i.e. testifies four times) by Allah that he be one of those who speak the truth. And the fifth (testimony) (should be) invoking the Curse of Allah on him if he be one of those who tell a lie (against her). But it shall avert the punishment from her, if she bears witness four times by Allah, that he (her husband) is telling a lie. And the fifth (testimony) should be that the Wrath of Allah be upon her if (her husband) speaks the truth". (Quran 24:6-9)


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 6,351 ✭✭✭katydid


    Who said that the Qur'an has contradictions? the Qur'an does not have a single contradiction as God him self says:

    "Do they not consider the Qur'an carefully? Had it been from other then Allah,they would surely have found therein many contradiction"4:82


    The book is clear, in Islam there are ground rules and conditions as to whether ones interpretation is correct or no, a group of Muslim scholars have occupied themselves with establishing the criteria and methodology of how to differentiate proper interpretations from improper ones. The unprecedented science of Usul al-fiqh provide the basic tools necessary to approach shari`ah texts and the requirements for those eligible for practising this interpretation.

    The Qur'an contain verses that may be unclear in their meaning and only these verses are open for interpretation I wrote before discussing such verses:






    The issue of the testimony have already been explained numerous times before, review the OP who even discussed the verse as there's no different interpretation regarding this verse it just need to be put into contexts and taken as a whole before being explained.

    YOU said it has contradictions. You "explained" the thing about a woman's testimony being less than that of a man - and you then quoted verses which claim men and women are of equal value. Whatever the "explanation" for the testimony issue, the FACT is that in the one book you have two contradictory things. That's only one, there are many others. Too many to list here, you can find a good list on this website.

    Which is fine. The Bible, similarly, is full of contradictions. The vast majority of Christians accept that, because they accept that being a product of human minds, it is imperfect. The Qur'an is also imperfect, but you argue that because it is "the word of God", it can't be. It DOES contain verses that are unclear in meaning. That is also an imperfection.he evidence is staring you in the face, and to deny it is just being foolish.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 6,351 ✭✭✭katydid


    Sunrays1 wrote: »
    I am a Muslim woman living in Ireland and have read through some of the beginning of this thread (and not completed reading the whole thread right now as it is quite lengthy!) and have some comments to make, in particular to the comments relating to Muslim women's thoughts.



    Islam does not enable discrimination against anyone. Controlling, un-educated people enable discrimination by whichever means they can. If a woman is free to have a career then the religion is not, “saying that women are not capable of providing for themselves”.




    Women are not dependent on men as they can have their lives as they wish. Career or no career, own income or not.




    I am free, happy and enjoying life thanks to Allah. The covering of my body except for my face and hands is my choice of dress and 'identity'. I don't wear an invisible cloak or any cloak for that matter, so I'm very certain that I can be seen in public.



    Men in Islam are expected to dress modestly, they have a list of criteria that their dress (and conduct) should meet, according to their body form.





    To limit temptations is onlynone reason for covering the body for both men and women along with reasons such as generally not drawing attention to yourself, showing off, being moderate in appearance whereby as an individual, male or female, you are neither extravagant nor scruffy looking. Similar to school uniform where everyone is equal and students are not made to feel pressured into designer labels etc. but obviously outside school environment you can dress as you please. Similarly, in Islam, you can dress as you please however, clothes shouldn't be transparent, or tight fitting which show the shape of your body, 'flashy'/attention seeking, always extravagant/expensive or always 'scruffy'/torn. Men are to cover at all times from navel to knees. Women are to cover their body, except face, hands and feet.

    I understand this is where the argument lies but it has to be realised that if a Muslim man was to be topless in front of people, clearly flexing muscles or the alike, then this would not be allowed either. A women being topless will always be more of a statement and attraction than a man being topless, although when it is a statement by a man, it would not be allowed either as mentioned.

    The hair of a woman adds to her beauty and her neck and chest follow on from this. The covering of which has been instructed by Allah therefore is required by Muslim women. If anyone, Muslim or non-Muslim, does not believe Allah or God to have said this, then they do not have to, there is no compulsion in Islam. If the passages which refer to this instruction are examined carefully, it is seen that the head covering is not specifically mentioned. The word 'Khimar' is used when Allah says, "...they should draw their khimar over their bosoms and not display their zeena (beauty)..." (24:60). A khimar is translated as a loose scarf which was worn in the Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) time by women, which covered their head, neck and possibly shoulders only. This is therefore where the instruction appears and the khimar head covering was told to be extended to the bosom too. The passage does go on to mention the covering of the rest of the body but I focussed on head covering there as many people don't understand why women cover their heads and men don't.

    I talk of topless men and women as that is the extreme end of not covering obviously and therefore, a line has been drawn, a boundary has to be made, there needs to be a rule set as it is clearer to follow. Islam being more of a preventative religion in my opinion, rather than curative, (cures however aplenty there are in Islam). Jewels for example are kept safe and hidden away from someone wanting to steal them, similarly, women are covered to be protected. Not just from men, from jealousy too, from extravagance too. If there were no boundaries, it would be harder to maintain a certain form of appropriate too. This extends to protecting men from women, men from jealousy and men from extravagance which are all applicable in Islam to them just as much as they have a dress code and code of conduct. If you refuse to accept that that is what Islam says, then that is unfortunate and a result of the misconceptions of the teachings of Islam that Muslims have and therefore they don’t always act upon.

    Everyone has their own view on what is and isn't appropriate and that is why there are so many different people in the world. Muslims are a type of people and that is their view from their Islamic teachings.

    As we see nowadays there is more and more vulgarity and obscenity in the media as there are no rules as such governing them, so there is nothing stopping people from acting or dressing 'inappropriately', (I use inverted commas as it is only my opinion (which I am using to explain the issue), that some people act and dress inappropriately in the media and in society for that matter and it is probably not their opinion).





    I have been brought up as an equal to man as have my female friends and relatives who are Muslim and the covered way I dress is not my submission to men but to Allah. The only Being I want to and need to please. I have been shown nothing but respect by all men, Muslim or not, in places of study, work and of course at home. My father, brother, husband or any man for that matter has never told me to cover, neither did any female relative. It has been through my own studying of my religion which guided me to what my dress code should be.

    Some women do face oppression in the name of Islam, that doesn't make it Islam. There is lots of good and bad in the world and that's one bad. I'm not stating anything ground-breaking there, its common knowledge. Headways are trying to be made in various ways to eliminate misconceptions in Islam by Muslims, things take time, culture can be powerful over religion. Different countries have different ways (again no ground-breaking news there), generalisation is pointless. There are many bad things in the world and good people try to do what they can to eradicate those things. Female oppression is one of them.




    It's a matter of faith, you either believe or don't believe that is the word of God. Just like other religions.




    I have not misread the verse of Qur'an as can be seen by my above comment on that specific verse.






    Parts of the Qur'an are open to interpretation other parts aren't. The different schools of thought within Islam agree to disagree on parts and people are free to choose what they feel is correct and act accordingly (as humans do) and Allah knows best what is in their hearts. Specifically on the issue of general dress code, there is a consensus between the schools of thought on this. Niqab (face covering) is not obligatory in Islam, some women choose to whilst not being forced to.





    I am offended that you think I am not capable of knowing and understanding the difference between what men could or have interpreted and what God has said. I understand why you may believe this to be the case but you are quite wrong, as thankfully, I have had an education in the West and have been able to use knowledge seeking skills to study my religion too. I would not blindly follow something, as our education in the West and Islam itself encourages us to question, ponder, research etc. a whole variety of things (this may not be the case in some cultures/countries especially where education is poor and power and control over the vulnerable is rife). In the specific verse there is next to no interpretation except for one word 'khimar', as previously mentioned. Therefore I choose to dress the way I do, covered.


    All in all, I have been treated equally to my brother growing up, had the right to an education, to a career, to marrying whom I wish, for dressing as I wish. The same can be said for all of the females in my circle of friends and family some of whom dress like me and some who don't, all of whom are Muslim.

    Men and women in Islam on the majority have the same roles and responsibilities and definitely have to conduct themselves in the same way, respectfully to each other and to the people in their society. If certain cultures portray this differently, it is not the fault of Islam.
    You may have been treated equally to your brother, but, if you are a good Muslim, you know you are not equal to him. Your testimony is worth half his in certain circumstances, and you have to cover up in a way he doesn't. When he marries, he can take up to four wives, you can only take one husband, but may have to share him with three other women.

    If that's the way you want to live, fine. But please don't pretend you are equal. You don't see yourself as equal to men, otherwise you wouldn't pander to them by covering yourself up to save them getting sexually aroused. Or maybe you have such an exaggerated idea of your own beauty that you genuinely think men are unable to see your hair without getting uncontrollable urges. Either way, it's patent nonsense. I work with male colleagues and have male friends. We show each other mutual respect; I would think very little of my friends and colleagues if I were to think of them as so weak willed as Muslim men seem to be. This afternoon, I spent two hours in a meeting with two men - it never crossed my mind that I should cover myself up to save them from arousal, or to guard my chastity, because, believe it or not, I was dealing with them as fellow human beings that I respect.

    It's sad that you are so brainwashed, and that you should try to justify your own oppression the way you do.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 545 ✭✭✭Defender OF Faith


    katydid wrote: »
    YOU said it has contradictions. You "explained" the thing about a woman's testimony being less than that of a man - and you then quoted verses which claim men and women are of equal value. Whatever the "explanation" for the testimony issue, the FACT is that in the one book you have two contradictory things. That's only one, there are many others. Too many to list here, you can find a good list on this website.
    #1)I never said there are contradictions, I said there are verses which may appear contradictory to you or me due to our limited understanding and knowledge but they are not, and this is why we Muslims refer to the scholars who spend their lifetime studying this book and the language in which it was revealed to explain such verses.

    #2) The issue of the testimony does not contradict the purpose the Qur'an sets to make which is equality between the sexes, you need to quote the full verse and put it into context, the only part of the verse you keep quoting is "and call upon two of your men to act as witnesses; and if two men are not available, then a man and two women from among such as are acceptable to you as witnesses... (2:282)", without reference to the full verse and the context in which it's revealed.


    The Islamic jurisprudent Ibn Taimeya clarified that the verse was discussing the condition of transaction not the legal testimony before a judge. He added that a woman’s forgetfulness and hence her need for another woman to confirm her testimony in situations of deals is not a nature in all woman, but it rather has to do with experience and practice (in financial affairs), so if a woman has experience in financial matters and was known to have piety then her testimony alone is accepted.


    #3) I repeat again that there's no contradictions in the Qur'an, and all the sites that claims so are written by people who have no scholarship foundation in the Qur'an such as Silas or answering-Islam or the writers of Wiki-Islam that already have all their claims refuted.
    Now am not going to look around for them, but if you found one present it to me and show me how is it a contradiction.

    #4) You keep referring to the fact that Muslim women cover themselves to save men from getting sexually aroused. This is probably the 4th time we tell you this, that Muslim women do not cover up to save men from getting sexually aroused they cover up because God ordered them to do so as the sister her self puts it is a sign of her submission to God and not the weakness of men because men did not order the women to do such a thing, God the did.


  • Advertisement
  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 136 ✭✭niamhstokes


    #1)

    #3) I repeat again that there's no contradictions in the Qur'an, and all the sites that claims so are written by people who have no scholarship foundation in the Qur'an such as Silas or answering-Islam or the writers of Wiki-Islam that already have all their claims refuted.
    Now am not going to look around for them, but if you found one present it to me and show me how is it a contradiction.

    Isn't there something about abrogated verses ? and that's how quran avoids contradictions? I don't know , i'll have to look it up.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 6,351 ✭✭✭katydid


    #1)I never said there are contradictions, I said there are verses which may appear contradictory to you or me due to our limited understanding and knowledge but they are not, and this is why we Muslims refer to the scholars who spend their lifetime studying this book and the language in which it was revealed to explain such verses.

    #2) The issue of the testimony does not contradict the purpose the Qur'an sets to make which is equality between the sexes, you need to quote the full verse and put it into context, the only part of the verse you keep quoting is "and call upon two of your men to act as witnesses; and if two men are not available, then a man and two women from among such as are acceptable to you as witnesses... (2:282)", without reference to the full verse and the context in which it's revealed.


    The Islamic jurisprudent Ibn Taimeya clarified that the verse was discussing the condition of transaction not the legal testimony before a judge. He added that a woman’s forgetfulness and hence her need for another woman to confirm her testimony in situations of deals is not a nature in all woman, but it rather has to do with experience and practice (in financial affairs), so if a woman has experience in financial matters and was known to have piety then her testimony alone is accepted.


    #3) I repeat again that there's no contradictions in the Qur'an, and all the sites that claims so are written by people who have no scholarship foundation in the Qur'an such as Silas or answering-Islam or the writers of Wiki-Islam that already have all their claims refuted.
    Now am not going to look around for them, but if you found one present it to me and show me how is it a contradiction.

    #4) You keep referring to the fact that Muslim women cover themselves to save men from getting sexually aroused. This is probably the 4th time we tell you this, that Muslim women do not cover up to save men from getting sexually aroused they cover up because God ordered them to do so as the sister her self puts it is a sign of her submission to God and not the weakness of men because men did not order the women to do such a thing, God the did.

    You didn't use the words "there are contradictions", but you admitted it in highlighting the two examples you gave. They ARE contradictions. You can try and explain them away, but the bottom line is that when one reads the text, they are contradictions, and the only way to try to understand them is to interpret them. The same with the long list of contradictions I linked you to.

    Interpretations are only necessary when something is unclear or incapable of being understood. So the text is imperfect.

    You seem to be unable to see that this is simply a matter of logic and fact. You can explain and contextualise and interpret till the cows come home, you are simply confirming the fact; a perfect text needs none of these actions.

    It's as simple as that.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 545 ✭✭✭Defender OF Faith


    Isn't there something about abrogated verses ? and that's how quran avoids contradictions? I don't know , i'll have to look it up.

    In the Qur'an abrogation of a verse is done by God alone, as he says:
    "Whatever a Verse do We abrogate or cause to be forgotten, We bring a better one or Similar to it. Know you not that Allah is Able to do all things?"2:106

    Abrogation applies to only the regulative parts of God's revelation. The commands and prohibitions of the Sharia.

    "God alters what was once declared lawful into unlawful, or vice-versa; what was legally unregulated into prohibited and vice-versa. But such changes can occur only in verses conveying commands, positive and negative. Verses cast in the indicative and conveying narrative statements, can be affected by neither nāsikh [abrogating material] nor mansūkh [abrogated material]" Al-Tabari.

    By contradiction I mean verses that have not been pointed out by the scholars of Tafsir as abrogated, that discuss the same situation but present a different scenario,location or number.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 545 ✭✭✭Defender OF Faith


    katydid wrote: »
    You didn't use the words "there are contradictions", but you admitted it in highlighting the two examples you gave. They ARE contradictions. You can try and explain them away, but the bottom line is that when one reads the text, they are contradictions, and the only way to try to understand them is to interpret them. The same with the long list of contradictions I linked you to.
    I didn't try explaining them I just put the section of the verse which you quoted out of context into context.
    katydid wrote: »
    Interpretations are only necessary when something is unclear or incapable of being understood. So the text is imperfect.
    As I mentioned only the Unclear verses in the Qur'an are open for interpretation, such verses are refereed to as Mutashabihat while others are very precise and clear in their meaning these are called Muhkamat.

    Your question may be what is the wisdom behind such unclear verses? why is the Qur'an not all clear and Muhkam?

    The answer to a similar question asked by a brother is given in the article linked deals with the answer to the question above as well: http://islamqa.info/en/103146

    The questioner asks:
    "What is the meaning of the words of Allaah (interpretation of the meaning): “In it are Verses that are entirely clear, they are the foundations of the Book; and others not entirely clear…”? What should a person do if he is confused because of something unclear in a verse that is not entirely clear?"


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 6,351 ✭✭✭katydid


    I didn't try explaining them I just put the section of the verse which you quoted out of context into context.


    As I mentioned only the Unclear verses in the Qur'an are open for interpretation, such verses are refereed to as Mutashabihat while others are very precise and clear in their meaning these are called Muhkamat.

    Your question may be what is the wisdom behind such unclear verses? why is the Qur'an not all clear and Muhkam?

    The answer to a similar question asked by a brother is given in the article linked deals with the answer to the question above as well: http://islamqa.info/en/103146

    The questioner asks:
    "What is the meaning of the words of Allaah (interpretation of the meaning): “In it are Verses that are entirely clear, they are the foundations of the Book; and others not entirely clear…”? What should a person do if he is confused because of something unclear in a verse that is not entirely clear?"

    Putting something into context IS explaining it. Bottom line is that SOME of the Qur'an is unclear. So it is an imperfect text. That's all I'm saying.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6 Sunrays1


    katydid wrote: »
    You may have been treated equally to your brother, but, if you are a good Muslim, you know you are not equal to him. Your testimony is worth half his in certain circumstances, and you have to cover up in a way he doesn't. When he marries, he can take up to four wives, you can only take one husband, but may have to share him with three other women.

    Please don't patronise me. Who are you to tell me what a good Muslim should know? I know that my testimony is worth more than a man's in certain other circumstances and equal in all others bar one. This was spelt out to you in the opening post of this thread. Don't pick and choose points from my religion to suit your argument whilst ignoring the explanations given to you. The way I cover and the way he covers comes down to the logic of reality and human biology, again the reasoning of which I explained. Men and women are not identical in their ways. Islam makes provision for both accordingly.
    katydid wrote: »
    If that's the way you want to live, fine. But please don't pretend you are equal. You don't see yourself as equal to men, otherwise you wouldn't pander to them by covering yourself up to save them getting sexually aroused. Or maybe you have such an exaggerated idea of your own beauty that you genuinely think men are unable to see your hair without getting uncontrollable urges. Either way, it's patent nonsense. I work with male colleagues and have male friends. We show each other mutual respect; I would think very little of my friends and colleagues if I were to think of them as so weak willed as Muslim men seem to be. This afternoon, I spent two hours in a meeting with two men - it never crossed my mind that I should cover myself up to save them from arousal, or to guard my chastity, because, believe it or not, I was dealing with them as fellow human beings that I respect.

    It's sad that you are so brainwashed, and that you should try to justify your own oppression the way you do.

    What makes you think I'm pretending I am equal? How rude of you to say that I have an exaggerated idea of my beauty and that that could be a reason as to why I cover up, whilst ignoring my personal views which I shared. It is a shame you cannot show me any respect the way you say you show your male colleagues and friends.

    It is not patent nonsense. If you haven't or wouldn't partake in extra-marital affairs, it doesn't mean a large proportion of society doesn't, as the following article states,

    "Although precise figures remain elusive, surveys in the UK and the U.S. suggest that between 25 and 70 per cent of women — and 40 and 80 per cent of men — have engaged in at least one extramarital sexual encounter."
    (I can't link to the article because I'm a new user, but it can be found by searching the above exert from an article called, 'The infidelity epidemic: Never have marriage vows been under so much strain. Relationship expert Kate Figes spent 3 years finding out why adultery is now so worryingly common').

    It seems both men and women are weak-willed so don't pretend otherwise. Not everything is about immediate sexual urges but things can and do gradually lead to it. Islam is preventative, if it's followed correctly, I stand by this from my initial post.

    I didn't try to justify any oppression. Muslim women were being discussed in this forum and so I voiced my views the same way you do.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 6,351 ✭✭✭katydid


    Sunrays1 wrote: »
    Please don't patronise me. Who are you to tell me what a good Muslim should know? I know that my testimony is worth more than a man's in certain other circumstances and equal in all others bar one. This was spelt out to you in the opening post of this thread. Don't pick and choose points from my religion to suit your argument whilst ignoring the explanations given to you. The way I cover and the way he covers comes down to the logic of reality and human biology, again the reasoning of which I explained. Men and women are not identical in their ways. Islam makes provision for both accordingly.



    What makes you think I'm pretending I am equal? How rude of you to say that I have an exaggerated idea of my beauty and that that could be a reason as to why I cover up, whilst ignoring my personal views which I shared. It is a shame you cannot show me any respect the way you say you show your male colleagues and friends.

    It is not patent nonsense. If you haven't or wouldn't partake in extra-marital affairs, it doesn't mean a large proportion of society doesn't, as the following article states,

    "Although precise figures remain elusive, surveys in the UK and the U.S. suggest that between 25 and 70 per cent of women — and 40 and 80 per cent of men — have engaged in at least one extramarital sexual encounter."
    (I can't link to the article because I'm a new user, but it can be found by searching the above exert from an article called, 'The infidelity epidemic: Never have marriage vows been under so much strain. Relationship expert Kate Figes spent 3 years finding out why adultery is now so worryingly common').

    It seems both men and women are weak-willed so don't pretend otherwise. Not everything is about immediate sexual urges but things can and do gradually lead to it. Islam is preventative, if it's followed correctly, I stand by this from my initial post.

    I didn't try to justify any oppression. Muslim women were being discussed in this forum and so I voiced my views the same way you do.

    I'm not patronising you. I'm telling it like it is. You accept your subservient role in Islam and try to justify it with weak arguments. You are fooling yourself into thinking you are equal, but your religion tells yo you are not. I have given you examples of how, for example, you are not equal to your brother, whom you claim to be equal to. I'm not picking and choosing anything...your scripture says these things, and you can't deny them.

    I'm not being rude when I say that you must have an exaggerated view of yourself; either that, or you really believe that your Muslim "brothers" are so weak willed that they can't control themselves in the presence of any woman. Either way, it doesn't say much about Islam or Muslims. Non-Muslim men and women can manage to interact every day without feeling sexual urges, because they respect each other as individuals. Of course, it's easy to opt out and prevent the possibility of sexual attraction, but non-Muslims prefer to trust people and to respect them. People may be weak willed, but they also have free will and respect for one another. It doesn't seem that Islam gives believers much credit for showing maturity or self-restraint. How DO I hold myself back every day when I interact with my male colleagues????? Sure, some people give in to their feelings; that's their choice. It all comes down to respect for the individual.

    Why should I show you respect when you don't respect other people, who happen to be male?

    They way you cover yourself up and the way your brother may dress doesn't come down to "the logic of reality and human biology,". Your brother can wear a pair of jeans and a tee-shirt, and display his face, his hair, his six-pack...Men have hair, and their hair can make them attractive. According to LOGIC, that fact should lead to them covering it up.

    You may not think you are not justifying oppression, but you are. You are clearly brainwashed, and from that you are totally lacking in respect for half the human population.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 326 ✭✭confusedquark


    katydid wrote: »
    Non-Muslim men and women can manage to interact every day without feeling sexual urges, because they respect each other as individuals.

    You missed this bit here:

    "surveys in the UK and the U.S. suggest that between 25 and 70 per cent of women — and 40 and 80 per cent of men — have engaged in at least one extramarital sexual encounter."

    But then when you later say:
    katydid wrote: »
    Sure, some people give in to their feelings; that's their choice.

    ... are you now saying that non-Muslim men and women DON'T manage to interact every day without feeling sexual urges, because they (presumably DON'T) respect each other as individuals?

    Which is it?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 545 ✭✭✭Defender OF Faith


    <snipped wall of text. See my comments in the first post>


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,212 ✭✭✭✭Tom Dunne


    katydid wrote: »
    It's sad that you are so brainwashed, and that you should try to justify your own oppression the way you do.

    That's not an acceptable comment on this or any forum. Any more of that from you and it's a forum ban.






Advertisement