Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Manchester United Team Talk/Gossip/Rumours Thread - See Mod Warning in OP, 09/11

1299300302304305333

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,972 ✭✭✭Trond


    I don't see Pogba moving for anything under 50million. I think City go after him at some point, Probably to replace Toure.

    I thought they'd have to cash in on Vidal in order to secure him for another few years (which they managed anyway).


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 12,832 ✭✭✭✭Blatter


    Pro. F wrote: »
    How much support would the idea of playing Di Maria from a deep central position have gotten before he started to play centrally, in any form, for Madrid?

    Another example you could use to support your point is how many people would have considered it in any way viable to play Philip Lahm as a DM 2 years ago?

    Or Stewart Downing as a #10 this season?

    Not many.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,219 ✭✭✭✭Pro. F


    How much support would playing Wayne Rooney at the World Cup have gotten if he'd actually been a pub landlord?

    Maybe I'm not understanding what you're trying to say. Or maybe it doesn't make sense.

    What I'm saying is that a lot of fans who discuss football (maybe the majority of posters in this forum) are overly concerned with observing the decisions succesful managers make and then shaping their own opinions to match. This makes defending opinions easier, but it also inhibits genuine insight.

    The idea of Di Maria being useful in the team when playing centrally is now commonly accepted on this thread. But if anybody had suggested it a few years ago, before he started getting games there for his club, it would not have been well received.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,547 ✭✭✭Your Airbag


    Pro. F wrote: »
    How much support would the idea of playing Di Maria from a deep central position have gotten before he started to play centrally, in any form, for Madrid?


    Ok, so if we imagine a ficticious scenario where Di Maria never played centrally for Madrid ever that would improve your point a little.

    Unfortunatley Di Maria did play centrally for Madrid and was a star there so I have no interest in discussing make believe scenarios with you.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,084 ✭✭✭✭Kirby


    Pro. F wrote: »
    What I'm saying is that a lot of fans who discuss football (maybe the majority of posters in this forum) are overly concerned with observing the decisions succesful managers make and then shaping their own opinions to match. This makes defending opinions easier, but it also inhibits genuine insight.

    The idea of Di Maria being useful in the team when playing centrally is now commonly accepted on this thread. But if anybody had suggested it a few years ago, before he started getting games there for his club, it would not have been well received.
    That's a good point.

    But don't go overboard with it. There is a danger that thinking like that can excuse ridiculous idea's and opinions under the guise of being an unconventional genius.

    "Oh it's an out of the box idea!"
    Sometimes it's just plain stupid and wrong.


  • Advertisement
  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 2,345 ✭✭✭Gits_bone


    Ok, so if we imagine a ficticious scenario where Di Maria never played centrally for Madrid ever that would improve your point a little.

    Unfortunatley Di Maria did play centrally for Madrid and was a star there so I have no interest in discussing make believe scenarios with you.

    He said before he started playing centrally.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,219 ✭✭✭✭Pro. F


    Ok, so if we imagine a ficticious scenario where Di Maria never played centrally for Madrid ever that would improve your point a little.

    Unfortunatley Di Maria did play centrally for Madrid and was a star there so I have no interest in discussing make believe scenarios with you.

    Fùcking hell. Talk about making heavy work out of a simple point.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,080 ✭✭✭✭Maximus Alexander


    Pro. F wrote: »
    What I'm saying is that a lot of fans who discuss football (maybe the majority of posters in this forum) are overly concerned with observing the decisions succesful managers make and then shaping their own opinions to match. This makes defending opinions easier, but it also inhibits genuine insight.

    The idea of Di Maria being useful in the team when playing centrally is now commonly accepted on this thread. But if anybody had suggested it a few years ago, before he started getting games there for his club, it would not have been well received.

    Fair enough. My response would effectively be what Kirby has written above then. ;)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,521 ✭✭✭Giggsy11


    Ok, so if we imagine a ficticious scenario where Di Maria never played centrally for Madrid ever that would improve your point a little.

    Unfortunatley Di Maria did play centrally for Madrid and was a star there so I have no interest in discussing make believe scenarios with you.

    This looks like a reply for just a sake of disagreeing with him. His point was simple and clear.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,219 ✭✭✭✭Pro. F


    Kirby wrote: »
    That's a good point.

    But don't go overboard with it. There is a danger that thinking like that can excuse ridiculous idea's and opinions under the guise of being an unconventional genius.

    "Oh it's an out of the box idea!"
    Sometimes it's just plain stupid and wrong.

    What's the danger, that we'll be overrun with people with uncovpnventional ideas? Not much chance of that I think. The vast majority of opinions expressed in this thread are shared by large numbers of other posters. As long as each idea is supported by a logical argument I wouldn't worry.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 8,333 ✭✭✭brinty


    Lads would gifs of bewbs make you all happier, some heated discussions in here today...
    Max you're normally a great man for the gifs ;)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,521 ✭✭✭Giggsy11


    Blatter wrote: »
    Another example you could use to support your point is how many people would have considered it in any way viable to play Philip Lahm as a DM 2 years ago?

    Or Stewart Downing as a #10 this season?

    Not many.

    There are plenty of examples in the last 5-6 years.

    Blind was a LB flop at Ajax and who would have thought that he would be signed by ManUtd as a DM.

    Bale looked so awful when he just started to play on right wing and I for one hated that. Always believed he should be played as LW to stretch the teams but he was just amazing as RW year later.

    Dembele was moved from striker to CM position.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,547 ✭✭✭Your Airbag


    Gits_bone wrote: »
    He said before he started playing centrally.

    I know thats exactly the point I was addressing? He wants to have discussion about a player who never played centrally playing centarally, when said player has, so its a pointless one.
    Pro. F wrote: »
    Fùcking hell. Talk about making heavy work out of a simple point.


    Ah right, I guess you don't like bring jumped on either, for any minor indescretions you may type.

    So we'll leave it.

    Merry Christmas Pro F


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,547 ✭✭✭Your Airbag


    Giggsy11 wrote: »
    This looks like a reply for just a sake of disagreeing with him. His point was simple and clear.

    His inital point was comparing his Carrick/Britton statement to the idea of Di Maria playing deep centerally in terms of bring out there statements.

    I offered the opinion it wasn't a crazy idea as Di Maria plays well as a ACM. Pro F then moved the goalposts a bit with lets imaginie Di Maria never played centerally, so I called him on it as we know how strict he is on that happening.

    It wasn't disagreeing for the sake of it, both of his points were silly but I have said I have no interest on getting into it any further.

    Merry Christmas Giggsy


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 17,638 ✭✭✭✭bangkok


    Pro. F wrote: »
    What I'm saying is that a lot of fans who discuss football (maybe the majority of posters in this forum) are overly concerned with observing the decisions succesful managers make and then shaping their own opinions to match. This makes defending opinions easier, but it also inhibits genuine insight.

    The idea of Di Maria being useful in the team when playing centrally is now commonly accepted on this thread. But if anybody had suggested it a few years ago, before he started getting games there for his club, it would not have been well received.

    but when I said to play marco reus there I got widely ridiculed.....


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 2,345 ✭✭✭Gits_bone


    I know thats exactly the point I was addressing? He wants to have discussion about a player who never played centrally playing centarally, when said player has, so its a pointless one.




    Ah right, I guess you don't like bring jumped on either, for any minor indescretions you may type.

    So we'll leave it.

    Merry Christmas Pro F

    No he doesn't.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,219 ✭✭✭✭Pro. F


    Ah right, I guess you don't like bring jumped on either, for any minor indescretions you may type.

    So we'll leave it.

    Merry Christmas Pro F

    Well done on entering the conversation, contributing nothing, getting in a huff and leaving. Your gold star is in the post.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,521 ✭✭✭Giggsy11


    Merry Christmas Giggsy

    Merry Christmas mate..


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,080 ✭✭✭✭Maximus Alexander


    brinty wrote: »
    Lads would gifs of bewbs make you all happier, some heated discussions in here today...
    Max you're normally a great man for the gifs ;)

    You know I love an aul GIF brinty, but I wouldn't want to be upsetting the Right Honourable TSC this close to Christmas.

    Have I got his title right? I'm bad at titles.

    Senator TSC?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,211 ✭✭✭✭bucketybuck


    bangkok wrote: »
    but when I said to play marco reus there I got widely ridiculed.....

    Post of the year.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,521 ✭✭✭Giggsy11


    bangkok wrote: »
    but when I said to play marco reus there I got widely ridiculed.....

    Should be played as a RB.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,219 ✭✭✭✭Pro. F


    bangkok wrote: »
    but when I said to play marco reus there I got widely ridiculed.....

    Exactly*. Adox's mention of that is what led me to writing the original post.



    *Well not exactly exactly, because they're different players and possibly a slightly different suggestion of position, but the principle is the same.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 8,333 ✭✭✭brinty


    You know I love an aul GIF brinty, but I wouldn't want to be upsetting the Right Honourable TSC this close to Christmas.

    Have I got his title right? I'm bad at titles.

    Senator TSC?

    Sure there's no harm in one

    Overlord Vader TSC will save it for his private stash!!!!

    I asked this morning and haven't heard an objection so i think we should be ok....


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,547 ✭✭✭Your Airbag


    Gits_bone wrote: »
    No he doesn't.

    Yes he did
    Pro. F wrote: »
    Well done on entering the conversation, contributing nothing, getting in a huff and leaving. Your gold star is in the post.

    A huff? lol

    Your Christmas card is in the post


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 8,333 ✭✭✭brinty


    Giggsy11 wrote: »
    Should be played as a RB.

    Stick him in nets and Big dave at DM.....


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,885 ✭✭✭SherlockWatson


    Ok, so if we imagine a ficticious scenario where Di Maria never played centrally for Madrid ever that would improve your point a little.

    Unfortunatley Di Maria did play centrally for Madrid and was a star there so I have no interest in discussing make believe scenarios with you.

    Christ this tedious ****e is worse than anything, if you don't want to reply or discuss anything with him, don't, but there's no need for the Drama Llamas to pop their heads out every time Pro.F posts something.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 19,889 ✭✭✭✭The Moldy Gowl


    bangkok wrote: »
    but when I said to play marco reus there I got widely ridiculed.....

    Hahaha poor Bangkok.

    <3


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,080 ✭✭✭✭Maximus Alexander


    brinty wrote: »
    I asked this morning and haven't heard an objection so i think we should be ok....

    I... don't think that's how it works. :pac:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,902 ✭✭✭MagicIRL


    If Vlaar or Hummels comes in during the January window, I can see Carrick playing alongside Vlaar/Hummels & Jones/Smalling/Evans to form the back three with Blind as the DM. Shaw and Rafael are obvious first choices as wing-backs, but cover is desperately needed for RB, since Young seems to be playing at a decent squad level to be used as cover for Shaw at LB.

    This is not fantasy football stuff. I can't wait!
    De Gea
    Smalling - Carrick - Vlaar
    Rafael
    Shaw
    Blind
    Strootman - Di Maria
    Rooney
    RVP - Falcao


  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 42,996 Mod ✭✭✭✭Lord TSC


    ah see, there is always some who take it too far. Posts deleted containing naughty links ;)


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement