Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
If we do not hit our goal we will be forced to close the site.

Current status: https://keepboardsalive.com/

Annual subs are best for most impact. If you are still undecided on going Ad Free - you can also donate using the Paypal Donate option. All contribution helps. Thank you.

Liverpool FC Team Talk/Gossip/Rumours Thread 2014 - Mod Warning in OP, 10/12

1214215217219220333

Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 40,059 ✭✭✭✭Harry Palmr


    Its only when you stay out of this thread for a day or two you realise the nonsense that's in it! :p


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 3,470 ✭✭✭SuperTortoise


    I'd still have Torres ahead of Lambert, Ballotelli and Borini.

    Torres is the type of player that only thrives when his head is in the right place, and it never looked to be since he joined Chelsea.
    Besides, we won't sign him, potential is clearly what the transfer comittee is after. I think they have the attitude that it'll only take 1 in every 10 to turn into a great signing to pay for the other punts and leave a tidy profit.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,427 ✭✭✭PropJoe10


    Torres on a free transfer on a 6 month contract would be better than nothing, but only slightly. Although who knows, maybe coming back to restore his reputation with the Pool fans would be an incentive for him to get his head right. He's only 30 and shouldnt be this crap at this stage of his career.


  • Posts: 45,738 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    If there's a striker for free that's better fair enough. That was the original point.

    I just can't see the owners giving Rodgers cash in January considering CL is gone and top 4 is improbable


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,560 ✭✭✭✭martyos121


    PropJoe10 wrote: »
    Torres on a free transfer on a 6 month contract would be better than nothing, but only slightly. Although who knows, maybe coming back to restore his reputation with the Pool fans would be an incentive for him to get his head right. He's only 30 and shouldnt be this crap at this stage of his career.

    Pay-as-you-play contract with huge goal bonuses is the only way to go, IMO. I think he'd be willing to sign that sort of contract given his form post-betrayal.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,770 ✭✭✭✭Mr.Crinklewood


    e.r wrote: »
    Torres and Gerrard might click again worth a punt

    It's Euro these days.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,425 ✭✭✭chicorytip


    It appears Lovren may well be available in the January sales. What a shocking indictment of Rodgers' management. The fella clearly lacks two basic qualifications for any successful manager,good judgement of players and clear minded tactical nous.Time to get rid .....


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 28,404 ✭✭✭✭Turtyturd


    e.r wrote: »
    Torres and Gerrard might click again worth a punt

    flat,550x550,075,f.jpg


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,918 ✭✭✭✭rob316


    chicorytip wrote: »
    It appears Lovren may well be available in the January sales. What a shocking indictment of Rodgers' management. The fella clearly lacks two basic qualifications for any successful manager,good judgement of players and clear minded tactical nous.Time to get rid .....

    I blame the manager for what happens on the pitch not transfers. No one has a clue who actually signs these players and did rodgers want them. Allen and borini are his but I'm not sure after that.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 28,404 ✭✭✭✭Turtyturd


    Lovern played week in and week out until there was no option but to drop him, it's safe to say that he is one.

    However defending has been an issue since day one with 'The Rodgers' so offloading players isn't going to do anything.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,325 ✭✭✭smileyj1987


    PropJoe10 wrote: »
    Torres on a free transfer on a 6 month contract would be better than nothing, but only slightly. Although who knows, maybe coming back to restore his reputation with the Pool fans would be an incentive for him to get his head right. He's only 30 and shouldnt be this crap at this stage of his career.

    Honestly give it a shot . It can't be any worse then only having lambert and ballotelli right now .
    Edit no disrespect to borini but it looks like his days are numbered .


  • Posts: 45,738 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    chicorytip wrote: »
    It appears Lovren may well be available in the January sales. What a shocking indictment of Rodgers' management. The fella clearly lacks two basic qualifications for any successful manager,good judgement of players and clear minded tactical nous.Time to get rid .....

    Appears from where?

    Got a link?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,372 ✭✭✭✭Mr Alan


    rob316 wrote: »
    I blame the manager for what happens on the pitch not transfers. No one has a clue who actually signs these players and did rodgers want them. Allen and borini are his but I'm not sure after that.

    I wish people would stop with this fallacy.
    “There is absolutely no way a player will come in here if I don’t want him,” Rodgers told the Liverpool Echo. “I will always be the first person it comes to. That’s not being arrogant, that’s how we operate here and how it works in this country.”

    He added: "Abroad it works differently where you have a coach and the club will bring in the players. The coach then works with the players he’s given. A lot has been made of it but the fact is the process that happens here is no different to what happens at other English clubs."

    “We have a number of people, scouting staff and analysts, who will look for targets who fit the profile of the players that we want. Then I will sit down with those guys, look at those targets and make a shortlist from that. I know the club will go and do the best it can to get the players we want.

    “But it’s very clear that anyone we sign will be because I want him here.”

    RODGERS CALLS THE SHOTS WITH TRANSFERS. THERE IS OTHER PEOPLE INVOLVED WITH THE PROCESS, SAME AS ANY CLUB, BUT RODGERS IS IN CHARGE


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,427 ✭✭✭PropJoe10


    Honestly give it a shot . It can't be any worse then only having lambert and ballotelli right now .
    Edit no disrespect to borini but it looks like his days are numbered .

    Might as well forget Borini, hes a goner. Rodgers has preferred to go into games with one striker (Lambert) recently rather than even have him on the bench. Borini isnt very good but at least he'd offer some pace and movement until we get someone better.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 428 ✭✭e.r


    It's Euro these days.
    Its a figure of speech most days:(


  • Posts: 45,738 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Mr Alan wrote: »
    I wish people would stop with this fallacy.



    RODGERS CALLS THE SHOTS WITH TRANSFERS. THERE IS OTHER PEOPLE INVOLVED WITH THE PROCESS, SAME AS ANY CLUB, BUT RODGERS IS IN CHARGE


    You'd wonder what's the point in the committee then?

    Surely he could pick a player and then get a simple yes or no from the board?


    Why do you fully believe what Rodgers says with regards to this but then say he's a spoofer on other things?


    Personally I take what managers say with a dose of salt.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,372 ✭✭✭✭Mr Alan


    rarnes1 wrote: »
    You'd wonder what's the point in the committee then?

    I'd suggest most clubs have a similar arrangement. A number of stakeholders involved in transfers, all subject to sign off from a couple of key people ie. Manager & Chairman.
    Rarnes wrote:
    Surely he could pick a player and then get a simple yes or no from the board?

    Essentially this is what happens? Players identified & signed off by stakeholders if authorised :confused:
    Rarnes wrote:
    Why do you fully believe what Rodgers says with regards to this but then says he's a spoofer on other things?

    Are you referring to Lallana's injury? The only thing I can think of where I've said it seems like bull****.
    Rarnes wrote:
    Personally I take what managers say with a dose of salt.

    So you essentially believe nothing. Unless you want to.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 61,272 ✭✭✭✭Agent Coulson


    The committee as I see it see just a glorified scouting network where they scout positions the manager say he needs filled they come back with a number of players including the player the manager wants and back ups if they can't get the first pick.

    Then the manager say to Ayre these are my first picks go get them, If he they can't get first picks they go down the list.

    So it is easy for the manager to leak to his friends in the press it's the committee picks that he didn't get his first picks I can't see any one else at the club leaking this to the press.


  • Posts: 45,738 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Mr Alan wrote: »
    I'd suggest most clubs have a similar arrangement. A number of stakeholders involved in transfers, all subject to sign off from a couple of key people ie. Manager & Chairman.



    Essentially this is what happens? Players identified & signed off by stakeholders if authorised :confused:



    Are you referring to Lallana's injury? The only thing I can think of where I've said it seems like bull****.



    So you essentially believe nothing. Unless you want to.

    So why the big deal about a committee then?

    Why set it up?


    I thought you called Rodgers a spoofer before, must have been someone else.

    Yeah, I wouldn't believe too much a manager says. Fergie, Wenger, Mourinho all compulsive liars. They all do it. Always have always will


  • Posts: 45,738 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Downing scores again. 3 goals and 6 assists. Not bad!


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 28,404 ✭✭✭✭Turtyturd


    Would be a big blow to his ego to have to come out and admit he doesn't have the final say after the big deal he made about not working under anyone.

    If he does have the final say, he looks even worse, buying players then freezing them out of the squad.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,044 ✭✭✭✭Utopia Parkway


    rarnes1 wrote: »
    Downing scores again. 3 goals and 6 assists. Not bad!

    Bit like the season he had at Villa before we bought him. Think he ended up with 7 league goals and a bunch of assists.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,044 ✭✭✭✭Utopia Parkway


    By the way you can't believe half the stuff a manager comes out with. Rodgers is hardly going to come out and say "I don't have full control of transfers". It would undermine his own position and make him look weak. Ultimately we don't know how they do it. I imagine there is a certain amount of horse trading involved. Give me this player that I like and I'll take that player that you like, etc, etc.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,325 ✭✭✭smileyj1987


    rarnes1 wrote: »
    Downing scores again. 3 goals and 6 assists. Not bad!

    Still glad to see the back of him . He seems to be hot and cold . He was very cold for LFC !


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,372 ✭✭✭✭Mr Alan


    By the way you can't believe half the stuff a manager comes out with. Rodgers is hardly going to come out and say "I don't have full control of transfers". It would undermine his own position and make him look weak. Ultimately we don't know how they do it. I imagine there is a certain amount of horse trading involved. Give me this player that I like and I'll take that player that you like, etc, etc.

    This is ultimately true then of every manager ever. Is it therefore unfair to ever pass judgement on a managers ability in the transfer market? :confused:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 9,273 ✭✭✭duffman13


    e.r wrote: »
    Its a figure of speech most days:(

    It's a figure of speech which has nothing to do with the old Irish pound so you were correct anyway :)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,983 ✭✭✭✭NukaCola


    Wether its Rodgers or the transfer committee making the signings it clearly isn't working. Every signing isn't going to be a hit but to be fair their record is poor.

    Signing potential is all well and good when the deal and time is right. The fees we've payed on potential is crazy. For example Markovic went for less than half the fee we payed just the season before, thats the time to buy. Same as Can. I know Lovren was bought for now but he also went for less than half the fee we paid just the season before.

    We've paid stupid money for average players and young players. And most important we didn't replace a goalscorer with a goalscorer. Thats all on Rodgers as he has final say.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 61,272 ✭✭✭✭Agent Coulson


    So Carra thinks we to spend another £100m to get back in the title race.

    Only way I see that happening is with a new manager.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,758 ✭✭✭Strongbow10


    So Carra thinks we to spend another £100m to get back in the title race.

    Only way I see that happening is with a new manager.

    with new owners more like

    no point spending 100 million if you are going to offer poor wages, players we need to improve us will command big fees (and good players ask for big wages).

    if we have any competition whatsoever then we'll shirk any potential bidding war.

    We spent a similar sum this summer and not one of them was a top player. they all fell quite comfortably into our wage structure, but if you want game changing players you need to be less restrictive.

    It seems to be a whose who of rejection in the last few years.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,372 ✭✭✭✭Mr Alan


    Excuses around our wage bill & transfer spend are yet more ridiculous fallacy.

    We're amongst the highest transfer spends in Europe & near the top in England for wages too.

    Our problem is not with the resources available, it's with how it's being spent.


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement