Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Haven't had a 'guns+Murica' thread in a while

«1

Comments

  • Posts: 3,773 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Deaths from gun violence in the US is on a downward spiral, despite what it might seem.

    Let them have their guns and their freedoms!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 81,060 ✭✭✭✭biko


    About a week or so.

    Last was "Another USA Gun Thread (special apperances by M16s, MRAPs & rocket launchers)"


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 20,373 ✭✭✭✭foggy_lad


    What a shower of useless brain-dead Muppets the American police appear to be!

    Shooting a person for not wearing their seat belt, Whatever next? will they shoot children for decaying their own teeth by eating sweets?

    It is never a white person that gets shot!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 34,788 ✭✭✭✭krudler


    That's fcuked up, asks to see the guy's license, shoots him when he turns to get it.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,095 ✭✭✭solomafioso




  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,436 ✭✭✭c_man


    Imagine this guy going around your neighbour! Ah the lads in the states, some craic



  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,720 ✭✭✭Sir Arthur Daley


    Would i get a good winter sun deal here?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,497 ✭✭✭✭Witcher


    c_man wrote: »
    Imagine this guy going around your neighbour! Ah the lads in the states, some craic


    At least he's being safe with it, hasn't even got a magazine in the rifle and has the bolt open.

    Pretty sure those are AR15 mags at 0:49, dunno what he's carry those around for.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,384 ✭✭✭✭kneemos


    c_man wrote: »
    Imagine this guy going around your neighbour! Ah the lads in the states, some craic


    Walnut Creek rings a bell,either The Waltons or Little House on the Prairie.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,436 ✭✭✭c_man


    In fairness, he's doing his part for the pro-second amendment cause. If I lived in the States, in that neighbourhood with him doing his walks in body armour, armed with knives and a rifle, well I'd probably buy my own gun tbh.


  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 17,701 Mod ✭✭✭✭Manic Moran


    krudler wrote: »
    That's fcuked up, asks to see the guy's license, shoots him when he turns to get it.

    Definitely some learning points there. He should have been a little more specific about the steps. "Where is your license? Slowly retrieve it" etc.

    That said, there have been a spate of officers ambushed and killed in the US the last month (The exact number is 8 killed by gunfire), including a couple at traffic stops (one of the more publicised ones was a police chief), it doubtless had an effect on the trooper's thinking. If you look at it from the tactical point of view, the guy turned away, turns back quickly and has his hands close to his chest. If he was getting a weapon, it's exactly how he would have moved. He was probably expecting the guy to have his license in his pocket or glove compartment, and what actually happened didn't fit his expectation.

    No two ways it's not the fault of the officer, but it is understandable if not particularly excusable.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,076 ✭✭✭Reindeer


    Definitely some learning points there. He should have been a little more specific about the steps. "Where is your license? Slowly retrieve it" etc.

    That said, there have been a spate of officers ambushed and killed in the US the last month (The exact number is 8 killed by gunfire), including a couple at traffic stops (one of the more publicised ones was a police chief), it doubtless had an effect on the trooper's thinking. If you look at it from the tactical point of view, the guy turned away, turns back quickly and has his hands close to his chest. If he was getting a weapon, it's exactly how he would have moved. He was probably expecting the guy to have his license in his pocket or glove compartment, and what actually happened didn't fit his expectation.

    No two ways it's not the fault of the officer, but it is understandable if not particularly excusable.

    The officer shot a man for doing exactly what the officer asked him to do. It is 100% the fault of the officer.


  • Site Banned Posts: 2,922 ✭✭✭Egginacup


    foggy_lad wrote: »
    What a shower of useless brain-dead Muppets the American police appear to be!

    Shooting a person for not wearing their seat belt, Whatever next? will they shoot children for decaying their own teeth by eating sweets?

    It is never a white person that gets shot!

    A black male gets shot dead by US cops or vigilantes every 28 hours. The cops there are pricks. Watch what they do to a pregnant woman:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m3bOm8BKmQI


  • Site Banned Posts: 2,922 ✭✭✭Egginacup


    [QUOTE=Manic Moran;92357592]Definitely some learning points there. He should have been a little more specific about the steps. "Where is your license? Slowly retrieve it" etc.

    That said, there have been a spate of officers ambushed and killed in the US the last month (The exact number is 8 killed by gunfire), including a couple at traffic stops (one of the more publicised ones was a police chief), it doubtless had an effect on the trooper's thinking. If you look at it from the tactical point of view, the guy turned away, turns back quickly and has his hands close to his chest. If he was getting a weapon, it's exactly how he would have moved. He was probably expecting the guy to have his license in his pocket or glove compartment, and what actually happened didn't fit his expectation.

    No two ways it's not the fault of the officer, but it is understandable if not particularly excusable.[/QUOTE]


    Yeah, ok :rolleyes:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 23,887 ✭✭✭✭Akrasia


    Definitely some learning points there. He should have been a little more specific about the steps. "Where is your license? Slowly retrieve it" etc.

    That said, there have been a spate of officers ambushed and killed in the US the last month (The exact number is 8 killed by gunfire), including a couple at traffic stops (one of the more publicised ones was a police chief), it doubtless had an effect on the trooper's thinking. If you look at it from the tactical point of view, the guy turned away, turns back quickly and has his hands close to his chest. If he was getting a weapon, it's exactly how he would have moved. He was probably expecting the guy to have his license in his pocket or glove compartment, and what actually happened didn't fit his expectation.

    No two ways it's not the fault of the officer, but it is understandable if not particularly excusable.
    Are you taking the piss???

    The guy turns back 'quickly' because the cop was shouting at him to get out of the car and firing his gun at him 3 or 4 times! That cop could have killed the man. it was insane!

    Ban billionaires



  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 17,701 Mod ✭✭✭✭Manic Moran


    No, I'm not taking the piss. There were a chain of events which the officer started which, unfortunately, also could match a threat. The officer isn't as much to blame for shooting as he is for starting the chain and creating the apparent threat to begin with. I think we all agree that the officer screwed up and the victim is blameless.
    A black male gets shot dead by US cops or vigilantes every 28 hours. The cops there are pricks. Watch what they do to a pregnant woman:

    Assuming the figures here are generally correct...

    http://online.wsj.com/news/articles/SB10001424052702304830704577496501048197464

    A black male is killed by a black person every hour and a half. Blacks are obviously even worse pricks. Or, perhaps, both your statement and mine are completely pointless absent further information. As to the pregnant woman, maybe she shouldn't have struggled and it's not as if they beat her up. I'm not sure quite how well the foetus would respond to being tased, for example.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,920 ✭✭✭✭end of the road


    No, I'm not taking the piss. There were a chain of events which the officer started which, unfortunately, also could match a threat. The officer isn't as much to blame for shooting as he is for starting the chain and creating the apparent threat to begin with. I think we all agree that the officer screwed up and the victim is blameless.



    Assuming the figures here are generally correct...

    http://online.wsj.com/news/articles/SB10001424052702304830704577496501048197464

    A black male is killed by a black person every hour and a half. Blacks are obviously even worse pricks. Or, perhaps, both your statement and mine are completely pointless absent further information. As to the pregnant woman, maybe she shouldn't have struggled and it's not as if they beat her up. I'm not sure quite how well the foetus would respond to being tased, for example.
    they beat her into the ground within an inch of her life and enjoyed every minute of it. wouldn't expect anything less from the trash that are allowed into the police force over there. no quality control at all

    I'm very highly educated. I know words, i have the best words, nobody has better words then me.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,818 ✭✭✭donvito99


    no quality control at all

    I doubt that very much.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,344 ✭✭✭The Dagda


    Definitely some learning points there. He should have been a little more specific about the steps. "Where is your license? Slowly retrieve it" etc.
    If
    That said, there have been a spate of officers ambushed and killed in the US the last month (The exact number is 8 killed by gunfire), including a couple at traffic stops (one of the more publicised ones was a police chief), it doubtless had an effect on the trooper's thinking. If you look at it from the tactical point of view, the guy turned away, turns back quickly and has his hands close to his chest. If he was getting a weapon, it's exactly how he would have moved. He was probably expecting the guy to have his license in his pocket or glove compartment, and what actually happened didn't fit his expectation.

    No two ways it's not the fault of the officer, but it is understandable if not particularly excusable.

    Gun toting American defends a gun toting American. How surprising?!

    Do you think the recent "spate" of police being shot has anything to do with the repeated acts of violence committed against civilians by the police?

    "Learning points"? :rolleyes:


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,497 ✭✭✭✭Witcher


    The Dagda wrote: »
    Gun toting American defends a gun toting American. How surprising?!

    Manic is Irish.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,344 ✭✭✭The Dagda


    Blay wrote: »
    Manic is Irish.

    Many claim to be.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,880 ✭✭✭Canis Lupus


    To be fair Manic has a point. You only need to look at a few videos online of cops getting shot and they look quite similar to how the guy went into his car.

    Lets not forget this is America, cops get shot there all the time.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,344 ✭✭✭The Dagda


    To be fair Manic has a point. You only need to look at a few videos online of cops getting shot and they look quite similar to how the guy went into his car.

    Lets not forget this is America, cops get shot there all the time.

    He doesn't have any point. He's just blindly defending another gun happy yank.

    How many people do police in America kill every year?

    No one knows because there's no official tracking of the numbers.

    There's around 17,000 law enforcement agencies in the US and one survey of only 750 of those showed 400 fatal shootings by police of civilians.

    If you extrapolate those figures to the full 17,000 that would mean approx 9,000 shootings.

    Which is nearly 800 shootings per month as against Moran's "spate" of 8 police being shot recently.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,076 ✭✭✭Reindeer


    No, I'm not taking the piss. There were a chain of events which the officer started which, unfortunately, also could match a threat. The officer isn't as much to blame for shooting as he is for starting the chain and creating the apparent threat to begin with. I think we all agree that the officer screwed up and the victim is blameless.

    The officer deserves every bit of blame for that shooting. It is nearly 1st degree murder. He did not wait to see if the man was armed before he shot him, and he purposefully set those chain of events in motion. If I were a citizen in Texas of all places(and I am), and it were me instead of the officer on that dash cam, I would be going to jail for murder.

    And that, my friend, is one of the main reasons Americans do not stand behind their police much any more. In fact, when I see yet another officer shot in the line of duty, I often wonder if he had it coming. And I am most certainly not alone in this regard as an American.


  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 17,701 Mod ✭✭✭✭Manic Moran


    The Dagda wrote: »
    Do you think the recent "spate" of police being shot has anything to do with the repeated acts of violence committed against civilians by the police?

    No, I don't.

    And police are civilians. Unless they're military police, in which case, they're not :P (I don't care what some recent dictionaries say, the historical and legal definition of the word separates military from civil)


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,344 ✭✭✭The Dagda


    No, I don't.

    And police are civilians. Unless they're military police, in which case, they're not :P (I don't care what some recent dictionaries say, the historical and legal definition of the word separates military from civil)

    The police are not civilians.

    Your only reply to the thread is a ridiculous dispute over the language used?!!!

    Ok mtm :rolleyes:


  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 17,701 Mod ✭✭✭✭Manic Moran


    I think this is now my fourth post on this thread?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,344 ✭✭✭The Dagda


    I think this is now my fourth post on this thread?

    3 of them were typically ignorant yank rhetoric.

    Why do American cops kill so many innocent American civilians?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,291 ✭✭✭✭Gatling


    So a cop is to wait to see if a suspect is armed befored drawing his own weapon ,

    Greeting mr bad guy can i see your licence ,registration please and while your there give us a look at the 357 and sawn off shot gun sitting on your lap,
    Mr bad guy do mind if draw my 9mm just in case we are playing who can shoot first ,


Advertisement
Advertisement