Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all, we have some important news to share. Please follow the link here to find out more!

https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058419143/important-news/p1?new=1

Gameweek 2 match day thread

12357…36

Comments

  • #122
    irish son
    Closed Accounts Posts: 1,195 ✭✭✭irish son


    Coloccini and Hutton, a nice start to the week.


  • #123
    bohsman
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,881 ✭✭✭bohsman


    Paully D wrote: »
    or a combination of both of those teams defenders every week will turn out to be a bad move far more often than not and should hopefully balance itself out over the next few weeks.

    But hey - I'm not bitter :pac:

    A lot of us went with 2 of the main 4m options being Hutton, Dummett and Moore, playing 3 at the back all season it really shouldn't be an issue.


  • #124
    Dearg81
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,174 ✭✭✭Dearg81


    Paully D wrote: »
    Very frustrating seeing those with Villa defenders being rewarded two weeks in a row. In my private leagues a lot have Vlaar and some actually even have Guzan as their goalkeeper.

    Crazy the amount of people who appear to have had more than one of Villa/Newcastle today, but the only saving grace is that doubling up on Villa, Newcastle, or a combination of both of those teams defenders every week will turn out to be a bad move far more often than not and should hopefully balance itself out over the next few weeks.

    But hey - I'm not bitter :pac:

    Newcastle defenders are good value this season and they have good fixtures so I think you're wrong in saying that having one is a bad move. There was value in having a villa defender for the first 3 games too but not anymore.


  • #125
    res ipsa
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 692 ✭✭✭res ipsa


    wonski wrote: »
    To be honest this game had 0-0 written all over it. I played Hutton ahead of Chambers.

    Retro specto scope goggles?


  • #126
    SlickRic
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 36,700 ✭✭✭✭SlickRic


    my GW starts now.


  • Advertisement
  • #127
    Paully D
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 28,710 ✭✭✭✭Paully D


    Dearg81 wrote: »
    Newcastle defenders are good value this season and they have good fixtures so I think you're wrong in saying that having one is a bad move. There was value in having a villa defender for the first 3 games too but not anymore.

    I said "more than one" and never said having a Newcastle defender was a bad move either.


  • #128
    Dearg81
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,174 ✭✭✭Dearg81


    Paully D wrote: »
    I said "more than one" and never said having a Newcastle defender was a bad move either.

    Fair enough, I imagine they just doubled up cos of the their cheap prices.


  • #129
    Mr.Prodston
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,305 ✭✭✭✭Mr.Prodston


    ESP added in the BPS and looks like the Bonus will be:

    Collocini - 31 - 3 Bps
    Janmaat - 28 - 2 BPs
    Dummett - 27 - 1 BP


  • #130
    KevIRL
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,482 ✭✭✭✭KevIRL


    Mr.Prodston wrote: »
    ESP added in the BPS and looks like the Bonus will be:

    Collocini - 31 - 3 Bps
    Janmaat - 28 - 2 BPs
    Dummett - 27 - 1 BP

    At least none of the Villa lads got any, something small to be thankful for


  • #131
    Ziegler1988
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,747 ✭✭✭Ziegler1988


    Siggy with a clear chance but straight at the keeper


  • Advertisement
  • #132
    KevIRL
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,482 ✭✭✭✭KevIRL


    Fabregas getting shoved off the ball easily enough a couple of times now


  • #133
    Paully D
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 28,710 ✭✭✭✭Paully D


    KevIRL wrote: »
    Fabregas getting shoved off the ball easily enough a couple of times now

    If I hadn't seen the line-up before the game, I would have thought Hazard wasn't playing. I don't think he's touched the ball as of yet.

    Leicester certainly holding their own at the minute.


  • #134
    iamanengine
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,891 ✭✭✭iamanengine


    Yeah I haven't seen Hazard at all so far. Fab having a decent game so far imo but he is losing out on a few challenges.


  • #135
    KevIRL
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,482 ✭✭✭✭KevIRL


    An auld goal would be nice...


  • #136
    KevIRL
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,482 ✭✭✭✭KevIRL


    KevIRL wrote: »
    An auld goal would be nice...

    Dyer goal Swans


  • #137
    [Deleted User]
    Posts: 9,005 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Nathan Dyer scored, who assisted?


  • #138
    Copper_pipe
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,553 ✭✭✭✭Copper_pipe


    Sigurdsson with the assist


  • #139
    Mr.Prodston
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,305 ✭✭✭✭Mr.Prodston


    A Siggy assist :D

    Dyer goal


  • #140
    [Deleted User]
    Posts: 9,005 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Siggy assist.


  • #141
    CSF
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 34,579 ✭✭✭✭CSF


    This week has started off much better then the last, gwan Hutton/Siggy!!!


  • Advertisement
  • #142
    KevIRL
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,482 ✭✭✭✭KevIRL


    Siggy on my bench :(


  • #143
    iamanengine
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,891 ✭✭✭iamanengine


    Siggy delivers again. Hero <3


  • #144
    [Deleted User]
    Posts: 9,005 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    KevIRL wrote: »
    Siggy on my bench :(

    You joking?


  • #145
    ShaneU
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,071 ✭✭✭✭ShaneU


    ****ing Siggy, bandwagon brigade strikes again


  • #146
    Gatame
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 321 ✭✭Gatame


    #NoSiggyNoParty


  • #147
    Backstreet Moyes
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,406 ✭✭✭Backstreet Moyes


    KevIRL wrote: »
    Siggy on my bench :(

    Why would you have sigurdson and put him on the bench at home to Burnley?:confused:


  • #148
    Shaque attack
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 921 ✭✭✭Shaque attack


    Great start so far, hoping for a hutton bandwagon to form a convoy with the siggy brigade!


  • #149
    zarquon
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,734 ✭✭✭zarquon


    KevIRL wrote: »
    Siggy on my bench :(

    Against Burnley? Surely not! :eek:


  • #150
    Mr.Prodston
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,305 ✭✭✭✭Mr.Prodston


    ShaneU wrote: »
    ****ing Siggy, bandwagon brigade strikes again

    You mean the Love Train :)


  • Advertisement
  • #151
    iamanengine
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,891 ✭✭✭iamanengine


    Madness to have Siggy on the bench. He is the ultimate bandwagon!!


Advertisement