Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/

Israel - Palestine Conflict. **Mod note in OP - updated 1st August**

1149150152154155174

Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 10,250 ✭✭✭✭bumper234


    If Israel are the shining light of democracy and justice in the middle east then what have they to hide?

    Israel bans international human rights workers from Gaza

    http://www.imemc.org/article/68906?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+PalestineNews+%28Palestine+News%29
    Since beginning its assault on the Gaza Strip on July 8th, Israeli officials have prevented human rights observers and experts employed by Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch from entering Gaza to conduct independent investigations.
    Israel should immediately allow access to Gaza for Amnesty International, Human Rights Watch and other international human rights organizations so they can investigate allegations of serious violations of international humanitarian law by all parties to the conflict, Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch said today.
    If Israel is confident in its claim that Hamas is responsible for civilian deaths in Gaza, it shouldn’t be blocking human rights organizations from carrying out on-site investigations,” said Sarah Leah Whitson, Middle East and North Africa director at Human Rights Watch. “Public pronouncements by a warring party don’t determine whether attacks violated the laws of war, but field investigations could.”
    Human Rights Watch received similar responses from the Civil Administration to its request for permission to enter Gaza since the recent escalation in hostilities. Israeli authorities at the Erez Crossing also said that Human Rights Watch was not eligible for permits to enter Gaza because it was not a registered organization. However, the Israeli authorities acknowledged that they had discretion to make an exception. On August 17, Human Rights Watch requested such an exception as soon as possible; Israeli authorities denied it on August 19. Prior to 2006, Israeli authorities repeatedly granted Human Rights Watch access to Gaza without requiring the group to register or seek a special exception.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 10,250 ✭✭✭✭bumper234


    Another day another war crime

    http://www.imemc.org/article/68909?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+PalestineNews+%28Palestine+News%29

    Including Three Children, Eight Palestinians Killed In Gaza
    Palestinian medical sources in the Gaza Strip have reported that eight Palestinians, including three children, have been killed and many Palestinians injured, including four children who suffered serious injuries, after the Israeli army fired missiles into the Nafaq Street, in Gaza City.

    And now you can't even bury your loved ones in safety.
    In addition, soldiers fired a missile into the Sheikh Radwan Graveyard in Gaza, while families where burying loved ones, killed in an earlier Israeli bombardment. Four were killed in the shelling and scores have been injured, some seriously.

    And i'm sure this will be translated as "Hamas did it"
    The al-Quds Brigades of the Islamic Jihad said it fired four Grad missiles into Esdod (Ashdod), while other resistance groups said they fired missiles close to Lod Airport in Ramla.

    Abu Ali Mustafa Brigades of the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine also said it fired missiles into two settlements close to the border with Gaza.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,106 ✭✭✭✭Tony EH


    bumper234 wrote: »
    In addition, soldiers fired a missile into the Sheikh Radwan Graveyard in Gaza, while families where burying loved ones, killed in an earlier Israeli bombardment. Four were killed in the shelling and scores have been injured, some seriously.

    That's absolutely outrageous. :(


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 735 ✭✭✭Tuisceanch


    Egginacup wrote: »
    Just read that Russia have shut down McDonald's, haha. That's a million burgers a day.....gone

    Just because you're typing in front of a computer doesn't mean you can absolve yourself from normal adult behaviour. Have the manners to reply to my response to your erroneous and offensive post rather than slipping away in embarrassment.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 735 ✭✭✭Tuisceanch


    old_aussie wrote: »


    There are a number of hate fueled Pro Israeli Facebook pages who revel in this sort of thing. Wouldn't you better off there? or is this infantile malicious enjoyment of violence really just a cry for help?. I'm sure there's another thread dealing with self help issues.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,481 ✭✭✭Barely There


    We should be asking questions.

    Why are hamas shooting rockets?.

    Because they are a bunch of terrorist fundamentalists.

    What are the reasons for this?

    See above


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 10,250 ✭✭✭✭bumper234


    Because they are a bunch of terrorist fundamentalists.




    See above

    Yet Israel are the ones using terrorist actions.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 507 ✭✭✭...__...


    shedweller wrote: »
    Wrong. Read back through the thread and educate yourself on this.
    israel have been illegaly expanding past its borders that were established a long time ago.
    The Palestinians are now confined to a very small area with little or no control over simple things like electrical power or sewage treatment etc.

    Now if hamas stopped lobbing rockets at the israelis we would have an interesting situation where israel would have no excuse to indiscriminately kill civilians with their terribly inaccurate state of the art weapons supplied by the most powerful army on this planet.
    How then would they take more land? Hmm...
    It has already been said in this very thread that the idf were firing first but do we believe that?

    In any case, the idf have been taking yet more land and hamas' response to this is similar to a dog that has been abused all its life and is now cornered. It will lash out and the abuser will get bitten.
    So to think all will be sunshine and lollipops if hamas stop firing rockets is simply delusional and naieve. Or something more sinister...

    What land in Gaza have Israel been taking they pulled out years ago and look what they got in return. over 12000 rockets since then. You need to accept that Hamas's aim as it says in its charter is the destruction of Israel remember the chant the ipsc guys are screaming down o connell street "from the river to the sea". Makes me wonder do they want a Palestinian state or would they be happy enough having Jordan and Egypt take back the land.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 735 ✭✭✭Tuisceanch


    When I read many of the comments on Pro-Israeli Facebook pages and the comments on YouTube videos I'm reminded of the film 'Apocalypto' in that there are many people of different faith systems who seem to be possessed of a religious mania. In the book 'The Great War for Civilization' by Robert Fisk,he makes an interesting observation regarding the Taliban,namely that the Taliban were people who had grown up in the refugee camps on the Pakistani border, having been driven there by the Russian invasion, and endured an extreme education in Sharia Law and so this is all they knew and that when they subsequently gained power they just modeled the whole country on the refugee camps from whence they came. Most people just tend to see what is presented to them by whatever media sources they choose to inform themselves and are naturally abhorred by the subsequent actions and advocate for more wars as if this is the only solution. It might be better if we took the time to educate ourselves on the root causes of the conditions that leads to the rise of religious fundamentalist movements and move towards better non-violent solutions. However since most people are aware of the pernicious influence of the armaments industry which tends to dominate the debate this is no small task and also the disturbing ignorance of large swathes of the western population who are fixated on a sugar diet of news.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,097 ✭✭✭Herb Powell


    Tuisceanch wrote: »
    There are a number of hate fueled Pro Israeli Facebook pages who revel in this sort of thing. Wouldn't you better off there? or is this infantile malicious enjoyment of violence really just a cry for help?. I'm sure there's another thread dealing with self help issues.

    The IDF's official page, for example.

    That's the one I find most disgusting.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,829 ✭✭✭TommyKnocker




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 735 ✭✭✭Tuisceanch




    That was an incredibly inspiring and uplifting speech. She's absolutely right that we need to stop mincing our words!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 227 ✭✭Ignorant etc.


    Before I explain why I am pro-Israeli in this conflict, let me first state that whilst I am of a strong left-wing mentality, I define myself as an Irish Republican and I believe that the political group that best represents me is Sinn Féin. I do understand what it means to feel your (I hold my hand up, I come from the UK originally, but I come from a very Irish background with a lot of Republican sentiment in my family) country, or part of it, is occupied. Much as the Palestinians feel they have a right to the Gaza Strip and the West Bank, Republicans, I don't need to tell anyone here, believe that the six counties should be returned to Ireland and that Ireland should be one country, united and free under one flag. I am also not blind to the oppresion brought upon by an "invader".

    However, whilst many Irish Republicans see themselves at one with the Palestinians, I see certain similarities, as already explained, but also certain differences. The first difference I see is that the Provisional IRA and Hamas were two completely different types of paramilitary force. Whilst some of what the Provisional IRA did was absolutely deplorable, such as the outrages at Enniskillen and Warrington. It was a force that tried to minimise civilian casualty. It was also always a force that wished to engage in dialogue. In fact the Army Council of the Provisional IRA sought dialogue long before the British government was prepared to talk. I, and many other Republicans, argue that if the British Prime Minister had not been Margaret Thatcher at that time, then the Troubles would not have taken so long to resolve.

    There are a number of differences between Hamas and the Provisional IRA. First, Hamas relishes civilian casualty. It celebrates every dead Israeli and knows that with every Palestinian death, its support increases. In order to increase its support, it plants its missiles in hospitals, schools and other civilian areas to maximise the potential for the highest number of civilian death possible. This is abhorrent. If Israel is to protect itself, it has no alternative but to attack these civilian areas to destroy Hamas armaments. It is also why, whilst the Provisional IRA enjoyed a certain level of support amongst the population of Ireland, the Real IRA and the Continuity IRA are denounced as monsters as those groups place no value on civilian life.

    Secondly, Hamas has quite categorically expressed its wish to wipe Israel off the face of the Earth and to lead a genocide against the Jews. This accusation could never have been levelled at the Provisional IRA, which wanted an occupying force to leave Ireland, equal rights for Catholics in the six counties but never once spoke of wanting to destroy the British state nor of wanting to create a genocide.

    Thirdly, Hamas does not want to deal in dialogue. How can it when it clearly states that its mission is to destroy Israel and that it does not recognise the Israeli state?

    This is why I find myself unable to offer sympathy towards the Palestinian forces in this conflict. Yes, I think it is dreadful that ordinary Palestinians have to live in squalor. No people anywhere in the world should have to endure that. For that situation to change, the Israelis must provide more worker permits for the Palestinians, Israel must relieve the unfair trade sanctions and Israel must deal both with the Yesha settler movement, who, quite frankly, are no better than Hamas, and must deal with the problems of the Palestinian refugees. If the six counties has taught us anything, it should be that conflict breeds conflict, and that only dialogue and concessions resolve war. One great similarity between the Irish and the Palestinians is that neither give up. Israel needs to realise this, because the Palestinians will fight until the last. In this vein, Israel could make their intentions clearly known by dealing with Fatah in the West Bank. Fatah is a paramilitary force much like the Provisional IRA. It has no wish to destroy Israel, it has no wish to cause genocide and it wishes to engage in dialogue. Yes, it will take time to work with Fatah, but the resolution in the six counties did not occur overnight either. By dealing with Fatah through clear dialogue and through concessions, Israel could prove its intentions to the Palestinians in Gaza who in turn may find the resolve to overthrow Hamas.

    What I do not tolerate in this part of the world, however, is condemnation of the IDF on one hand, and a condoning of Hamas on the other. Make no mistake, the IDF may be stronger than Hamas, and may have more powerful support, but it is Hamas' actions and Hamas' intentions that have led to this situation. Hamas bombards Israel daily with missiles, and only for the technology of the Iron Dome, Israelis have not faced carnage. The IDF and Israel must, and is correct to, defend itself from this threat.

    Pro-Palestinians downplay these daily rocket attacks by Hamas, they downplay Hamas usage of civilian buildings to store and to fire rockets, they downplay the terror tunnels underneath Israel dug by Hamas. They talk about the high number of Palestinian casualties but dismiss the Israel casualties as "only three". Only, is not a word that should be used in terms of death. That is still three people who didn't deserve to die, three families who have to pick up the pieces of their lives.

    I don't see how anyone can support Hamas in this conflict, a paramilitary group which seeks to destroy another country. I often wonder whether Pro-Palestinians feel that the world would be a better place if Israel didn't exist. Unfortunately, whether you agree with the formation of Israel in 1948 is irrelevant, much as whether Irish Republicans feel that the British government sponsored arrival of Scottish and English people into the six counties was correct. The fact is that in both lands, there are people who were born there, who have spent their whole lives there and for whom that part of the world is now home. Sinn Féin always speaks of the need to protect and help the Protestant community in the six counties to grow. This attitude is to be applauded for Belfast, Derry and other Irish cities are their homes as much as they are of the Catholic population. Do you really imagine that Hamas would follow that example with regard to Israeli Jews?

    I also find it astonishing that Pro-Palestinians ignore the rise of anti-semitism in Europe during this conflict. It has been widely covered in media, not just in the UK and Ireland, that Jewish people have been attacked and that Jewish homes and buildings have been attacked since the start of Operation Protective Edge, simply because they were Jewish. There is no way this would have gone unmentioned by Pro-Palestinians if the attacks were on Muslims. Quite rightly there would have been great protest against such events. However, that is no excuse for ignoring what happens to the side you oppose.

    I will end by stating that I wish Israel and Fatah would sit down and discuss how to move out of this enduring conflict. It will require concessions from both sides, much as both sides in the six counties has made concessions to the other. It cannot be a one way dialogue, it cannot be a one way concession. Israel must show its intent to deal with the settlements, Yesha and other issues such as the wall, the refugees and the trade restrictions. On the other hand, Fatah must show itself willing to deal with Hamas and other extremist groups, to support the state of Israel, along lines agreeable to both parties, and to establish law and order in Palestine. However, no peace can ever be found with Hamas. Hamas is a monster. Fatah is not. Neither is Israel. Both pro-Israelis and pro-Palestinians should be exploring this angle. I would also encourage pro-Israelis and pro-Palestinians not to fall into the trap that certain Republicans did for a long time. That of seeing a people and a government as one and the same.

    Personally, I cannot tolerate outright condemnation of Israel the condoning of a vicious and extremist group like Hamas.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 46,938 ✭✭✭✭Nodin


    Before I explain why I am pro-Israeli in this conflict, let me first state that whilst I am of a strong left-wing mentality, I define myself as an Irish Republican and I believe that the political group that best represents me is Sinn Féin...............

    You're really with the wrong party if you're here going 'Up the IDF'.

    As for Fatah and Israel - read this.

    http://www.theguardian.com/world/2011/jan/23/palestine-papers-expose-peace-concession


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 227 ✭✭Ignorant etc.


    Nodin wrote: »
    You're really with the wrong party if you're here going 'Up the IDF'.

    As for Fatah and Israel - read this.

    http://www.theguardian.com/world/2011/jan/23/palestine-papers-expose-peace-concession

    I wrote a long explanation of my view of the situation and that's all you get from it. Way to go in explaining your viewpoint. Also, whether Sinn Féin supports Palestine or Israel is irrelevant. Sinn Féin has no, or a minimal, role to play in the Middle East. It is possible to support a political party without having to adhere to every single thought that party puts out there. Its a political party, not a dogma. You are allowed to engage your brain and make up your own mind.

    And yes, with regards to Hamas, a jihadist cult that wants to destroy an entire state and bring genocide to those people, I very much say up the IDF!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 735 ✭✭✭Tuisceanch


    I also find it astonishing that Pro-Palestinians ignore the rise of anti-semitism in Europe during this conflict. It has been widely covered in media, not just in the UK and Ireland, that Jewish people have been attacked and that Jewish homes and buildings have been attacked since the start of Operation Protective Edge, simply because they were Jewish. There is no way this would have gone unmentioned by Pro-Palestinians if the attacks were on Muslims. Quite rightly there would have been great protest against such events. However, that is no excuse for ignoring what happens to the side you oppose.

    Like all the other standard talking points you mentioned they have been discussed ad nauseum if you care to read through the thread and with regard to the rise of Anti-Semitism attacks, this was mentioned quite recently and I responded with the following, encouraging the poster to expand on the subject but as typifies many of their ilk they are only interested in hurling accusations at people.
    biko wrote: »
    Linking to an American paper (yes Jewish) as Swedish general media seems to have overlooked it...
    http://www.algemeiner.com/2014/08/18/swedish-woman-viciously-beaten-for-wearing-jewish-star-necklace/
    Tuisceanch wrote: »
    It would have been more instructive if you could have provided some analysis of this story within the context of the general theme of this discussion.

    Here for example is an article on the rise of Anti-Semitism in Europe

    http://www.nytimes.com/2013/11/09/world/europe/jews-in-europe-report-a-surge-in-anti-semitism.html?_r=0
    It reports on a survey conducted recently. I will provide the quote to highlight this:

    "The survey, by the bloc’s Fundamental Rights Agency, focused on eight countries that account for more than 90 percent of Europe’s Jewish population and found that “while member states have made sustained efforts to combat anti-Semitism, the problem is still widespread.”

    I will draw your attention to the following:

    "One-third of respondents said they considered statements critical of Israel as anti-Semitic. "

    Is this,in your opinion,an accurate description of anti-semitism?

    Another quote:

    "The Internet has become a particular cause for concern among European Jews, with 75 percent of those surveyed stating that they considered anti-Semitism a problem online. Nearly the same proportion said they believed it had grown more serious over the past five years. A quarter said they had experienced some form of anti-Semitic harassment.
    Physical violence, however, is comparatively rare, with 4 percent responding that they had experienced violence or threats of violence because they were Jewish in the year before the survey.


    Most previous efforts to assess the level of anti-Semitism have relied on the number of officially reported incidents of harassment or physical violence in individual countries. Such figures, however, appear to understate the extent of the problem, as most incidents are not reported and only 13 of the 28 countries in the European Union collect data on anti-Semitic incidents. "


    Now since the woman who is reported to have been attacked in Sweden is:


    "Sjogren is reportedly helping to plan a Sept. 7 rally in support of Israel in conjunction with the WZO, something she was involved with before the attack."

    and that her name is in the public domain as a consequence of the media report you linked and others plus the fact it is on Facebook and you yourself disseminated the information they why does she not feel a responsibility to her community to report the incident to the Swedish police so that a stand can be made against this issue?

    Please feel free to expand on the issues which you felt needed raising.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 227 ✭✭Ignorant etc.


    Nodin wrote: »
    You're really with the wrong party if you're here going 'Up the IDF'.

    As for Fatah and Israel - read this.

    http://www.theguardian.com/world/2011/jan/23/palestine-papers-expose-peace-concession

    Ah, The Guardian... those muppets would be better off if they went back to school to learn how to spell and use grammatical structure properly before making up their own opinions. I've seen two-year-olds who spell more correctly than the average Grauniad hack.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,749 ✭✭✭✭wes


    And yes, with regards to Hamas, a jihadist cult that wants to destroy an entire state and bring genocide to those people, I very much say up the IDF!

    You mean like Israel already did to Palestine....... As for genocide, well that exactly what happening in Gaza as we speak. The IDF blew up people burying there dead in the most recent outrage.

    Its interesting how people talk about what Hamas may do, if given the chance, but happily ignoring what the state of Israel is doing.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,427 ✭✭✭RustyNut


    Before I explain why I am pro-Israeli in this conflict, let me first state that whilst I am of a strong left-wing mentality, I define myself as an Irish Republican and I believe that the political group that best represents me is Sinn Féin. I do understand what it means to feel your (I hold my hand up, I come from the UK originally, but I come from a very Irish background with a lot of Republican sentiment in my family) country, or part of it, is occupied. Much as the Palestinians feel they have a right to the Gaza Strip and the West Bank, Republicans, I don't need to tell anyone here, believe that the six counties should be returned to Ireland and that Ireland should be one country, united and free under one flag. I am also not blind to the oppresion brought upon by an "invader".

    Do you think that the Palestinian people have a right to resist an illegal military occupation and siege by any means necessary and their right to national self determination on their own terms?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,749 ✭✭✭✭wes


    Ah, The Guardian... those muppets would be better off if they went back to school to learn how to spell and use grammatical structure properly before making up their own opinions. I've seen two-year-olds who spell more correctly than the average Grauniad hack.

    So you are deliberately ignoring the content of the leak documents. Interesting tactic. Not going to work mind, as its clear as day your ignoring facts that you don't like.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,023 ✭✭✭shedweller


    ...__... wrote: »
    What land in Gaza have Israel been taking they pulled out years ago and look what they got in return. over 12000 rockets since then. You need to accept that Hamas's aim as it says in its charter is the destruction of Israel remember the chant the ipsc guys are screaming down o connell street "from the river to the sea". Makes me wonder do they want a Palestinian state or would they be happy enough having Jordan and Egypt take back the land.
    who created hamas?

    Do the Palestinians have a right to exist?

    Will israel let them be and go back to its agreed borders if hamas stop the rockets?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 227 ✭✭Ignorant etc.


    wes wrote: »
    You mean like Israel already did to Palestine....... As for genocide, well that exactly what happening in Gaza as we speak. The IDF blew up people burying there dead in the most recent outrage.

    Its interesting how people talk about what Hamas may do, if given the chance, but happily ignoring what the state of Israel is doing.

    And this was reported where?

    I'm not talking about what Hamas may do, I'm talking about what Hamas do do. Don't think for one second a Hamas militant would spare any one of us either if he got his hands on us. To them, we are infidels and deserve to be resolved by the sword.

    And genocide led by Israel... where do you suppose they should target if Hamas keep their weaponry in hospitals, schools and mosques. Maybe they should target Tel-Aviv, Beersheva and Haifa instead :rolleyes:?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 227 ✭✭Ignorant etc.


    wes wrote: »
    So you are deliberately ignoring the content of the leak documents. Interesting tactic. Not going to work mind, as its clear as day your ignoring facts that you don't like.

    There's always more to a story than meets the eye. Show me reports from a variety of newspapers, not just from a Communist claptrap rag like The Grauniad. Interesting how you've put nothing up from The Times, The Telegraph etc... or do you just ignore those because they don't agree with you?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 735 ✭✭✭Tuisceanch


    Ah, The Guardian... those muppets would be better off if they went back to school to learn how to spell and use grammatical structure properly before making up their own opinions. I've seen two-year-olds who spell more correctly than the average Grauniad hack.
    And this was reported where?

    I'm not talking about what Hamas may do, I'm talking about what Hamas do do. Don't think for one second a Hamas militant would spare any one of us either if he got his hands on us. To them, we are infidels and deserve to be resolved by the sword.

    And genocide led by Israel... where do you suppose they should target if Hamas keep their weaponry in hospitals, schools and mosques. Maybe they should target Tel-Aviv, Beersheva and Haifa instead :rolleyes:?

    You come across as a very confused and irony free soul.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 227 ✭✭Ignorant etc.


    Tuisceanch wrote: »
    Like all the other standard talking points you mentioned they have been discussed ad nauseum if you care to read through the thread and with regard to the rise of Anti-Semitism attacks, this was mentioned quite recently and I responded with the following, encouraging the poster to expand on the subject but as typifies many of their ilk they are only interested in hurling accusations at people.

    Of course, you, as a pro-Hamas supporter would be way above throwing accusations at people.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 735 ✭✭✭Tuisceanch


    There's always more to a story than meets the eye. Show me reports from a variety of newspapers, not just from a Communist claptrap rag like The Grauniad. Interesting how you've put nothing up from The Times, The Telegraph etc... or do you just ignore those because they don't agree with you?


    It's the Palestinian Papers they are reporting on. It doesn't matter what media outlet draws your attention to them.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 10,250 ✭✭✭✭bumper234


    Ah, The Guardian... those muppets would be better off if they went back to school to learn how to spell and use grammatical structure properly before making up their own opinions. I've seen two-year-olds who spell more correctly than the average Grauniad hack.

    Oh the irony :rolleyes:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 227 ✭✭Ignorant etc.


    Tuisceanch wrote: »
    You come across as a very confused and irony free soul.

    Confused about what? Confused that I don't like a group that wants to destroy another country and throw the people in it to the dogs? Yeah, I'm well confused about that, I'm also confused about thinking the Shoah was a bad thing too... real confused.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 735 ✭✭✭Tuisceanch


    Of course, you, as a pro-Hamas supporter would be way above throwing accusations at people.

    There you go again. I've never expressed support for Hamas but you follow the standard pattern of applying meaningless label to organisations and then stifle all discussion on the subject. If you haven't the capacity or intellect to debate then jog on.


Advertisement