Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
If we do not hit our goal we will be forced to close the site.

Current status: https://keepboardsalive.com/

Annual subs are best for most impact. If you are still undecided on going Ad Free - you can also donate using the Paypal Donate option. All contribution helps. Thank you.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.

Israel - Palestine Conflict. **Mod note in OP - updated 1st August**

17273757778174

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,370 ✭✭✭✭Son Of A Vidic


    h2005 wrote: »

    From the above....
    ...BOSTON, MA, 10 July 2014 – Boston’s transit authority, the MBTA, has removed advertisements highlighting Israeli human rights abuses against Palestinians from Boston’s subway transit system under pressure from pro-Israel groups....

    Considering the context and subject matter of the ads that were taken down. The expression 'pro-Israeli' is actually a misnomer, they obviously meant to say pro-zionist.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 494 ✭✭Chance The Rapper


    Pakistani Government website : http://works.ajk.gov.pk/Gaza.htm


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 735 ✭✭✭Tuisceanch


    From the above....



    Considering the context and subject matter of the ads that were taken down. The expression 'pro-Israeli' is actually a misnomer, they obviously meant to say pro-zionist.

    Consistent in circumventing the law in all jurisdictions. They have a strange concept of democracy.


  • Site Banned Posts: 8,331 ✭✭✭Brown Bomber




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,370 ✭✭✭✭Son Of A Vidic


    The hypocrisy is sickening but nothing new. This advertisement was judged to be “not only protected speech — it is core political speech,”

    Disturbing stuff, those posters are reminiscence of the the hate filled bile put out by the Nazi's in 1930's Germany.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,203 ✭✭✭moxin




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,705 ✭✭✭Johro


    Did it need pointing out? Who didn't already know?
    Too many people, apparently.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 616 ✭✭✭duckcfc


    Nothing can be done about it, isreal has a plan and is backed the rulers of this earth that is the USA. All we can do is sit back and watch or do t watch because theres sweat fcuk all you or i can do about it


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 953 ✭✭✭donegal__road


    Cydoniac wrote: »
    I don't know why you linked this to me, what has it to do with what I said?

    forget about it... I deleted my post, maybe you could delete your reply.. cheers


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 735 ✭✭✭Tuisceanch


    http://tinyurl.com/kb86g76

    "Once there was widespread Israeli outrage over the bombing of homes in Gaza. Now there is just indifference"


  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 17,295 Mod ✭✭✭✭Manic Moran


    SeaBreezes wrote: »
    I understand as you have a military background you are interested in the rules of warfare.

    I dont understand, in the rules of warfare, how the targeting of:

    1) water supply plants

    2) power supply plants

    3) UN refugee centres/schools

    4) hospitals

    5) medical personnel

    6) Mosques

    Is this normal warfare? Or Genocide?

    I dont have a military background, so from my perspective this looks like a deliberate systematic destruction of all possibility of human life in Gaza.

    What are your thoughts on this?

    They aren't (though you could make an argument for the power plant). You need to have a damned good reason to target the above. For example, when being ambushed by opposition fighters, a tank in our company deliberately engaged the tower of a mosque. (Minaret?). Not only was it a great vantage point for the enemy fighter occupying it (there's a reason church towers were usually the first to go in WWII), but after the fact we found that the mosque was actually the location of the headquarters element. Incidental damage isn't a particular concern as long as people aren't being stupid about it. As Gaza is a dense urban area, there's a little less distinction here between protected areas and general targets: in all cases one is supposed to use the weapon system least likely to affect unintended victims, hence the use of guided munitions, DIME munitions, no use of cluster bombs etc. As a result, all things being equal, you'll likely find that hospitals etc are getting hit as often as anything else, even when things are all above board.

    My uninformed opinion is that there is a mix of things happening. A number of these incidents are inevitable 'that was unfortunate'. I suspect a number similarly are cases of recklessness, either by troops who don't care, or who are otherwise good people in the heat of things aren't thinking things through. These would be unlawful. What I find unlikely is that someone back at base made a specific conscious decision like "today, Ishmael, your mission is to bomb the Al Jafait Hospital" Of course, what I find unlikely may actually be happening, in which case it also is blatantly unlawful.


  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 17,295 Mod ✭✭✭✭Manic Moran


    Tuisceanch wrote: »
    This article casts doubts on the continuous Israeli mantra of how they are taking all measures 'humanely' possible to minimize civilian loss in Gaza.

    http://tinyurl.com/mcu3atw

    A quote

    "Where howitzers are used to strike back at missiles or mortars launched from inside Gaza, the guns are aimed with the help of the Shilem radar system and a linked, computerised fire direction centre. The coordinates for any protected building – the UN school for example – are supposed to have been fed into that computer database to block fire in that direction automatically. The UN says it had provided the coordinates of all its buildings, but it is not clear whether that data was incorporated into IDF systems."

    The meat of the article (the bit you didn't quote) is probably the best bit of it referring to an apparent lack of personnel capability. Lack of calibration was one thought which came to mind as I read your quote segment. There are a couple of other possibilities, though. For example, if it's correctly calibrated, and the artillery or mortar rounds actually were correctly fired, then that means that the Hamas fire came from the area of the UN building. It wouldn't surprise me that the occasional Israeli gunner was actually competent. The other problem is that bulldings are three dimensional entities, but I've never seen a no fire zone system which operates on anything other than a 2 dimensional map. So Shilem reports a grid, it's outside the area of the UN grounds, but the computer has no way of knowing that the four story building rises up to intersect the line of flight of the rounds. Rounds are fired, and that's that.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 190 ✭✭pedro1234


    Souce: thepensivequill.am/2014/08/actions-of-state-which-is-extending-its.html -- can't post full links - sorry.

    After some lengthy discussions with pro-Zionists, I've decided it's time address some of the propaganda being spouted by them, the US Media and of course the IDF.
    "It's very clear that Israel has the right to defend itself" -- Barack Obama

    "Hamas have fired 2000 rockets into Israel" -- Sean Hannity

    "Hamas are using human shields" -- Hilary Clinton

    I'll address these in reverse order, starting ... with the human shields quote from Hilary Clinton.

    Whenever I hear this line it's clear to me the person speaking has never seen Gaza before. They're speaking like a person who has never even spoken to a Gazan on the ground during the current conflict, or a Gazan who was in the area during any of the conflicts over the past decade or so.

    Gaza is a heavily populated civilian area. It is a ghetto, a prison, a concentration camp. Israel have created multiple concentration camps throughout Palestine, making Palestine the largest concentration camp the world has ever seen.

    Gaza is not a liberated town where people can freely go about their day to day lives; it's a prison. The locals are heavily policed by the Israeli military, intimidation is a constant theme. Gazans are stopped on their way to see a friend in hospital, stopped on their way to school if the school is actually operating, and if they can actually afford it they're stopped on their way to the local food market. When stopped they are often searched, asked for ID, and held there for hours before being allowed to leave.

    When you attack civilian areas, you kill civilians. When you purposely attack schools, hospitals, apartment buildings, food markets, you kill civilians. According to Beit Salem, an Israeli Human Rights Group which tracks Israeli and Palestinian deaths in the region, dozens of children as young as four years of age were killed by gunshot wounds to the head, neck, and chest. By now we've all seen videos of snipers killing ambulance crew and rescue workers, ambulances and hospitals being bombed repeatedly. One such video details an attack on two ambulances attempting to offer support to the local Gazans. The video showed ten bombs often landing within a minute apart in what was clearly a calculated attack.

    There was no Hamas members here. There were no weapons on the ambulances. It was a blatant war crime against innocent civilians.

    Moving on to Hannity's quote regarding 2,000 rockets fired from Hamas into Israel. Ask yourself why is there no running total on the firepower used by Israel? Israel have deployed drones, tanks, f-16 fighter jets, and cannons which have fired rockets, missiles, tank shells, cluster bombs, white phosphorous bombs (illegal when used in civilian areas), bullets, cannons shells and grenades.

    It's impossible to continue to answer the Hamas rockets question, without addressing Obama's quote where he states Israel have a right to defend itself.

    Hamas exist as a defensive need. The Palestinian people are an occupied people. They didn't invade Israel, they didn't strike at Israel first. Israel didn't even exist until the 1940s. Since it's foundation it has been stealing land from Palestine.

    Let me ask you a question: If you occupied a legitimate nation, crippled their trade and placed an economic embargo on them, humiliated them daily, considered them sub human and treated them as such, controlled their water, electricity and food supply, stole the most fertile land from them and banished them to live in slums, knocked down their buildings and replaced them with your own, murdered them in the street in broad day light, shot their children, bombed their mosques, schools and businesses, destroyed their crops and threw thousands of them in dungeons and then they fired rockets at you - do you really believe you can use their defensive rocket fire (which is extremely ineffective) against your tyranny as an excuse to obliterate them?

    Israel has been mass murdering Palestinians since the 1940s, long before rockets were fired in self defense and long before Hamas even existed. So this is nothing but a fallacy designed to deflect the reality of the situation and mislead others.

    Finally, with the US behind Israel the world is powerless. The US gave Israel over 100 billion dollars between 1947 and 2006. Up until 1996 the figure was 62.5 billion dollars. The US helped create this state, fund this state, and have essentially created this monster. Israel started out on the left but has completely changed into a fascist regime.

    This whole episode has highlighted how futile world politics actually is. The entire occupation is against the Geneva convention. They've broken the Geneva convention several times by their actions in Palestine, and that's ignoring the bombing and murdering they're doing. Tell me, what gives an oppressor, a land stealer, an aggressor, precedent over the oppressed from defending themselves? The US and Israel's stance is amoral.

    Israel started all of this. Not the Palestinians. Not Hamas. Israel has one of the most well equipped armies in the world and it is using all its might to crush a defenseless people that Israel has penned into what I already described as the largest concentration camp the world has ever seen.

    Netanyahu has point blank refused to allow the Palestinians their own state, the best he offered them was apartheid South Africa style Bantustans where Israel would still control them militarily.

    The Americans don't even understand what that is like. Constant oppression. It's a giant prison, a ghetto. The US are asking if Israel is really the bad guy here? Yes, they are! They created this entire situation because of some crazy religious Zionist ideal that they are gods people.

    Nazis said they were the master race. Israel say they are gods chosen people. The similarity is shocking.

    If Hamas downed weapons in the morning, Israel would not stop - they would not want to give Hamas a chance at regrouping and rebuilding. Israel will not stop until the Palestinians are wiped out and the land is theirs.

    These are not the actions of a state which is defending itself. These are the actions of a state which is extending its borders and stealing land; an aggressor.

    There is no excuse for the slaughter of innocent civilians in this manner. None


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 326 ✭✭notfromhere


    RIP the 64 Israeli soldiers.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,675 ✭✭✭✭A Dub in Glasgo


    Another UN school hit, ah sure Israel and their apologists are only defending themselves :rolleyes:

    How any rational person cannot see through this bullsh!t is beyond me


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,124 ✭✭✭Hitchens


    RTE does not report that Hamas is hated by most moderate Middle Eastern states. Arab commentators ask all the questions RTE fails to ask. This is what Abdulateef Al-Mulhim, a retired Royal Saudi Navy commodore, now a columnist for the Arab Daily News, has to say about Hamas.

    “Hamas leaders are jet-setters. They travel high class, stay at the best hotels and eat the best food but their people are not paid their salaries on time and, what is worse, is that they are always under constant pressure from Hamas rule and the Israeli missiles.”

    The retired commodore wonders why Palestine has special victim status. “There are more Syrian refugees and displaced families than there are Palestinians. There is more destruction in Libya and Yemen than there is in Gaza and there are far more gruesome killing scenes in Iraq than in Gaza.”

    He finishes with a fundamental question, never asked by the media in Ireland, about Hamas using its huge cement imports to build tunnels not bomb shelters. “But if Hamas really wanted an armed conflict, then they should have at least built some bomb shelters for the poor innocent Palestinians.”

    - See more at: http://www.independent.ie/opinion/columnists/eoghan-harris/a-shameful-surrender-to-sinn-feins-sharia-tactics-30479096.html#sthash.qpqQifLZ.dpuf

    he makes a very fair point indeed


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 162 ✭✭Contributor 2013


    When you elect a government that does random rockets attacks towards a much bigger nation. Un-guided rockets etc, do you not set your self up to be recipients of the retaliation?

    Just wondering...


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,335 ✭✭✭wendell borton


    moxin wrote: »

    Don't see the point of the video, if someone had been there they'd now be dead.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,675 ✭✭✭✭A Dub in Glasgo


    When you elect a government that does random rockets attacks towards a much bigger nation. Un-guided rockets etc, do you not set your self up to be recipients of the retaliation?

    Just wondering...

    Just wondering? Nah, more like just attempting to justify slaughter


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,436 ✭✭✭c_man


    Another UN school hit, ah sure Israel and their apologists are only defending themselves :rolleyes:

    Yep, it certainly seems that Israel realise that education and knowledge are terribly dangerous things for an oppressed people to get.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 523 ✭✭✭carpejugulum


    The hypocrisy is sickening but nothing new. This advertisement was judged to be “not only protected speech — it is core political speech,”
    How do you describe jihadists?


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 700 ✭✭✭mikeyjames9


    I wonder if the UN should be giving the israelis coordinates for these schools

    it appears that the IDF are deliberately targeting these civilians

    the israelis moan about the holocaust yet seem to have scant regard for the welfare of civilians themselves


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 10,087 ✭✭✭✭Dan_Solo


    How do you describe jihadists?
    Now you can play the newspeak game too!
    Where's your definion of "jihadist" that doesn't also cover "Zionist" pretty much to a T?


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 10,087 ✭✭✭✭Dan_Solo


    Don't see the point of the video, if someone had been there they'd now be dead.
    Sounds like they're more likely to be hit by an asteroid TBH.
    So IDF missiles that miss their target are not "terrorism" then?


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 10,087 ✭✭✭✭Dan_Solo


    The meat of the article (the bit you didn't quote) is probably the best bit of it referring to an apparent lack of personnel capability. Lack of calibration was one thought which came to mind as I read your quote segment. There are a couple of other possibilities, though. For example, if it's correctly calibrated, and the artillery or mortar rounds actually were correctly fired, then that means that the Hamas fire came from the area of the UN building. It wouldn't surprise me that the occasional Israeli gunner was actually competent. The other problem is that bulldings are three dimensional entities, but I've never seen a no fire zone system which operates on anything other than a 2 dimensional map. So Shilem reports a grid, it's outside the area of the UN grounds, but the computer has no way of knowing that the four story building rises up to intersect the line of flight of the rounds. Rounds are fired, and that's that.
    All of this IDF apologism starts from the base assumption that Israel isn't deliberately targetting civilians and works its tortured logic from there. There's ample evidence that this simply isn't the case.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 10,250 ✭✭✭✭bumper234


    RIP the 64 Israeli soldiers.

    They knew the risks, maybe you would like to say a nice word or 2 about the hundreds of innocent kids?


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 10,087 ✭✭✭✭Dan_Solo


    RIP the 64 Israeli soldiers.
    And the hundreds of children they have killed, no?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,675 ✭✭✭✭A Dub in Glasgo


    Don't see the point of the video, if someone had been there they'd now be dead.

    Even the cat or squirrel got away


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,567 ✭✭✭Red Pepper


    I am curious, I hear a lot about Hamas rockets being fired into Israel but do they do any damage or kill people? What kind of rockets are they?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,563 ✭✭✭SeaBreezes


    They aren't (though you could make an argument for the power plant). You need to have a damned good reason to target the above. For example, when being ambushed by opposition fighters, a tank in our company deliberately engaged the tower of a mosque. (Minaret?). Not only was it a great vantage point for the enemy fighter occupying it (there's a reason church towers were usually the first to go in WWII), but after the fact we found that the mosque was actually the location of the headquarters element. Incidental damage isn't a particular concern as long as people aren't being stupid about it. As Gaza is a dense urban area, there's a little less distinction here between protected areas and general targets: in all cases one is supposed to use the weapon system least likely to affect unintended victims, hence the use of guided munitions, DIME munitions, no use of cluster bombs etc. As a result, all things being equal, you'll likely find that hospitals etc are getting hit as often as anything else, even when things are all above board.

    My uninformed opinion is that there is a mix of things happening. A number of these incidents are inevitable 'that was unfortunate'. I suspect a number similarly are cases of recklessness, either by troops who don't care, or who are otherwise good people in the heat of things aren't thinking things through. These would be unlawful. What I find unlikely is that someone back at base made a specific conscious decision like "today, Ishmael, your mission is to bomb the Al Jafait Hospital" Of course, what I find unlikely may actually be happening, in which case it also is blatantly unlawful.

    Thanks for that Manic.

    Tho I believe it is deliberate.

    Theres the case of the catholic church and the hospital that got the phone call first. Please leave. We are about to bomb. The catholic church holds 1 priest, 3 nuns and 30 severly disabled children. They had nowhere to go. The church was destroyed, all the windows in their house blown out but 30 severely disabled kids and 3 adults are sheltering on the ground floor no food no water nowhere to go.

    In those cases it definately wasnt 'oops' but targeted strikes.

    It maybe hard to believe someone is capable of doing this genocide. But thats obviously the reality.


Advertisement