Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

wind power the future ? yes no?

13

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,691 ✭✭✭MayoSalmon


    Actually most of that levy goes to Peat and Gas plants. :mad:
    http://www.cer.ie/docs/000791/cer13130.pdf - Figures are 2013/14 PSO Forecast (Indicative)


    Peat Stations: Lough Ree (100MW), Edenderry (120MW) and West Offaly (150MW) €69.2m

    Gas (CAP05) Aughinish Alumina (160MW) and Tynagh (400MW) . €50.6m


    REFIT & AER renewables include wind energy, small-scale hydropower,
    combined heat and power (CHP) biomass (landfill gas), biomass-CHP;
    biomass-anaerobic digestion and offshore wind. €40.8m


    ALL the renewables combined only get 25% of the PSO levy

    Which is about the same % of our energy they supply.


    If you want to reduce the PSO levy by 75% then stop subsidising the smaller less efficient fossil fuel plants.

    You seem to be missing the point that they are only subsided because of the presence of wind on the grid and Tynagh is one of the largest power plants in Ireland.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,794 ✭✭✭Aongus Von Bismarck


    The portfolios on offer by the large European utilites when trying to raise money on the bond market are making very little mention of investment in nuclear generation. Clean and green are the buzzwords, as long as it doesn't involve building new nuclear stations. Analysts are starting to worry though. It's a premise built on hot air for spare capacity (if you'll pardon the pun).


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 10,056 ✭✭✭✭SeanW


    Actually most of that levy goes to Peat and Gas plants. :mad:
    http://www.cer.ie/docs/000791/cer13130.pdf - Figures are 2013/14 PSO Forecast (Indicative)


    Peat Stations: Lough Ree (100MW), Edenderry (120MW) and West Offaly (150MW) €69.2m

    Gas (CAP05) Aughinish Alumina (160MW) and Tynagh (400MW) . €50.6m


    REFIT & AER renewables include wind energy, small-scale hydropower,
    combined heat and power (CHP) biomass (landfill gas), biomass-CHP;
    biomass-anaerobic digestion and offshore wind. €40.8m


    ALL the renewables combined only get 25% of the PSO levy

    Which is about the same % of our energy they supply.


    If you want to reduce the PSO levy by 75% then stop subsidising the smaller less efficient fossil fuel plants.

    Nonsense - gas is, either explicitly or implicitly part of the Green agenda, in particular CCGT, which is needed to counter the ups and downs of wind power production.
    Guess which type of plant Tynagh is?

    And the other is a CHP installation. More green tech.

    https://u24.gov.ua/
    Join NAFO today:

    Help us in helping Ukraine.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 28,787 ✭✭✭✭ScumLord


    Ah, some people think electric cars are non polluting & these are the same people that think wind power is the big answer.

    Think about it. Electric cars emit no emissions, but the power stations that supply the power to their batteries do.
    Other than batteries electric cars are better in every conceivable way. The other thing you need to take into account is that electric cars are simpler, less moving parts means it's easier to make them and easier to maintain them. Less liquids and oils are needed to manufacture and keep the motors running.

    The cars are faster and more efficient, once new battery technologies come along they'll be lighter and have the same range as your average oil powered car.

    There's also the fact that they won't require a global transport network feeding them more oil on a daily basis. You car will come with a battery that will last ten year and it's fuel will come along already established power lines direct to your home.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 48,742 ✭✭✭✭Wichita Lineman


    A lot of people dont realise that the proposed wind farms are to provide additional power to the UK market and so Ireland will not benefit from any reduction of emissions etc etc. The reason the UK market are coming here is that our politicians are corrupt greedy pushovers and would sell the countryside in a heartbeat.

    If the city folk want windmills, O'Connell St is wide enough now and available for some small bribes to the right people so work away lads and see how you get on with that plan.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,158 ✭✭✭323


    ScumLord wrote: »
    Other than batteries electric cars are better in every conceivable way. The other thing you need to take into account is that electric cars are simpler, less moving parts means it's easier to make them and easier to maintain them. Less liquids and oils are needed to manufacture and keep the motors running.

    The cars are faster and more efficient, once new battery technologies come along they'll be lighter and have the same range as your average oil powered car.

    There's also the fact that they won't require a global transport network feeding them more oil on a daily basis. You car will come with a battery that will last ten year and it's fuel will come along already established power lines direct to your home.

    Agree electric vehicles will be the future, can't see present generation and distribution infrastructure, the "already established power lines" you mention, being able to support large scale deployment of these. Was not a consideration when the grid was developed generations ago, for some reason it still does not appear to be a consideration.

    Yes, electric vehicles are very efficient, but few of the proponents of electric vehicles seem to want to think about where their power comes from. In most cases as yet, from hugely inefficient outdated fossil generation plants delivered through highly inefficient grid transmission/distribution systems.

    My direct injection diesels with an efficiency of > 40% are as yet much more efficient and much lower polluters than any electric vehicle, unless its being charged from renewable generation, so as to the OP, Wind power for the future ? Yes!

    “Follow the trend lines, not the headlines,”



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 28,787 ✭✭✭✭ScumLord


    323 wrote: »
    Agree electric vehicles will be the future, can't see present generation and distribution infrastructure, the "already established power lines" you mention, being able to support large scale deployment of these. Was not a consideration when the grid was developed generations ago, for some reason it still does not appear to be a consideration.
    I don't see why they couldn't. People will be switching over gradually giving time to upgrade the network if needed, there are also high capacity charging stations being rolled out that can charge a car in 30 minutes.

    We need better infrastructure, our power demands are only going to increase and any planning for the future should take into account everyone eventually switching to electric cars. Nuclear is the only way we can meet our demands without covering the entire surface of the planet with wind turbines.

    My direct injection diesels with an efficiency of > 40% are as yet much more efficient and much lower polluters than any electric vehicle, unless its being charged from renewable generation, so as to the OP, Wind power for the future ? Yes!
    I don't think your engine is more efficient that a large generator, I'm pretty sure if you worked it out it's cheaper to produce the power in bulk at a station and then transfer it directly to the user.

    I still think once you take into account all the costs of maintaining the oil industry and keeping oil run cars on the road (the combustion engine is a much more complicated piece of engineering when compared to an electric motor) you'll find it evens out.

    The batteries we're using now aren't the batteries that will encourage people to use electric cars, they're another five or so years away. But it could be straightforward to upgrade the battery pack in a car you buy today to the newer alternative.

    The formula-e series will be starting up this year, they're already developing the next generation of batteries, apparently they have working prototypes it's just they're having trouble with heat.


  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 99,596 Mod ✭✭✭✭Capt'n Midnight


    MayoSalmon wrote: »
    You seem to be missing the point that they are only subsided because of the presence of wind on the grid and Tynagh is one of the largest power plants in Ireland.
    they are being subsidised because wind undercuts them on price so they aren't anywhere near as economic as they were and they are in rural areas, and at the time it looked like the boom was going to continue so it would have been cheaper than building replacement plants

    be sure that those plants would not have got the same financing if the contracts were signed more recently.



    Tynagh isn't one of the biggest power plants in Ireland, it isn't even in the top 10 plants on the Island

    Aghada
    Dublin Bay
    Huntstown
    Moneypoint
    Poolbeg
    Tarbert
    Whitegate

    Ballylumford
    Kilroot
    Coolkeeragh

    Also the East-West Interconnector is bigger
    and if you add in Turlough hill , dispatchable hydro power is also bigger


  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 99,596 Mod ✭✭✭✭Capt'n Midnight


    Seaneh wrote: »
    We've already "discovered" fusion, we know it works, we know how to do it, there are fusion reactors being built already. It's just new tech and needs a lot of research before it's commercially viable.
    Roughly speaking the 3.2GW Hinckley C power plant will cost £100Bn over it's live. That's ten times what's being spent on the ITER

    The clean ups at Sellafield and Hanford will probably each cost another £100 Bn

    Imagine how far further fusion research would be with that sort of money invested in it.

    Thing is if we could store power cheaply we wouldn't even need fusion because the costs of wind and solar keep dropping.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,687 ✭✭✭Karl Stein


    if we could store power cheaply

    Can't they dam a fjord and pump sea water into it when wind turbines are generating unneeded power?

    When the wind isn't blowing they let the water behind the dam generate hydroelectric power - the fjord would essentially be a giant battery.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,691 ✭✭✭MayoSalmon


    they are being subsidised because wind undercuts them on price so they aren't anywhere near as economic as they were and they are in rural areas, and at the time it looked like the boom was going to continue so it would have been cheaper than building replacement plants

    be sure that those plants would not have got the same financing if the contracts were signed more recently.



    Tynagh isn't one of the biggest power plants in Ireland, it isn't even in the top 10 plants on the Island

    Aghada
    Dublin Bay
    Huntstown
    Moneypoint
    Poolbeg
    Tarbert
    Whitegate

    Ballylumford
    Kilroot
    Coolkeeragh

    Also the East-West Interconnector is bigger
    and if you add in Turlough hill , dispatchable hydro power is also bigger

    Turlough hill is not bigger and I wasn't including NI plants or the Interconnection. Tynagh is a large plant, to say that its being subsidized because it's small is being disingenuous.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,954 ✭✭✭Tail Docker


    Karl Stein wrote: »
    Can't they dam a fjord and pump sea water into it when wind turbines are generating unneeded power?

    When the wind isn't blowing they let the water behind the dam generate hydroelectric power - the fjord would essentially be a giant battery.

    That's actually a good idea. On another note, we're a bit short of fjords here in the midlands..


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,687 ✭✭✭Karl Stein


    That's actually a good idea.

    It's already used in Ireland.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 24,755 ✭✭✭✭Cookie_Monster


    Solar is the future, a global grid so generation is alway possilbe. Combined with hydro, geo-thermal and wave as secondary sources. Wind is just too unpredictable and while it useful for pumpted storage and turning down hydro flow in times of high wind it'll never be a mainstream generator.


  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 99,596 Mod ✭✭✭✭Capt'n Midnight


    Wind is just too unpredictable and while it useful for pumpted storage and turning down hydro flow in times of high wind it'll never be a mainstream generator.
    In theory maybe.

    But in practice it is.


    Of course you can't rely on wind 24/7 but you can rely on it to provide a decent chunk of energy predictably and cheaply


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,691 ✭✭✭MayoSalmon


    In theory maybe.

    But in practice it is.


    Of course you can't rely on wind 24/7 but you can rely on it to provide a decent chunk of energy predictably and cheaply

    Simply put, no you can't.

    Tidal and Solar are the future. Everyday the suns shines and everyday the tides moves.

    If the wind blew all the time it would solve all our energy problems unfortunately it doesn't.


  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 99,596 Mod ✭✭✭✭Capt'n Midnight


    MayoSalmon wrote: »
    Simply put, no you can't.

    Tidal and Solar are the future. Everyday the suns shines and everyday the tides moves.

    If the wind blew all the time it would solve all our energy problems unfortunately it doesn't.
    Tidal ?
    Yes it's predictable years in advance, but spring tides vs. neap tide is a large power variation over a month
    and to recover max energy you have to exploit the height difference or have a more expensive system with at least two lagoons

    solar is actually a good fit with wave power, we get most wave energy in winter , but on a really dark rainy day you can get as little as 10-15% of nameplate power,

    Until we get cheap energy storage it's a case of tapping into as many different sources as are economic so that they balance better, demand reduction is another one.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,691 ✭✭✭fclauson


    Red Pepper wrote: »
    I actually love seeing windfarms or individual wind turbines. I think they look great and make me feel relaxed. The fact that they are generating green electricity is just mighty too.

    Have you ever lived within the able range of one - you just might change you opinion

    For example a 20db increase over background noise when measured 1000M for a turbine with a 30db spike as the turbine starts - see image

    key area to look at is the red cloud in the middle - that is a massive noise increase


    http://s28.postimg.org/j7ena4hal/Capture.png


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 953 ✭✭✭donegal__road


    AnonoBoy wrote: »
    We could just flatten Longford Donegal and make it the wind farm county.

    Problem solved.

    Sure people in Longford Donegal would complain but sure who f*cking cares about people from Longford Donegal?


    I have made a couple of changes to your post, this has already happened in Donegal.. and that is the attitude that the companies erecting the windmills have towards the locals. My electricity bill is going up, yet every fcuking direction I look there are windmills on the horizon.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,442 ✭✭✭✭Grayson


    I have made a couple of changes to your post, this has already happened in Donegal.. and that is the attitude that the companies erecting the windmills have towards the locals. My electricity bill is going up, yet every fcuking direction I look there are windmills on the horizon.

    It's cloudy today. Guess that means climate change is bollox


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 953 ✭✭✭donegal__road


    Grayson wrote: »
    It's cloudy today. Guess that means climate change is bollox

    ..


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,244 ✭✭✭✭bnt


    Energy storage is even more of problem in Hawaii, where there are a lot of solar panels on roofs, and they generate the most power in mid-afternoon when it's not needed. The BBC has an article about one plan to use vanadium batteries for short-term energy storage there.

    Another idea, which might work where there is lots of space, is to use spare energy to produce liquid nitrogen or air, which can then directly power a turbine generator on demand. See Cryogenic Energy Storage.)

    Government resting upon the will and universal suffrage of the people has no anchorage except in the people's intelligence.

    — Grover Cleveland



  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 99,596 Mod ✭✭✭✭Capt'n Midnight


    bnt wrote: »
    Energy storage is even more of problem in Hawaii, where there are a lot of solar panels on roofs, and they generate the most power in mid-afternoon when it's not needed. The BBC has an article about one plan to use vanadium batteries for short-term energy storage there.
    the main problem is a supply of cheap vanadium, otherwise it meets many requirements
    Another idea, which might work where there is lots of space, is to use spare energy to produce liquid nitrogen or air, which can then directly power a turbine generator on demand. See Cryogenic Energy Storage.)
    not so sure about the efficiency, the economics may depend on by products like Oxygen. Then again using the oxygen means you get a higher temperature in turbine and things so better Carnot efficiency (and less oxides of nitrogen) or you could use the oxygen to burn producer gas or other fuels too poor to burn effectively in air. Or us it for the incinerators to really, really get rid of dioxins and their ilk.


  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 99,596 Mod ✭✭✭✭Capt'n Midnight


    I have made a couple of changes to your post, this has already happened in Donegal.. and that is the attitude that the companies erecting the windmills have towards the locals. My electricity bill is going up, yet every fcuking direction I look there are windmills on the horizon.
    Today's wholesale price is about 4.5c per unit and there's very little wind (when it's windy it can drop to 3c/unit) http://www.sem-o.com/Pages/default.aspx

    you pay 19c per unit give or take on top of standing charges

    are you seriously suggesting that difference is mainly caused by wind ?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,244 ✭✭✭✭bnt


    the main problem is a supply of cheap vanadium, otherwise it meets many requirements

    not so sure about the efficiency, the economics may depend on by products like Oxygen. Then again using the oxygen means you get a higher temperature in turbine and things so better Carnot efficiency (and less oxides of nitrogen) or you could use the oxygen to burn producer gas or other fuels too poor to burn effectively in air. Or us it for the incinerators to really, really get rid of dioxins and their ilk.
    That's not really what's meant by cryogenic storage as I was thinking: at the point where the energy is used, there's no burning of anything, but instead the turbine uses the rapid expansion of the liquid in to gas as it's released and heats back up to ambient temp. That needs a lot of heat, which can be gotten from the environment, but you'd need some major heat exchangers to do it efficiently.

    The UK pilot program will be run at an existing power station, which offers a source of low-grade heat which currently goes to waste. (Storing low-grade heat can be done by something as low-tech as a Cowper stove, for example: a tank or a hole in the ground lined with bricks.) That heat will serve to re-heat the liquid air before the turbine, a major improvement to the efficiency of the process as a whole.

    Government resting upon the will and universal suffrage of the people has no anchorage except in the people's intelligence.

    — Grover Cleveland



  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 99,596 Mod ✭✭✭✭Capt'n Midnight


    bnt wrote: »
    That's not really what's meant by cryogenic storage as I was thinking:
    What I meant is that it takes a lot of energy to liquefy air

    look at this - only 25% efficient unless you can piggy back it onto a heat source
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cryogenic_energy_storage#Efficiency


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 225 ✭✭Fabo


    What we need is more windmills - one in everyones back yard. There is room for about 50 turbines in the parks of South Co.Dublin. We should start there since CRO records show that about 90% of the wind investors reside there. Once we get one up in everyone's back yard, our electricity bills will be No.1 highest instead of No.4 in EU. Nobody will want to live here except people from South Co.Dublin. We will have reduced farming carbon emissions by half as they will less land to pollute. Plus we will have a load more thermal plant to help us keep the lights on.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 225 ✭✭Fabo


    Today's wholesale price is about 4.5c per unit and there's very little wind (when it's windy it can drop to 3c/unit) http://www.sem-o.com/Pages/default.aspx

    you pay 19c per unit give or take on top of standing charges

    are you seriously suggesting that difference is mainly caused by wind ?

    PSO levy recoups any reduction in wholesale prices so irrelevant


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 225 ✭✭Fabo


    I have made a couple of changes to your post, this has already happened in Donegal.. and that is the attitude that the companies erecting the windmills have towards the locals. My electricity bill is going up, yet every fcuking direction I look there are windmills on the horizon.

    Yes but think of how happy you make people of South Co.Dublin. They take some of your money off you (which alleviates the need for you to worry about money and what to do with it) plus they recoup their tax back on their massive salaries which in all fairness, is very unjust paying 56% of your earnings in tax.

    You should be proud and happy that you are making sacrifices for the good of South Dublin, I mean the country.


  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 99,596 Mod ✭✭✭✭Capt'n Midnight


    Fabo wrote: »
    What we need is more windmills - one in everyones back yard. There is room for about 50 turbines in the parks of South Co.Dublin. We should start there since CRO records show that about 90% of the wind investors reside there. Once we get one up in everyone's back yard, our electricity bills will be No.1 highest instead of No.4 in EU. Nobody will want to live here except people from South Co.Dublin. We will have reduced farming carbon emissions by half as they will less land to pollute. Plus we will have a load more thermal plant to help us keep the lights on.


    Yeah because having loads of turbines close to the ground in urban areas works well.

    the cost per watt is insane, when you add controllers and connection , the capacity factor is low because you want a windier site and away from the ground.


    There's 1,236,518 Households in Dublin So with a 1 KW turbine each that's only 1.236GW peak, and that's rarely going to happen. Budget maybe €5K per turbine. Overall it's still just the power output from a few of the larger wind farms planned.

    Micro power only works when you have massively inflated retail costs / high standing costs.


Advertisement
Advertisement