Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

***JC 2014 Maths Paper Two - Mon. June 9th 2014 - all levels***

13567

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27 Scrublord420


    Hello fellow scrubs yeah i thought paper 2 was well easier than paper one can i ask what did anyone get for question 8 i got the first part but i got stuck on the others


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 589 ✭✭✭coolerboy


    Liordi wrote: »
    I'm almost sure the swing was 7.4.
    Tan X = 5/4
    X = Tan -1 (5/4)
    X = 51.34

    51.34 * 1.2 = 61.6

    Tan 61.6 = x/4
    4 Tan 61.6 = x
    x = 7.39
    x = 7.4

    Idk if that's right or wrong but how I did it.

    Why do you have to multiply by 1.2 ?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,226 ✭✭✭Liordi


    coolerboy wrote: »
    Why do you have to multiply by 1.2 ?

    You're increasing it by 20%


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 407 ✭✭Gerrymandering reborn


    coolerboy wrote: »
    Why do you have to multiply by 1.2 ?
    HE INCREASED it by 20%


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,226 ✭✭✭Liordi


    Hello fellow scrubs yeah i thought paper 2 was well easier than paper one can i ask what did anyone get for question 8 i got the first part but i got stuck on the others

    Got the slope to be 1/3
    1, -2 wasn't on the line.
    y - y1 = m ( x - x1)
    As they're parallel m is the same

    y - (-2) = 1/3 (x - 1) (3)
    3y + 6 = x - 1
    x - 3y - 7 = 0


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,226 ✭✭✭Liordi


    coolerboy wrote: »
    Was it the swing question

    The coordinate geometry question.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 53 ✭✭DanielChester


    One of the questions on co-geometry asked if the line was perpendicular to another, I said no. It was towards the end, did anyone get that?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 225 ✭✭ECM1234


    Liordi wrote: »
    I'm almost sure the swing was 7.4.
    Tan X = 5/4
    X = Tan -1 (5/4)
    X = 51.34

    51.34 * 1.2 = 61.6

    Tan 61.6 = x/4
    4 Tan 61.6 = x
    x = 7.39
    x = 7.4

    Idk if that's right or wrong but how I did it.

    Where did the 4 come from? Was that you're distance from A-B ?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 114 ✭✭yaEHya


    Ah I even got that easy question wrong.how was 5 the hypothenis?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,226 ✭✭✭Liordi


    yaEHya wrote: »
    Ah I even got that easy question wrong.how was 5 the hypothenis?

    Tan is opp/adj


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,226 ✭✭✭Liordi


    ECM1234 wrote: »
    Where did the 4 come from? Was that you're distance from A-B ?

    Yeah.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 225 ✭✭ECM1234


    One of the questions on co-geometry asked if the line was perpendicular to another, I said no. It was towards the end, did anyone get that?

    Same here, because the slope are not equal to -1 ! :)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 407 ✭✭Gerrymandering reborn


    Liordi wrote: »
    Got the slope to be 1/3
    1, -2 wasn't on the line.
    y - y1 = m ( x - x1)
    As they're parallel m is the same

    y - (-2) = 1/3 (x - 1) (3)
    3y + 6 = x - 1
    x - 3y - 7 = 0

    YEs i got that


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,226 ✭✭✭Liordi


    One of the questions on co-geometry asked if the line was perpendicular to another, I said no. It was towards the end, did anyone get that?

    Yup, they weren't perpendicular. :)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 114 ✭✭yaEHya


    Liordi wrote: »
    Tan is opp/adj

    I thought it was adjacent over hypothesis ffs


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 225 ✭✭ECM1234


    YEs i got that

    I got that, but thought it was wrong, so I did the question again, can I still get the marks?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,226 ✭✭✭Liordi


    ECM1234 wrote: »
    I got that, but thought it was wrong, so I did the question again, can I still get the marks?

    If you didn't scribble it out, you might get low/high partial. :)
    This is why people are adamant to avoid using tippex.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 114 ✭✭yaEHya


    YEs i got that

    At least I got that


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 225 ✭✭ECM1234


    Liordi wrote: »
    If you didn't scribble it out, you might get low/high partial. :)
    This is why people are adamant to avoid using tippex.

    I didn't use tip ex, hopefully I can still get the marks :)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 114 ✭✭yaEHya


    I was thinking sohtahcoa in my head not sohcahtoa such a ****ing rehab haha


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 941 ✭✭✭yomtea98


    Liordi wrote: »
    Yup, they weren't perpendicular. :)

    It was.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27 Scrublord420


    One of the questions on co-geometry asked if the line was perpendicular to another, I said no. It was towards the end, did anyone get that?

    The lines had the same slope so they were perpendicular i think


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 589 ✭✭✭coolerboy


    For question 1 what was the probability I thinkvi got 9/64 but I think its wrong


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,226 ✭✭✭Liordi


    yomtea98 wrote: »
    It was.

    Which question are you talking about?
    I'm referencing when the slopes were 5/4 and - 5/4.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 225 ✭✭ECM1234


    yomtea98 wrote: »
    It was.

    No, it wasn't if it was , their slopes would be equal to -1


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,226 ✭✭✭Liordi


    coolerboy wrote: »
    For question 1 what was the probability I thinkvi got 9/64 but I think its wrong

    3/8, which is the same as 9/64. :)
    So, yeah. ^^


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 941 ✭✭✭yomtea98


    ECM1234 wrote: »
    No, it wasn't if it was , their slopes would be equal to -1

    And they were. 5 over 4 and -5 over 4 multiplied equal -1


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 589 ✭✭✭coolerboy


    Liordi wrote: »
    3/8, which is the same as 9/64. :)
    So, yeah. ^^

    Its not 3 doesnt go into 64 evenly


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 407 ✭✭Gerrymandering reborn


    Liordi wrote: »
    3/8, which is the same as 9/64. :)
    So, yeah. ^^

    Are you HIGH? 3/8 is 24/64


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,226 ✭✭✭Liordi


    yomtea98 wrote: »
    And they were. 5 over 4 and -5 over 4 multiplied equal -1

    1.25 * - 1.25 =/= -1.


Advertisement
Advertisement