Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Edge of Tomorrow (Tom Cruise, Emily Blunt, Bill Paxton!)

Options
245678

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 2,746 ✭✭✭FortuneChip


    Well colour me surprised!
    I saw the marketing tagline "A summer blockbuster... with brains" and cringed.
    Usually that means it's a bog standard blockbuster with an attempted "intellectual" twist at the end. But from the brief summaries of reviews I've read, it really does seem to be decent. Guess I'll check it out!


  • Registered Users Posts: 51,342 ✭✭✭✭That_Guy


    Was pleasantly surprised by this. A very solid film with some brilliant CGI effects. Could be trimmed down about 20 minutes but is a very (surprisingly) good film.

    Well worth a watch.


  • Registered Users Posts: 34,788 ✭✭✭✭krudler


    saw the trailer for this last night before Godzilla and it ruined a fairly big plot point, I knew the basic stuff about why Cruise is doing what he's doing but gahhh, didnt know about what was revealed in the trailer I saw. cop on marketing people!


  • Registered Users Posts: 6,026 ✭✭✭Amalgam


    Oh Krudler.. I learnt my lesson from Oblivion, stay away from the trailers..

    Off to see this in the afternoon. (Friday)


  • Registered Users Posts: 17,056 ✭✭✭✭Tusky


    Very impressed with this. It's pretty much the perfect popcorn munching blockbuster. The central plot is pretty silly, but its handled in a smart and creative way. And its visually stunning. Felt like a cross between Starship Troopers, the Matrix and Groundhog Day.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 781 ✭✭✭Cartel Mike


    No interest in this film , haven't seen probably his last half dozen films and judging from the supermarkets ive been in they seem to end up in the bargain buckets pretty fast.
    I think he needs to change it up.
    I'd like to see Cruise in a smal Indy film or as part of a strong ensemble cast or in a Cohen brothers or O'Russel film or just something different than this same old formulating blockbuster where he's the star /come promotion salesman.
    I"m not sure if it's the fact that he has no interest in doing this or if it's that certain kinds of directors just don't want him in their films cause he"s kinda one dimensional nowadays and lacks a bit of depth so they go for someone like a Christian Bale instead.
    Can't help wondering would alot of these cliche roles not work just as well with Cage or Statham or whoever...Not talking box office , just general effectiveness.


  • Registered Users Posts: 4,699 ✭✭✭Bacchus


    No interest in this film , haven't seen probably his last half dozen films and judging from the supermarkets ive been in they seem to end up in the bargain buckets pretty fast.
    I think he needs to change it up.

    You've interest in this yet you post here. You've not seen his last 6 or so movies but you think he needs to change it up.

    This isn't the right thread for this but....
    Last 6 movies...
    Tropic Thunder - a A-list comedy movie
    Knight and Day - I've not seen this, looks like a paint by numbers action flick
    Mission: Impossible 4 - excellent action thriller, one of the best in the genre
    Rock of Ages - a musical FFS!
    Jack Reacher - Pretty decent action movie
    Oblivion - Sci-fi thriller

    Ok, he's following up Oblivion with another Sci-fi thriller but he has a mix of movies in there (3 action, 1 sci-fi thriller, 1 comedy and 1 musical), not to mention a fairly diverse selection of movie going further back.

    Yes, Cruise has tended towards action flicks and has a taste for sci-fi (WotW, Minority Report, Oblivion, EoT) but by in large they are good movies. If he was making sh*t action/sci-fi movies I'd agree with you that he should go back to his Vanilla Sky, Few Good Men, Rain Man etc. days but he's not. Maybe you should try watching some of his movies instead of criticising him for making the kind of movies you're not interested in.


  • Registered Users Posts: 804 ✭✭✭doubledown


    My take -

    You have to hand it to Tom Cruise. He has had his fair share of bad PR and has endured a great deal of ridicule and criticism over the past few years but he still manages to come up with the goods when it matters. He’s one of the most successful movie stars on the planet with a very impressive body of work. It would be very easy for him to rest on his laurels and just cruise (sorry) from one formulaic film to the next, collecting monster paycheques along the way. Instead, he seems to revel in making bold choices – working with different directors, finding and developing exciting scripts, pushing the envelope in terms of storytelling and effects and, most important of all, taking risks.

    Edge of Tomorrow is no exception. It’s a cracking, intelligent, engaging and darkly comic action thriller.

    It’s also one of the best sci-fi films of the last few years.

    The set-up is straightforward enough – in the near future, an alien race (called Mimics) has invaded Earth and all-but defeated the world’s military units. Cruise plays Major William Cage, a military officer who specialises in media relations but has virtually no trigger time, who is unwittingly deployed into a massive combat mission against the aliens on the coast of France. Cage is killed within minutes, but finds himself caught in a time loop, living the same day from the same point over and over again. The catch is – Cage must die to restart each loop. And with each loop, he begins to train relentlessly to prepare himself to outwit the aliens, teaming up with Special Forces warrior Rita Vrataski (played by Emily Blunt) to try and defeat them once and for all.

    The refreshing thing about Cruise’s character is that he’s not your stereotypical, gung-ho, fearless, indestructible hero. He’s a military officer with a very cushy number who is literally thrown in at the deep end and he must dig deep and use the abundance of extra time he has been given to try and save mankind.

    Director Doug Liman (Swingers, The Bourne Identity) wastes very little time with exposition and rapidly plunges us right into the heart of a beach landing sequence to rival Saving Private Ryan. Thousands of troops land on the coast wearing impressive futuristic exoskeletons to help them fight the terrifying mimics. And we get to revisit this battlefield many times over, with Cruise and Blunt learning from their fatal mistakes and rectifying them in the next loop.

    Liman does a great job of managing the many, many time loops, showing us just what we need to see with each reset, advancing the story and the mission a little bit further each time.

    The design of the alien Mimics is very original and they are genuinely terrifying whenever they are on screen. The film, although never particularly gory, definitely pushes the boundaries for a 12A rating.

    One of the most surprising things about the film is the liberal use of humour. It has several genuine laugh-out-loud moments, most of which revolve around Cruise meeting his end in a series of darkly comic ways. He seems to be having a lot of fun here and, despite being 52, is showing no signs of letting up in the physical action stakes.

    The film boasts a strong supporting cast too. Brendan Gleeson is reliable as always as Cage’s commander. Emily Blunt does a terrific job as the battle-hardened, no-nonsense Angel of Verdun, nicknamed the “Full Metal Bitch.” And it’s great to see Bill Paxton (Aliens, The Terminator) on the big screen again, being utilised to his full potential. Between this and his recent stint on Marvel’s Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D. I hope this is the start of a career resurgence for Paxton.

    Sure, there are shades of Groundhog Day, Elysium, Source Code, Saving Private Ryan and a host of many other time travel, science fiction and war films, but Edge of Tomorrow somehow still manages to come out the other end feeling wholly original. Doug Liman has already shown that he is very adept when it comes to action (Mr. and Mrs. Smith, The Bourne Identity) but with Edge of Tomorrow he has established himself as a very credible sci-fi director too. Based on this I wouldn’t mind seeing him take on one of the Star Wars spin-off films in the next couple of years.

    There are a couple of minor plot holes here and there. The grand finale doesn’t QUITE reach the dizzying heights of the incredible beach sequences that make up much of the film’s first half. And the ending will no doubt generate much discussion and light up internet message boards with theories and opinions. But isn’t that what great movies do?

    Edge of Tomorrow is a whole lot of FUN, unlike a few recent po-faced blockbusters (I’m looking at YOU, Godzilla). See it with a large audience and enjoy.

    Highly recommended.


  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 18,145 Mod ✭✭✭✭CatFromHue


    Just back from it and enjoyed it alot.

    I do wonder how it will fare in the US as it is Europe based but that's for another day.

    Emily Blunt is very very lovely too


  • Registered Users Posts: 804 ✭✭✭doubledown


    CatFromHue wrote: »
    Just back from it and enjoyed it alot.

    I do wonder how it will fare in the US as it is Europe based but that's for another day.

    Emily Blunt is very very lovely too

    Agreed!


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 781 ✭✭✭Cartel Mike


    I've already said I"ve no interest in watching these movies ffs can't you read?
    Tell me how any of those films you mention cant accurately be loaded onto a 30 second trailer? Why should I watch them when I know exactly what their about after 3 seconds. What is he doing in these films that Jason bloody Statham cant?
    Suggest one I should watch and why should watch it.


    People like you annoy me. Please quote the orther half my post that you left in so expetedly left out and give some sort of opinion in it ffs


    This is for the the poster who quoted me above.
    (quote button didn't work sorry)


  • Registered Users Posts: 34,788 ✭✭✭✭krudler


    I've already said I"ve no interest in watching these movies ffs can't you read?
    Tell me how any of those films you mention cant accurately be loaded onto a 30 second trailer? Why should I watch them when I know exactly what their about after 3 seconds. What is he doing in these films that Jason bloody Statham cant?
    Suggest one I should watch and why should watch it.


    People like you annoy me. Please quote the orther half my post that you left in so expetedly left out and give some sort of opinion in it ffs


    This is for the the poster who quoted me above.
    (quote button didn't work sorry)

    Sure why bother watching any film when you can get a 30 sec sum up on youtube, that's some pretty silly reasoning right there.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,551 ✭✭✭Goldstein


    That's the biggest surprise in years. I'm rarely impressed by big budget science fiction but I honestly feel this is a triumph. Only watched the early trailer months ago and it might as well have beeen for a different movie. I'm trying to think of any part of it I didn't like and after mulling it over for a few hours there just isn't one. Story - great, acting - great, cast - superb (loved Bill Paxton!), action - oh ya! frantic, direction - very strong, careful thought and planning is always crucial in a looping narrative to keep things interesting and the result proves the hard work and effort was worth it, vfx - flawless, aliens - original, pacing - perfect, even the humour works. I was too busy enjoying the ride to pay much attention but I have a feeling the editing must have been superb to make this work as well as it does. Just like TNG: Cause & Effect and SG1: Window of Opportunity they follow through on the fun premise, keep advancing the story in creative ways and execute it perfectly). I think this is the best film Cruise has been in in over a decade. Oblivion was ok for what it was but this is on another level entirely, an instant classic of the genre.

    Emily Blunt is a perfect match for Cruise, they work really well together on screen, she has the presense to match his and for once she's not just a love interest defined by the male lead but owns her action hero role. The best strong sci-fi female lead since Kara Thrace.

    I watched it in 3D purely because it was showing on a much bigger screen than the 2D version but I'll go again tomorrow in 2D and could easily see myself going a third time. No issues with brightness in the 3D version but a few of the fast paced multi-layered action scenes get a little blurry / jittery so I'd go with 2D if you can get it on a big screen.


  • Registered Users Posts: 781 ✭✭✭Cartel Mike


    krudler wrote: »
    Sure why bother watching any film when you can get a 30 sec sum up on youtube, that's some pretty silly reasoning right there.


    Is it?

    I haven't seen Death race or The Mechanic ( Jason Statham) and I can tell you exacfly what those films are about ....based on a 30 sec trailer . Can't you?


  • Administrators, Computer Games Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 32,153 Admin ✭✭✭✭✭Mickeroo


    Is it?

    I haven't seen Death race or The Mechanic ( Jason Statham) and I can tell you exacfly what those films are about ....based on a 30 sec trailer . Can't you?

    That's kind of the whole point of a trailer...


  • Registered Users Posts: 781 ✭✭✭Cartel Mike


    Mickeroo wrote: »
    That's kind of the whole point of a trailer...

    Thank you


    It also tells you that it's a certain kind of film and that's it's Jason Statham being well... Jason Statham


  • Registered Users Posts: 34,788 ✭✭✭✭krudler


    What's Jason Statham got to do with this? Cruise is a good actor, he just needs to take more chances or do smaller movies, his comedic stuff in Tropic Thunder was hilarious. He is the most famous movie star in the world and he's what 53 now almost? he's probably just getting the action stuff in while he can and do less physical stuff later on his career. I would like to see him reteam with someone like Michael Mann


  • Registered Users Posts: 781 ✭✭✭Cartel Mike


    krudler wrote: »
    What's Jason Statham got to do with this? Cruise is a good actor, he just needs to take more chances or do smaller movies, his comedic stuff in Tropic Thunder was hilarious. He is the most famous movie star in the world and he's what 53 now almost? he's probably just getting the action stuff in while he can and do less physical stuff later on his career. I would like to see him reteam with someone like Michael Mann



    Tom cruise is decent actor.There are hundreds of great actors and alot of better actors.He probably is the most famous actor on the planet cause he literally tirelessly travels the entire planet to promote his latest summer action 'blockbuster' , he's an old fashioned movie star who now plays old fashioned roles.
    The formula now is tiresome , I can't even remember when the last time he was even nominated for anything , yet in mind actually win anything and Its not as if he 's ever actually made an Oscar winning performance compared to actors who have won an actual Oscar. You don't get Oscars for making money .
    I"m glad you like his films cause I have to say I think i alot of his recent roles don't require much acting as dar as i can make out.

    I think Its a safe bet bis next role will be simiar to this one.


  • Registered Users Posts: 6,026 ✭✭✭Amalgam


    Visually impressive, yet overall quite a reserved film, in how it rolled itself out, to the viewer. Didn't presume you were a feckin' eejit.

    Krudler is right though, some of the speech between characters is far too revealing in one of the trailers. A pity. I knew I had spoiled things for myself when I watched it.

    Very enjoyable. City centre cinema wanted €14 a ticket, I made my way out to the suburbs (IMC) and watched the last Friday show in a loosely packed cinema.


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,307 ✭✭✭weiland79


    Amalgam wrote: »
    City centre cinema wanted €14 a ticket, I made my way out to the suburbs (IMC) and watched the last Friday show in a loosely packed cinema.

    14 quid, really?
    name and shame!


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,464 ✭✭✭e_e


    99.99999999999999% sure that was Cineworld.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,899 ✭✭✭Paddy@CIRL


    Just back from this, not a huge Cruise fan but loved every minute of it. Superb!


  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Entertainment Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Regional East Moderators Posts: 18,219 CMod ✭✭✭✭The Black Oil


    My first 3D experience. It was IMAX 3D - and I think the medium give me a touch of a headache.

    We begin with global instability, the PR side of the conflict and then frontline, or the main story. There's a touch of the familiar, this isn't necessarily a bad thing. The enemy are unpleasant, resource hogging little feckers. Cruise's character is not an indestructible one man army. To begin with, he's quite green, at least prior to his Matrix style training. This is in contrast to Emily Blunt (lovely) who is tough, smart, experienced and ballsy, plus, I'd trust her behind the wheel.

    Overall, I enjoyed this - it moves along pretty well, the story advances a little each time. There was a point where I felt it had outstayed its welcome a little bit - spoiler ink on
    the Paris side of things.
    Hence as someone mentioned the execution of finale doesn't perhaps quite live up to what's gone before, but Cruise and Blunt work well together and there's a few dashes of humour thrown into the mix, also.


  • Registered Users Posts: 4,216 ✭✭✭Looper007


    Got to say it was Tom Cruise best blockbuster in a while, although I taught Jack Reacher is underrated gem. Loved Emily Blunt, has she ever been as hot then in this, I think she's so under used so far in Hollywood but in this she rocked. Loved that Cruise character was a bit of ass at the start of the film, the whole reliving the moment over had some dark wicked funny moments. Bill Paxton and Brendan Gleeson cameo's are always welcome. I agree with The Black Oil that
    The Paris section was a little blockbuster by the numbers
    but nothing that took away from the film.

    got to say Tom Cruise on his day is a excellent actor, he hasn't took risks in a while like he did in his earlier career. Rain Man (he's better then Dustin Hoffman) and Born on the 4th of July were top performances. Jerry Maguire and Magnolia were great performances too. He's great when he plays flawed characters.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 990 ✭✭✭timetogo


    Saw this today. Add me to the list of people that really enjoyed it.
    I don't think there was a lull at all in the movie and it was funnier than I was expecting.

    One thing that annoyed me (and this wasn't the movies fault) is that I'd seen the long trailer that was released last week and that fairly exhaustively covers the first half of the movie.

    The film isn't going to do well though. My local cinema (Swords) is only showing it in 3D and because my missus can't see 3D I looked for an alternative. It doesn't have many showings in most cinemas. It's a pity as I'd say it'd get some traction from word of mouth.

    Overall one of the better movies of the year.


  • Registered Users Posts: 617 ✭✭✭arch_stanton


    Saw it yesterday and really enjoyed it though I'm still not entirely sure I understood the end correctly.

    Great to see Bill Paxton again. I must watch Frailty again. It's an excellent horror/suspense film he directed, staring Matthew McConnaughy before his rom-com days. Hopefully it's on Netflix somewhere.

    Box office wise it seems to have gotten off to a bad start. It took only $20m internationally over the weekend. Admittedly it was an off peak show at noon when I saw it, but there were only 2 of us in a 240 seat screen. It's on every bus stop in madrid and one of the top tv shows moved their entire studio to London last week for an hour long special with Cruise and Blunt.


  • Registered Users Posts: 6,028 ✭✭✭Mike Litoris


    Wow that was fantastic! Apart from Prometheus I haven't enjoyed a Sci Fi movie this much since the 80's.


    Only niggles for me are I thought the CGI was average, Gleeson didn't suit the role, the pacing towards the end became erratic and ruined the flow somewhat plus the end wasn't dark enough imo. That aside it was clever, funny, Cruise didn't play himself and was great to watch, the supporting cast were great especially Paxton and the pacing was great apart a couple of scenes.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 25,953 ✭✭✭✭kryogen


    Tom cruise is decent actor.There are hundreds of great actors and alot of better actors.He probably is the most famous actor on the planet cause he literally tirelessly travels the entire planet to promote his latest summer action 'blockbuster' , he's an old fashioned movie star who now plays old fashioned roles.
    The formula now is tiresome , I can't even remember when the last time he was even nominated for anything , yet in mind actually win anything and Its not as if he 's ever actually made an Oscar winning performance compared to actors who have won an actual Oscar. You don't get Oscars for making money .
    I"m glad you like his films cause I have to say I think i alot of his recent roles don't require much acting as dar as i can make out.
    I think Its a safe bet bis next role will be simiar to this one.

    Born. On. The. Fourth. Of. July.
    A Few Good Men
    Interview with The Vampire
    Jerry Maguire
    Magnolia
    Collateral
    Top Gun!
    Mission: Impossible
    Vanilla Sky

    Some excellent performances in that pile, you can argue a few of them alright and it would just come down to personal preference, but some Oscar worthy performances in there for sure.

    He is a great actor with a great range, he is making some stuff that he wants to make right now, he is 51 years of age let him at it. Fluff pieces have not tainted the reputations and legacies of guys like De Niro and Pacino, they should not take away from Cruise either


  • Registered Users Posts: 34,788 ✭✭✭✭krudler


    Cruise outacted Dustin Hoffman in Rain Man too, played the much more difficult role.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 1,899 ✭✭✭Paddy@CIRL


    With regards the ending...
    When he woke up on the helicopter, I thought for a moment that when the Omega absorbed him, it used him to reset the timeline and it was back to square one again but this time with even more knowledge of the humans assault and thus rendering the Mimics unbeatable. That would have been very, very dark.


Advertisement