Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Sky introduce new encryption system to combat piracy (HD Channels have began switch)

1356789

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,089 ✭✭✭radiowaves


    irishfeen wrote: »
    Yeah but radio it is as we have seen happening already so the 12 days before the WC (without any major sport events) would be the perfect time to do it - and of course sky sports news would be safe guarded from any potential mishaps well in advance.

    I haven't said it won't happen mate - I'm questioning the logic of them using the World Cup in particular as a cutting off point :)

    I'm also questioning why people would just read some guesswork on an internet forum and start quoting it as if it might have some basis in fact. Did the original source give any reason for their citation. Did they have an inside source?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,787 ✭✭✭hallo dare


    radiowaves wrote: »
    :confused:

    What sort of a response is that?

    I think you need to chill - and I'm certainly not your son :p

    You really should have read the thread anyway!

    As I said, is there any point in just repeating something you saw mentioned somewhere without giving any reasoning for it? Did you question it at all before posting?

    What I'm doing is giving the reasoning against it - and that's your comeback?

    :D

    No point in even posting here when there's a fool like you. Hope it actually does happen before the world cup now, if for nothing else but to take your ego down a peg or 2.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,069 ✭✭✭irishfeen


    radiowaves wrote: »
    I haven't said it won't happen mate - I'm questioning the logic of them using the World Cup in particular as a cutting off point :)

    I'm also questioning why people would just read some guesswork on an internet forum and start quoting it as if it might have some basis in fact. Did the original source give any reason for their citation. Did they have an inside source?
    Could very well be inside sources as sky is a massive organisation and tbh sky probably aren't keeping it majorly on the DL - time will tell but one thing is certain, they will all be on the new system come Premier League kick off in August.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,089 ✭✭✭radiowaves


    hallo dare wrote: »
    No point in even posting here when there's a fool like you. Hope it actually does happen before the world cup now, if for nothing else but to take your ego down a peg or 2.

    I must admit, you've made me smile.

    Give me one good reason why Sky would actually use the World Cup as a cut-off point?

    I've given you a couple why there is no logical basis to this assumption.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,787 ✭✭✭hallo dare


    radiowaves wrote: »
    I must admit, you've made me smile.

    Give me one good reason why Sky would actually use the World Cup as a cut-off point?

    I've given you a couple why there is no logical basis to this assumption.

    You really are failing to see what i commented! I finished with "however true that is", i wasn't stating that it would happen.

    Can't be bothered conversing with you.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,089 ✭✭✭radiowaves


    irishfeen wrote: »
    Could very well be inside sources as sky is a massive organisation and tbh sky probably aren't keeping it majorly on the DL - time will tell but one thing is certain, they will all be on the new system come Premier League kick off in August.

    That's what I'm questioning. Did this source even mention inside knowledge? Maybe somebody could post the actual quote here so that a judgement can be made?

    But, as I said, anybody can say anything on an internet board and have others quoting it as if there is some basis in it (and to be fair to you Irishfeen you have given a reason why you think there might be something in it).

    Now, Sky using the new Premier League season as a cut-off point - that does make sense.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,787 ✭✭✭hallo dare


    radiowaves wrote: »
    I must admit, you've made me smile.

    Give me one good reason why Sky would actually use the World Cup as a cut-off point?

    I've given you a couple why there is no logical basis to this assumption.

    You really are failing to see what i commented! I finished with "however true that is", i wasn't stating that it would happen.

    Can't be bothered conversing with you.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,069 ✭✭✭irishfeen


    radiowaves wrote: »
    That's what I'm questioning. Did this source even mention inside knowledge? Maybe somebody could post the actual quote here so that a judgement can be made?

    But, as I said, anybody can say anything on an internet board and have others quoting it as if there is some basis in it (and to be fair to you Irishfeen you have given a reason why you think there might be something in it).

    Now, Sky using the new Premier League season as a cut-off point - that does make sense.
    Ha radio with all due respect I think you being a tad hard on hallo dare - with such a system very few even inside sky will probably know the exact day the channels will be switched over (because its contantly changing) but "Before the WC" could be used as a date to give everyone a bit of breathing space either way but that's the date all channels are due to be done and dusted.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,089 ✭✭✭radiowaves


    hallo dare wrote: »
    You really are failing to see what i commented! I finished with "however true that is", i wasn't stating that it would happen.

    Can't be bothered conversing with you.

    And yet that's what you're doing :P

    I'm questioning why you even mentioned it?

    Do you go around internet boards picking out titbits of information and just posting them on other boards without even questioning the logic behind what you're quoting?

    This is the real problem right there - I doubt if anyone really knows what Sky are thinking or planning.

    I notice no channels have gone down this week (so far). There could be any number of reasons why that is but could it mean they've ran into problems? Or could it mean they'll all go in one fell swoop in the nxt couple of weeks.

    We'll wait and see but if it happens before the World Cup I believe that has got to be a coincidence because, I repeat, they will not be carrying the World Cup on any of their own channels and the HD channels on their platform that are showing the matches are free to air.

    How it is egotistical to have and state that belief I'm not really sure but there you go :)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,089 ✭✭✭radiowaves


    irishfeen wrote: »
    Ha radio with all due respect I think you being a tad hard on hallo dare - with such a system very few even inside sky will probably know the exact day the channels will be switched over (because its contantly changing) but "Before the WC" could be used as a date to give everyone a bit of breathing space either way but that's the date all channels are due to be done and dusted.

    Again Irishfeen you're at least giving some reasoning behind why you believe the statement might be correct - although I'd still like to know what it is about the original post that has people believing there's something in it and it's not just guesswork on the part of the OP.

    In return I'm giving the reasoning why I believe it is not correct.

    I really don't know why some people get so worked up about others who hold opinions that differ from their own without resorting to abuse.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,787 ✭✭✭hallo dare


    radiowaves wrote: »
    Again Irishfeen you're at least giving some reasoning behind why you believe the statement might be correct - although I'd still like to know what it is about the original post that has people believing there's something in it and it's not just guesswork on the part of the OP.

    In return I'm giving the reasoning why I believe it is not correct.

    I really don't know why some people get so worked up about others who hold opinions that differ from their own without resorting to abuse.

    Exactly, maybe you should read and abide by what you just said.

    Night, night!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,089 ✭✭✭radiowaves


    hallo dare wrote: »
    Exactly, maybe you should read and abide by what you just said.

    Night, night!

    Still conversing with me then?

    You are extremely sensitive to react the way you have just because somebody questioned what you posted.

    And you still haven't actually given a reason why you posted it (beyond you read it somewhere else) :)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,172 ✭✭✭Zardoz


    Is there not some European law which states something to the effect that CAMs have to be made available separately for pay TV services ?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 39 gg69me


    Lets call a spade a spade here , sky are greedy bastards with their high prices when people are trying to make ends meet and struggling to pay bills and people will always look for cheaper alternatives to get the sky chns as sky have nearly every sporting event sewn up now , they are even getting their hands on the GAA now thanks to the greed of the GAA aswell and their pathetic excuse of catering for the irish abroad which is fine but let the matches run on our own terrestrial chns at the same time and that way everybody is happy so the short and the long of it is if sky had reasonable prices for their service then maybe people wouldnt go to the hassle of streaming and card sharing and if i can get cheap sources elsewhere i will use them and not feel one bit guilty either...dont get me started...


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,837 ✭✭✭same ol sh1te


    gg69me wrote: »
    Lets call a spade a spade here , sky are greedy bastards with their high prices when people are trying to make ends meet and struggling to pay bills and people will always look for cheaper alternatives to get the sky chns as sky have nearly every sporting event sewn up now , they are even getting their hands on the GAA now thanks to the greed of the GAA aswell and their pathetic excuse of catering for the irish abroad which is fine but let the matches run on our own terrestrial chns at the same time and that way everybody is happy so the short and the long of it is if sky had reasonable prices for their service then maybe people wouldnt go to the hassle of streaming and card sharing and if i can get cheap sources elsewhere i will use them and not feel one bit guilty either...dont get me started...

    The GAA went with Sky because they were afraid they'd not get paid at all when TV3 go bust. Sky didn't outbid TV3, nor did the GAA get greedy


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 39 gg69me


    you are right , the GAA didnt get greedy , they were always greedy , only for the great skill involved in hurling the gaa would be finished as nobody could afford to go to the intercounty matches never mind the all ireland final and all the money they get from the concerts in croke park and now they want the people in the country old and young alike to pay sky to watch the best sport in the world and our national game and try and justify it with feeble excuses , anyway lets not go off topic here too much as all i am interested in is cheap or free sports chns , check out xbmc its free....


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Read on another forum that a cam has been made that will work with the new encrption.

    Obviously Cams dont allow pirates to share but for those of us who hate the SKY box and have nice VU+`s, hopefully is an alternative to not being able to use our boxes.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,331 ✭✭✭MrFrisp


    I hate to say it but I think this Thread could be heading for locking.

    I'd love it to stay open as I always think there could be a good discussion about the subject, without going into how it could be used for the wrong reasons.

    But I think over the last few posts, some of the limits that this Thread can work within to stay open are being pushed to the brink.

    :(
    .


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    MrFrisp wrote: »
    I hate to say it but I think this Thread could be heading for locking.

    I'd love it to stay open as I always think there could be a good discussion about the subject, without going into how it could be used for the wrong reasons.

    But I think over the last few posts, some of the limits that this Thread can work within to stay open are being pushed to the brink.

    :(
    .

    Why do you think that?

    As long as people dont discuss Sea Lions and how to illegally obtain encrypted channels then nothing has been broken.

    Using your Sky card in another box with a CAM is perfectly legal under EU law, Using boxes such as dreamboxes is perfectly legal providing you dont use it for illegal means to obtain encrpted channels.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,331 ✭✭✭MrFrisp


    Why do you think that?

    As long as people dont discuss Sea Lions and how to illegally obtain encrypted channels then nothing has been broken.

    Using your Sky card in another box with a CAM is perfectly legal under EU law, Using boxes such as dreamboxes is perfectly legal providing you dont use it for illegal means to obtain encrpted channels.



    Cool...Thanks for that.

    I thought once CAMS were mentioned it was going to start going down hill.

    Glad it's been cleared up. :D
    .


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,172 ✭✭✭Zardoz


    gg69me wrote: »
    Lets call a spade a spade here , sky are greedy bastards with their high prices when people are trying to make ends meet and struggling to pay bills and people

    The sad thing is that the price is going to keep on increasing .
    Its already at ludicrous levels due to the vast amounts of subscribers money required to pay for the EPL rights.

    Sky paid an increase of 70% for their recent 3 year Premier League rights deal over the existing deal.

    The Premier league now want to bring forward the auction date for the next 3 years of rights.
    The rights on the block will cover three Premier League seasons, beginning with the 2016-17 campaign.

    It is understood that the Premier League has informally suggested BSkyB and BT would be invited to bid as early as this December rather than after the end of the next football season in June 2015.

    It wouldn’t benefit the Premier League in the sense they would actually get the money any earlier but the question is whether they can strike while the iron is hot. The whole sports rights market is fairly hot at the moment. and it looks more like commercial opportunism than anything else.:mad:


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 498 ✭✭Mallagio


    Nothing changing with the encryption as such, just a new way of pairing the HD channels.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,519 ✭✭✭galtee boy


    gg69me wrote: »
    Lets call a spade a spade here , sky are greedy bastards with their high prices when people are trying to make ends meet and struggling to pay bills and people will always look for cheaper alternatives to get the sky chns as sky have nearly every sporting event sewn up now , they are even getting their hands on the GAA now thanks to the greed of the GAA aswell and their pathetic excuse of catering for the irish abroad which is fine but let the matches run on our own terrestrial chns at the same time and that way everybody is happy so the short and the long of it is if sky had reasonable prices for their service then maybe people wouldnt go to the hassle of streaming and card sharing and if i can get cheap sources elsewhere i will use them and not feel one bit guilty either...dont get me started...

    Sky are a business and a very successful one at that. They will charge whatever people are willing to pay. If you feel they are "greedy bastards" don't subscribe to them. I'm sure you are well aware, that Saorview and Freesat will give you all Irish and UK channels and hundreds more for free, after initial set up costs. In this current economic climate, subscription TV, be it from Sky or UPC is a luxury, not a necessity and for those who can afford it, enjoy it, and for those who can't afford it, Saorview and Freesat is damn good free alternative. And Sky are perfectly entitled to protect their services and channels in whatever way they see fit. Those who are paying Sky are entitled to know that all efforts are being made to stop freeloaders from pirating their channels.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,178 ✭✭✭STB


    MrFrisp wrote: »
    Cool...Thanks for that.

    I thought once CAMS were mentioned it was going to start going down hill.

    Glad it's been cleared up. :D
    .

    The CAMS are the CI+ modules. CI+ allows the protection of the encyption not been broken outside the proprietary box. They are used in Germany by Kabel Deutchsland who also use NDS. You need a compliant CI+ device for them to work.

    309080.JPG

    But it doesnt mean Sky will allow/faciliate them be used. Remember their proprietary boxes are meant to hypnotise you with their cant leave ever GUI. :)


  • Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 12,336 Mod ✭✭✭✭icdg


    Using your Sky card in another box with a CAM is perfectly legal under EU law

    but is against the terms and conditions of Sky services. and when you signed your contract with BSkyB you made a legal agreement that if they provided you with a service you wouldn't use anything other than a Sky Digibox to recieve that service.

    I AM watching this thread, so no discussing how to recieve pirated services please


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,178 ✭✭✭STB


    Yes it is of course against the T&C of a subscribers agreement with Sky.

    It raises the question, will Sky ever offer the possibility of using a compliant module to its subscribers ? The answer is most likely, no.
    Why though?

    Control. They dont want people accessing their content any other way other than how they present it. They also make a lot of money out of EPG positioning.

    To put exactly how serious Sky are about what one can and cannot do with its channels and how they are packaged and presented one only has to look at TopupTV's story.

    Topup TV which was a add on to the Freeview platform in the UK had to jump through hoops to get Sky Sport 1 & 2 on the Freeview Platform through CI+ when the must offer wholesale rule was applied to Sky through an Ofcom ruling, meaning they had to unbundle those channels to competitors. Sky had long maintained that the security implications prevented them to do so. With the advent of CI+, there was nowhere to hide. They still made it difficult for TopupTV with only a small number of CI+ compliant TV's actually approved to accept the CI+ module. Ultimately Sky bought that group's subscriber base, the unbundled Sky Sports Channels were dropped as an option on the platform and TopupTV ceased to exist at the end of last year.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,543 ✭✭✭✭machiavellianme


    icdg wrote: »
    but is against the terms and conditions of Sky services. and when you signed your contract with BSkyB you made a legal agreement that if they provided you with a service you wouldn't use anything other than a Sky Digibox to recieve that service.

    I AM watching this thread, so no discussing how to recieve pirated services please

    Does that include after you go out of contract? I pay for Sky but my HD box has seen better days. I was thinking of going the non-Sky box route for a replacement so I could swap out my TNTSAT and Sky cards as required (if I can source a suitable box with diseqc).

    I still don't understand why we continue to be forced to take Sky software updates on hardware that we own. On android, windows, OS, at least we can choose if we want to receive an update. I liked the previous EPG but cant stand the new one, yet I have no choice.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,461 ✭✭✭✭watty


    Does that include after you go out of contract? I pay for Sky but my HD box has seen better days. I was thinking of going the non-Sky box route for a replacement so I could swap out my TNTSAT and Sky cards as required (if I can source a suitable box with diseqc).

    You only have a working Sky Card if you have a contract. If you have a Sky Card only use it in a Sky Box. If you are long term customer they often will replace a dead box for free.

    You own the physical box, cables and dish. You don't own the viewing card or software.

    Over 10 years ago a 1 year Sky contract was a cheap way to get a Sat box and install. Now if you only want Free to Air, a Sky Box is pointless.

    I have still one old Sky box used for Radio in Bedroom (a free Sky replacement) without Contract. For Living room I use Freesat HD box. For "hobby" use I have a cheap generic box (less than 2 months Sky Sub) which can use either Motorised Dish or a setup with four LNBFs.

    I also have a PC with 2 x DVB-S2 PCI cards using DVBviewer with MHEG5 plugin option and fed also from four x LNBFs.

    By all means get a fancy box for FTA / Hobby / Media. But if you have a Sky Sub only use the card in the Sky Box. It's not criminal to use it in another box as long as you don't "share" (that is criminal, not just copyright). But using a Sky card outside of your Sky Box, Sky are entitled to kill it for breach of contract. It may stop working anyway.

    No Contract = Sky Card doesn't Work. Use a non-Sky box.
    Working Sky Card = Contract only. By using it you are agreeing to contract, only use in Sky Box or it may fail or you can face Sky penalties. Sky will "cheaply" or "free" replace boxes on long term customers.


    You do own Sky Hardware (except card) from DAY 1 of Contract. You are NOT out of contract after a year. You are only out of Contract when you have no Subscription. Every NEW Contract or Contract Renewal or free box replacement will have a minimum period before you can cancel. You are NOT out of Contract after this period. The Contract ONLY ends when you get Sky to agree to cancel subscription.

    Sky is a Pay TV service. They don't own any Satellite(s) either. To make the service work your box MUST automatically accept updates. It's not the same scenario as mobile phone. The reason you own the box and dish is that is suits Sky's accounting better than Cable TV company where you NEVER own the box (Cable or MMDS). In essence the Sky box is pretty crippled without a subscription (no recording or even playback) and today is pointless without a subscription.


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    icdg wrote: »
    but is against the terms and conditions of Sky services. and when you signed your contract with BSkyB you made a legal agreement that if they provided you with a service you wouldn't use anything other than a Sky Digibox to recieve that service.

    I AM watching this thread, so no discussing how to recieve pirated services please

    Id imagine EU law trumps SKY.

    Its just a case of waiting for someone to sue SKY in the European courts.


  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 12,336 Mod ✭✭✭✭icdg


    Does that include after you go out of contract?

    You are bound by your contract until you give notice to Sky that you are cancelling it, and that notice period then expires. Of course, that means they will no longer supply you with pay-TV services, so the question of needing the viewing card becomes moot.

    What most people refer "out of contract" really is that the minimum period that you must stay with them before you are allowed to cancel without penalty has expired. But your contract remains in place whilst you receive a service, you are just in a position that you can cancel without penalty.

    EDIT: Of course, Watty's pointed all this out a few posts back :-)


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement