Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
If we do not hit our goal we will be forced to close the site.

Current status: https://keepboardsalive.com/

Annual subs are best for most impact. If you are still undecided on going Ad Free - you can also donate using the Paypal Donate option. All contribution helps. Thank you.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Maybe another?

1…101112131416»

Comments

  • #452
    jukebox2310
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 315 ✭✭jukebox2310


    Believe it or not I'm a Gunner. And going to manage Spurs ........
    Just think Utd won't be as bad again but as I said its there to be torn apart. .


  • #453
    GT_TDI_150
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,917 ✭✭✭✭GT_TDI_150


    jukebox2310 wrote: »
    Believe it or not I'm a Gunner. And going to manage Spurs ........
    Just think Utd won't be as bad again but as I said its there to be torn apart. .

    ooh traitor ... :p


  • #454
    jukebox2310
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 315 ✭✭jukebox2310


    I know. Just trying to foster relations in North London after the damage Jack Wilshere did :-)


  • #455
    KERSPLAT!
    Closed Accounts Posts: 31,152 ✭✭✭✭KERSPLAT!


    Burlap_sack will take united :)


  • #456
    jukebox2310
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 315 ✭✭jukebox2310


    Think 3 teams in Division 1 will be hardest to get people to take so if anyone has other ideas throw them out.


  • Advertisement
  • #457
    KERSPLAT!
    Closed Accounts Posts: 31,152 ✭✭✭✭KERSPLAT!


    Throw in teams with decent youth/prospects


  • #458
    Colemania
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,125 ✭✭✭Colemania


    KERSPLAT! wrote: »
    Throw in teams with decent youth/prospects

    Psv and/or Ajax?


  • #459
    KERSPLAT!
    Closed Accounts Posts: 31,152 ✭✭✭✭KERSPLAT!


    Ah I dunno. This is getting way too complicated. I'll set the league up later and decide on the settings then. The only outside rule is max 50 players after one season. Meaning get your squad below 50 by the first game of the second season or you're banned from transfers with other managers


  • #460
    GT_TDI_150
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,917 ✭✭✭✭GT_TDI_150


    KERSPLAT! wrote: »
    Burlap_sack will take united :)
    Noooooooooooooo .... no hope of getting Januzaj now :(


  • #461
    Wilberto
    Moderators, Computer Games Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators Posts: 8,583 Mod ✭✭✭✭Wilberto


    Instead of Malmo, Teplice, & Hibs, they should be relatively known teams like Cardiff, Leicester, QPR, Burnley, Nottingham Forest, Fulham, Twente, Club Brugges, etc. I mean, who the hell is going to want to take over Teplice?!


  • Advertisement
  • #462
    Al Capwned
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,721 ✭✭✭Al Capwned


    The whole point of the random draw at the start has been completely negated with all the swapping of teams.
    I would have preferred to have seen the divisions left as they are, especially when I logged on just now to see that I was in Division 3, then 2, then proposed to be in 1. The whole aim of this GW for me, especially after I was drawn in D3, was to see how far I could bring AZ, not to see how far they'd drop before I could stop it.

    I was happy with the original random draw, and it seems people have changed and swapped to suit themselves. Not giving out about it, just what was the point of a random draw?


  • #463
    Wilberto
    Moderators, Computer Games Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators Posts: 8,583 Mod ✭✭✭✭Wilberto


    Al Capwned wrote: »
    The whole point of the random draw at the start has been completely negated with all the swapping of teams.
    I would have preferred to have seen the divisions left as they are, especially when I logged on just now to see that I was in Division 3, then 2, then proposed to be in 1. The whole aim of this GW for me, especially after I was drawn in D3, was to see how far I could bring AZ, not to see how far they'd drop before I could stop it.

    I was happy with the original random draw, and it seems people have changed and swapped to suit themselves. Not giving out about it, just what was the point of a random draw?

    Apparently there was none! It was just a proposal anyway. Personally I'm the same as you and would have preferred to start in D3 but I think that can be said for almost every manager on here.

    The divisions themselves now are relatively competitive so if you want to start a campaign to swap D1 and D3 then go ahead! :D


  • #464
    GT_TDI_150
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,917 ✭✭✭✭GT_TDI_150


    Wilberto wrote: »
    Apparently there was none! It was just a proposal anyway. Personally I'm the same as you and would have preferred to start in D3 but I think that can be said for almost every manager on here.

    The divisions themselves now are relatively competitive so if you want to start a campaign to swap D1 and D3 then go ahead! :D

    Id take either list of divisions really... but once a few swaps were done it started leaving big teams 'isolated' in d1 or smaller teams 'isolated' in the sharkpit that D3 became


Advertisement