Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Bunkers...... damed Bunkers

  • 22-05-2014 10:41AM
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,181 ✭✭✭


    what is the story with all the bunkers these days,
    it seems that with the man power on golf courses these days that the poor bunkers are only getting a quick look at.

    been playing a few courses now this year and the bunkers have been dreadfull.

    Yes I know if I good enough I shouldnt be in one, but I should at least have some level of consistency on every course.


Comments

  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 18,888 Mod ✭✭✭✭slave1


    Agreed, USPGA standard bunkers should have a consistent depth of fairway and greenside bunkers, I think something like 2-4 and 4-6 inches but not sure which level applies to which bunker group.
    Nothing worse that no sand and a flyer


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 661 ✭✭✭Norfolk Enchants_


    cgh wrote: »
    what is the story with all the bunkers these days,
    it seems that with the man power on golf courses these days that the poor bunkers are only getting a quick look at.

    been playing a few courses now this year and the bunkers have been dreadfull.

    Yes I know if I good enough I shouldnt be in one, but I should at least have some level of consistency on every course.
    You're going to have to be a bit more specific about which course and what exactly is the state of the bunkers, although by the sounds of it I would suggest it has more to do with the quaility of the course you're playing and also you're probably not taking into consideration current/recent weather events.
    In my experience (and I play alot of golf 2/3 rounds a week on different courses), "poor bunkers" are few and far between and often it's a case of the golfer misdiagnosing damp compact sand as no sand at all.
    When you bare in mind that we play in a relatively wet environment it remains extraordinary how many regular golfers are unable to make that distinction and are then also unable to adjust their swing/shot selection to take account of that fact.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 634 ✭✭✭gman127


    Surely when you take your stance and start to shuffle your feet into the sand you'll have a decent feel for the sand depth and adjust accordingly.

    I also find most bunkers to be ok but some do lack sand depth. In that case I play closer to a pitch out rather than a sand splash.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,920 ✭✭✭alxmorgan


    gman127 wrote: »
    Surely when you take your stance and start to shuffle your feet into the sand you'll have a decent feel for the sand depth and adjust accordingly.

    I also find most bunkers to be ok but some do lack sand depth. In that case I play closer to a pitch out rather than a sand splash.

    True but surely they should be consistent in the first place ?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 826 ✭✭✭geeksauce


    alxmorgan wrote: »
    True but surely they should be consistent in the first place ?

    I agree consistency should be essential in relation to bunkers. Was in one on the 13th the other day and it was like concrete, hardly any sand at all when I took the shot, then on the 18th I was in another and there was enough sand to fill ten bunkers. Very annoying.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,646 ✭✭✭Webbs


    I know I will be in the minority here, I am as disappointed as the next guy when my ball is in a footmark etc, but the bunker is designated a hazard after all, and I think that as such it should be a bit down to luck as to your lie etc.

    Again the pro/PGA game has a lot to answer for in demanding perfect pristine consistent bunkers. How many pros say they prefer to be in a bunker than a greenside lie - that to me is not a hazard


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,642 ✭✭✭newport2


    Webbs wrote: »
    I know I will be in the minority here, I am as disappointed as the next guy when my ball is in a footmark etc, but the bunker is designated a hazard after all, and I think that as such it should be a bit down to luck as to your lie etc.

    Again the pro/PGA game has a lot to answer for in demanding perfect pristine consistent bunkers. How many pros say they prefer to be in a bunker than a greenside lie - that to me is not a hazard

    Very true. They were all whinging when Jack Nicklaus had grids raked into the bunkers at his event, leaving you only a 50/50 chance of getting a good lie. IMO, it should be like this at all events. They're good enough, and like you say, bunkers are a hazard, not a safety net.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,181 ✭✭✭cgh


    Played in Hollywood lakes yesterday, it was wet and the Bunkers were nicely raked and full of sand.
    I even ended up in a footprint, where the bunker hadnt been raked. plenty pf sand still under the ball.
    have to say very impressed with the quality of the Bunkers there.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 661 ✭✭✭thewing


    The recent weather has made them play like concrete.

    In this case, use your pitching wedge and ball forward in stance.

    Joys of irish golf


Advertisement
Advertisement