Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

LOI 2014 Thread

1181921232453

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,597 ✭✭✭dan1895


    overshoot wrote: »
    in fairness the coleman deal is always said as £60k but its a few hundred thousand at this stage with appearance/international clauses and so on, still a bargain for everton though.

    on the friendly, i wouldnt bet on it, went to the sligo friendly they had tied to colemans move, coleman played 10mins, Shane Duffy played, everyone else came from reserves/underage... basically unheard of, so put in a bring the first team clause ;) their fans around me left feeling quite pissed off, not that sligo would care, decent crowd so got the money and they won easy

    Ah I don't give a toss who plays, just wanna go on the lash in Tolka with my scouse cousins and uncles.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,980 ✭✭✭✭Gavin "shels"


    overshoot wrote: »
    in fairness the coleman deal is always said as £60k but its a few hundred thousand at this stage with appearance/international clauses and so on, still a bargain for everton though.

    on the friendly, i wouldnt bet on it, went to the sligo friendly they had tied to colemans move, coleman played 10mins, Shane Duffy played, everyone else came from reserves/underage... basically unheard of, so put in a bring the first team clause ;) their fans around me left feeling quite pissed off, not that sligo would care, decent crowd so got the money and they won easy

    The Board/Jonny Mc have had this deal on their plate since February, they're going to make sure it's done right as it will be our first fee for a player in years.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,587 ✭✭✭✭Oat23


    I love Dermot Keely.

    42,000 morons :pac:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,980 ✭✭✭✭Gavin "shels"


    Dermot Keelys quotes back in 2007 with us were quality, this is up another level!


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 4,719 ✭✭✭dundalkfc10


    This is top TV


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,069 ✭✭✭kksaints


    That was entertaining!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,587 ✭✭✭✭Oat23


    What a terrible decision to give an offside against Brennan.

    OPaL4T5.jpg


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,069 ✭✭✭kksaints


    Its been said before but the referee and lino quality is so low its worrying.

    Russell and Zayed goals were crackers this week.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 4,719 ✭✭✭dundalkfc10


    Oat23 wrote: »
    What a terrible decision to give an offside against Brennan.

    OPaL4T5.jpg

    At least 3 or 4 not only bad, but shocking decisions every week


  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 15,754 Mod ✭✭✭✭dfx-


    In that image, the UCD player is off the pitch, where Brennan is in relation to the UCD player in front of the keeper...hard to tell.....


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,587 ✭✭✭✭Oat23


    dfx- wrote: »
    In that image, the UCD player is off the pitch, where Brennan is in relation to the UCD player in front of the keeper...hard to tell.....

    Does him being off the pitch matter? He wasn't off injured, he fell out right before the pass. That would mean a defender could just jump off the pitch at any time to get an offside call, no?

    The defender in front of the keeper wasn't playing him on BTW.


  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 15,754 Mod ✭✭✭✭dfx-


    From what I remember, the law/rule states specifically to deliberate actions - such as stepping off the field to catch someone offside, but here that doesn't seem to fit.

    Either way, it's not a shocking decision by LOI standards. You wouldn't be campaigning for Hancock to return.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 172 ✭✭Garrigai


    simonw wrote: »
    We had them over for a friendly in Dalymount 3 years ago, reasonable team out from them. All I really remember of it was Fellaini broke Keith Buckley's nose with one of his then world famous wild elbows when jumping for a header. Bisto scored against Tim Howard, and your man Vellios looked like a wonderkid.

    http://www.liverpoolecho.co.uk/sport/football/football-news/bohemians-1-everton-fc-1-3367828

    EDIT: looking at that match report looks like most of the first team squad got some minutes


    That friendly was played after the London riots and Everton were due to be playing Spurs and wanted game time as it was early season. Fellaini was brutal that day.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,818 ✭✭✭Bateman


    Do they just moan about officials on that programme?

    People need to get over the refereeing thing, it's excuse-making at its finest, particularly in Heary's case.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,587 ✭✭✭✭Oat23


    dfx- wrote: »
    From what I remember, the law/rule states specifically to deliberate actions - such as stepping off the field to catch someone offside, but here that doesn't seem to fit.

    Never knew that!


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,746 ✭✭✭AgileMyth


    overshoot wrote: »
    in fairness the coleman deal is always said as £60k but its a few hundred thousand at this stage with appearance/international clauses and so on, still a bargain for everton though.

    on the friendly, i wouldnt bet on it, went to the sligo friendly they had tied to colemans move, coleman played 10mins, Shane Duffy played, everyone else came from reserves/underage... basically unheard of, so put in a bring the first team clause ;) their fans around me left feeling quite pissed off, not that sligo would care, decent crowd so got the money and they won easy
    Considering he was out of contract shortly after, we did as well as possible out of Seamie. We'll never get over the lack of a sell on clause when he goes to Madrid for 100m!

    That friendly was not part of the deal either, was arranged separately. There was a group of Everton fans standing near me abusing Fernando Torres.. Nobody was too upset when they left at half time.

    On a seperate note Shane Duffy was awful that day and on every subsequent appearance in the showgrounds. He has no business being in the Ireland squad.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,021 ✭✭✭uch


    The player on the ground off the pitch is considered in play unless he is receiving treatment for an injury, or the Ref has given him permission to be off the pitch (gear adjustment, etc) as leaving the pitch without the Ref's authority is a bookable offence. So IMO as a retired Junior ref, if Brennan was in line with the Keeper he should have been onside as the player on the ground was still in the Game.
    dfx- wrote: »
    From what I remember, the law/rule states specifically to deliberate actions - such as stepping off the field to catch someone offside, but here that doesn't seem to fit.

    Either way, it's not a shocking decision by LOI standards. You wouldn't be campaigning for Hancock to return.

    21/25



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,279 ✭✭✭overshoot


    AgileMyth wrote: »
    Considering he was out of contract shortly after, we did as well as possible out of Seamie. We'll never get over the lack of a sell on clause when he goes to Madrid for 100m!

    That friendly was not part of the deal either, was arranged separately. There was a group of Everton fans standing near me abusing Fernando Torres.. Nobody was too upset when they left at half time.

    On a seperate note Shane Duffy was awful that day and on every subsequent appearance in the showgrounds. He has no business being in the Ireland squad.
    ah thought it was. The old issue with all LOI players tho, short contracts, leaves us badly open to losing our better players for nothing. Given the fickle nature of fans though, a bad year and big fall in gates could leave clubs badly exposed though.

    Duffy showed early promise, i dont think hes done anything tho since he got that bad in training. cant remember if that was before/after that game


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,529 ✭✭✭Paz-CCFC


    overshoot wrote: »
    ah thought it was. The old issue with all LOI players tho, short contracts, leaves us badly open to losing our better players for nothing. Given the fickle nature of fans though, a bad year and big fall in gates could leave clubs badly exposed though.

    Duffy showed early promise, i dont think hes done anything tho since he got that bad in training. cant remember if that was before/after that game

    The compensation system for under 23s is a big help here. It allows LoI teams to keep the short contracts for the young players, whilst having some protection. Over 23s, then, are generally unlikely to make the move over.

    When Danny Morrissey, who's 20, was linked to a move to England in the off season. The estimated compensation for the move would have been 6 figures. A huge sum for a player that we didn't even have under contract at the time. Obviously, I'm happy that we kept such a promising young striker - his injury just better feck off, so he can start banging them in again!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 172 ✭✭Garrigai


    Paz-CCFC wrote: »
    The compensation system for under 23s is a big help here. It allows LoI teams to keep the short contracts for the young players, whilst having some protection. Over 23s, then, are generally unlikely to make the move over.

    When Danny Morrissey, who's 20, was linked to a move to England in the off season. The estimated compensation for the move would have been 6 figures. A huge sum for a player that we didn't even have under contract at the time. Obviously, I'm happy that we kept such a promising young striker - his injury just better feck off, so he can start banging them in again!

    How come Rovers got nothing for Shep when he went to Reading so?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,818 ✭✭✭Bateman


    Sheppard isn't very young as far as I know and may just have been out of contract


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,104 ✭✭✭✭djpbarry


    Bateman wrote: »
    Sheppard isn't very young as far as I know and may just have been out of contract
    He's actually only 23.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,818 ✭✭✭Bateman


    ...and the policy applies to U23s so maybe there's your answer. Maybe not, I remember looking this up a few years ago in relation to another player but the rules aren't as simple as you'd think they might be


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,104 ✭✭✭✭djpbarry


    Bateman wrote: »
    ...and the policy applies to U23s so maybe there's your answer.
    He was obviously under 23 when he moved to Reading.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,980 ✭✭✭✭Gavin "shels"




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 51,342 ✭✭✭✭That_Guy


    According to the match preview ahead of Rovers/Bohs, Reynor, Lee Murphy and McCabe have left Bohs....

    http://bohemianfc.com/?cat=5

    Fúcking hell.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,558 ✭✭✭✭dreamers75


    Have to be some retarded fcuktard to do this. Probably think they are cool and stuff.

    10342837_10152398028541648_7826530851165750991_n.jpg

    10270292_10152398028591648_4791041306716964942_n.jpg


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,996 ✭✭✭10green bottles


    Thats bad form :(

    This DundalkFC mural which was on a main town thoroughfare was "vandalized" and painted pink to gain aprox 0.6 seconds of Giro D'Italia publicity on Italian/BBC TV by our local Town Council 2 weeks ago !!

    dundalk-mural-preview1-720x326.jpg


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,380 ✭✭✭geeky


    File under 'this is why we can't have nice things'. :(


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,428 ✭✭✭.jacksparrow.


    dreamers75 wrote: »
    Have to be some retarded fcuktard to do this. Probably think they are cool and stuff.

    10342837_10152398028541648_7826530851165750991_n.jpg

    10270292_10152398028591648_4791041306716964942_n.jpg

    Isn't that beside Dalymount?

    Obviously done to wind up bohs fans, what do you expect them to do in all fairness.


Advertisement