Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

The Anti-Austerity Crowd

2456714

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,806 ✭✭✭D1stant


    Grayson wrote: »
    I'm about as socialist as they come and i agree with Austerity. Well, to an extent.
    You're right, we had a huge drop in revenue and we had an increase in expenditure. We had to make cutbacks and we need to increase taxes. I think that no one group should be overly hit. And I think we do need to be careful with where we make cutbacks so as to minimise the pain.

    there are people who are pro austerity who want to gut the public service and social security. they're idiots. A balanced reasoned approach is what is needed.

    Agree. Its ironic that the AA people are spending a significant amount of money on trying to get councilors elected. If you want to save on unnecessary expense - start with the councils.

    County Councils are ineffective, bloated, powerless drains on public finances


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,798 ✭✭✭✭hatrickpatrick


    Fundamental redesign of the currency and monetary system is the only way to really fix the economy.
    It's a simple fact that the current system acts as a suppressant to potential rather than a facilitator of it. There are plenty of things it's physically possible for us to so, but we "can't" because our monetary system isn't fit for purpose.

    The idea of scarcity makes no sense when we are capable of producing more than enough. The whole concept of people starving in Europe at the same time as massive "surpluses" are thrown away is just fudamentally ridiculous - it genuinely surprises me that more people don't talk about these fundamentals.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,797 ✭✭✭KyussBishop


    Fundamental redesign of the currency and monetary system is the only way to really fix the economy.
    It's a simple fact that the current system acts as a suppressant to potential rather than a facilitator of it. There are plenty of things it's physically possible for us to so, but we "can't" because our monetary system isn't fit for purpose.

    The idea of scarcity makes no sense when we are capable of producing more than enough. The whole concept of people starving in Europe at the same time as massive "surpluses" are thrown away is just fudamentally ridiculous - it genuinely surprises me that more people don't talk about these fundamentals.
    "The process by which banks create money is so simple that the mind is repelled" ~ John Kenneth Galbraith.

    You can even show the Bank of England talking about this, yet the topic generates so much cognitive dissonance, that people will say the Bank of England is wrong rather than change their beliefs.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 4,287 ✭✭✭mickydoomsux


    ?. Well, every tax-paying citizen in Ireland arsed it up badly for themselves, as they are the ones that bailed out un-guarrenteed bondholders by force from government and allowed it without a protest.

    The Irish taxpayer injected itself into this austerity wilfully by not stopping the government in forwarding your monies to gamblers that lost. Cutbacks and all this sh!t will multiply when a persons head is stuck up it's anus yearly. If you lost a bet in paddy power, do you think you would get your money back ? of course not. But all Irish taxpayers just laid back and said nothing and allowed this corrupt government to extract your money to pay criminals off. It was never our debt.

    Keep paying if you like, it's your money, so you can burn it if you like.

    This kind of frothing-at-the-mouth nonsense is why anti-austerity heads are laughable.

    Your point is almost entirely fact-free.

    Well done. You managed to contribute nothing and parrot what the rest of your ilk are constantly harping on about.

    You forgot to use the phrase "bend over and take it" and you didn't call everyone "sheep" though.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 24,461 ✭✭✭✭darkpagandeath


    This kind of frothing-at-the-mouth nonsense is why anti-austerity heads are laughable.

    Your point is almost entirely fact-free.

    Well done. You managed to contribute nothing and parrot what the rest of your ilk are constantly harping on about.

    You forgot to use the phrase "bend over and take it" and you didn't call everyone "sheep" though.

    One of the options to the IMF when they came here was to Burn the unsecured bondholders. They chose Austerity.


  • Advertisement
  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 4,287 ✭✭✭mickydoomsux


    One of the options to the IMF when they came here was to Burn the unsecured bondholders. They chose Austerity.

    Yes, because further tanking investor confidence in Ireland was exactly what was needed at the time.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,250 ✭✭✭✭Iwasfrozen


    What the anti-austerity crowd - and everyone really - should be fighting against now, is Property Bubble 2.0, as this is going to land us with another wave of mountainous public/private debt eventually, while enriching well connected folk in government/banking/finance/construction:
    http://brianmlucey.wordpress.com/2014/05/17/are-the-irish-government-nuts-their-housing-policy-is/

    It will be another upward-transfer of wealth, and a dumping of debt onto the rest of us.
    So what you're saying is invest in property.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 24,461 ✭✭✭✭darkpagandeath


    Yes, because further tanking investor confidence in Ireland was exactly what was needed at the time.

    Do you know what Unsecured means ?


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 4,287 ✭✭✭mickydoomsux


    Do you know what Unsecured means ?

    Yes.

    The fact that the bonds themselves are unsecured doesn't mean that burning the holders will have any less of a negative impact on investor confidence.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 9,660 ✭✭✭Padraig Mor


    ?. Well, every tax-paying citizen in Ireland arsed it up badly for themselves, as they are the ones that bailed out un-guarrenteed bondholders by force from government and allowed it without a protest.

    The Irish taxpayer injected itself into this austerity wilfully by not stopping the government in forwarding your monies to gamblers that lost. Cutbacks and all this sh!t will multiply when a persons head is stuck up it's anus yearly. If you lost a bet in paddy power, do you think you would get your money back ? of course not. But all Irish taxpayers just laid back and said nothing and allowed this corrupt government to extract your money to pay criminals off. It was never our debt.

    Keep paying if you like, it's your money, so you can burn it if you like.

    Usual loony left ignorance. Paying for the banks, bondholders etc only accounts for a small proportion of our current deficit, national debt and supposed austerity. The vast majority of money goes to cover 'normal' government spending.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,766 ✭✭✭Bongalongherb


    This kind of frothing-at-the-mouth nonsense is why anti-austerity heads are laughable.

    Your point is almost entirely fact-free.

    Well done. You managed to contribute nothing and parrot what the rest of your ilk are constantly harping on about.

    You forgot to use the phrase "bend over and take it" and you didn't call everyone "sheep" though.

    I didn't realise my comment hurt you so deeply. My comment is the truth as you know, but you are afraid to acknowledge this fact because you are a taxpayer like me and we basically gave our monopoly away to gamblers and we were screwed badly. Do not attack me for my comment, attack yourself as you and I and everyone else here paid gamblers debts off that had absolutely nothing to do with us.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 24,461 ✭✭✭✭darkpagandeath


    Usual loony left ignorance. Paying for the banks, bondholders etc only accounts for a small proportion of our current deficit, national debt and supposed austerity. The vast majority of money goes to cover 'normal' government spending.

    Have you a link ? How much of the 12 bn overspend is interest payments for the bail out


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 24,461 ✭✭✭✭darkpagandeath


    Yes.

    The fact that the bonds themselves are unsecured doesn't mean that burning the holders will have any less of a negative impact on investor confidence.
    He said while many people presumed sovereign defaults were “extremely costly”, this had historically not been the case.

    From the IMF


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 4,287 ✭✭✭mickydoomsux


    From the IMF

    That's nice dear but my statement and your quote don't seem to have anything to do with each other.

    By all means, continue to flail wildly and you may very well hit on a relevant point.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 8,061 ✭✭✭keith16


    Bubbaclaus wrote: »
    The people that protest against austerity. How would they expect Ireland to finance a country crippling government deficit?


    I don't get it. Could somebody explain? I've never heard of an alternative solution (that actually makes sense and would work better).

    There are numerous alternatives to austerity. The cuts this country has gone through have been savage and in all the wrong areas.

    No country has ever taxed its way out of a recession. The government can choose to legislate to introduce real reform and cut out all the bloated inefficiencies in public service bodies. They choose not to do that.


    They are not going to do this by cutting the pay of front line staff.

    It's very frustrating that people just accept austerity in this country without question. There will be no tax breaks in this years budget either. They will save that for next year with a general election on the horizon.

    These are not the policies of good governance. They are the policies of a self-serving body who would rather take medical cards off sick children than even consider looking at the middle management of the HSE.

    But yeah, anyone who is anti-austerity is part of a "crowd" or "shower". Here's a question for those pro-austerity. Why does Ireland continue to foster such a crippling budget deficit? In a county of around 4 million people?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 24,461 ✭✭✭✭darkpagandeath


    That's nice dear but my statement and your quote don't seem to have anything to do with each other.

    By all means, continue to flail wildly and you may very well hit on a relevant point.

    I see so you have more experience than the ex head of the IMF ?


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 4,287 ✭✭✭mickydoomsux


    keith16 wrote: »
    Why does Ireland continue to foster such a crippling budget deficit?

    Because the country costs more to run than we are taking in.

    That's why we need austerity.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 4,287 ✭✭✭mickydoomsux


    I see so you have more experience than the ex head of the IMF ?

    I never claimed that but your quotes and the article linked have nothing to do with the point we are arguing.

    You're trying to have a "GOTCHA!" moment with the wrong information.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 13,370 ✭✭✭✭Bruthal


    hfallada wrote: »
    I had a socialist LE candidate at my door this week and I asked him about what was his taxation beliefs. He said a more equaitable tax system and I asked him what he meant by that. He tried to tell me the bottom 20% of society pay more tax than the top 10% of society. He lost it when I told him our tax system is the second most progressive in the world and 50% of workers pay no tax. He also told me class doesnt have to exist(every socialists believe class will always exist and its beneficial to society) and a doctor shouldnt earn more than anyone else in society

    Most of these anti-austerity crowd are full on nut jobs, who have no idea how a society function. They believe rich should pay more, but dont realise they pretty much pay all the taxes in society and get very little in return

    They pay no tax? I bet they do.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 8,061 ✭✭✭keith16


    Because the country costs more to run than we are taking in.

    That's why we need austerity.

    So austerity is the only solution in your view?

    Forgetting austerity for a moment, are you happy that it costs so much to run?


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 24,461 ✭✭✭✭darkpagandeath


    I never claimed that but your quotes and the article linked have nothing to do with the point we are arguing.

    You're trying to have a "GOTCHA!" moment with the wrong information.

    It's nothing to do with "Gotcha" All I have said is the IMF got it wrong choosing Austerity. Alot of people in Ireland were of the opinion a default would be crippling all I did was link the ex heads words in regards to that. There were several options Austerity was the wrong one.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,766 ✭✭✭Bongalongherb


    I never claimed that but your quotes and the article linked have nothing to do with the point we are arguing.

    You're trying to have a "GOTCHA!" moment with the wrong information.

    Why are you so angry ?. Every comment you have made is dedicated forcefulness as if you are right at all times. Loosen up duder, it's just a comment-fest of crazyness. ;)


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 4,287 ✭✭✭mickydoomsux


    keith16 wrote: »
    So austerity is the only solution in your view?

    Forgetting austerity for a moment, are you happy that it costs so much to run?

    Of course it could be run more cheaply, you do realize that that is part of what the austerity we are experiencing?

    Cuts to certain welfare brackets, cuts to front line public services and things like the withdrawal of medical cards from certain people is all part and parcel of attempting to cut costs.

    There is obviously more that could be done but, honestly, the quickest and most efficient way is to increase taxes and tackle easy spending cuts.

    Analyzing and rationalizing the spending of every single department of government would take years and we can't afford to wait years for our economic recovery.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,766 ✭✭✭Bongalongherb


    Of course it could be run more cheaply, you do realize that that is part of what the austerity we are experiencing?

    Cuts to certain welfare brackets, cuts to front line public services and things like the withdrawal of medical cards from certain people is all part and parcel of attempting to cut costs.

    There is obviously more that could be done but, honestly, the quickest and most efficient way is to increase taxes and tackle easy spending cuts.

    Analyzing and rationalizing the spending of every single department of government would take years and we can't afford to wait years for our economic recovery.

    Umm... Cuts cuts cuts etc... you sure love austerity. And yes, I will say bend over, because folk like you just take it time after time, and try to make it sound like a natural thing that a society needs to do after been raped/robbed of billions. I seriously can't figure out what solar system you are from in accepting austerity that was forced upon us all as you so lovenly indulge in.
    the quickest and most efficient way is to increase taxes and tackle easy spending cuts.

    An astronomically draconian view of disaster.


  • Posts: 81,308 CMod ✭✭✭✭ Toby Polite Pigeon


    I hate when they have more things than I do and someone should take their things away from them because it's just like so unfair
    hfallada wrote: »
    I had a socialist LE candidate at my door this week and I asked him about what was his taxation beliefs. He said a more equaitable tax system and I asked him what he meant by that. He tried to tell me the bottom 20% of society pay more tax than the top 10% of society. He lost it when I told him our tax system is the second most progressive in the world and 50% of workers pay no tax. He also told me class doesnt have to exist(every socialists believe class will always exist and its beneficial to society) and a doctor shouldnt earn more than anyone else in society

    Most of these anti-austerity crowd are full on nut jobs, who have no idea how a society function. They believe rich should pay more, but dont realise they pretty much pay all the taxes in society and get very little in return

    I would love if one of them showed up at my door! :D:D
    Ohhhh boy


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 3,126 ✭✭✭Santa Cruz


    Bubbaclaus wrote: »
    The people that protest against austerity. How would they expect Ireland to finance a country crippling government deficit?


    I don't get it. Could somebody explain? I've never heard of an alternative solution (that actually makes sense and would work better).

    The magic money tree of course.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,442 ✭✭✭✭Grayson


    ?. Well, every tax-paying citizen in Ireland arsed it up badly for themselves, as they are the ones that bailed out un-guarrenteed bondholders by force from government and allowed it without a protest.

    The Irish taxpayer injected itself into this austerity wilfully by not stopping the government in forwarding your monies to gamblers that lost. Cutbacks and all this sh!t will multiply when a persons head is stuck up it's anus yearly. If you lost a bet in paddy power, do you think you would get your money back ? of course not. But all Irish taxpayers just laid back and said nothing and allowed this corrupt government to extract your money to pay criminals off. It was never our debt.

    Keep paying if you like, it's your money, so you can burn it if you like.

    With or without the banking fiasco we were fecked.

    The property market accounted for nearly 60% of tax income in 2007-2008. That disappeared with the crash. Expenditure increased because there were more unemployed. there wasn't enough money. We simply had more bills going out than money coming in. We needed to make cutbacks and see about generating more money through higher taxes.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 4,287 ✭✭✭mickydoomsux


    .... raped/robbed of billions.

    Oh, right. Won't be wasting any more time arguing with you.

    You're right, the bad rich mans came and took all our monies. What happened is exactly the same thing as being raped or having something stolen from you. That's not a childish view at all.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,766 ✭✭✭Bongalongherb


    Oh, right. Won't be wasting any more time arguing with you.

    You're right, the bad rich mans came and took all our monies. What happened is exactly the same thing as being raped or having something stolen from you. That's not a childish view at all.

    Your comment reply is out of context.
    the bad rich mans came and took all our monies.

    Well you're the one paying for it aren't you, enjoy so.

    Money raped was the comment if you can understand the basic concept of the comment.


  • Advertisement
  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 4,287 ✭✭✭mickydoomsux


    Money raped was the comment if you can understand the basic concept of the comment.

    "Money raped"?

    Just nonsense.


Advertisement
Advertisement