Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

The Origin of Specious Nonsense. Twelve years on. Still going. Answer soon.

14142444647101

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,779 ✭✭✭MrPudding


    Here you go JC, your evidence won't be off topic here.

    MrP


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,779 ✭✭✭MrPudding


    J C wrote: »
    That would be somewhat off-topic ... as the thread is about the origin Specious Nonesense AKA Spontaneous Evolution.:);)
    Here you go then, knock yourself out.

    http://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/showpost.php?p=90278122&postcount=1

    MrP


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,615 ✭✭✭✭J C


    MrPudding wrote: »
    I never thought there was such a 'hunger' for Creation Science on the A & A.

    ... but, of course, it stands to reason ... when you think about it.:)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,615 ✭✭✭✭J C


    Don't work on me no more, you've done me too often.
    I was talking about the MIB.:)


  • Moderators Posts: 52,029 ✭✭✭✭Delirium


    J C wrote: »
    I never thought there was such a 'hunger' for Creation Science on the A & A.

    ... but, of course, it stands to reason ... when you think about it.:)

    less talk, more evidence

    *cracks whip*

    :P

    If you can read this, you're too close!



  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,940 ✭✭✭Corkfeen


    SW wrote: »
    Are you going to post any evidence in support of creationism?

    He added to his abbreviation,isn't that enough? CFSI is no more and CFGSI is born, further bollocks with a slightly different name. :rolleyes:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 35,522 ✭✭✭✭Gordon


    MrPudding wrote: »
    Here you go JC, your evidence won't be off topic here.

    MrP
    Because bible.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 10,250 ✭✭✭✭bumper234


    Something tells me he will choose to ignore this thread.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,615 ✭✭✭✭J C


    Corkfeen wrote: »
    He added to his abbreviation,isn't that enough? CFSI is no more and CFGSI is born. :rolleyes:
    Good point Corkfeen ... it's the evolution of the Modern Creation Synthesis ... happening right here on the A & A.

    No wonder Mr P is even hungering for more ... and impulsively created a special thread dedicated to Creation Science.

    I couldn't ask for more, guys ... it's just like all of my birthdays have come together.

    Hugs all around ... including you, Mr P.

    BTW ... it's CFSGI ... but no worries.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 10,250 ✭✭✭✭bumper234


    J C wrote: »
    Good point Corkfeen ... it's the evolution of the Modern Creation Synthesis ... happening right here on the A & A.

    No wonder Mr P is even hungering for more ... and impulsively created a special thread for Creation.

    I couldn't ask for more guys ... it's just like all of my birthdays have come together.

    The question (that you probably won't answer) is will you ever post any of this evidence on the thread specially created for you to post evidence in?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,615 ✭✭✭✭J C


    bumper234 wrote: »
    The question (that you probably won't answer) is will you ever post any of this evidence on the thread specially created for you to post evidence in?
    That's the first piece of evidence ... everything that is created (like Mr P's thread) has an intelligent source.

    Mr P was displaying the fact that he is made in the image of his Creator when he did this.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 10,250 ✭✭✭✭bumper234


    J C wrote: »
    That's the first piece of evidence ... everything that is created (like Mr P's thread) has an intelligent source.

    Mr P was displaying the fact that he is made in the image of his Creator when he did this.

    Still watching the other thread for your evidence.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,615 ✭✭✭✭J C


    bumper234 wrote: »
    Still watching the other thread for your evidence.
    I haven't seen such enthusiasm for Creation Science since the week that Ken Ham visited Ireland back in 2005.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,779 ✭✭✭MrPudding


    J C wrote: »
    That's the first piece of evidence ... everything that is created (like Mr P's thread) has an intelligent source.

    Mr P was displaying the fact that he is made in the image of his Creator when he did this.
    Stop talking sh1t and post your alledged evidence.

    MrP


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 10,250 ✭✭✭✭bumper234


    J C wrote: »
    I haven't seen such enthusiasm for Creation Science since the week that Ken Ham visited Ireland back in 2005.

    You do realise that by claiming to have evidence but then refusing to post this evidence makes you look (at best) like a common liar?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,615 ✭✭✭✭J C


    bumper234 wrote: »
    You do realise that by claiming to have evidence but then refusing to post this evidence makes you look (at best) like a common liar?
    I made a start ... and Mr P called it 'sh1t' ... how can I follow that ????


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 276 ✭✭Bellatori


    J C wrote: »
    I made a start ... and Mr P called it 'sh1t' ... how can I follow that ????

    By making a fool of him through posting evidence... of course that assumes that...


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 10,250 ✭✭✭✭bumper234


    J C wrote: »
    I made a start ... and Mr P called it 'sh1t' ... how can I follow that ????

    Post your evidence in the evidence thread, what do you have to lose? At best you probe to others that your theories are true and at worse people ignore your evidence. At the moment you are just coming across as a liar.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,615 ✭✭✭✭J C


    Bellatori wrote: »
    By making a fool of him through posting evidence... of course that assumes that...
    I have no wish to make a fool of anybody ... just presenting the truth with love and respect.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 10,250 ✭✭✭✭bumper234


    J C wrote: »
    I have no wish to make a fool of anybody ... just presenting the truth with love and respect.

    I await this in the evidence thread.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,940 ✭✭✭Corkfeen


    J C wrote: »
    That's the first piece of evidence ... everything that is created (like Mr P's thread) has an intelligent source.

    Mr P was displaying the fact that he is made in the image of his Creator when he did this.

    It astonishes me when you continue to create an infinite loop where god requires an intelligent creator by your very own logic. The omnipotent,always exists logic doesn't really work........


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,615 ✭✭✭✭J C




  • Closed Accounts Posts: 10,250 ✭✭✭✭bumper234


    Yeah


    I don't have the time to read through 3000 pages worth of posts, why don't you give us the edited version. I only need to read your evidence not the thousands and thousands of other posts in those thread. So your evidence please >>>>>>>>


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,615 ✭✭✭✭J C


    Corkfeen wrote: »
    It astonishes me when you continue to create an infinite loop where god requires an intelligent creator by your very own logic. The omnipotent,always exists logic doesn't really work........
    I guess its a concept that is something like a 'singularity' ... only much more plausible.


  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 15,904 Mod ✭✭✭✭smacl


    bumper234 wrote: »
    Something tells me he will choose to ignore this thread.

    J C miss an opportunity like this. Never :)


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 10,250 ✭✭✭✭bumper234


    J C wrote: »
    I guess its a concept that is something like a 'singularity' ... only much more plausible.

    Or when people make claims about something but then don't back that up.....liars if you will


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,615 ✭✭✭✭J C


    bumper234 wrote: »
    Post your evidence in the evidence thread, what do you have to lose?
    Just did it ... and it looks great.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 10,250 ✭✭✭✭bumper234


    J C wrote: »
    Just did it ... and it looks great.

    Stop lying.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,615 ✭✭✭✭J C


    bumper234 wrote: »
    Or when people make claims about something but then don't back that up.....liars if you will
    'Singularity' believers aren't liars ... they're just mistaken.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,615 ✭✭✭✭J C


    bumper234 wrote: »
    Stop lying.
    I linked to the evidence for Creation that you guys are hungering for.

    Linking is a good way of efficiently presenting evidence.

    ... and I gave an example of evidence for Creation ... and Mr P called it 'sh1t' without any further engagement or discussion.

    ... I guess there are some days when my best is not enough.


Advertisement