Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Why isn't fighting to the death legal if consented?

2»

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 428 ✭✭wolfeye


    *Rubs glove print*
    I accept!

    Very good Sir.
    A duel with pistols at first dawn tomorrow.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,305 ✭✭✭Cantremember


    So the local Manny Pacquaio dislikes you. He challenges you to a fight to the death, no weapons. Well now Ted.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 2,618 ✭✭✭The Diabolical Monocle


    This is actually where we get the term 'touché'.

    Back in the day when I was growing up in gaie Paris there were duels a plenty.

    And they were perfectly acceptable to the local préfecture

    Duels took place initially for serious raisons.
    But soon they were taking place for all the raisons one may care to imagine.

    A slight on your quality of wig, refusing an aperitif, the whole Strasbourg vs Biarritz rivalry.

    Anyway, this left many a madamoiselle without her husband and many an enfant without a pere.

    Alors, Laws came into effect whereby the first to cause a wound was the victor.
    Soon after that it was the first to draw blood, and so the mere touch of an epee was enough to win.

    Even a tiny wound you could barely notice - and so the loser would own up - touched - touché - you win this time Prudence. A la prochaine.... a la prochaine.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,903 ✭✭✭✭Riskymove


    Karl Stein wrote: »
    So was slavery. We kinda got more civilised in many parts of the world.

    It was tongue in cheek


  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 99,624 Mod ✭✭✭✭Capt'n Midnight


    In Paraguay duelling is legal as long as both parties are registered blood donors.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,999 ✭✭✭Conall Cernach


    It would be cool if men could walk around with swords though.


  • Moderators, Entertainment Moderators, Politics Moderators Posts: 14,566 Mod ✭✭✭✭johnnyskeleton


    The origin was with the Plantagenet kings who wanted to stop people killing each other so that they could go off and kill Frenchmen.

    Also the bible I suppose!


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,435 ✭✭✭Stavros Murphy


    I too would consent to a duel. Pistols at 1000 paces. No aiming for the head..


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,473 ✭✭✭Wacker The Attacker


    But you could be like dead and sh1t


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 2,618 ✭✭✭The Diabolical Monocle


    It would be cool if men could walk around with swords though.

    We do.


    with pork swords.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 645 ✭✭✭Vision of Disorder


    I too would consent to a duel. Pistols at 1000 paces. No aiming for the head..

    Or balls.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,435 ✭✭✭Stavros Murphy


    But you could be like dead and sh1t

    kinda doubtful at 1000 paces. The winner could be the person who raises dust nearest to the other.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 934 ✭✭✭robertpatterson




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 904 ✭✭✭Drakares


    TheBrinch wrote: »
    Serious question.

    If 2 people hated each other so much that they mutually agreed to a fight to the death, why shouldn't this be allowed? On the condition that no-one else is in any sort of danger from the event.

    Now I'm proposing this on the grounds that it should not be turned into a sport or televised. Also it would be a non-gambling event. Its not the type of thing where winners are broadcasted or made look like mad gladiators or something. The competitors must be over 18 or 21 or something.

    This shouldn't be the type of thing which people are coerced into and for the sake of it both people would need to sign a legal contract agreeing to the event while also having a witness present (or possibly a lawyer). They wouldn't face a murder charge or anything like that seen as it was completely agreed to.

    Now I know some people may jump at the opportunity, I couldn't see this happening on a regular basis as not everyone would agree to such a thing.

    Keep in mind this is obviously just a rough idea and I haven't gone over every scenario in my head but you should get the idea.

    Some people will likely disagree because its too 'barbaric' or some crap but this is a genuinely interesting subject I would like peoples opinion on.

    So yay or nay? :D

    On a side note, this could be applied to other instances such as assisted suicide for example. Imagine a relative is paralyzed or something and they ask you to help them die. As long as they are in their right mind, you both sign a contract and its legal to do it...
    Please do not pro-create.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,210 ✭✭✭pablo128


    The chance of legally beating Joey Barton to death is quite tempting......


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,033 ✭✭✭✭Richard Hillman


    I was watching Gladiator this morning and thinking the exact same thing. I'm sure if you set up an arena in some proper ****hole country with vast amounts of open land, you could pay off the local police to turn a blind eye. In terms of gladiators, i'm sure there would be people out there in the world that would be open to doing it for a large fee. The PPV money can pay for that.

    You could do themed matches too. Old School Gladiator fights, Mexican stand offs or even fights with humans against crocodiles and stuff.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,435 ✭✭✭Stavros Murphy


    I was watching Gladiator this morning and thinking the exact same thing. I'm sure if you set up an arena in some proper ****hole country with vast amounts of open land, you could pay off the local police to turn a blind eye. In terms of gladiators, i'm sure there would be people out there in the world that would be open to doing it for a large fee. The PPV money can pay for that.

    You could do themed matches too. Old School Gladiator fights, Mexican stand offs or even fights with humans against crocodiles and stuff.

    This sounds new and exciting. The venue could be called somthing groovy, like "The Colosseum" or whatever. If we ran out of willing participants, religious minorities could be roped in to fight lions and the like. The crowd could be like the X-Factor judges and give the thumbs up or down for who lives or dies. This would be a huge leap forward in entertainment, previously unseen. Good idea. Maybe.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,305 ✭✭✭Cantremember


    This is actually where we get the term 'touché'.

    Back in the day when I was growing up in gaie Paris there were duels a plenty.

    And they were perfectly acceptable to the local préfecture

    Duels took place initially for serious raisons.
    But soon they were taking place for all the raisons one may care to imagine.

    A slight on your quality of wig, refusing an aperitif, the whole Strasbourg vs Biarritz rivalry.

    Anyway, this left many a madamoiselle without her husband and many an enfant without a pere.

    Alors, Laws came into effect whereby the first to cause a wound was the victor.
    Soon after that it was the first to draw blood, and so the mere touch of an epee was enough to win.

    Even a tiny wound you could barely notice - and so the loser would own up - touched - touché - you win this time Prudence. A la prochaine.... a la prochaine.

    You Sir, are masquerading as Le Monocle Diabolique. Any red blooded Frenchman knows that when a madamoiselle marries she loses her oiselle and becomes Madame. I will see you behind Les Jardins Luxembourg at Le Premier Coq.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,435 ✭✭✭Stavros Murphy


    You Sir, are masquerading as Le Monocle Diabolique. Any red blooded Frenchman knows that when a madamoiselle marries she loses her oiselle and becomes Madame. I will see you behind Les Jardins Luxembourg at Le Premier Coq.

    They closed Le Premier Coq last year for breaches of the Health regulations. It has re-opened, under new management, as Le Coq Nouvelle.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,158 ✭✭✭✭Degag


    The OP is watching too much Game of Thrones methinks.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 291 ✭✭TheBrinch


    Degag wrote: »
    The OP is watching too much Game of Thrones methinks.

    Nah, was just reading the other thread about questions people think but never ask...always had this thought in my mind for whatever reason :D


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,744 ✭✭✭diomed


    Premeditated killing is wrong, and unlawful. Suggesting organised killing for entertainment is a disgraceful idea.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 645 ✭✭✭Vision of Disorder


    diomed wrote: »
    Suggesting organised killing for entertainment is a disgraceful idea.

    I'm pretty sure that the OP stressed that it would not be a public spectacle in his original post?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,928 ✭✭✭Renegade Mechanic


    We should set up an arena. And make it a public spectacle! A big, very well lit semi-sphere cage that loads of people can climb up on and watch two people enter, that despise each other, and fight.

    But I wonder... What could such a place be called.....


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,563 ✭✭✭Adamantium




Advertisement
Advertisement