Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Will you eat meat tomorrow

1323334353638»

Comments

  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 2,562 ✭✭✭eyescreamcone


    P_1 wrote: »
    And thus both opposing armies took out their trenching tools and all logical thinking folk wept...

    Of course you don't mean "logical thinking" religionists ...because there are none!!!


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,228 ✭✭✭mrsbyrne


    It is not our job to prove that gods dont exist as we are not making the claim of existance.
    By your logic i can make something up right now...
    let me see......
    I have a magical hamster orbiting the moon in a shopping trolley and he will grant every one on earth eternal life if they believe in it.

    Have you any proof that this isnt so?

    Burden of proofhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Burden_of_proof

    Your hamster sounds adorable Sir Meh. Can he see The Clangers and the Soup Dragon?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 464 ✭✭Knight who says Meh


    That's frankly nonsense, there is as many murders in Dublin in a month now than there would have been in the whole country in a year 50 years ago. There was no drug crime, drug problems etc even 20 years ago never mind further back.The streets were a much safer place years ago, beating, muggings etc were unheard off. Robberies were extremely rare, nobody locked their house yet people weren't robbed etc etc etc etc.

    That's just a quick comparison.



    I don't see 2000 years worth of books, scripts, teachings etc etc etc for your hamster. Not to people witnessing it in recent times in Knock, Medjugorje etc.
    Knock...yeah....That was burnt retinas......
    My hamster doesnt have books behind it like islam, Judaeism, paganism and all those other false religions have. Oh hang about. Those have MORE and OLDER books than yours. Does that mean..................


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 892 ✭✭✭GenieOz


    mrsbyrne wrote: »
    Your hamster sounds adorable Sir Meh. Can he see The Clangers and the Soup Dragon?

    I'm sure you're not aware of how much you're ridiculing your own belief or how bad it looks that you ignore posts you can't argue against.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 464 ✭✭Knight who says Meh


    mrsbyrne wrote: »
    Your hamster sounds adorable Sir Meh. Can he see The Clangers and the Soup Dragon?

    Still avoiding debate then...


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,113 ✭✭✭shruikan2553


    That's frankly nonsense, there is as many murders in Dublin in a month now than there would have been in the whole country in a year 50 years ago. There was no drug crime, drug problems etc even 20 years ago never mind further back.The streets were a much safer place years ago, beating, muggings etc were unheard off. Robberies were extremely rare, nobody locked their house yet people weren't robbed etc etc etc etc.

    That's just a quick comparison.

    Its as if there was a large rise in population in the area.
    I don't see 2000 years worth of books, scripts, teachings etc etc etc for your hamster. Not to people witnessing it in recent times in Knock, Medjugorje etc.

    So it needs writing of about 200 years old before its a religion? Cant wait until we recognise Scientology.
    People also claim to see aliens.


  • Posts: 24,773 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Its as if there was a large rise in population in the area.

    No there simply was no drugs, almost no murders and almost no organised crime etc in Ireland 50 years ago. Population as nothing to do with it, these sort of things just didn't happen.

    I wonder how many old people were beaten and robbed in their home 50 years ago. None I'd wager. Nowadays its a common occurrence.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 2,562 ✭✭✭eyescreamcone


    Its as if there was a large rise in population in the area.



    So it needs writing of about 200 years old before its a religion? Cant wait until we recognise Scientology.
    People also claim to see aliens.

    Scientology is as reasonable as any other religion

    More chance of aliens existing than gods I'd imagine


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 892 ✭✭✭GenieOz


    No there simply was no drugs, almost no murders and almost no theft in Ireland 50 years ago. Population as nothing to do with it, these sort of things just didn't happen.

    I wonder how many old people were beaten and robbed in their home 50 years ago. None I'd wager. Nowadays its a common occurrence.

    On a scale of 1-10, how naive would you say you are?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,228 ✭✭✭mrsbyrne


    Still avoiding debate then...

    I've been debating here for days? There's not a child in the house washed?


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,113 ✭✭✭shruikan2553


    No there simply was no drugs, almost no murders and almost no organised crime etc in Ireland 50 years ago. Population as nothing to do with it, these sort of things just didn't happen.

    I wonder how many old people were beaten and robbed in their home 50 years ago. None I'd wager. Nowadays its a common occurrence.

    There wasnt TVs or video games either. Maybe indoor plumbing could have caused the downfall of society?


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 2,562 ✭✭✭eyescreamcone


    No there simply was no drugs, almost no murders and almost no organised crime etc in Ireland 50 years ago. Population as nothing to do with it, these sort of things just didn't happen.

    I wonder how many old people were beaten and robbed in their home 50 years ago. None I'd wager. Nowadays its a common occurrence.

    There were no gays, lesbians or anyone put off the road for drunk driving either.

    Excellent discipline in the schools though.
    And no problems finding a good laundry service.

    Ah those were the days.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,228 ✭✭✭mrsbyrne


    Akrasia wrote: »
    Ireland in the 21st century, for all it's flaws, is overall a much much better place than it was in the Ireland of Angelas ashes and the Magedelin Laundries

    Oh I wouldn't agree with you at all. If you speak to anyone working or volunteering with Child line Seniors Helpline Victim Support Samaritans St Vincent due Paul they will soon tell you how utterly obnoxious we are and how there are no boundaries or taboos any more. Our elderly racist and God-bothering as they are used to be cherished but not now. Children sexualy abused by a man their mother invited into the house but most often by a family member. On and on it goes the misery.
    And the Magdelen girls of 2014 where are they? Lots get tremendous support from family. some have at least a decent leaving cert and can struggle on into further education in the hope of becoming independent some day. But the girls I meet are stuck in poor accommodation poorly educated from dysfunctional backgrounds struggling to manage financially . No skills to deal with life. Depressed lonely they hook up with the next guy they meet in the hope that he'll be "the One" get pregnant to him in the hope he'll stay few slaps later and he's gone too. "I'm finished with fellas Mrs Byrne" if I had € for every time.
    We can never go back to the horrors of the laundry but don't think the singleparent lot is all sweetness and light. For some lucky ones its good but flinging money at them and rewarding them with more filthy lucre and no questions asked when you add to your brood is doing them no favours.
    What really angers me is how great it would have been if the nuns hadn't been so bloody greedy and evil and sadistic. A place to be safe a place to think a place to plan your future. That should have been the Convents. Now there's nothing.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,113 ✭✭✭shruikan2553


    mrsbyrne wrote: »
    Oh I wouldn't agree with you at all. If you speak to anyone working or volunteering with Child line Seniors Helpline Victim Support Samaritans St Vincent due Paul they will soon tell you how utterly obnoxious we are and how there are no boundaries or taboos any more. Our elderly racist and God-bothering as they are used to be cherished but not now. Children sexualy abused by a man their mother invited into the house but most often by a family member. On and on it goes the misery.

    So the man comes to them instead. At least if its reported it gets taken seriously and nobody has to be moved to another parish.


  • Posts: 24,773 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    GenieOz wrote: »
    On a scale of 1-10, how naive would you say you are?

    1 (assuming 1 means not the slightest bit naive).


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,301 ✭✭✭The One Who Knocks


    As for me personally, I forgot what day it was and had chicken.

    Ah well..


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,228 ✭✭✭mrsbyrne


    1 (assuming 1 means not the slightest bit naive).

    Is this an A and A tag team then lol?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,228 ✭✭✭mrsbyrne


    So the man comes to them instead. At least if its reported it gets taken seriously and nobody has to be moved to another parish.

    Sorry shruikan I was adding a bit to that post.
    No different to when it was clergy doing the abusing the poor kids , the abusers threaten to harm family members "tell anyone and I'll come back and kill you and your sister". The only difference now is that teachers nurses guards etc are not turning a blind eye like they ere back then and are actually actively looking for signs of abuse. Plus of course society now finds it unacceptable to punish children for the sins of their mothers. It wasn't always like that.
    Sadly the main thing that hasn't changed is the fact that the man who fathers these kids still gets to walk away scot free almost all of the time. Until we start making them face their responsibilities were never going to move on.
    Talk about derailing a thread.
    Sorry.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 9,085 ✭✭✭SpaceTime


    No there simply was no drugs, almost no murders and almost no organised crime etc in Ireland 50 years ago. Population as nothing to do with it, these sort of things just didn't happen.

    I wonder how many old people were beaten and robbed in their home 50 years ago. None I'd wager. Nowadays its a common occurrence.

    There actually was very significant crime in the 1800s. The murder rate was twice what it is now in the mid 1800s

    The lowest point was the 1940s and 1950s. It probably coincides with the impact of WWII on society and also mass emigration.

    A lot of violent crime (other than murder) would have been unreported too. Domestic violence, rape etc were hidden.

    Clothes mangles were as high tech as most homes got.

    Property theft was low because people didn't have many valuables. Electronics didn't exist, houses were poor too.

    You could leave your door open largely because there was very little to steal in most average homes.

    Drug abuse and dealing hadn't happened yet and car crime was low because car ownership was low.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 24,079 ✭✭✭✭Akrasia


    sheesh wrote: »
    thats fine you go and believe in your hamster and be happy.

    I don't believe in your hamster but fully recognise your right to believe in what ever you want.
    Are you serious?

    You wouldn't even try to challenge this belief?

    If your child's teacher believed in the celestial hamster and mentioned it to you, would you have a) more respect, b) less respect or c) the same amount of respect for that teacher as a professional and an intellectual human being?

    Ban billionaires



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 24,079 ✭✭✭✭Akrasia


    That's frankly nonsense, there is as many murders in Dublin in a month now than there would have been in the whole country in a year 50 years ago. There was no drug crime, drug problems etc even 20 years ago never mind further back.The streets were a much safer place years ago, beating, muggings etc were unheard off. Robberies were extremely rare, nobody locked their house yet people weren't robbed etc etc etc etc.

    That's just a quick comparison.



    I don't see 2000 years worth of books, scripts, teachings etc etc etc for your hamster. Not to people witnessing it in recent times in Knock, Medjugorje etc.
    There's just as much literature and far more claimed sightings of Banshees and leprechauns and fairies in Ireland than there are of Jesus or 'the virgin Mary'

    If someone tells you they saw a Banshee, do you think
    a)That they saw a Banshee
    b) they think they saw a Banshee but it was probably a trick of the light or some other explanation
    c) They're winding you up

    Banshees are incompatable with the catholic doctrine, as are leprechauns and faeries by the way

    Ban billionaires



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 24,079 ✭✭✭✭Akrasia


    No there simply was no drugs, almost no murders and almost no organised crime etc in Ireland 50 years ago. Population as nothing to do with it, these sort of things just didn't happen.

    I wonder how many old people were beaten and robbed in their home 50 years ago. None I'd wager. Nowadays its a common occurrence.
    A very large percentage of the crime in Ireland is committed by a small section of the community that have gotten out of control, and I can guarantee you, that the vast majority of these people are not atheists.

    Ban billionaires



  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,734 ✭✭✭J_E


    That's frankly nonsense, there is as many murders in Dublin in a month now than there would have been in the whole country in a year 50 years ago.
    Along with the same crimes happening today there was a slew of church sanctioned child abuse, women losing children and being seen as disgusting creatures, margainalisation left right and centre. I guess that doesn't count.
    I don't see 2000 years worth of books, scripts, teachings etc etc etc for your hamster. Not to people witnessing it in recent times in Knock, Medjugorje etc.
    Witnessing what...? Like are you suggesting what I think you are?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 24,079 ✭✭✭✭Akrasia


    mrsbyrne wrote: »
    Oh I wouldn't agree with you at all. If you speak to anyone working or volunteering with Child line Seniors Helpline Victim Support Samaritans St Vincent due Paul they will soon tell you how utterly obnoxious we are and how there are no boundaries or taboos any more. Our elderly racist and God-bothering as they are used to be cherished but not now. Children sexualy abused by a man their mother invited into the house but most often by a family member. On and on it goes the misery.
    And the Magdelen girls of 2014 where are they? Lots get tremendous support from family. some have at least a decent leaving cert and can struggle on into further education in the hope of becoming independent some day. But the girls I meet are stuck in poor accommodation poorly educated from dysfunctional backgrounds struggling to manage financially . No skills to deal with life. Depressed lonely they hook up with the next guy they meet in the hope that he'll be "the One" get pregnant to him in the hope he'll stay few slaps later and he's gone too. "I'm finished with fellas Mrs Byrne" if I had € for every time.
    We can never go back to the horrors of the laundry but don't think the singleparent lot is all sweetness and light. For some lucky ones its good but flinging money at them and rewarding them with more filthy lucre and no questions asked when you add to your brood is doing them no favours.
    What really angers me is how great it would have been if the nuns hadn't been so bloody greedy and evil and sadistic. A place to be safe a place to think a place to plan your future. That should have been the Convents. Now there's nothing.

    All of those things existed in the past but were brushed under the carpet. Now that they're open, we have a chance of dealing with these problems.

    People who have freedom will make poor choices. We can try to deal with this in several ways.
    1. Remove their freedom and try to force them to act in the way that the powers that be deem to be acceptable
    2. Teach them proper life skills. How to reason, how to think critically
    2a Support people as they try to find their way in life. We're all young once and need guidance while we find our way forward.

    The education system is crucial as it has a massive effect on future outcomes and opportunities for the next generation.

    Ireland does somethings very well, and some things very poorly. The free pre-school places for children is a very progressive step, and I think we should have much better early intervention for children to stop them from falling behind if they are unfortunate enough to be born into a family that is incapable of putting their development first.

    The focus of our education should be on preparing them for life in the 21st century. It's very sad that so much primary school time is taken up with counter productive religious indoctrination. Teaching children that magic is real istead of teaching them how to think and reason and argue and understand the world around them.

    Kids are able to pick these things up. Instead of teaching about the nativity (which even christian scholars acknowledge was completely fabricated) wouldn't it be amazing to teach them about cosmology instead? Instead of teaching them that 3 'wise men' followed a star, teach them about how we all came from elements forged in supernova explosions and that these discoveries were made by men and women who appreciate and understand mathematics and science, not astrology and prophesy.

    I can't understand how anyone in the 21st century could possibly disagree with this?

    Ban billionaires



  • Posts: 24,773 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    SpaceTime wrote: »
    A lot of violent crime (other than murder) would have been unreported too. Domestic violence, rape etc were hidden.

    Clothes mangles were as high tech as most homes got.

    Property theft was low because people didn't have many valuables. Electronics didn't exist, houses were poor too.

    You could leave your door open largely because there was very little to steal in most average homes.

    Drug abuse and dealing hadn't happened yet and car crime was low because car ownership was low.

    I wasn't trying to suggest that as a whole things were better 50 years ago, life in general is obviously much better nowadays. I was arguing the point that a lot of the significant social problems we have today did not exist 50 years ago.
    Akrasia wrote: »
    The focus of our education should be on preparing them for life in the 21st century. It's very sad that so much primary school time is taken up with counter productive religious indoctrination. Teaching children that magic is real istead of teaching them how to think and reason and argue and understand the world around them.

    Kids are able to pick these things up. Instead of teaching about the nativity (which even christian scholars acknowledge was completely fabricated) wouldn't it be amazing to teach them about cosmology instead? Instead of teaching them that 3 'wise men' followed a star, teach them about how we all came from elements forged in supernova explosions and that these discoveries were made by men and women who appreciate and understand mathematics and science, not astrology and prophesy.

    I can't understand how anyone in the 21st century could possibly disagree with this?

    I don't know where you are getting the idea that children aren't thought all these things about how to think and reason and about the world around them.
    We also have an excellent record of teaching maths and science in Irish schools, I should know I am a scientist.

    There is plenty of time in the day for teaching religion also. Also you appear to be suggestion that complicated subjects should be taught at primary school level. This would be detrimental as they wont understand and it will probably turn them off studying them in the future.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,734 ✭✭✭J_E


    I wasn't trying to suggest that as a whole things were better 50 years ago, life in general is obviously much better nowadays. I was arguing the point that a lot of the significant social problems we have today did not exist 50 years ago.

    Except you kind of were suggesting that. Also think you're discrediting children's ability with primary school post. I was bored to tears because the material through primary school wasn't challenging me at all, parts of curriculum leave a lot to be desired and could be a lot better. We use a disproportionate amount of time on religious education as it is, between the 150 mins a week (matched only by Israel I think?) Not even mentioning the skipped days used to prepare for communion and confirmation which should absolutely not need to take so much time if parents bothered to do this themselves. Our religious education at primary level isn't even balanced, Alive O is essentially Catholic propaganda, hardly a mention of world religion, no wonder kids grow up with irrational attitudes towards other religions. Anyway, not saying religion in schools is entirely to blame, but the whole thing could be structured a lot better and more time given to literacy/numeracy, and if we were really ambitious, could even throw a European language in there!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,111 ✭✭✭Christy42


    I wasn't trying to suggest that as a whole things were better 50 years ago, life in general is obviously much better nowadays. I was arguing the point that a lot of the significant social problems we have today did not exist 50 years ago.



    I don't know where you are getting the idea that children aren't thought all these things about how to think and reason and about the world around them.
    We also have an excellent record of teaching maths and science in Irish schools, I should know I am a scientist.

    There is plenty of time in the day for teaching religion also. Also you appear to be suggestion that complicated subjects should be taught at primary school level. This would be detrimental as they wont understand and it will probably turn them off studying them in the future.

    I would argue they are smarter than you give them credit for. Obviously the course needs to be tailored for a younger audience and so would lose some of the technical aspects but get the idea across. I studied Photosynthesis at primary school and got the basic idea, I don't see why the same can't be done for other parts of science too. There is also plenty of time to teach about religion, I just feel it should be an academic subject teaching them about different belief systems.

    I would argue against how good we are at teaching kids to reason but that is an argument I have against the department of education and not the RCC.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 24,079 ✭✭✭✭Akrasia


    There is plenty of time in the day for teaching religion also. Also you appear to be suggestion that complicated subjects should be taught at primary school level. This would be detrimental as they wont understand and it will probably turn them off studying them in the future.
    Time is a very precious commodity in the education system. There is so much more that we could teach the kids if there was time to do so, and unfortunately, this time is reduced even further by spending enormous amounts of time preparing for religious ceremonies during school hours.

    I'm not suggesting that the kids are taught the equations or the minutia of particle physics, but they can be taught the wonder of science and broad but non patronising explanations for how we know things and how things really are

    I know the author puts a lot of people off, but The Magic of Reality by Dawkins is a book written specifically for primary school aged children that shows how deep the explanation can be without losing the attention of children.

    If this book was on the curriculum rather than 'the good news' or catechism, I think the kids would have a much better start to life.

    Kids should also be taught elementary computer science and the basics of how computer programs work, again, time spent doing this would be infinitely better spent than time spent learning off catechism so that the teacher isn't embarrased when the parish priest does his inspection. (kids as young as 5 are able to learn these concepts as proven by the excellent Coder Dojo organisation)

    Ban billionaires



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 24,079 ✭✭✭✭Akrasia


    I mentioned earlier a Coursera Course called 'A Beginners Guide to Irrational Behaviour' provided by Dan Ariely from Duke University

    This course starts today and the first set of lectures are, as expected, extremely entertaining and thought provoking. Anyone who has the time and is interested in exploring the oddities of human reasoning, i highly recommend this
    (it's free)

    https://class.coursera.org/behavioralecon-002

    Ban billionaires



  • Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement