The Order (PS4 Exclusive)

humanji · 18-02-2014 2:55pm #1

There's finally some gameplay footage for this, from Eurogamer:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jyjJbW-4OPo

Described as a mix between a Quantic Dream game and a Naughty Dog one certainly sets the bar high. I'm usually not a fan of QTE's, but I don't have much of a problem if they're done in the branching way they say it is, instead of the "miss your button and you fail" type. It worked reasonably well in the Quantic games.

It'll be interesting to see what more vids show us.

The full Eurogamer article is here: http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/2014-02-18-how-the-order-reinvents-qtes

Retr0gamer · 18-02-2014 3:03pm

It's looks very brown and very gears of war to me. And QTEs or whatever the hell they are calling them as a feature? Is it 2006 again?

Could be decent but it's not exactly filling me with confidence. The setting could have been used a lot better than taking it and just filling it with guns and chest high walls.

It's looking more and more like something I probably pick up when it's a tenner in a few months and never play. One of those, it's decent but I've far too many better games to play. I'd need to see a lot more than that trailer shows to get excited.

johnny_ultimate · 18-02-2014 3:13pm

Interesting to note that the game is employing a 2.4:1 aspect ratio and 30 FPS to very purposefully emulate the aesthetics of epic cinema. Always think the potential of different aspect ratios is regrettably ignored in gaming.

Almost unique to see this sort of presentation utilised with a deeper visual ambition in mind. Curious to see how it works in practice, although I can already imagine the frustration and confusion the widescreen presentation is going to elicit.

Retr0gamer · 18-02-2014 3:23pm

How will that work though, will there be bordering?

johnny_ultimate · 18-02-2014 3:28pm

Of course - the exact same way watching a 2.35:1 (or wider) film on your TV looks.

Otacon · 18-02-2014 3:29pm

johnny_ultimate wrote: »

Interesting to note that the game is employing a 2.4:1 aspect ratio and 30 FPS to very purposefully emulate the aesthetics of epic cinema. Always think the potential of different aspect ratios is regrettably ignored in gaming.

Almost unique to see this sort of presentation utilised with a deeper visual ambition in mind. Curious to see how it works in practice, although I can already imagine the frustration and confusion the widescreen presentation is going to elicit.

I have also read, but cannot find a link at the moment, that they are employing a lens quality to the game during their rendering. Apparently this will give the game a grainy quality, like film.

Personally, I like the direction. Just disappointed that it won't be a co-op game.

Varik · 18-02-2014 5:24pm

Otacon wrote: »

Personally, I like the direction. Just disappointed that it won't be a co-op game.

I agree, said the same thing somewhere else after they announced that and got bitched at by the SP lovers.

2Mad2BeMad · 18-02-2014 5:30pm

I don't think linear type sp games should be priced at 65quid too be honest
unless the games like 15+ hours long or has a good reason to replay
this game does not seem like it has a good reason to replay, it seems very story focused (judging by how they want it like a film so much)
wouldnt mind a horde mode with warewolfs tbh

*hides from anti gears of war people*

johnny_ultimate · 18-02-2014 5:33pm

2Mad2BeMad wrote: »

I don't think linear type sp games should be priced at 65quid too be honest
unless the games like 15+ hours long or has a good reason to replay
this game does not seem like it has a good reason to replay, it seems very story focused (judging by how they want it like a film so much)
wouldnt mind a horde mode with warewolfs tbh

I'm pretty sure we're effectively polar opposites in what we want and expect from games, by what you've just said.

2Mad2BeMad · 18-02-2014 5:41pm

johnny_ultimate wrote: »

I'm pretty sure we're effectively polar opposites in what we want and expect from games, by what you've just said.

so you'd pay full price for a short linear story game with no online and little replay value?

Professey Chin · 18-02-2014 5:47pm

If it's a good story and game absolutely. Much better then shoehorning multiplayer into everything and shoving in a load of collectables for no reason then to make the game seem longer then it is.

F1ngers · 18-02-2014 5:49pm

2Mad2BeMad wrote: »

I don't think linear type sp games should be priced at 65quid too be honest
unless the games like 15+ hours long or has a good reason to replay
this game does not seem like it has a good reason to replay, it seems very story focused (judging by how they want it like a film so much)
wouldnt mind a horde mode with warewolfs tbh

*hides from anti gears of war people*

E65 - you're shopping in the wrong places.

johnny_ultimate · 18-02-2014 5:54pm

2Mad2BeMad wrote: »

so you'd pay full price for a short linear story game with no online and little replay value?

As above, if it's good enough absolutely. I hate tacked on online. In extreme cases, it even noticeably hurts the single player - vice versa is often true too, of course. I think its ludicrous that people expect a game to be a certain length, when absolutely every game is unique. I've played games everywhere from an hour to 100 hours long that have been perfect, and unfortunately more long, bloated ones than I care to recall. As for replayability? Bottom of the list for me when considering a purchase - I want to get the most out of it in one go, and pointless collectibles, achievements and difficulty modes (it's the rare hard mode indeed that inspires me to replay) are the epitome of filler to me.

Of course, it's very rare that I'd pay full retail price for a game, as online and sales ensure I can get most much cheaper with only a minimum of patience or effort. I try to support developers as much as I can, but it's easy to shop around and not get fleeced.

FlyingIrishMan · 23-05-2014 7:17pm

There'll be some new footage for this game at 9pm. Not sure how long it'll be, could be a trailer, some full gameplay, or just snippets like last time.

twitch.tv/playstation

RasTa · 24-05-2014 9:12am

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l8pl3aVnsyE

This looks ok. It's from a compressed twitch stream

Retr0gamer · 24-05-2014 11:25am

Well that looks as dull as I was hoping it wouldn't look.

Magill · 24-05-2014 11:35am

I dunno, looks pretty impressive to me. At least graphically. Never been the biggest fan of 3rd person shooters tho.

Retr0gamer · 24-05-2014 11:58am

Well graphically it looks good. Everything else is old hat and done better elsewhere.

RasTa · 24-05-2014 12:08pm

Magill · 24-05-2014 12:08pm

I wouldn't really judge "everything" off a 2 minute video lol. Doubt it's going to be some masterpiece, more like a next gen gow.

Retr0gamer · 24-05-2014 12:25pm

No but if they are trying to put their best foot forward and impress people then its looking like a very dull game if what they have shown so far including that video is anything to go by.

I hope that isn't the best they can show us.

FlyingIrishMan · 24-05-2014 12:46pm

Retr0gamer wrote: »

No but if they are trying to put their best foot forward and impress people then its looking like a very dull game if what they have shown so far including that video is anything to go by.

I hope that isn't the best they can show us.

I'd say it's just ****ty marketing on Sony's part. Ready at Dawn didn't even know that they were showing more footage, so didn't get to choose what was shown.
As far as I know the embargo on media previews is lifting on Tuesday so we'll get some better idea of how the gameplay actually is then.

Plus it was extremely stupid to stream it, just put it on youtube. Now we have people judging the framerate from a laggy stream, and then even worse people record the stream, then upload it to youtube where it gets compressed even further.

johnny_ultimate · 24-05-2014 1:53pm

Don't envy Sony and Ready to Dawn trying to explain why they went with an unusual resolution and 30FPS as a stylistic decision :pac:

Xenji · 21-01-2015 7:02pm

Only a month away now, gonna wait for some reviews and impressions on this one, it has the potential to be really mediocre but is still holding my interest.

humanji · 21-01-2015 7:13pm

It sadly reminds me of the Underworld films, especially with what seems to me to be an "Our side are the good guys...oh wait, we're actually the bad guys" vibe to it.

Burgo · 21-01-2015 10:30pm

humanji wrote: »

It sadly reminds me of the Underworld films, especially with what seems to me to be an "Our side are the good guys...oh wait, we're actually the bad guys" vibe to it.

Yeah it really seems like that's what the story will be, I'm hoping its something else, but we shall see.

super_furry · 21-01-2015 11:05pm

Surprised that there's zero multiplayer. With a game like this, it's usually taken as a given.

.ak · 22-01-2015 1:11pm

super_furry wrote: »

Surprised that there's zero multiplayer. With a game like this, it's usually taken as a given.

Honestly glad there's not. It's one of my pet peeves, that EVERY game has to have multiplayer, despite it not suiting the game at all.

Only a minor peeve though as I can obviously choose to ignore the multiplayer part...

weiland79 · 20-02-2015 6:23pm

Did nobody get this today? Seems like a good choice if you didn't. Not even one for the bargain bin it seems.

http://kotaku.com/the-order-1886-the-kotaku-review-1686595338
http://ie.ign.com/articles/2015/02/19/the-order-1886-review
http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/2015-02-19-the-order-1886-review

Gamer Bhoy 89 · 20-02-2015 6:43pm

I heard this game didn't get the warmest of welcomes. Apparently it's very short and doesn't have much re-playability to warrant another playthrough.

Mind you I have never played the game but the reception the game is after getting is okay at best. I think I'll give this one a miss, especially at the price it is being sold for.

Sephiroth_dude · 20-02-2015 6:44pm

I definitely wanna play it but I'll wait till it comes down in price, I'll play it for myself and make my own opinions on it.

The Order (PS4 Exclusive)

Comments