Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Garda Ombudsman offices bugged

1121315171848

Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,797 ✭✭✭KyussBishop


    EireGun wrote: »
    This really isn't the thread for a discussion about the NSA, GCHQ or the War on Terror... It's about the spying on the Garda Ombudsman.
    Can we get back on topic instead of having an anti-American ranting match... Please.
    Yes, as if you have not yourself been participating in the debate dragging the thread off-topic - and when you lose the ability to provide a rational counterargument, start feigning a call to reason (to bring the thread back on topic), right at the moment you lose the ability to defend your position.


    So yes, by all means, lets have the thread back on topic - and lets see if you (and those thanking you) actually stick to that, rather than using it purely as a rhetorical tool.
    I'm happy to have this back on topic, but if the same specious arguments are used to try and diminish the comparison I put forward, I will debate it.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 194 ✭✭EireGun


    19543261 wrote: »
    Wow, that must be some threat to justify the casual mass undermining of civil liberties the world over, with no due process or accountability!

    I mean, being killed by a terrorist must have pretty high odds, right?

    Say, 1 in 20,000,000?

    Thank God they've prioritised the threat of dying in a bathtub, at 1 in 800,000, and are working tirelessly to save lives. Thank God we're all rational, well-informed human beings-- imagine the state of the world otherwise!

    http://www.thestar.ie/star/secret-army-squad-keeps-watch-on-60-al-qaeda-in-ireland-26336/

    It's fine for those who don't work in this field to make sweeping statements like that.
    That's all I'm saying on this matter.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,797 ✭✭✭KyussBishop


    EireGun wrote: »
    Oh look, an off-topic post - weren't you just calling for the thread to be brought back on-topic? Just a rhetorical tactic after all, I see.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 194 ✭✭EireGun


    Oh look, an off-topic post - weren't you just calling for the thread to be brought back on-topic? Just a rhetorical tactic after all, I see.

    One the one hand you accuse me of not replying and using the back on topic thing as a ploy, and when I do reply briefly you accuse me of a "rhetorical tactic".

    Can't win. Goodnight.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,797 ✭✭✭KyussBishop


    EireGun wrote: »
    One the one hand you accuse me of not replying and using the back on topic thing as a ploy, and when I do reply briefly you accuse me of a "rhetorical tactic".

    Can't win. Goodnight.
    I never accused you of not replying - that is made up; quote me saying that.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 194 ✭✭EireGun


    I never accused you of not replying - that is made up; quote me saying that.

    You said more...
    Yes, as if you have not yourself been participating in the debate dragging the thread off-topic - and when you lose the ability to provide a rational counterargument, start feigning a call to reason (to bring the thread back on topic), right at the moment you lose the ability to defend your position.

    Goodnight. Death to America and all that. :confused:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 90 ✭✭Youzername


    Seriously guys, enough of the bitchin' about the NSA etc. and squabbling between yourselves please.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,973 ✭✭✭19543261




  • Closed Accounts Posts: 431 ✭✭6781


    Sorry to go off topic. But did anyone hear the story about the GSOC office getting bugged?.........


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,496 ✭✭✭Boombastic


    6781 wrote: »
    Sorry to go off topic. But did anyone hear the story about the GSOC office getting bugged?.........

    I think it was the gardai































    Or the Americans


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,472 ✭✭✭brooke 2


    EireGun wrote: »

    It is galling that no one in government is expressing any outrage re the fact that the HQ of the GSOC was bugged. They could have even made a pretence of being concerned.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,019 ✭✭✭who_ru


    brooke 2 wrote: »
    It is galling that no one in government is expressing any outrage re the fact that the HQ of the GSOC was bugged. They could have even made a pretence of being concerned.
    perhaps they knew about it all along, rehearsed their lines in adavance, spin misinformation like 'blame the GSOC for not informing MOJ', que subservient/spineless media to tow the line, try to make it all go away.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,435 ✭✭✭Stavros Murphy


    brooke 2 wrote: »
    It is galling that no one in government is expressing any outrage re the fact that the HQ of the GSOC was bugged. They could have even made a pretence of being concerned.

    Why? Would pretendy concern make you feel better? I'd prefer if there was some real concern, but as per usual, not two sh1ts will be given. Even pretending is becoming too much effort. Pat Rabbitte broke the mirror on that one with his "shure we all lie" effort.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 543 ✭✭✭Shady Tady


    It's hard to expect the government to have huge sympathy for GSOC when they didn't appear to trust the government with the information.

    Does the ombudsman know of huge corruption at the highest level in the government and police and if so they have a duty to expose it.

    I think the ombudsman has struggled to do its job from the start through incompetence and has had many high profile failures in court, this has created a desire to get convictions in every case even where in normal cases the DPP would never run with it. They seem to have people at the top who have adopted a certain line and now cannot back down!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,397 ✭✭✭golfball37


    I think the 2nd biggest story here after who was behind this is why did the GSOC not trust the Commissioner or Minister to bring this to them?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,487 ✭✭✭banquo


    Anyone else notice that the broadsheet media, who would usually speculate as to the perpetrators in a story like this, have consistently not been doing so? Few heads I know who work in PR and Communications tell me that that usually means they have a good or solid idea who did it, but can't say or say without getting sued.

    I think the most sensible money is on the Gardai being behind it, though of course nothing is proven yet. But means, motive and opportunity are strongest amongst them, not to mention the reluctance to go to Shatter, who's pretty close to the Commissioner by most accounts.

    Edit: I still can't believe how small a story this is being treated as. There's a very real chance that people within the Gardai Siochana have been spying on their own Ombudsman.


  • Site Banned Posts: 4,415 ✭✭✭MilanPan!c


    "State level technology"


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,373 ✭✭✭Phoebas


    .
    "State level technology"


  • Site Banned Posts: 4,415 ✭✭✭MilanPan!c


    Phoebas wrote: »
    .

    Yes yes, everything else was true, but sure, that's not - even though no one involved has even vaguely denied it.

    But sure.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,373 ✭✭✭Phoebas


    MilanPan!c wrote: »
    Yes yes, everything else was true, but sure, that's not - even though no one involved has even vaguely denied it.

    But sure.
    What's the 'everything else'? We have no specific information at all except that 3 'anomalies' were found. Everything else is based on the unidentified source.

    The GSOC have said there is 'no evidence of garda misconduct', so who does that leave in the frame?


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 8,156 ✭✭✭Iwannahurl


    Phoebas wrote: »
    The GSOC have said there is 'no evidence of garda misconduct', so who does that leave in the frame?



    No evidence means just that.

    The only function of the GSOC is oversight of An Garda Siochana. Whatever was going on, it was by definition something to do with AGS.

    We're in cock-up versus conspiracy territory here.


  • Site Banned Posts: 4,415 ✭✭✭MilanPan!c


    Phoebas wrote: »
    What's the 'everything else'? We have no specific information at all except that 3 'anomalies' were found. Everything else is based on the unidentified source.

    The GSOC have said there is 'no evidence of garda misconduct', so who does that leave in the frame?

    We're they bugged?
    Yes
    Did they call in British security specialists?
    Yes
    Did they not tell the MOJ?
    Yes

    Now, you can continue to pretend that the rest of the info is false, based on your bias, but that's on you.

    We don't know the source. Nothing anyone has said contradicts the source.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,373 ✭✭✭Phoebas


    MilanPan!c wrote: »
    We're they bugged?
    Yes
    Did they call in British security specialists?
    Yes
    Did they not tell the MOJ?
    Yes

    Now, you can continue to pretend that the rest of the info is false, based on your bias, but that's on you.

    We don't know the source. Nothing anyone has said contradicts the source.
    I don't pretend that its false - I don't know if its true or false yet. This isn't based on bias, but based on a lack of clear evidence so far.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 193 ✭✭oholly121


    While most of us agree and are confident that only one of 2 agencies in this state have the capacity to carry out covert surveillance on the GSOC (Gardaí and Military) we should in all fairness look for the facts in this situation and act like the Gardai/Police should and would by firstly looking to who had motive to carry out this scary act on the Garda watchdog:
    1st obviously the Gardai have the motive to carry out an operation such as this they have the tools and the reasons to do so, since the setting up of the GSOC this organisation has been met with nothing but aggression and contempt by the Gardai with refusing access to its PULSE system, constant non co-operation with investigations and a frosty relationship with the force as a whole.
    The Gardai are not above the law and as such Michael Mcdowell after the shambles that was Donegal brought in the GSOC in order to have an impartial approach to investigating the Gardai as is also the case in most countries around the world with the old system of Gardai investigating Gardai a joke! The Gardai simply don’t like the idea of someone looking over their shoulder and spot checking their work, they don’t like impartial investigations, the mere idea that there is an ombudsman offends them but in saying they would not be set up if there was no need for them.
    So why spy on the GSOC simple so they can have a head start in any potential investigation, so they could sweep any problems under the carpet before investigation and finally they are corrupt plain and as clear as day!

    If you want more evidence of Garda Corruption look to the Penalty Point controversy of a few weeks ago, the smithwick inquiry, what’s happening down in Mayo with Shell, harassment of young people, enforcing draconian sheriff laws, collecting illegal and disputable taxes on behalf of the state and the countless posts on boards and other websites about gardai and their actions!
    Something really has to Give/Change!.... But don’t worry this is Ireland where no one is ever held accountable and there is no repercussions for anything so expect this to go away in a few days and be confined to history!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 702 ✭✭✭legrand


    [QUOTE= But don’t worry this is Ireland where no one is ever held accountable and there is no repercussions for anything so expect this to go away in a few days and be confined to history![/QUOTE]

    Just the way the State (whoever is in power) likes it.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 193 ✭✭oholly121


    legrand wrote: »
    Just the way the State (whoever is in power) likes it.

    Do you and other accept this we need and deserve better than the same old same old!!!!

    We can change this!!!


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 3,126 ✭✭✭Santa Cruz


    I am a great believer in seeing the evidence before making a decision. It may be Gardaí, it may be some media organisation. The crowd brought in have found nothing definite but have to come up with something to justify their fees.
    Did GSOC jump the gun?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 57,077 ✭✭✭✭tayto lover


    The point everyone seems to be missing is the reason why the GSOC called in this security firm to sweep their offices in the first place.

    They said that they were worried by matters becoming public knowledge and couldn't understand why this was happening.

    It would not be in the interest of the Garda to make public the cases which were being investigated by the GSOC. In fact the opposite would make more sense.

    Now then, who would benefit by bugging this office if not the Garda?
    Who makes money out of these stories?

    Think outside the box lads.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 193 ✭✭oholly121


    Santa Cruz wrote: »
    I am a great believer in seeing the evidence before making a decision. It may be Gardaí, it may be some media organisation. The crowd brought in have found nothing definite but have to come up with something to justify their fees.
    Did GSOC jump the gun?

    Why would the media ( Whom I reckon don't have access to sophisticated state level surveillance equipment bug the GSOC ) it doesn't add up!!

    look to who has something to gain from accessing sensitive information for their own gain, what would the media report on if they got this information and most media outlets in this country are bias towards the state institutions so even if information was acquired this would make no difference at all!


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 193 ✭✭oholly121


    The point everyone seems to be missing is the reason why the GSOC called in this security firm to sweep their offices in the first place.

    They said that they were worried by matters becoming public knowledge and couldn't understand why this was happening.

    It would not be in the interest of the Garda to make public the cases which were being investigated by the GSOC. In fact the opposite would make more sense.

    Now then, who would benefit by bugging this office if not the Garda?
    Who makes money out of these stories?

    Think outside the box lads.


    It would however make sense for the Gardai to have a head start in any potential investigation


Advertisement
Advertisement