Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Truskmore down on power ?

2»

Comments

  • #32
    Peter Rhea
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 4,285 ✭✭✭Peter Rhea


    Galway wrote: »
    Peter Rhea has a habit of hacking people off.

    I'm not an idiot. I was fully expecting a tongue-lashing from the OP for basically trying to tell him how to do his job. (Didn't think he'd just go off the deep end like that.)

    I understand how those actually in the business would feel under pressure to make things work. Blaming RTE won't get them anywhere though.


  • #33
    Galway
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 654 ✭✭✭Galway


    Ronnie Raygun wrote: »
    Are you afraid to take on an actual experienced installer on the subject? Maybe he'll tell you to f*ck off, as he's already done in to others in this thread?

    This forum should not be a place to 'take people on'. His behaviour was OTT. However, the veiled sarcasm from some 'know alls' to simple questions can become irritating.


  • #34
    Galway
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 654 ✭✭✭Galway


    Peter Rhea wrote: »
    He has a point. Maybe some of your comments on 'contract' (or 'economy' or whatever) aerials have touched a nerve there?

    People are awful touchy. As are those who appear to have no patience with straightforward questions.


  • #35
    Peter Rhea
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 4,285 ✭✭✭Peter Rhea


    There's a straightforward answer (not from me) in post #2, re. contacting 2rn.

    I wonder did the OP bother or, if he did, did he believe the reply he got? (From 'an excuse for an engineer', as he put it himself.) It would be a terrible thing to burst his little bubble of indignation.


  • #36
    Galway
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 654 ✭✭✭Galway


    Peter Rhea wrote: »
    There's a straightforward answer (not from me) in post #2, re. contacting 2rn.

    I wonder did the OP bother or, if he did, did he believe the reply he got? It would be a terrible thing to burst his little bubble of indignation.

    Why do people have to resort continually to scoring points? Must be an ego thing.


  • Advertisement
  • #37
    Peter Rhea
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 4,285 ✭✭✭Peter Rhea


    So, it should be OK for anyone to come on here & assert that all failures of Saorview reception are down to the network operator messing with coverage patterns?

    Smfm isn't the 1st. Always annoys these people when you see through to the pomposity right from the off.


  • #38
    Galway
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 654 ✭✭✭Galway


    Peter Rhea wrote: »
    So, it should be OK for anyone to come on here & assert that all failures of Saorview reception are down to the network operator messing with coverage patterns?

    Smfm isn't the 1st. Always annoys these people when you see through to the pomposity right from the off.

    I'm sure 2RN are well able to defend themselves. They can sometimes be at a fault and are not infallible. Best to keep things factual, rather than personal.


  • #39
    Peter Rhea
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 4,285 ✭✭✭Peter Rhea


    Galway wrote: »
    Best to keep things factual, rather than personal.

    Well, I won't antagonise him any further, in case he does decide to report back. (Not that he gives a crap what I think.)


  • #40
    Galway
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 654 ✭✭✭Galway


    Peter Rhea wrote: »
    Well, I won't antagonise him any further, in case he does decide to report back. (Not that he gives a crap what I think.)

    No it was bit mental alright though.


  • #41
    Ronnie Raygun
    Closed Accounts Posts: 1,351 ✭✭✭Ronnie Raygun


    Galway wrote: »
    I'm sure 2RN are well able to defend themselves.

    Haven't seen much sign of them defending themselves on here. And that "Mux 2 launched" thread is full of this nonsense, people even citing the "official" launch of RTE1 HD as the cause of their reception woes.

    They just don't seem to be able to grasp the concept of the "digital cliff", the fairly fine line between "perfect picture" & "no picture".


  • Advertisement
  • #42
    icdg
    Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 12,322 Mod ✭✭✭✭icdg


    Galway, your backside moderation will earn you a ban too if I see it again. There is NO questioning moderator decisions on thread. Or personally attacking other posters.

    Since there hasn't been an actual reply on thread for about a page and a half, I think its best to closed


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement