Son suspended falsely - Extremely angry

terryduff12 wrote: »

So if a child has a asthma attack he can't asked someone for help as that would be talking the lad wasn't sitting on the table having the Craic with the boys now was he. Last time I talked to someone it carried on for more than 5 seconds. If that teacher can't be bothered to listen to what happened then go and get some classes on how to deal with kids.what's is suppose to teach the child own up to something he didn't do great experience for the child to carry on to adulthood.

Not sure what you're saying with any of this.
If I have correctly interpreted the part in bold you have missed the bit where the OP told us that his son did in fact talk, despite a warning from the teacher.

All this nonsense about the teacher having left the room is comical. It's a second level school. Unless there are issues with severe special needs in the class, the kids do not need to be supervised %100 of the time. Teachers are supposed to be facilitators in self-directed independent learning, not omniscient beings.

Here's me thinking there being paid to a job, its a second level school with kids flying objects at other kids like kids do that's why there supervised. Mite be one of them new fancy schools where kids teach themselves