Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Exactly what percentage of the population is "christian"?

1383941434470

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,644 ✭✭✭✭Zubeneschamali


    CramCycle wrote: »
    I care that incorrectly self identifying on the census means that certain policies or actions of the government may be influenced under the assumption that this is what the majority of the country believe/support whether they do or not.

    I think that the country should be secular with a proper seperation of Church and State even if 99% of the population were real live practicing catholics.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,678 ✭✭✭I Heart Internet


    CramCycle wrote: »
    I did not think you had to be a Christian, I thought anyone could do it.

    You could be right. But I thought it was a case of a baptised christian baptising another.
    CramCycle wrote: »
    What it means is they are not X, they could turn into an X but at the moment in time, they are not. They can also call themselves X, no issues there, it maybe wrong and misleading but they can still do it, I won't force them to stop. I might point out the issues calling yourself X when in fact you are an L may create.

    OK. But you could say the exact same thing about e.g. a gay man who kisses a girl at a party. "YOU ARE NOT GAY!!! You're confusing the numbers by calling yourself gay!!!" That would be rude.

    CramCycle wrote: »
    Your missing the point, I don't care what anyone self identifies as, I care that incorrectly self identifying on the census means that certain policies or actions of the government may be influenced under the assumption that this is what the majority of the country believe/support whether they do or not.

    There's that word again. Who are we to say they've incorrectly identified themselves? "Oh, it's just a phase you're going through."


  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 26,375 Mod ✭✭✭✭CramCycle


    People who identify themselves as Catholics believe a wide range of things. This is an undeniable fact.

    Your opinion that they are not "really" Catholics, or are "faking it" is not a fact.

    NOt believing in God (presumably he was talking of the Christian one) is a fairly clear indicator that they are not Catholic. You can still call yourself one, I won't stop you, but your still not a Catholic.


  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 26,375 Mod ✭✭✭✭CramCycle


    I think that the country should be secular with a proper seperation of Church and State even if 99% of the population were real live practicing catholics.
    Agreed


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 2,562 ✭✭✭eyescreamcone


    But of course the thread title is:

    Exactly what percentage of the population is "christian"?

    A Christian being someone who adheres to Christianity, an Abrahamic, monotheistic religion based on the life and teachings of Jesus of Nazarath.

    In my opinion very few people in Ireland, in spite of how they label themselves, live their lives based on the life and teachings of Jesus Christ.

    So an answer to the question might be - the exact percentage is very difficult to determine, but would be a small minority of the total population.


  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 26,375 Mod ✭✭✭✭CramCycle


    OK. But you could say the exact same thing about e.g. a gay man who kisses a girl at a party. "YOU ARE NOT GAY!!! You're confusing the numbers by calling yourself gay!!!" That would be rude.
    Wouldn't bother me as I don't think such actions in any way influence the community/nation at large. people can kiss whoever is OK with them kissing them. To refute that argument, I have kissed alot of men when I was younger, does not mean I am Gay (doesn't mean I am not but my wife prefers that I self identify as straight :pac:)
    There's that word again. Who are we to say they've incorrectly identified themselves? "Oh, it's just a phase you're going through."
    but they have, I will give a clearer example than your gay man kissing women example.

    I am an astronaut. I am identifying myself as an astronaut. I have no training, no ambitions to go to space and have never previously boarded a space shuttle or rocket. This self identification is incorrect. I can still call myself this, no one can force me to stop but it is still incorrect. It may in the future become correct but that possibility does not mean it is correct right now. In fact, on the next census I will self identify as an Astronaut.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,678 ✭✭✭I Heart Internet


    In my opinion very few people in Ireland, in spite of how they label themselves, live their lives based on the life and teachings of Jesus Christ.

    We can but do our best.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,678 ✭✭✭I Heart Internet


    CramCycle,

    Assessing the formal qualifications and necessary skills to function as an astronaut is very different from "assessing" a person's religious belief or sexuality.

    Another example where your black-and-white methodology falls down is around race/ethnicity. If a person is of mixed race/ethnicity - say a white south african father with dutch and english parents and a french mother with Somali and Italian parents - says that their ethniticy is "White European", will you pick holes in that for them too??


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,644 ✭✭✭✭Zubeneschamali


    CramCycle wrote: »
    In fact, on the next census I will self identify as an Astronaut.

    But identifying as a Catholic is a different thing. The catholic church is that thing composed of all its members. It's more like being a Man U supporter than an astronaut.

    I can hate David Moyes and every current Man U player and still call myself a Man U supporter. And you don't get to tell me I'm wrong.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 2,562 ✭✭✭eyescreamcone


    But identifying as a Catholic is a different thing. The catholic church is that thing composed of all its members. It's more like being a Man U supporter than an astronaut.

    I can hate David Moyes and every current Man U player and still call myself a Man U supporter. And you don't get to tell me I'm wrong.

    Unless he self identifies as a critic?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,218 ✭✭✭✭Bannasidhe


    alaimacerc wrote: »
    Just to be clear, that's not the Catechism, which is the proverbial three-volume doorstopper novel, but the Credo. (Specifically the Apostle's Creed, I think, which is slightly more "lightweight" than the Nicene one, in a couple of areas.) And again, almost every Christian denomination subscribes to this. (In fact, even moreso, as I think the AC flies with some Unitarians, Modalists and Restoration Godhead non-trin types, for whom the NC is already a dealbreaker.)

    Yeah - I used that as in my very brief experience of our State funded education system (aged 4-6) that was one of the two things I learned (I could already read) -we had to recite it over and over and over again and then we would make a paper boat and go on break. In the afternoon there was knitting but I flunked that.

    My education in a Catholic ethos school consisted of making paper boats and 'whomadedeworldgogmadedeworldwhereisgodgodiseverywhere' . I can still make paper boats but I had to google the Credo. :D


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 3,644 ✭✭✭swampgas


    Nice for who? You? Why should people do anything if they don't want to?

    So people should be happy to appear to support the homophobic stance of the church just because they can't be bothered to speak up and disagree?

    Just want to be sure I understand you here.


  • Moderators Posts: 52,179 ✭✭✭✭Delirium


    People who identify themselves as Catholics believe a wide range of things. This is an undeniable fact.

    Your opinion that they are not "really" Catholics, or are "faking it" is not a fact.
    A priest delivering a sermon about how God sacrificed his only son for the sins of mankind while not believing said God exists isn't "faking it"? :confused:

    If you can read this, you're too close!



  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 2,562 ✭✭✭eyescreamcone


    Bannasidhe wrote: »
    Yeah - I used that as in my very brief experience of our State funded education system (aged 4-6) that was one of the two things I learned (I could already read) -we had to recite it over and over and over again and then we would make a paper boat and go on break. In the afternoon there was knitting but I flunked that.

    My education in a Catholic ethos school consisted of making paper boats and 'whomadedeworldgogmadedeworldwhereisgodgodiseverywhere' . I can still make paper boats but I had to google the Credo. :D

    In my day the first question in the Cathecism was:

    Who is God?
    God is our father in Heavan, the most wonderful person ever. (?)

    The second question?
    I forget!


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,232 ✭✭✭Brian Shanahan


    Bannasidhe wrote: »
    Brother owns one with a lovely view in Kinsale :D.

    Up on the head about two miles outside of town?

    If so it's a windy place to visit.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,678 ✭✭✭I Heart Internet


    swampgas wrote: »
    So people should be happy to appear to support the homophobic stance of the church just because they can't be bothered to speak up and disagree?

    Just want to be sure I understand you here.

    People are free to say and do (or not) pretty much anything they like (or not) on any subject they fancy.

    Your desire to judge them as catholic or not, morally right or not, homophobe or not, based on their silence on any topic that happens to interest or animate you is your problem, not their's.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,644 ✭✭✭✭Zubeneschamali


    SW wrote: »
    A priest delivering a sermon about how God sacrificed his only son for the sins of mankind while not believing said God exists isn't "faking it"? :confused:

    You talk to some of these more "sophisticated" catholics, and it isn't clear that they believe in anything supernatural at all; they regard the whole business as metophorical with deep connections to meaning and inner experience.

    No magic or actually rising from the dead or anything recognizable as a god to an outsider.

    Are they still "real" catholics? Not my call - they certainly say they are.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,218 ✭✭✭✭Bannasidhe


    Up on the head about two miles outside of town?

    If so it's a windy place to visit.

    Yup. When he bought it they asked if he wanted a view of the sea or the golf course. He asked for a view of the sky. :D


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 544 ✭✭✭AerynSun


    Bannasidhe wrote: »
    My education in a Catholic ethos school consisted of making paper boats and 'whomadedeworldgogmadedeworldwhereisgodgodiseverywhere' . I can still make paper boats but I had to google the Credo. :D

    Aaah ya terrible heathen critter you - that 'whomadedeworld' stuff isn't the Credo, it's the Penny Catechism. :P

    I know, I know... had to find *something* I could chirp... wasn't so great at knitting myself, so didn't have any wise 'God made a slip knot and then he casted on 10 purl stitches' wisecracks... paper boats though... that's more fun as an activity. Although I'm surprised they let you do that... parts of that boat folding resembles a female anatomy lesson?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,218 ✭✭✭✭Bannasidhe


    AerynSun wrote: »
    Aaah ya terrible heathen critter you - that 'whomadedeworld' stuff isn't the Credo, it's the Penny Catechism. :P

    I know, I know... had to find *something* I could chirp... wasn't so great at knitting myself, so didn't have any wise 'God made a slip knot and then he casted on 10 purl stitches' wisecracks... paper boats though... that's more fun as an activity. Although I'm surprised they let you do that... parts of that boat folding resembles a female anatomy lesson?

    Well that explains a lot.

    :D


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,232 ✭✭✭Brian Shanahan


    catallus wrote: »
    The whole problem stems from the artificial separation of the Church and the State.

    Seriously, what's your problem with your freedom to practise your religion (or not practise any) without any interference from anybody else?

    The way you go on about how "evil" and "unnatural" separation of church and State is, you'd think you want to be put on a rack and tortured for your faith.

    Or is it (the far more likely) case that you want to have everybody who doesn't follow your faith to be persecuted?


  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 16,153 Mod ✭✭✭✭smacl


    People who identify themselves as Catholics believe a wide range of things. This is an undeniable fact.

    Interestingly people who identify as being catholic are not necessarily identifying as being Catholics. According to Merriam Webster the uncapitalised adjective catholic has a number of meanings, including broad in sympathies, tastes, or interests whereas a Catholic (proper noun) is a member of the Catholic church.

    So as of now, I choose to self identify as a catholic atheist :)

    I wonder how the text of the census reads?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,644 ✭✭✭✭Zubeneschamali


    If interested in the whole "real catholic" thing, take a look at this:

    German theologians critique church teachings, propose new sexual understanding

    Note that the theologians surveyed are not saying most catholics disagree with the hierarchy, therefore most catholics are wrong/sinners/not real catholics. They are saying most Catholics do not believe what the hierarchy says they believe, so the hierarchy is wrong.


  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 26,375 Mod ✭✭✭✭CramCycle


    I can hate David Moyes and every current Man U player and still call myself a Man U supporter. And you don't get to tell me I'm wrong.
    On that description you could easily qualify as a Man Utd supporter.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 3,644 ✭✭✭swampgas


    People are free to say and do (or not) pretty much anything they like (or not) on any subject they fancy.

    Your desire to judge them as catholic or not, morally right or not, homophobe or not, based on their silence on any topic that happens to interest or animate you is your problem, not their's.


    Hey, I'm only going on the best evidence I have. If someone tells me they are a Catholic, but doesn't tell me that they don't follow the churches teachings, how I am supposed to know? I'll take their self-identification at face value and assume that they mean they are a Catholic as defined by the RCC. If that means I get the wrong impression, that's their problem, they are the ones mis-identifying themselves.

    .


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,823 ✭✭✭weisses


    Up on the head about two miles outside of town?

    If so it's a windy place to visit.

    Not a place to walk around with an urn full with ash :D


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,232 ✭✭✭Brian Shanahan


    weisses wrote: »
    Not a place to walk around with an urn full with ash :D

    True that, not that I make a habit of walking around with urns. Go up there regularly as my aunt is buried in the nun's plot.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 3,644 ✭✭✭swampgas


    If interested in the whole "real catholic" thing, take a look at this:

    German theologians critique church teachings, propose new sexual understanding

    Note that the theologians surveyed are not saying most catholics disagree with the hierarchy, therefore most catholics are wrong/sinners/not real catholics. They are saying most Catholics do not believe what the hierarchy says they believe, so the hierarchy is wrong.

    If Catholics think the hierarchy is wrong, why don't they do something about it? If they really think the Pope is misrepresenting what Catholicism is all about, they might try letting the world know.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,218 ✭✭✭✭Bannasidhe


    I may have missed it but has anyone explained how there can be a 'Catholic Ethos' which is very important to 'Catholic' parents who have a right to have their children educated in this ethos when there is, apparently, no actual unifying Catholic doctrine or criteria to be adhered to in order to be a Catholic as it is, seemingly, more of a 'what ever you are believing yourself like' religion.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,678 ✭✭✭I Heart Internet


    swampgas wrote: »
    I'll take their self-identification at face value and assume that they mean they are a Catholic as defined by the RCC. If that means I get the wrong impression, that's their problem, they are the ones mis-identifying themselves.

    It's only their problem if they care about what you think of them, correct or incorrect.

    Most people, thankfully, do not open conversations with..."my stance on gay marriage is as follows..." I prefer to think the best of everyone and see where that gets me.


Advertisement