Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Please note that it is not permitted to have referral links posted in your signature. Keep these links contained in the appropriate forum. Thank you.

https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2055940817/signature-rules

Horsepower or Torque?

1568101113

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,193 ✭✭✭Cleveland Hot Pocket


    No the 520 D is got 34 more hp and it's actually not lighter than the crv in fact I'm seeing 100 kg or so heavier ? heavier than my 2000 crv.

    I never said the 520 was slow. I said "your average soot box diesel "
    No but a lot of people (myself included) would consider the 520d (especially in the F10) to be underpowered in a near 2 tonne car. It was not exactly very powerful in the e60 either

    In Ireland, i would say that a 520d is one of the most popular cars bought, so would fit in as being an average diesel. Certainly given the proliferation of them on our roads "for de cheep tax"

    What else would you like to compare as an average diesel? Golf TDI? A4 TDI? Can't see a CRV beating either of them tbh.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,604 ✭✭✭thecomedian


    What's NGO ?

    Torque on the MK 1.5 is about 210 lbs or 280 nm and about 240 lbs ,325 Nm on the MK I .

    NGO is the spellchecks way of saying bhp :)
    Right, the leaf has a lot of torque and about 100bhp?
    But yet it isn't fast. The performance won't be as good as something with say 170bhp and 170lbs of torque.
    I'm just using this as an example that Hp is needed for performance.
    Even the 535d with bundles of torque still has about 272bhp.


  • Posts: 21,179 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    NGO is the spellchecks way of saying bhp :)
    Right, the leaf has a lot of torque and about 100bhp?
    But yet it isn't fast. The performance won't be as good as something with say 170bhp and 170lbs of torque.
    I'm just using this as an example that Hp is needed for performance.
    Even the 535d with bundles of torque still has about 272bhp.

    No I never said the Leaf was fast, it's got 110 hp it's heaver than the my generation crv by about 20 kgs, and the Mk 1.5 leaf is about 7 kg lighter but it's also down on torque.

    The leaf is about as fast as an average diesel with about 140 hp to 60 mph.

    It's been independently tested as having a 0-60 in around 9.5 seconds, while that's not fast as some would say, it is comparable to a modern family diesel.

    Even though the crv and prius may not be fast as some would say compared to a 530 D, they are acceptably quick.

    Same with the Leaf, it's acceptably quick to accelerate, though the torque is available form a stand still most people find the power delivery for superior to any engine of the same power. And power is instant at any speed. Even though torque decreases with motor speed, whatever is there is instant.

    Electric power trains are different, you can't compare them to normal petrol or diesel.

    Electrics are limited so you don't need so much hp as you won't be going past 87 mph in relation to the leaf, but you can still have good acceleration.

    You could use that 110 hp and have faster 0-60 but you'd loose top speed, or you could have slower 0-100 and a higher top speed.

    Electric output depends on the windings, the current going through them and the voltage. Also the reducer gear has a say in it too. And the controller to some degree.

    But on average if you want more speed, you increase the voltage or change the windings for speed or torque. Torque can be increased by simply turning up the amps to the motor if the battery/motor can take it.

    I know there is a lot of hoo ha here in relation to power = torque x rpm

    In an ev if you want more torque you simply increase the current to the windings with the same motor.

    My electric bike was as simple as that, If I wanted more torque or faster acceleration I could do 2 things, decrease the diameter of the wheel or increase the current.

    Decreasing the wheel size would have the same effect as turning up the amps but I'd loose top speed, to counter act, I simply add more voltage. Obviously the motor is in the hub of the wheel.

    If I go the other way and increase the wheel size for more speed, I'd simply turn up the amps to make up for the loss of torque.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,193 ✭✭✭Cleveland Hot Pocket


    NGO is the spellchecks way of saying bhp :)
    Right, the leaf has a lot of torque and about 100bhp?
    But yet it isn't fast. The performance won't be as good as something with say 170bhp and 170lbs of torque.
    I'm just using this as an example that Hp is needed for performance.
    Even the 535d with bundles of torque still has about 272bhp.
    That's my pre LCI one, has 272 bhp and 480 torques.
    The post LCI models are near on 300 bhp, which is amazing from a 3.0 diesel imo


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,193 ✭✭✭Cleveland Hot Pocket


    Even though the crv and prius may not be fast as some would say compared to a 530 D, they are acceptably quick.
    .
    Hang on, you said they were fast!
    And I gave you a list of "run of the mill" diesels that were faster
    Then you moved back to comparing to a 530d


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,604 ✭✭✭thecomedian


    Madlad I never said, that u said the leaf was fast. I was using it as an example for the torque vs Hp.
    Doing 20mph in a leaf, you put the foot down and realise that it isn't quick. It's 0-20 might be quick but it doesn't have the power higher up.


  • Posts: 21,179 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Hang on, you said they were fast!
    And I gave you a list of "run of the mill" diesels that were faster
    Then you moved back to comparing to a 530d

    Yeah fast as your average diesel or faster.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,604 ✭✭✭thecomedian


    Yeah fast as your average diesel or faster.

    Did u mean 520d


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,193 ✭✭✭Cleveland Hot Pocket


    Yeah fast as your average diesel or faster.

    520d is average diesel
    CRV not as fast as 520d


  • Posts: 21,179 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Madlad I never said, that u said the leaf was fast. I was using it as an example for the torque vs Hp.
    Doing 20mph in a leaf, you put the foot down and realise that it isn't quick. It's 0-20 might be quick but it doesn't have the power higher up.

    Ah no, it gets to 100 decently fast, dare I say fast, it's way faster than a Zoe.

    It has great torque at slower speed but it has sufficient torque to get it to 87 mph or so.

    It's 110 hp moves it pretty well considering its weight. As I said its around 9.5 seconds which is Faster than a 1.6 golf tdi which isn't bad considering it's around the same hp but 300 kg heavier.

    The spark has a 7.5 second 0-100 kph. Which is as fast as a golf 180 hp with 50 less hp in a heavier car.


  • Advertisement
  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 16,620 ✭✭✭✭dr.fuzzenstein


    Ah no, it gets to 100 decently fast, dare I say fast, it's way faster than a Zoe.

    It has great torque at slower speed but it has sufficient torque to get it to 87 mph or so.

    It's 110 hp moves it pretty well considering its weight. As I said its around 9.5 seconds which is Faster than a 1.6 golf tdi which isn't bad considering it's around the same hp but 300 kg heavier.

    The spark has a 7.5 second 0-100 kph. Which is as fast as a golf 180 hp with 50 less hp in a heavier car.

    You're some mad yoke, so you are!:D
    If this was Top Gear, I'd feel a race coming on.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,193 ✭✭✭Cleveland Hot Pocket


    You're some mad yoke, so you are!:D
    If this was Top Gear, I'd feel a race coming on.
    The only thing a CRV would win a race against is some hape like my n/a carina
    Wouldnt stand a chance against most modern cars like a 520d


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,986 ✭✭✭rocky


    Power for me, thanks. Torque? it's up there somewhere



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 917 ✭✭✭Joe 90


    Jesus. wrote: »
    I think its even moreso down to personal taste. Most people seem to prefer driving petrols but there are some who genuinely like the experience of a diesel better. I know the dyed-in-the-wool petrol-head would think that's sacrilege but everyone's different.
    You've summed it up. Some people like Rory, others like Daniel O'Donnel.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 4,794 ✭✭✭Jesus.


    torque is cheap.

    I see what you did there :D


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,193 ✭✭✭Cleveland Hot Pocket


    Jesus. wrote: »
    I see what you did there :D
    Missed that on first skim read.
    Haha.


  • Posts: 21,179 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    I wouldn't have considered a 520 d to be average car based on sales figures anyway ?

    The top selling model is a golf and most likely the 1.6 tdi.

    The BMW is the 10th .


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 4,794 ✭✭✭Jesus.


    rocky wrote: »
    Power for me, thanks. Torque? it's up there somewhere

    Rocky, that was a bit close at 00:58 wasn't it?

    Were you late for your fight with Apollo Creed? ;)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,193 ✭✭✭Cleveland Hot Pocket


    I wouldn't have considered a 520 d to be average car based on sales figures anyway ?

    The top selling model is a golf and most likely the 1.6 tdi.

    The BMW is the 10th .
    Can't compare that.
    The CRV is 2.0 and that golf is only 1.6

    You refute the comparison with a 530d because it is a bigger capacity then suggest a comparison with a 1.6?? You make no sense mad_lad, even by prius driver standard :P


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,986 ✭✭✭rocky


    Jesus. wrote: »
    Rocky, that was a bit close at 00:58 wasn't it?

    Were you late for your fight with Apollo Creed? ;)

    Close? Only in Ireland. He was flashing to say hi, I flashed back.


  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 21,179 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Can't compare that.
    The CRV is 2.0 and that golf is only 1.6

    You refute the comparison with a 530d because it is a bigger capacity then suggest a comparison with a 1.6?? You make no sense mad_lad, even by prius driver standard :P

    The crv isn't comparable to a car with nearly twice the power.

    Neither is the crv comparable to the 1.6'golf it's more comparable to the 150 hp diesel golf which would be faster as it's a lot lighter.

    But to compare like for like, the crv would be faster than its diesel equivalent.

    I was more making the point the BMW isn't an average diesel that the golf 1.6 is most likely more average as you can't get engine stats but only model and fuel.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 4,794 ✭✭✭Jesus.


    rocky wrote: »
    Close? Only in Ireland. He was flashing to say hi, I flashed back.

    What's your Motor, Rock?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,986 ✭✭✭rocky


    2005 530i


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,193 ✭✭✭Cleveland Hot Pocket


    The crv isn't comparable to a car with nearly twice the power.

    Neither is the crv comparable to the 1.6'golf it's more comparable to the 150 hp diesel golf which would be faster as it's a lot lighter.

    But to compare like for like, the crv would be faster than its diesel equivalent.

    I was more making the point the BMW isn't an average diesel that the golf 1.6 is most likely more average as you can't get engine stats but only model and fuel.
    hmm


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 16,620 ✭✭✭✭dr.fuzzenstein


    rocky wrote: »
    2005 530i

    Nice. Honestly, I would if I could.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 4,794 ✭✭✭Jesus.


    Which of these three Peugeot 607, 2.2 L engines would be better performers for that particular car?

    Especially, which would be preferable, the first diesel with less hp but more torque vs the petrol at the bottom, with more hp and less torque?


    2.2 litre (2179 cc) DW12 HDi Diesel I4, 136 PS (100 kW; 134 hp) and 235 lb·ft (319 N·m)
    2.2 litre (2179 cc) DW12 HDi Diesel I4, 170 PS (125 kW; 168 hp) and 272 lb·ft (369 N·m)
    2.2 litre (2230 cc) EW12 I4, 160 PS (118 kW; 158 hp) and 162 lb·ft (220 N·m)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,718 ✭✭✭Matt Simis


    Jesus. wrote: »
    Which of these three Peugeot 607, 2.2 L engines would be better performers for that particular car?

    Especially, which would be preferable, the first diesel with less hp but more torque vs the petrol at the bottom, with more hp and less torque?


    2.2 litre (2179 cc) DW12 HDi Diesel I4, 136 PS (100 kW; 134 hp) and 235 lb·ft (319 N·m)
    2.2 litre (2179 cc) DW12 HDi Diesel I4, 170 PS (125 kW; 168 hp) and 272 lb·ft (369 N·m)
    2.2 litre (2230 cc) EW12 I4, 160 PS (118 kW; 158 hp) and 162 lb·ft (220 N·m)
    Why? The 2 engines you didnt list (ie not 2.2's) are much, much more interesting.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 4,794 ✭✭✭Jesus.


    Matt Simis wrote: »
    Why? The 2 engines you didnt list (ie not 2.2's) are much, much more interesting.

    In reference to the torque vs horsepower argument. You know, the title of this thread? :D

    Which one would you take Matt, more bhp and less torque or vice versa?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,202 ✭✭✭✭jimgoose


    Jesus. wrote: »
    In reference to the torque vs horsepower argument. You know, the title of this thread? :D

    Which one would you take Matt, more bhp and less torque or vice versa?

    Those numbers are about as much use as tits on a bull without power-and-torque curves! :D


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 917 ✭✭✭Joe 90


    jimgoose wrote: »
    Those numbers are about as much use as tits on a bull without power-and-torque curves! :D
    Not so in this case. Provided the gear ratios are right for the job the one with the highest power is the one you want.:)


Advertisement